|
Post by terroreign on Dec 11, 2010 4:18:06 GMT -5
Confirmed by NATO & UN sources, as well as witnesses - Muslims calculatingly orchestrated attacks on muslim civilians in order to disallow the peace process and get NATO to bomb Serbs. Also in cooperation with this, the western media went to great lengths to demonize the Serbs and glorify the Muslims. Going so far as to stage a fake concentration camp which was actually an Emergency shelter. It's sickening as to the lengths Izetbegovic's government went to destroy the Serbs, and to get western aid. But really doesn't surprise me that the US/European media churned out such great, cinematic propaganda. I mean they did a great job in Iraq too, watching American news people were convinced Saddam Hussein and Osama were best pals My two cents: the real "war" of Bosnia wasn't Muslims vs Serbs, or vice-versa, it was truth vs. lies.
|
|
|
Post by Emperor AAdmin on Dec 11, 2010 12:43:18 GMT -5
It is said that in any given crime the party or parties which stand to gain most could easily be the most responsible ones involved in such crime.
|
|
|
Post by Username on Dec 11, 2010 21:45:22 GMT -5
That wouldn't surprise me, but it's not like Serbs were innocent of that either.
Those Bosnian Muslims have to have been pretty clever, to win a war of propaganda against their Christian neighbors, and get the Christian West on their side... Give me a break... Serbs = guilty aggressors.
|
|
|
Post by terroreign on Dec 11, 2010 23:55:20 GMT -5
^More like twisted and soulless, to kill their own people in order to further an illegal war
|
|
|
Post by Username on Dec 12, 2010 0:57:17 GMT -5
^More like twisted and soulless, to kill their own people in order to further an illegal war Like I said, there are MANY REPORTS OF SERBS DOING THE SAME. Pffttt.. what about the arms embargo that crippled Bosnia and gave Serbs an unbeatable advantage for years? I fail to see how you can convince anyone of Bosnian Muslims being the main perpetrators in this war when they were so heavily disadvantaged and were the clear underdogs. Just more Serb propaganda.. what else to expect from this forum. You were portrayed as animals during the war and rightfully so. Get over it and accept it.
|
|
|
Post by terroreign on Dec 12, 2010 1:16:24 GMT -5
^They weren't the "main perpetrators", both sides equally fought and killed. The Muslims just used more back-handed and dastardly tactics.
I mean, framing a refugee camp as a DEATH CAMP! Can you sink any lower?
The Bosniaks lied and manipulated their way into getting the west on their side. Accept it.
|
|
|
Post by Marshall_Stanko on Dec 12, 2010 8:17:33 GMT -5
That wouldn't surprise me, but it's not like Serbs were innocent of that either. Those Bosnian Muslims have to have been pretty clever, to win a war of propaganda against their Christian neighbors, and get the Christian West on their side... Give me a break... Serbs = guilty aggressors. Your half Serbian yourself so therefore do you also consider yourself to be partially aggressive also?
|
|
|
Post by Sh1 Shonić on Dec 12, 2010 10:02:41 GMT -5
Pffttt.. what about the arms embargo that crippled Bosnia and gave Serbs an unbeatable advantage for years? I fail to see how you can convince anyone of Bosnian Muslims being the main perpetrators in this war when they were so heavily disadvantaged and were the clear underdogs. Just more Serb propaganda.. what else to expect from this forum. You were portrayed as animals during the war and rightfully so. Get over it and accept it.
|
|
|
Post by Gigolo on Dec 19, 2010 14:58:35 GMT -5
In January 2004, prosecutors in the trial against Stanislav Galić, a Serb general in the siege of Sarajevo, introduced into evidence a report including the testimony of ammunition expert Berko Zečević. Working with two colleagues, Zečević's investigation revealed a total of six possible locations from which the shell in the first Markale massacre could have been fired, of which five were under VRS and one under ARBiH control. The ARBiH site in question was visible to UNPROFOR observers at the time, who reported that no shell was fired from that position.
Zečević further reported that certain components of the projectile could only have been fired from one of two places, both of which were under the control of the Army of Republika Srpska. The court would eventually find Galić guilty beyond reasonable doubt of all five shellings prosecutors had charged him with, including Markale. Although widely reported by the international media, the Helsinki Committee for Human Rights noted that the verdict was ignored in Serbia itself.
Well, there's the end of that.
However I doubt any amount of evidence will discourage certain Serbs from repeating theories that have been destroyed for years. Because some Serbs simply need them to be true.
Farewell.
|
|
|
Post by Gigolo on Dec 19, 2010 15:12:51 GMT -5
Oh and as for UNPROFOR:
David Harland, former head of UN Civil Affairs in Bosnia, claimed at the trial of General Dragomir Milošević in ICTY that he was responsible for the creation of the myth that UNPROFOR was unable to determine who had fired the mortar shells that caused the second Markale massacre. The myth that has survived for more than ten years, Harland said was created because of a “neutral statement” made by General Rupert Smith, the UNPROFOR commander. On the day of the second attack on Markale, General Smith stated “it is unclear who fired the shells, although at that time he already had the technical report of UNPROFOR intelligence section, determining beyond reasonable doubt that they were fired from VRS positions at Lukavica”. Harland’s responsibility lies in the fact that he himself advised General Smith to make “a neutral statement in order not to alarm the Serbs who would be alerted to the impending NATO air strikes against their positions had he pointed a finger at them”. That would have jeopardized the safety of UN troops in the territory under VRS control or on positions where they might have been vulnerable to retaliatory attacks by Serb forces.
Byes.
|
|
|
Post by Caslav Klonimirovic on Dec 21, 2010 8:51:38 GMT -5
I'd just like to know how a massively unarmed civilian Bosniak side was able to take out over 20,000 Serbian well armed military. They must have had awesome gings.
|
|