|
Post by Novus Dis on Mar 21, 2011 15:47:55 GMT -5
Novus - put Seselj up against any Serbian politician see how he destroys him. and this today, is the most valued aspect of a successful politician to voters - being charismatic and strong argumentative skills. Seselj does it all - he will win if runs in Serbia, this I can guarantee you. Whether he's "western" enough is a moot point, being PC is just window dressing. America is maintaining its empire on propaganda alone. Can you imagine the backlash if America started attacking Tadic? It's much harder to explain to everybody, including themselves, why attacking Tadic is a good idea than why attacking Seselj is a good idea.
|
|
|
Post by uz on Mar 21, 2011 15:50:16 GMT -5
Krivos, no international bureaucrat is going to ever trust Sesejl. This is what counts. Sesejl's reputation got tainted, he also had his chance.
|
|
gavrilo
Amicus
Vi ste svi banane
Posts: 840
|
Post by gavrilo on Mar 22, 2011 5:20:23 GMT -5
Seselj is a great speaker, it really is amusing wartching him own the judges in the hague. But I think he is too radical to be allowed to rule.
|
|
|
Post by Novus Dis on Mar 22, 2011 5:56:26 GMT -5
You mean under Milosevic. Though Kostunica didn't do much he's relatively better than Tadic. . Milosevic did NOT lose Kosovo. He secured it very well in RES1244, it was only up to the next government to enforce it. That's funny. So what you're saying is that Serbs are living in fear because... Serbia has control? I don't care what a piece of paper says. The reality on the ground is the Shqiptar colonists are allowed to run rampant without repercussions.
|
|
|
Post by terroreign on Mar 22, 2011 23:38:01 GMT -5
^The Shqiptar problem is all because of the Yugoslav Commies who screwed over the Chetniks in the first place.
So it's high time we brought back the Chetnik (Seselj), and see Serbdom rise from the ashes like a phoenix
|
|
|
Post by uz on Mar 23, 2011 0:42:11 GMT -5
According to the resolution Serbs forces have the legal right as of now to go in. The government at the moment is just too scared to do something. To be honest, if a war were to happen it can easily involve the world, thats a bad scenario.
|
|
|
Post by Novus Dis on Mar 23, 2011 3:35:08 GMT -5
^The Shqiptar problem is all because of the Yugoslav Commies who screwed over the Chetniks in the first place. So it's high time we brought back the Chetnik (Seselj), and see Serbdom rise from the ashes like a phoenix Seselj isn't a Chetnik. That aside, subtly is the best way forward. Right now America is attacking Libya so Serbia should be helping Libya.
|
|
|
Post by Novus Dis on Mar 23, 2011 6:54:24 GMT -5
According to the resolution Serbs forces have the legal right as of now to go in. The government at the moment is just too scared to do something. To be honest, if a war were to happen it can easily involve the world, thats a bad scenario. yes there is what is written in the resolution, and there is reality ... you have to take into account the goal of the resolution: peace. And what you propose would certainly not contribute to de resolution goal, so why would this happen? In this case a litteral understanding of the resolution would be an abuse of right. But you have no knowledge of law, international law etc ... so why don't you just shut it ?? The agreement was broken as soon as NATO sent soldiers into Kosovo Metohija.
|
|
|
Post by uz on Mar 23, 2011 12:50:52 GMT -5
^ 6. After withdrawal, an agreed number of Yugoslav and Serbian personnel will be permitted to return to perform the following functions: - Liaison with the international civil mission and the international security presence; - Marking/clearing minefields; - Maintaining a presence at Serb patrimonial sites; - Maintaining a presence at key border crossings Section 6; Un RES1244 www.unmikonline.org/misc/N9917289.pdfReturning personnel - Equipment associated with returning personnel; - Terms of reference for their functional responsibilities; - Timetable for their return; - Delineation of their geographical areas of operation; - Rules governing their relationship to the international security presence and the international civil mission.According to the resolution; a discussion regarding a time frame of when re-deployment of Yugo/Serb forces needs to take place. 4. Confirms that after the withdrawal an agreed number of Yugoslav and Serb military and police personnel will be permitted to return to Kosovo to perform the functions in accordance with annex 2;shejtani; I believe it is time for you to shut it, so smile and walk away.
|
|
|
Post by Novus Dis on Mar 23, 2011 13:10:05 GMT -5
The agreement was the UN soldiers were to be sent to Kosovo Metohija, not NATO soldiers. Ergo the agreement is invalid and NATO is technically at war with Belgrade.
|
|
|
Post by uz on Mar 23, 2011 13:11:26 GMT -5
^ 6. After withdrawal, an agreed number of Yugoslav and Serbian personnel will be permitted to return to perform the following functions: - Liaison with the international civil mission and the international security presence; - Marking/clearing minefields; - Maintaining a presence at Serb patrimonial sites; - Maintaining a presence at key border crossings Section 6; Un RES1244 www.unmikonline.org/misc/N9917289.pdfReturning personnel - Equipment associated with returning personnel; - Terms of reference for their functional responsibilities; - Timetable for their return; - Delineation of their geographical areas of operation; - Rules governing their relationship to the international security presence and the international civil mission.According to the resolution; a discussion regarding a time frame of when re-deployment of Yugo/Serb forces needs to take place. 4. Confirms that after the withdrawal an agreed number of Yugoslav and Serb military and police personnel will be permitted to return to Kosovo to perform the functions in accordance with annex 2;shejtani; I believe it is time for you to shut it, so smile and walk away. you didn't read or didn't understand what I wrote. And just so you know, I was the best student at practical exercices of my course of international law at university So step up and say something about that Shejtani, since you're a lawyer and all. Bragging about what you "potentially" know is oblivious compared to what you may "actually" know. BTW Shejtani; The ICJ has NOTHING to do with this. Just thought you should know this, in case it comes up in your next exam.
|
|
|
Post by uz on Mar 23, 2011 13:13:31 GMT -5
The agreement was the UN soldiers were to be sent to Kosovo Metohija, not NATO soldiers. Ergo the agreement is invalid and NATO is technically at war with Belgrade. NATO was apart of this resolution, what are you saying man? The UN doesn't go to war with anybody, they exist for the "peacekeeping" sake. Read the agreement, and know one thing Novus.... patience is a virtue.
|
|
|
Post by uz on Mar 23, 2011 16:13:00 GMT -5
I think you are smart enough to know that this all a waiting game. The Kosovo situation is not nearly solved. Think about it...
Serbia did NOT ask that question for 1 reason, and that reason is war. The ICJ would have NO CHOICE but to respect the 1244, IF THE RIGHT QUESTION WAS ASKED. No one is this stupid. They asked the perfect question, because the answer everyone got didn't make any one side happy. The answer landed right in the middle, and this was the purpose of the ICJ. A "respected-opinion", that leads to nowhere.
|
|
|
Post by Novus Dis on Mar 23, 2011 16:57:00 GMT -5
The agreement was the UN soldiers were to be sent to Kosovo Metohija, not NATO soldiers. Ergo the agreement is invalid and NATO is technically at war with Belgrade. NATO was apart of this resolution, what are you saying man? The UN doesn't go to war with anybody, they exist for the "peacekeeping" sake. Read the agreement, and know one thing Novus.... patience is a virtue. Milosevic agreed to ceding Kosovo Metohija on the grounds that NATO have no presence there.
|
|
|
Post by uz on Mar 23, 2011 20:49:40 GMT -5
It was agreed to have a temporary power change. It was handed to the UN and NATO is the enforcer.
|
|
|
Post by Novus Dis on Mar 24, 2011 4:56:09 GMT -5
It was agreed to have a temporary power change. It was handed to the UN and NATO is the enforcer. The agreement was no NATO soldiers at all.
|
|