ivo
Amicus
Posts: 2,712
|
nicetas
Feb 21, 2012 16:19:39 GMT -5
Post by ivo on Feb 21, 2012 16:19:39 GMT -5
Hahahah dumb gyppos.
|
|
ioan
Amicus
Posts: 4,162
|
nicetas
Feb 21, 2012 16:22:48 GMT -5
Post by ioan on Feb 21, 2012 16:22:48 GMT -5
Yes, those written laws described this rule of the land as it has always been. So you use a source FROM 17 CENTURY to proove how it was the situation IN 11TH CENTURY? ?? With a source created 6 centuries AFTER the period we were discussing? ?? Do the Romanians even know what source is? Sorry I know yours are scarce... It reminds me of Catcher who used a source from 19 CENTURY as proof what happened in 11 CENTURY... Obviously its a pattern with our neighbours. By the way, there is no proof that the Cumans that created Cumania were muslim at that time. They were and are described as pagan - some supose their religion was tangrism. So again another crack in your "teory".
|
|
elemag
Senior Moderator
Posts: 369
|
nicetas
Feb 21, 2012 17:13:35 GMT -5
Post by elemag on Feb 21, 2012 17:13:35 GMT -5
One Wallachian compared to the several centuries of Bulgarian rule over you and your women? Well, I can accept that.
|
|
|
nicetas
Feb 21, 2012 20:34:08 GMT -5
Post by Anittas on Feb 21, 2012 20:34:08 GMT -5
"By the way, there is no proof that the Cumans that created Cumania were muslim at that time. They were and are described as pagan - some supose their religion was tangrism. So again another crack in your "teory"."
If you can't follow the discussion, formulate an argument and analyze what others have said, maybe it's better if you hang yourself. As I have said: the Cumans were Christians at the time when Wallachia was formed and those that remained on our soil were assimilated. We had no beef with the Cumans and we don't deny their presence. The laws that I spoke off were enforced after the foundation of the principalaties and when they were in full control of the land. For instance, it took Moldavia nearly half a century to fully control the eastern part of the country, now Republic of Moldova, and expel the Tatars from there.
|
|
ioan
Amicus
Posts: 4,162
|
nicetas
Feb 21, 2012 23:44:13 GMT -5
Post by ioan on Feb 21, 2012 23:44:13 GMT -5
They wouldn't remain not because they didn't want to remain, but because only Christians (and on a sidenote, Jews, too) could inhabit the principalities. Those that converted were of course integrated and such is the case for Buceag, which now mostly lies in Ukraine. The only Muslims that were permitted to wander the lands were merchants and officials. So you see, it is you who are dumb, because you probably thought of your country where the Muslim Turk ruled over you and deflowered your virgins. DUMB FUCK reread what you posted. We were discussing the Cumans. They in your first sentance is reference to the Cumans. So I bold what you stupid fuck wrote so everyone can see you implied the Cumans were muslims thats why they "moved" out of Romania (eventhough there are countless placenames in roma state derived from the name cuman). I know its hard to follow a roma, but come on: read what you post imbecile.
|
|
|
nicetas
Feb 22, 2012 0:06:43 GMT -5
Post by Anittas on Feb 22, 2012 0:06:43 GMT -5
They wouldn't remain not because they didn't want to remain, but because only Christians (and on a sidenote, Jews, too) could inhabit the principalities. Those that converted were of course integrated and such is the case for Buceag, which now mostly lies in Ukraine. The only Muslims that were permitted to wander the lands were merchants and officials. So you see, it is you who are dumb, because you probably thought of your country where the Muslim Turk ruled over you and deflowered your virgins. DUMB f**k reread what you posted. We were discussing the Cumans. They in your first sentance is reference to the Cumans. So I bold what you stupid f**k wrote so everyone can see you implied the Cumans were muslims thats why they "moved" out of Romania (eventhough there are countless placenames in roma state derived from the name cuman). I know its hard to follow a roma, but come on: read what you post imbecile. Dear Retard No 2, this is what you previously posted: "if the Bulgarians are distant relatives to the modern Turks, Mongols, Tatars, Huns, then you must be their brothers. As Ruse pointed out, its your country where every single turkic people passed from asia to europe... actually there are info on such people, not on you as we all know."As you can see, you brought up the whole Turkic family and referred to it, not just the Cumans.
|
|
ioan
Amicus
Posts: 4,162
|
nicetas
Feb 22, 2012 1:00:54 GMT -5
Post by ioan on Feb 22, 2012 1:00:54 GMT -5
Dear imbecile, you were answering to this post by ivo:
Could you be more dumber? The answer is no, you ve hit a rock bottom. Such stupidity can not be measured!!! Obviously your answer was not about the Turkics in general, but the Cumans, nice try though romaLe!
|
|
|
nicetas
Feb 22, 2012 1:11:59 GMT -5
Post by Anittas on Feb 22, 2012 1:11:59 GMT -5
Dear imbecile, you were answering to this post by ivo: Could you be more dumber? The answer is no, you ve hit a rock bottom. Such stupidity can not be measured!!! Obviously your answer was not about the Turkics in general, but the Cumans, nice try though romaLe! Haha, you retards are hysterical. No, Ioan, the part where I mentioned that the Turkic people couldn't settle on Romanian soil because of religious differences (post 163) was a reply to you (post 162). Yes, it all started with Ivo mentioning a bunch of crap about Turkic people (post 158), where he also made a fool of himself by saying that " Tatar' is a term that was originally used to label all peoples that were subjugated by the Mongols, much like the term 'Barbarian' has been used to label all non-Romans or non-Christians"; that triggered by reply in post 159 where I defused his erroneous statements; you then joined your retard friend in post 161 and 162, which triggered my reply in post 163. I know it's difficult to follow up on all that. Ivo has the same problem. Say, are you two twins?
|
|
ioan
Amicus
Posts: 4,162
|
nicetas
Feb 22, 2012 9:21:32 GMT -5
Post by ioan on Feb 22, 2012 9:21:32 GMT -5
I dont know your "inner world", "your intention" etc. I look at the forum objectively. I see you replied to Ivo about the Cumans. Weather you subjectively wanted to refer to the Cumans or the Turks is another matter and it goes to show how "clear" your posts are.
|
|
ivo
Amicus
Posts: 2,712
|
nicetas
Feb 22, 2012 11:10:34 GMT -5
Post by ivo on Feb 22, 2012 11:10:34 GMT -5
Point made. Anittas is a semi-literate Gypsy.
|
|
|
nicetas
Feb 22, 2012 11:12:24 GMT -5
Post by Anittas on Feb 22, 2012 11:12:24 GMT -5
Point made you and Ioan are two retards who can't follow a thread and make erroneous statements. You should end your misery.
|
|
ivo
Amicus
Posts: 2,712
|
nicetas
Feb 22, 2012 11:13:27 GMT -5
Post by ivo on Feb 22, 2012 11:13:27 GMT -5
^ Why all the hate bro. You'll live a better life if you hate less.
|
|
ioan
Amicus
Posts: 4,162
|
nicetas
Feb 22, 2012 13:18:50 GMT -5
Post by ioan on Feb 22, 2012 13:18:50 GMT -5
Uou, I m still amazed by the Fukky impudence: he cant write properly in a forum yet he calls others stupid.
|
|
|
nicetas
Feb 22, 2012 13:19:49 GMT -5
Post by Anittas on Feb 22, 2012 13:19:49 GMT -5
You and Ioan are doing all the hate, I'm merely reacting. Romania wanted to be your friend, but you spit in our face. You keep spitting in our face. After liberating you, you turned your dagger against us.
|
|
ioan
Amicus
Posts: 4,162
|
nicetas
Feb 22, 2012 13:29:12 GMT -5
Post by ioan on Feb 22, 2012 13:29:12 GMT -5
Please. I have lots of friends who are Romanians, I ve been over 5 times in Romania and I ve always enjoyed it. YOU ARE the problem... the majority of the Romanians are great. Both people have nothing to quarel about at this point. Well, thats not the case obviously in your sick mind!!!
|
|
|
nicetas
Feb 22, 2012 13:30:39 GMT -5
Post by uz on Feb 22, 2012 13:30:39 GMT -5
Anittas is alright, he just needs someone to duke it out with time to time.
|
|
ivo
Amicus
Posts: 2,712
|
nicetas
Feb 22, 2012 13:40:38 GMT -5
Post by ivo on Feb 22, 2012 13:40:38 GMT -5
Anittas is an ignorant turd. Read more of his posts and you'll come to the same conclusion.
|
|
|
nicetas
Feb 22, 2012 13:41:36 GMT -5
Post by uz on Feb 22, 2012 13:41:36 GMT -5
The guy needs help in other areas, Illyria forums has no place there. lol
|
|
|
nicetas
Feb 22, 2012 13:51:49 GMT -5
Post by Anittas on Feb 22, 2012 13:51:49 GMT -5
Ivo, you idiot, you have no true knowledge of your history and the history of your neighbors, yet you act like a blood authority on the subject. You make a fool of yourself every time you open your mouth! And if history is your best subject, I wouldn't want to know about your general knowledge in other areas. I don't think you would hold up well in a discussion on subjects such as literature, movies, politics (other than some BS opinions), art, etc.
|
|
ioan
Amicus
Posts: 4,162
|
nicetas
Feb 22, 2012 13:58:28 GMT -5
Post by ioan on Feb 22, 2012 13:58:28 GMT -5
fuckittas stfu u re incompetent in intepreting a simple fact, plus i wouldnt call your usage of sources history, rather sciencefiction.
|
|