Kralj Vatra
Amicus
Warning: Sometimes uses foul language & insults!!!
20%
Posts: 9,814
|
Post by Kralj Vatra on Mar 10, 2009 3:19:25 GMT -5
Serbs are (since 700-900AD) the children of Slavonic and Hellenic tribes. yesterday we were watching a documentary about Platon, and his ideas strikingly reminded me of Serbian way of life.
|
|
Kralj Vatra
Amicus
Warning: Sometimes uses foul language & insults!!!
20%
Posts: 9,814
|
Post by Kralj Vatra on Mar 10, 2009 5:23:13 GMT -5
still waiting to find the FIRST non-alb who will say "WE", meaning albs... anyway, 10000 years ago greeks and serbs and germanics and slavs and latins were the SAME nation.... albs never had any relatives (chechens excluded) lmaoo there was no nations 10,000 years ago -dead- anyways, its cute how you guys think youre related, and even cuter how its a point of pride rofl and how exactly is your highness' theory about the formation of languages? Language interacts with Nation in a loose or strict manner. The point that 10,000 years ago there were no nations in the strict sense (with borders,passports etc...) dont mean that there weren't more generic national formations...
|
|
|
Post by Novus Dis on Mar 10, 2009 6:09:34 GMT -5
10,000 years ago every family, clan and tribe was autonomous and linguistically, culturally and traditionally different from one another.
|
|
Kralj Vatra
Amicus
Warning: Sometimes uses foul language & insults!!!
20%
Posts: 9,814
|
Post by Kralj Vatra on Mar 10, 2009 6:31:39 GMT -5
10,000 years ago every family, clan and tribe was autonomous and linguistically, culturally and traditionally different from one another. at which year would you suggest was the formation of the languages as we know it today? when was Polish language formed and when was Serb language formed, so that today Serb and Pole are very much alike?, taking into consideration that language branches tend to ONLY DEVIATE and never CONVERGE to the original mother language.... if "10,000 years ago every family, clan and tribe was autonomous and linguistically, culturally and traditionally different from one another" then WHEN did larger language EMERGE from those dialects? anyone got a clue?
|
|
|
Post by Novus Dis on Mar 10, 2009 6:55:39 GMT -5
Impossible to tell and every region/group has developed differently (places like Nigeria still have hundreds if not thousands of language practised among it's inhabitants). That is without taking into account slang which has caused a kind of schism in languages.
|
|
Kralj Vatra
Amicus
Warning: Sometimes uses foul language & insults!!!
20%
Posts: 9,814
|
Post by Kralj Vatra on Mar 10, 2009 7:01:25 GMT -5
i dont about africa, i would like YOU to speculate what was the status of Slav/German/Greek/Latin *ROOT* tangs back in 10,000 and past forward.
|
|
|
Post by Novus Dis on Mar 10, 2009 7:54:52 GMT -5
There was no such thing. The Slavic, Germanic, Hellenic and Latin languages are a combination of languages from many tribes.
|
|
|
Post by Duke John on Mar 10, 2009 8:01:06 GMT -5
|
|
Kralj Vatra
Amicus
Warning: Sometimes uses foul language & insults!!!
20%
Posts: 9,814
|
Post by Kralj Vatra on Mar 10, 2009 8:29:08 GMT -5
There was no such thing. The Slavic, Germanic, Hellenic and Latin languages are a combination of languages from many tribes. COMBINATION? Thus an artificial product? Thus you say that the fact that in Central Siberia and Serbia peasants speak almost the same language is a result of a coordinated forced political decision? Intuition and elementary logic shows otherwise.
|
|
|
Post by Novus Dis on Mar 10, 2009 9:16:14 GMT -5
COMBINATION? Thus an artificial product? What? Thus you say that the fact that in Central Siberia and Serbia peasants speak almost the same language is a result of a coordinated forced political decision? Intuition and elementary logic shows otherwise. Serbian and Russian may share a similar alphabet but the overall language is totally different. So too Serbian and Bulgarian.
|
|
Kralj Vatra
Amicus
Warning: Sometimes uses foul language & insults!!!
20%
Posts: 9,814
|
Post by Kralj Vatra on Mar 10, 2009 9:44:04 GMT -5
I always had a problem to defend a thesis of mine when the opponent denies basic axioms like the striking similarity of Serb/Russian/Bulgarian language... Sorry.
|
|
|
Post by srbobran on Mar 10, 2009 17:25:48 GMT -5
Serbian and Bulgarian are quite similar are mutually intelligible but there are some minor differences. Serbian and Russian are quite different. I, for one, can't understand (apart from a few common words) Russian at all with my knowledge of Serbian.
|
|
|
Post by Novus Dis on Mar 10, 2009 19:11:50 GMT -5
I am unable to understand either Russia or Bulgarian. Hell, I cannot even understand Slovenian or Macedonian.
|
|
|
Post by Novi Pazar on Mar 10, 2009 21:19:50 GMT -5
^ I cannot understand Russian, but vardarian is more closer to standard serbian than standard serbian is to Bulgarian. However Bulgarian and serbian are close. I cannot understand Slovenian at all, completely alien to me.
|
|
|
Post by kapetan on Mar 10, 2009 23:17:25 GMT -5
Serbian and Bulgarian are quite similar are mutually intelligible but there are some minor differences. Serbian and Russian are quite different. I, for one, can't understand (apart from a few common words) Russian at all with my knowledge of Serbian. wtf....ive heard bulgarian a 100 times and dont undersatnd 95% of it when spoken what the hell in this video can you undertand besides the numbers/dates
|
|
|
Post by kapetan on Mar 10, 2009 23:22:05 GMT -5
I am unable to understand either Russia or Bulgarian. Hell, I cannot even understand Slovenian or Macedonian. I agree...you are from Bosnia as well as far as I know.....maybe that has something to do with it....cuz i really dont see how they can understand bulgarian or slovenian let alone russian
|
|