|
Post by fishcake on Sept 30, 2011 20:47:59 GMT -5
I'm not going to read the whole thing. Post the quote stating that they want Greater Serbia", and would not give the same rights to homosexuals as they would with heterosexuals. Exactly, this is very fascist of Serbia.
|
|
|
Post by uz on Sept 30, 2011 20:51:20 GMT -5
I'm not going to read the whole thing. Post the quote stating that they want Greater Serbia", and would not give the same rights to homosexuals as they would with heterosexuals. Exactly, this is very fascist of Serbia. You haven't followed the convo properly.
|
|
|
Post by uz on Sept 30, 2011 21:17:26 GMT -5
Another example of anti-Serb propaganda. The head of the Serbian Orthodox Church, Patriarch Irinej, called the pride march a "parade of shame" that is "foreign to our history, tradition and culture."Obviously the church is against it, what church really isnt? Is the Patriach a reliable go-to-guy for an opinon on this? Of course not.The ultranationalist Obraz, or Honor, group said that the ban presented a "victory for the Serb patriots."A complete different news source stating the same as the BBC. Can't these journalists interview a REAL CITIZEN OF BELGRADE to get a non-biased opinion?www.taiwannews.com.tw/etn/news_content.php?id=1722544I can even throw them contacts of Serbs in Belgrade who are homosexual AND are against the parade.
|
|
|
Post by ulf on Sept 30, 2011 22:04:12 GMT -5
Gay avalanche was cancelled due to safety reasons as some groups wanted to destroy parliament or some other government building hahahaha
|
|
|
Post by terroreign on Sept 30, 2011 23:03:13 GMT -5
Serbs are homophobic and racist. who says they're racist?
|
|
|
Post by terroreign on Sept 30, 2011 23:06:43 GMT -5
What do you know about the Serbian Radical Party? Well first off, they're radical. Secondly, they want a "Greater Serbia", and would not give the same rights to homosexuals as they would with heterosexuals. the don't know about the last part but explain what's wrong with wanting a greater serbia.
|
|
|
Post by radovic on Oct 1, 2011 0:08:26 GMT -5
Obviously the church is against it, what church really isnt? Well in Canada some of the protestant churches try to make themselves "in and cool" by embracing the homosexual agenda? Those are the churches with declining membership and $$$. They are also the one that get laughed at by theological students.
|
|
|
Post by Novus Dis on Oct 1, 2011 0:32:33 GMT -5
Last year the only "gay people" who paraded were EU politicians, foreign activists and faags looking for a handout from the taxed. Serbs are homophobic and racist. Serbia is more ethnically and religiously diverse than any of its neighbours. Save Bosnia, but only because Serbs are a sizeable group there. Something to think about. As far as homophobia is concerned, the vast majority of Serbs leave you alone if you leave them alone. They're not looking for a fight, unlike the majority of their neighbours.
|
|
|
Post by Moe Lester on Oct 1, 2011 0:53:40 GMT -5
]the don't know about the last part but explain what's wrong with wanting a greater serbia. Nothing really, as long as the countries part of this "greater Serbia" willing cede land, but the SRP won't take no for an answer.
|
|
|
Post by Moe Lester on Oct 1, 2011 1:08:17 GMT -5
I'm not going to read the whole thing. Post the quote stating that they want Greater Serbia", and would not give the same rights to homosexuals as they would with heterosexuals. Read: 2. Јединство Српства45. Забрана дискриминације97. Морал99. Државна пропагандаNOTE: My translation might not be correct
|
|
|
Post by terroreign on Oct 1, 2011 2:21:30 GMT -5
I'm not going to read the whole thing. Post the quote stating that they want Greater Serbia", and would not give the same rights to homosexuals as they would with heterosexuals. Read: 2. Јединство Српства45. Забрана дискриминације97. Морал99. Државна пропагандаNOTE: My translation might not be correctsee nothing there regarding sexuality, rather infers the exact opposite
|
|
|
Post by Moe Lester on Oct 1, 2011 2:25:36 GMT -5
Darn, I must have translated it wrong What I read was that it was ok to discriminate certain groups (eg homosexuals).
|
|
|
Post by terroreign on Oct 1, 2011 2:28:31 GMT -5
Darn, I must have translated it wrong What I read was that it was ok to discriminate certain groups (eg homosexuals). lol the american tea-party wouldn't even dare to put that in their charter.
|
|
|
Post by Anittas on Oct 1, 2011 7:18:27 GMT -5
Serbs are homophobic and racist. Hetero-phobia should not be tolerated, by any nation. Where were you when this happened? news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/europe/5045352.stmRomanian militias breaking up gay-pride The gay parades are not about being against heterosexuals and you know that. Why would you say such a stupid thing? It wasn't Romanian militias, but Romanian militants that did that; the Romanian police clashed with them and made arrests.
|
|
|
Post by uz on Oct 1, 2011 11:28:05 GMT -5
well, it's the same in all Balkans, but it's quite bad I think. One f**king day, one f**king poor parade, let them have their day ... (And all homsexuals aren't effeminate like some people in Balkans may think ...). They have 365 days out of the year to be gay, why a parade? I want my own parade. All good-looking people should unite and have their own parade. It's only fair. Unless guys and girls holding hands and (maybe) gettin it on is offensive, I don't see a problem.
|
|
|
Post by Anittas on Oct 1, 2011 12:39:37 GMT -5
If you want your own parade, go ahead and organize one.
|
|
|
Post by terroreign on Oct 1, 2011 17:27:55 GMT -5
I'd prefer a vlach parade, over a gay one. at least they have contributions to the world to be proud of.
|
|
|
Post by Moe Lester on Oct 1, 2011 21:40:36 GMT -5
Leonardo Da Vinci is suspected to be gay.
|
|
|
Post by terroreign on Oct 2, 2011 3:21:17 GMT -5
gay people claim more things as their own than a rabid bulgarian from canada.
|
|
|
Post by Moe Lester on Oct 2, 2011 3:31:28 GMT -5
People who claim this say his writings showed he had homosexual thoughts.
|
|