|
Post by vanilo on Sept 13, 2010 14:58:13 GMT -5
I wonder what all these women would do with their "unwanted" babies if medicine was not so advanced that it could rid the "problem" for them. Would the right to do whatever you want with your body, therefore also the baby inside of you, still exist if there was no such thing as abortion? It seems to me like it's so easy to be pro abortion when it's considered no big deal; you just swallow some pills, and it's all over. It's easier to get rid of a baby than it is to get rid of a sore throat. That's kinda twisted. Also, it's not that black and white that you are either pro or con individual rights. I personally am pro individual rights - but with responsibilities. Like...yeah, you can drink and get drunk - that's your right - but not if you're going to get drunk, get behind the wheels and drive all over my neighbourhood. And yeah, you can have sex, it's your body, do what you like with it (I may not agree with it but it's just an opinion, nothing more)...but not if you're going to be stupid and get yourself, or others, in trouble. Don't make babies you don't want, don't spread digusting diseases and don't play with peoples' emotions. So yeah...individual rights, I think, should sometimes not be automatically given to everybody. There's no harm in earning things in life...you also don't just give wages away for free just because everyone has a right to money in their pockets (unless you live in Scandinavia, of course ).
|
|
|
Post by Babylon Enigma on Sept 29, 2010 16:14:27 GMT -5
The majority of differences between men and women are in fact constructed (besides the biological physical sexual differences). Gender is by and large socially constructed, there is enough literature available for u close-minded morons, and Islamic-based Vanilo. Wow I would have thought you could come up with something more convincing. Apparently you've solved the nature versus nuture debate. I see this as typical secular atheist reasoning. Traditional values are dismissed as socially constructed whilst alternative behaviours and values are defended as innate. You are also devaluing biological and physical sexual differences there by trying to make it just a side note. The fact there are differences makes it significant enough but it seems you would prefer we pretend they do not exist at all. Haha, Arsenije atheism/securalism/humanism is a Marxist driven movement and a goal of communism. So is the elimination of family unit. But of course, all the attacks on family unit(and culture by default) and religion(also culture) is just a coincidence. Add that to the gigantic pile of coincidences.
|
|