Post by Fender on Jul 30, 2010 3:07:41 GMT -5
Now, after reading through the ICJ ruling, I find that it raises more questions than it answers.
Lets deal with the known facts.
A Decleration of Independance is not illegal. I read their reasoning and it makes sense.
A Decleration Of Independance in the eyes of the ICJ (now everyone follow this carefully) DOES NOT CONFIRM NOR DOES IT LEGITIMISE SELF DETERMINATION OR INDEPENDANCE, because it is in conflict with souverignty and thats something that the ICJ put ahead of Self Determination.
Now what made the Decleration in Kosovo not illegal. Simple.It wasn't made by the current UNMIK government bodies in place.
This now begs the question, if the current Pristina play school parliament is overseen by the U.N. and the main antagonisits are its PM ang President, then who is running the parrallel government. Who are they and what do they call themselves.
Now my young quisllings, it should be noted that the ICJ did take 1244 into account and did confirm that UNMIK are the legitimate government in place and that UNMIK cannot allow the current parlimental structure that they have put in place seceed as it violates 1244. So when some of these countries that set up embassies in Kosovo, who exactly did they show their credentials to? It could not have been to the UNMIK structure that Thaci and co must work under, as this violates 1244. I understand that Thaci and co signed the decleration away from the main government structures, but I also know that they weren't voted in by anyone outside of the UNMIK governmental Structure.
To me it sounds like a decleration made by ghosts for ghosts.
People, this is why the U.S. in all its stupendous glory, time and again trips over its own feet when trying to kill off a country. What has effectively happened is that the ICJ have painted the KLA into a corner. They said " You can shout your Decleration from the Roof tops, but we will not legitimise it by ruling in the postive for Self Determination".
How are they in this corner, if Serbia doesn't say yes, then countries will not invest. Currently any loans recieved are because of the UNMIK governmental structures in place. As much as banks are theives themselves, they will never lend to other theives. Quite simple, no UNMIK, no loans.
Have a nice day. ;D
Lets deal with the known facts.
A Decleration of Independance is not illegal. I read their reasoning and it makes sense.
A Decleration Of Independance in the eyes of the ICJ (now everyone follow this carefully) DOES NOT CONFIRM NOR DOES IT LEGITIMISE SELF DETERMINATION OR INDEPENDANCE, because it is in conflict with souverignty and thats something that the ICJ put ahead of Self Determination.
Now what made the Decleration in Kosovo not illegal. Simple.It wasn't made by the current UNMIK government bodies in place.
This now begs the question, if the current Pristina play school parliament is overseen by the U.N. and the main antagonisits are its PM ang President, then who is running the parrallel government. Who are they and what do they call themselves.
Now my young quisllings, it should be noted that the ICJ did take 1244 into account and did confirm that UNMIK are the legitimate government in place and that UNMIK cannot allow the current parlimental structure that they have put in place seceed as it violates 1244. So when some of these countries that set up embassies in Kosovo, who exactly did they show their credentials to? It could not have been to the UNMIK structure that Thaci and co must work under, as this violates 1244. I understand that Thaci and co signed the decleration away from the main government structures, but I also know that they weren't voted in by anyone outside of the UNMIK governmental Structure.
To me it sounds like a decleration made by ghosts for ghosts.
People, this is why the U.S. in all its stupendous glory, time and again trips over its own feet when trying to kill off a country. What has effectively happened is that the ICJ have painted the KLA into a corner. They said " You can shout your Decleration from the Roof tops, but we will not legitimise it by ruling in the postive for Self Determination".
How are they in this corner, if Serbia doesn't say yes, then countries will not invest. Currently any loans recieved are because of the UNMIK governmental structures in place. As much as banks are theives themselves, they will never lend to other theives. Quite simple, no UNMIK, no loans.
Have a nice day. ;D