|
Post by Anittas on Nov 4, 2011 3:43:52 GMT -5
I wouldn't go that far, Krivo. We don't bring that right-wing religious stuff in our political debates. We don't debate abortion rights. We leave that to philosophers.
|
|
|
Post by terroreign on Nov 4, 2011 3:57:29 GMT -5
well yeah there're different degrees of conservativism....in fact they say that today's american conservatives would be considered left-wing 60 years ago
but i doubt romania is bereft of a party that represents at some capacity the religiously conservative far-right
|
|
|
Post by Croatian Vanguard on Nov 4, 2011 8:30:24 GMT -5
These two clowns are embarassing. Don't insult our president, you prick. He wants the best for you and your children. If you as a Canadian don't get that, that's your problem. Yes, the Vlachs in Serbia need to be protected. Period. Seriously man , your posts are starting to degenerate. Do you honestly believe this?
|
|
|
Post by Anittas on Nov 4, 2011 10:23:12 GMT -5
Don't insult our president, you prick. He wants the best for you and your children. If you as a Canadian don't get that, that's your problem. Yes, the Vlachs in Serbia need to be protected. Period. Seriously man , your posts are starting to degenerate. Do you honestly believe this? Do I believe what? I made two assertations. Do I believe that he wants the best for the Serbia? Yes, I do, because it's in the interest of our country to have our neighbors have a prosperous economy and social life. Do I believe that he wants to protect the Vlach identity? Yes, I do; because it's part of the Romanian foreign policy to help preserve the Vlach identity and culture for reasons relating to our own identity and culture. I believe this is common sense and all progressive nations should strive to reach for these goals.
|
|
|
Post by Croatian Vanguard on Nov 4, 2011 10:58:21 GMT -5
^ I always pegged you for a person that is willing to critically think. Yet you believe a politician so openly and willilngly simply because he is the president of the nation you hail from. You really believe these politicians are only silent servents of the public and purely altruistic?
|
|
|
Post by Anittas on Nov 4, 2011 11:08:15 GMT -5
^ I always pegged you for a person that is willing to critically think. Yet you believe a politician so openly and willilngly simply because he is the president of the nation you hail from. You really believe these politicians are only silent servents of the public and purely altruistic? Man, I wasn't talking about politicians in general, but about Basescu. I don't think all politicians are corrupt, I think some do what they think is best for their country. What happened to you? Did someone hack your account? Your punctuation is off: you add the coma inbetween two spaces (I've seen you do this several times now). Are you really that Croatian dude or are you someone who snapped up his nickname? Basescu is a classic liberal and he stood up against many of the popular votes. He is also despised by many, one of them being Cather in the Rye. And if he sees this thread, where I defend Basescu, he will curse me down. But at least he will know why.
|
|
|
Post by Croatian Vanguard on Nov 4, 2011 11:18:33 GMT -5
All politicians are redistributionists which disqualifies them from any kind of good standing in my eyes. When you think about it they are violent people at the core. And yeah , he will do 'what's best for his country' to the extent it ensures that he stays in power as long as he can and that his farm gives him something. He is the farmer , you are his cow. Nothing. Sometimes I type fast because I'm doing multiple tasks. He's a farmer of human lifestock like the rest of the political class of which he is apart . Nothing personal against him or you. Just cutting the bs out of it.
|
|
|
Post by Anittas on Nov 4, 2011 11:26:19 GMT -5
Man, the guy doesn't even have a politicians background. He was a sea captain of Romania's largest commercia ship, spending half of his time getting drunk. This guy is blunt to the bone.
|
|
|
Post by Anittas on Nov 4, 2011 11:29:25 GMT -5
Here he tells an elderly citizen to get of the room if he can't remain civil. Heh ... Basescu for Romanian moderator! Just watch the clip. This is one of those times when you don't need to know the language in order to know what's going on. Lolz.
|
|
|
Post by Croatian Vanguard on Nov 4, 2011 12:10:23 GMT -5
Man, the guy doesn't even have a politicians background. He was a sea captain of Romania's largest commercia ship, spending half of his time getting drunk. This guy is blunt to the bone. The fact that he became a politician tells me enough about him. He's willing to initiate force to solve complex social issues. I find this universally wrong just as a rapist is willing to use force to get sex.
|
|
|
Post by Anittas on Nov 4, 2011 12:25:30 GMT -5
Are you pulling my leg? Unless you're an anarchist, I don't see what you'tr trying to pull here. Nations need a goverment in order to function. Politicians have their role to play. Many politicians are not in for the money. Many of them could've made a bigger profit in the private sector.
|
|
|
Post by Croatian Vanguard on Nov 4, 2011 13:17:54 GMT -5
^^ I don't label myself . I am simply pointing out that you don't need to initiate force to solve complex social problems. We detest force in the personal sphere what makes the public sphere so magical to operate on different rules?
Politicians don't have to be in it for the money. I didn't claim that. They are in it for the power. They want that mighty gun because they believe in their minds they can do such good with such a terribly evil thing.
|
|
|
Post by uz on Nov 4, 2011 23:08:42 GMT -5
Are you pulling my leg? Unless you're an anarchist, I don't see what you'tr trying to pull here. Nations need a goverment in order to function. Politicians have their role to play. Many politicians are not in for the money. Many of them could've made a bigger profit in the private sector. How does anarchism have to do with it? Your argument is to just accept the "reality on the grounds", this is what most W. Europeans think and N. Americans. But no one thinks for a moment that maybe in 50 years or so we may begin to question how we allowed everything up until then to happen. And "accepting the reality on the grounds" will be far too cliche, we would by then definitely move on from how we think today, the question is will it be too late.
|
|