|
Post by szorostalpu1 on May 12, 2009 6:46:19 GMT -5
|
|
|
Post by diurpaneus on May 14, 2009 15:58:27 GMT -5
Enjoy.
|
|
|
Post by szorostalpu1 on May 15, 2009 22:58:34 GMT -5
lol....Ilyen a mocskos roman allat. Next time yeni you should think twice before editing the title of my thread
|
|
yeni
Moderator
gulash freak
Posts: 327
|
Post by yeni on May 16, 2009 6:48:20 GMT -5
Next time yeni you should think twice before editing the title of my thread well sorry it just hurt my eye when i see topic titles like "dirty X or Y ethnic group". The standards are not too high here in illyria, but we should not go below a certain level... would you like it if other ppl write here "dirty hungarians" or "dirty hungarian animal" ? i have two options, edit your ethnic slur chit or allow others too to chit here. now the decision is yours (because im in a democratic mood now, ), will you edit your post (the "mocskos roman allat") or i should allow Romanians too to use the same language in the Hun forum?
|
|
wbb
Moderator
Posts: 733
|
Post by wbb on May 16, 2009 10:22:01 GMT -5
szorostalpu i understand ur reaction against romanian occupation and extremism against hungarians but do u thinks that's the way to solve out the final solution by an ethnic slur speech? What about those Romanians that's want to assimilate into typical magyar? how will they assimilate? there's enough romanians in transylvania that are assimilated in the hungarian environment, there's no need to separate them from us.
And another thing, it's good to be nationalist cause it a very important thing but we shouldnt be racist, just keep ur nationalist feeling but eliminate the racist and hate feeling. There's another way to be nationalist without being racist. We are better man than that.
|
|
|
Post by szorostalpu1 on May 16, 2009 17:50:00 GMT -5
nehez neked megerteni a videot (http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=e3GynS3jf74 ) arab bacsi? ezek a mocskos romanok nem emberek hanem hidegverri allatok.
|
|
|
Post by lvl100 on May 17, 2009 3:22:52 GMT -5
Its nice to see that some actions against extremism are taking place. Not only would benefit both parties Romanians and Hungarians, but also would add more quality in debates.
|
|
wbb
Moderator
Posts: 733
|
Post by wbb on May 17, 2009 5:35:57 GMT -5
meg ertem a videot komolyan. Those are the romanian extremist doing it not the innocent. The government, scholars and far-right are all extremist but not the romanian working citizens who live next-door with hungarians in transylvania. Believe me szorostalpu, there's alot of romanians who are against the ethnic cleasing of hungarians. I have met with some romanians are a member of Szekely Legion with a typical name...DANILIUC. What about those Romanians who was in the Hungarian army fighting against their brother romanian army in WW1 and 2? Should we hate even if they fought for Hungarian society rather than a romanian one? You see sometimes we get angry and frustrated when we hear bad news cause by romanians but we have to control ourselves not to hate the entire race because some of them are more better than hungarians when they support our solidarity.
|
|
|
Post by szorostalpu1 on May 17, 2009 8:07:11 GMT -5
"Those are the romanian extremist doing it not the innocent. The government, scholars and far-right are all extremist but not the romanian working citizens who live next-door with hungarians in transylvania.
Peasants flocked to the Iron Guard's ranks, seeking scapegoats for their misery. "Romania: Genocide and Crimes Against Humanity"
beszelj Magyarul, ezek a artatlan?
"they fought for Hungarian society rather than a romanian one?"
mikor? ne mondj hulyeseget
nem csak a budos romanok, a szerbek es totok allatok
|
|
wbb
Moderator
Posts: 733
|
Post by wbb on May 17, 2009 9:00:28 GMT -5
hat igen a paraszt nepek nem olyan okos, de a magyar paraszt se okos, talalkoztam egy par darabal, ezek szandekoznak a ciganyokal a ciganyfaluban.
WW1 and WW2 there were lots of individual romanians that fought for Hungary in those wars believe me, they didnt have to die fighting for our nation, but they did. I try find and post some source for you if necessary, if i cant then i hope Yeni will able do post some, since Yeni knows a bit of exploring the web then i do.
Ok u come up with other ethnic groups that are hostile to Hungarians, i recon that Slovaks are the most hostile to Hungarians before any other ethnic groups, Serbs would come 2nd after Slovaks, then Cigany, then Romanians, and Ukrainians would be the least hostile to Hungarians. Croatians yeah we have battles with them but it's very very unlike to see ethnic conflict between Croats and Hungarians. Rather we have historical problems with those bastard Russky p**ky who sniff far too much vodka made of cow-pizda. But who cares which ethnic hostile to other ethnic, every ethnic has a fukin idiots even Hungarians. Yeah i seen enough Hungarian who are just as fukin idiot like any other ethnic group. You cant praise Gyurcsany buzi cause he's Hungarian?!, he's still a fukin idiot.
We have a saying in Hungarian language regarding those Hungarians who are fukin idiot...mély magyar which means (low hungarians, Hungarian subhumans or sub-Hungarians). lol lol lol lol ;D ;D
|
|
|
Post by szorostalpu1 on May 17, 2009 11:22:42 GMT -5
"Its nice to see that some actions against extremism are taking place."
fogd mar be a pofadat....mocskos olah
"WW1 and WW2 there were lots of individual romanians"
lol.....hany? ket, te milyen vilagban elsz
|
|
yeni
Moderator
gulash freak
Posts: 327
|
Post by yeni on May 17, 2009 11:55:32 GMT -5
www.austro-hungarian-army.co.uk/orb14.htmu can find statistics here about the ethnic makeup of the Austro-Hungarian army by regiments on the bottom of the page click on Common Army Infantry & Jäger Ethnicity Common Army Cavalry Ethnicity Austrian & Hungarian Landwehr Infantry Ethnicity Austrian & Hungarian Landwehr Cavalry Ethnicity Common Army, Austrian & Hungarian Landwehr Field Artillery Ethnicity of course the desertion rates were high among the Slavic and Romanian soldiers, but still there were many who fought in the army as good soldiers. about ww2, do you think the ethnic Romanian Hungarian citizens were not conscripted? i don't have the book at hand but if you are interested, Ungváry Krisztián: A Magyar Honvédség a második világháborúban contains some ethnic statistics about the Hungarian occupation forces in the Soviet Union.
|
|
wbb
Moderator
Posts: 733
|
Post by wbb on May 17, 2009 12:34:37 GMT -5
ugyen olyan vilagban elek mint te. lol lol You so very funny dude heh heh heh heh, the forum is so boring without u having a insult on Bandi bacsi and his 40 bands commanded by Diurpy bacsi. haaaahaaaahaaahaaaa. ;D ;D ;D
|
|
|
Post by szorostalpu1 on May 17, 2009 12:36:11 GMT -5
conscripted and actually fought are two different things.....I've read where entire regiments of roumanians deserted. They were never good soldiers or citizens, and this is off-topic anyway. Look what THESE good working class neighbors did....became maniu guardists and butchered us.
|
|
|
Post by szorostalpu1 on May 17, 2009 12:46:16 GMT -5
" Bandi bacsi and his 40 bands commanded by Diurpy bacsi.
mit???
|
|
wbb
Moderator
Posts: 733
|
Post by wbb on May 17, 2009 14:05:16 GMT -5
i meant Bonny bacsi and his 40 bands commanded by Diur.
|
|
|
Post by szorostalpu1 on May 17, 2009 16:00:12 GMT -5
"u can find statistics here about the ethnic makeup of the Austro-Hungarian army"
Who cares about the "Austro-Hungarian army" anyway. I wouldn't have fought for it either. The Austrians are the ones responsible for the war and dragging Hungary into it. The austrians (Hapsburgs) are also responsible for bringing foreigners into Hungary in depopulated areas.
Where were your loyal romanian soldiers of Hungary in 1848...yeni?
"i meant Bonny bacsi and his 40 bands commanded by Diur."
lol, Am I supposed to know what this means? mit dohanyzol?
|
|
yeni
Moderator
gulash freak
Posts: 327
|
Post by yeni on May 17, 2009 18:12:42 GMT -5
If we lived that time, we would not have any other option. if the country calls, we must go... yeah but don't forget most of those became good Hungarians later and they refounded villages, contributed to the Hun economy, gave new life to the depopulated areas. Big part of the Serbs became problematic later, but the overwhelming majority of the German settlers ( Germans in and around Buda, Germans in Baranya, Banat Germans etc) became loyal Hungarian citizens. I wouldn't be surprised if majority of todays Hungarians have at least 1-2 ancestors who came in the 18th century. thats true the Romanians were the least loyal though they had some politicians who supported Hungary (Ioan Dragoº was a good guy for example, but he was murdered by Iancu's men..) there were much more Germans or Slovaks who sided with the Hungarian cause (big majority of Slovaks fought in the Hun army and not in pro Austria units of Ludovit Stur)
|
|
|
Post by lvl100 on May 17, 2009 19:07:43 GMT -5
thats true the Romanians were the least loyal though they had some politicians who supported Hungary The almost 500 years of denial of political life and consequently economical one may have something to do with the scarcity of reasons for loyalty Later edit : Whats interesting is that between 1200s and 1400s there was no discrimination in Transylvania and all the nations, including Romanians, had autonomous and political power. If that status quo would be maintained i`m sure the history would be different now.
|
|
|
Post by szorostalpu1 on May 18, 2009 5:26:35 GMT -5
mosckos roman, if you believe Transylvania, Partium and Banat were given to you asslickers for any type historical justifications or to rectify past discriminations you're way stupider than I thought you were. It was all done for economic and political purposes to punish and cripple Hungary and to keep her down.
|
|