Kralj Vatra
Amicus
Warning: Sometimes uses foul language & insults!!!
20%
Posts: 9,814
|
Post by Kralj Vatra on Jun 16, 2011 2:06:25 GMT -5
Pure political BS with huge doses of distortion and manipulation (as usual). ex-Yugo fell because its economy fell. And its economy fell because USA had chosen so. It is very simple actually. I urge all you guys to go and read "Machael Parenti"'s book "To kill a nation" (and he means all yugoalavs). This book uses 100% western sources .(this "western sources" thing means nothing to me but might mean smth to certain infidel "Thomas"'s we have around) Honeslty Pyrro , I don't think you know what you're talking about. Again with this global conspiracy crap. Yes the economy was bad , it was bad throughout the 80s but Yugoslavia still trudged through. This mystical harmony you and uz try to speak of simply didn't exist on the level you believe it did and this is evidenced by the election of pro-Republic parties when multi-party elections were finally allowed. I agree the many in the West were profiteers but they were not the cause of our problems (unless you count them forcing the union of Yugoslavia - twice -). Also , not wanting war didn't mean wanting Yugoslavia. I think if most people could chose ideally they would have not wanted Yugoslavia but neither a war. Unfortunately war was the price tag. Hmm, this kind of distortion of facts does not work any more, and the truth is only getting clearer as time goes by, because simply one cannot lie or act forever. I pointed you to FACTS, and you reply with some pathetic and weak generalities, as if you came str8 from the 90s..... Go and read the aforementioned book and then try and find *one* mistake in it... Good luck... take your time.... But i do not think that you are brave enough to face the truth.
|
|
Kralj Vatra
Amicus
Warning: Sometimes uses foul language & insults!!!
20%
Posts: 9,814
|
Post by Kralj Vatra on Jun 16, 2011 2:14:17 GMT -5
If you don't participate in this game, then you will be hit by new bombs and all the world will happily watch over CNN/BBC as the mighty NATO is bringing peace and justice once again in this cruel world - worse case scenario or nobody will give a fu ck - average case analysis. You are not thinking the right direction. Nations get bombed because of their actions, they made the wrong move. That's all it is. Can you please clarify the above? 1) What bad actions did Serbs do that Bosniaks, Croats, Albs did not do? 2) And if the answer to 1) is none, then why ONLY Serbs got bombed, and targeted and tagged? And what would be the results if Serbs had really engaged in full-throttle EXTERNAL propaganda? All their propaganda (if any) was for internal consumption. The exported propaganda was zero. OTOH The external propaganda of Bosniaks (see Bono of U2 and other such total clowns) and Albos was massive. In essence, all that Bosniaks,Albs did was only external propaganda.
|
|
Kralj Vatra
Amicus
Warning: Sometimes uses foul language & insults!!!
20%
Posts: 9,814
|
Post by Kralj Vatra on Jun 16, 2011 2:57:51 GMT -5
Again with this global conspiracy crap. Can you please define the term "conspiracy"?
|
|
|
Post by Croatian Vanguard on Jun 16, 2011 7:53:17 GMT -5
What facts? What facts? You and uz both suggest that the conflict wasn't the fault of the Yugoslavs at all ( or at least not the fault of the Serbs) and that the West is mostly to blame along with the non-Serbs. The country was held together by a thin thread of tolerance which was bound to snap since Yugo's creation was artificial at best. The West just capitalized on the situation and then did very little for 4 years to help bring peace. Send it to me
|
|
|
Post by Croatian Vanguard on Jun 16, 2011 7:54:23 GMT -5
Again with this global conspiracy crap. Can you please define the term "conspiracy"? A plot , usually hatched in secret , through various anonomus interests , to create a situation for which they cannot be blamed for and someone else is.
|
|
Kralj Vatra
Amicus
Warning: Sometimes uses foul language & insults!!!
20%
Posts: 9,814
|
Post by Kralj Vatra on Jun 16, 2011 8:15:15 GMT -5
Man read the damn book, i am sure after all those years of work in the fruitful land of the free, you have 20$ to spare.
|
|
|
Post by uz on Jun 16, 2011 9:43:45 GMT -5
1) What bad actions did Serbs do that Bosniaks, Croats, Albs did not do? 2) And if the answer to 1) is none, then why ONLY Serbs got bombed, and targeted and tagged? --
Yugoslavia was not part of the agenda, the Serbs were in the way.
|
|
Kralj Vatra
Amicus
Warning: Sometimes uses foul language & insults!!!
20%
Posts: 9,814
|
Post by Kralj Vatra on Jun 16, 2011 23:27:07 GMT -5
If you don't participate in this game, then you will be hit by new bombs and all the world will happily watch over CNN/BBC as the mighty NATO is bringing peace and justice once again in this cruel world - worse case scenario or nobody will give a fu ck - average case analysis. You are not thinking the right direction. Nations get bombed because of their actions, they made the wrong move. That's all it is. Yugoslavia was not part of the agenda, the Serbs were in the way. So ... Serbs did not get bombed because of some action, but because they existed, right?
|
|
|
Post by Novus Dis on Jun 16, 2011 23:37:36 GMT -5
Serbs were attacked because America knew the Serbs would surrender.
|
|
Kralj Vatra
Amicus
Warning: Sometimes uses foul language & insults!!!
20%
Posts: 9,814
|
Post by Kralj Vatra on Jun 17, 2011 0:58:03 GMT -5
Serbs were attacked because America knew the Serbs would surrender. That is yet another badly worded sentence by yours. Albs would surrender, Greeks would surrender Turks would surrender, yet USA never bombed any of those nations.
|
|
|
Post by Novus Dis on Jun 17, 2011 2:45:59 GMT -5
Serbs were attacked because America knew the Serbs would surrender. That is yet another badly worded sentence by yours. Albs would surrender, Greeks would surrender Turks would surrender, yet USA never bombed any of those nations. Yet Kosovo Metohija is under the control of Shqiptars, Krajina is under the control of Croats and Brcko is under the control of Turks.
|
|
Kralj Vatra
Amicus
Warning: Sometimes uses foul language & insults!!!
20%
Posts: 9,814
|
Post by Kralj Vatra on Jun 17, 2011 3:28:08 GMT -5
That is yet another badly worded sentence by yours. Albs would surrender, Greeks would surrender Turks would surrender, yet USA never bombed any of those nations. Yet Kosovo Metohija is under the control of USA, Krajina is under the control of USA and Brcko is under the control of USA. corrected.
|
|
|
Post by Novus Dis on Jun 17, 2011 5:12:37 GMT -5
Yet Kosovo Metohija is under the control of USA, Krajina is under the control of USA and Brcko is under the control of USA. corrected. Regardless, they're not under Serb control.
|
|
|
Post by Croatian Vanguard on Jun 17, 2011 5:49:10 GMT -5
The U.S. has no presence , not even a lowly soldier on any of the territory that comprised 'Krajina.' There are no non-Croatian bases in Croatia either although as part of NATO now , our allies can use them but they are not perminantly stationed anyway.
|
|
Kralj Vatra
Amicus
Warning: Sometimes uses foul language & insults!!!
20%
Posts: 9,814
|
Post by Kralj Vatra on Jun 17, 2011 6:41:41 GMT -5
^^^ LOL!
|
|
|
Post by gjakova on Jun 17, 2011 6:49:29 GMT -5
pyrro you know that you aren't serbian right?dude really wake up and be a greek for God sake.you're making a fool of yourself. your wife isn't going to leave you if you recognize you're greek.
|
|
|
Post by Croatian Vanguard on Jun 17, 2011 6:55:05 GMT -5
Name one American soldier in the territory of 'Krajina'?
|
|
|
Post by ulf on Jun 17, 2011 16:15:14 GMT -5
F*ck some of you are stupid here. Serbs got bombed & got partitioned their territories in few smaller states because they were the only one who openly fought the NWO
|
|
|
Post by uz on Jun 17, 2011 16:28:34 GMT -5
This ^ is what I'm partilially saying.
|
|
|
Post by plisbardhi on Oct 11, 2011 22:00:23 GMT -5
bumped
|
|