|
Post by Novi Pazar on Feb 5, 2012 3:19:46 GMT -5
"They were allowed, anyone was allowed to live in Kosovo if they could find land to buy or a house to buy. In the 1931 census there were 150,745 Orthodox Serbs. Then in 1948, another census counted 171,911 Orthodox Serbs, so the number of Serbs in Kosovo rose post WWII, even after 40 000 Serbs fled Kosovo during WWII to Montenegro and Serbia. So they did, in fact, return to Kosovo. And the number continued to rise (189 969 in 1953, 227 016 in 1961, and 228 264 in 1971), it was only up until 1981 that the number of Serbs in Kosovo began to decrease with a recorded 209 498 Serbs in Kosovo in 1981. And then in 1998, the number of Serbs in Kosovo began to rise again, this time to 221 000."
Your just a waste of time, buddy, go away and do some RESEARCH, l'm not interested in hearing your twisted views.
PS I was almost about to delete your garbage above.
|
|
|
Post by Moe Lester on Feb 5, 2012 5:50:41 GMT -5
Your just a waste of time, buddy, go away and do some RESEARCH, l'm not interested in hearing your twisted views. If it isn't saying Albanians were drinking Serb blood, then it musn't be true, right? I thought you were an adult. PS I was almost about to delete your garbage above. What a great way to look like you had an argument, while having nothing to fall back on.
|
|
|
Post by Moe Lester on Feb 5, 2012 5:53:04 GMT -5
There's all kinds of rumors that encircle Tito, some beleive he was Churchills' son, and I think they do look alike. Winston himself got him in power lol. Some say he was a Spanish revolutionary, but the biggest factor that "theorists" rely on is that his Serbo-Croatian was God-awful, which is true. I heard a rumour that said he was really Jewish, and that the real Tito died in the Spanish Civil War. This is from Metapedia, it's like a pedia for conspiracy theories.
|
|
|
Post by srbobran on Feb 5, 2012 11:52:23 GMT -5
Yeah I have always found that fact that despite his remarkable statesmanship throughout his life, he was unable to choose a suitable successor or means of succession. I mean, any joe blow from Yugo could have seen the inherent danger in a collective presidency which I always found a bit suspicious.
|
|
|
Post by Novus Dis on Feb 5, 2012 12:42:57 GMT -5
Uh, I'm pretty sure what happened happened exactly the way Tito wanted. Right now everybody's saying "OMG, WE NEED ANOTHER TITO" and "OMG, TITO KEPT YUGOSLAVIA TOGETHER" when it was because of Tito that the nation fell apart. He was the one that divided the nation into six autonomous states. He was the one that created monetary inflation. He was the one that didn't pick a successor. He wanted Yugoslavia to break apart so people idolized him after his death. Or maybe he was, according to you people, a complete and utter idiot. But considering that he held onto power for so long I don't think so.
|
|
|
Post by uz on Feb 5, 2012 13:13:44 GMT -5
This is what I beleive.
This is why I am with Novus on this one. You're right.
|
|
|
Post by bowandarrow on Feb 5, 2012 15:01:41 GMT -5
I think the Italians would disagree with Tito being a ''misunderstood'' person or guy.
|
|
|
Post by uz on Feb 5, 2012 15:02:54 GMT -5
The Italians don't like him, he got many Italians officers executed. There's a memorial on the Slovenia-Italy border somewhere commemorating dead Italian civilians in Trst I drove by it, didn't stop....
|
|