|
Post by Novus Dis on Mar 10, 2012 22:08:18 GMT -5
Why do Serbs keep talking about legality? Shqiptars only respect and understand power. The only way to negotiate with the Shqiptar is by smashing his head against the pavement.
|
|
|
Post by uz on Mar 10, 2012 22:19:02 GMT -5
"in a landlocked country devoid of hope and a future like serbia, conpiracy theories have found a breeding ground and are spreading like wildfire." atd, you spin so much crap like the Bulgars here. Can you do us a favour and source your claims, is it hard? he wouldn't know where to start, he just repeats the village gossip he hears going around.
|
|
Kralj Vatra
Amicus
Warning: Sometimes uses foul language & insults!!!
20%
Posts: 9,814
|
Post by Kralj Vatra on Mar 10, 2012 23:48:28 GMT -5
There is similar system for bus transportation Old one vs new: Greeks would take 10x of the money to implement the new system and still have the old one. This is the highest tech we can get: Those b1tches keep whining how in London they have a better system, but no one told them that Istanbul/Sofia/Belgrade/Zagreb/Sarajevo ARE ALSO MORE ADVANCED TECH-WISE.
|
|
|
Post by Moe Lester on Mar 11, 2012 0:04:50 GMT -5
and its harder to escape from there as well... it is harder to conquer your immediate neighbors, etc... Loads of lands got germanized or slavicized in mainland europe.. (especially slavicized) How many countries did the mighty japanese japanify? no one. Now how many neighboring countries did the english, englify? not even their own island... (see wales, cornwall, etc..) English managed to anglify only remote places with cavemen indigenous populations, nothing harder than that. on the contrary, more than once, Serbs, completely Serbified all of balkans.... Pyrros, they're aim wasn't to "Anglicise" or "Nipponise" anyone. How many times (and for how many years) has England and Japan been occupied or colonised compared to landlocked countries suck as Belarus, Serbia, Macedonia, Hungary, etc. It's not just whether a country is land-locked or sea-locked, but also their technology and level of culture. The Japanese and English have a higher culture (for lack of a better word).
|
|
Kralj Vatra
Amicus
Warning: Sometimes uses foul language & insults!!!
20%
Posts: 9,814
|
Post by Kralj Vatra on Mar 11, 2012 1:00:31 GMT -5
Of course it was. Japan has made numerous unsuccessful attempts to japanify Korea/parts of China, and England also numerous attempts to anglify the nearby Isles/Normandie. Ireland was the best they got.
Now look at the Serbian toponyms in south greece/hungary/romania and take a second thought.
PS
Come on, lets be serious here, the recent Fukusima disaster and the inadequate manner that the Jap state handled the problem of the refugees (trying to relocate them in Korea/America and still failing) is another symptom of the inefficiencies of being sea-locked.
|
|
|
Post by uz on Mar 11, 2012 12:30:43 GMT -5
You can't be serious in blaming the incompetence of the aftermath on being sea-locked. There's a lot more to it, and none of it have to do with being sea-locked.
Whether a nation is land-locked or sea-locked doesn't matter anymore. Technology today surpasses any obstacle as such.
|
|
|
Post by vinjak on Mar 11, 2012 21:39:23 GMT -5
Whether a nation is land-locked or sea-locked doesn't matter anymore. Technology today surpasses any obstacle as such
100 % True
|
|
Kralj Vatra
Amicus
Warning: Sometimes uses foul language & insults!!!
20%
Posts: 9,814
|
Post by Kralj Vatra on Mar 12, 2012 1:02:31 GMT -5
^^^ you take technology for granted. And that's a mistake. Only those not "vulnerable" to technology will survive. As long as earth stands where it is, and humans supposed to live on it, the nations of the earth/soil (Slavs) are meant to survive. Technology comes and goes. The earth/land stands.
Also, i have proved that land-locked countries have a much bigger chance of influencing their neighbors rather than sea-locked.
PS that said, CG is Serbia for funks sake. (Not that Croatian cost is any different). IIRC, the oldest cyrilllic script i think is from dubrovnik.
|
|
|
Post by uz on Mar 12, 2012 16:56:19 GMT -5
Sea-locked countries are more vulnerable to nature, especially by the coast lines. That's the only drawback I see nowadays regarding being sea-locked, maybe that's what you mean. While land-locked nations are not as vulnerable to tsumanies or other forms of natural disasters.
|
|
atdhetar
Amicus
tonight we dine in hell!
Posts: 3,124
|
Post by atdhetar on Mar 12, 2012 19:07:58 GMT -5
Why do Serbs keep talking about legality? Shqiptars only respect and understand power. The only way to negotiate with the Shqiptar is by smashing his head against the pavement.
|
|
|
Post by Novus Dis on Mar 12, 2012 23:06:36 GMT -5
Why do Serbs keep talking about legality? Shqiptars only respect and understand power. The only way to negotiate with the Shqiptar is by smashing his head against the pavement. Do you disagree? Shqiptar history, and current events, proves me right.
|
|
|
Post by Shqipni13 on Mar 12, 2012 23:37:55 GMT -5
^Do something about hero otherwise STFU, you mutt!
|
|
|
Post by Moe Lester on Mar 13, 2012 0:23:54 GMT -5
Do you disagree? Shqiptar history, and current events, proves me right. Not to cause some controversial argument or anything, but didn't a Serb start "The War to end all Wars?
|
|
|
Post by Caslav Klonimirovic on Mar 13, 2012 5:17:50 GMT -5
Do you disagree? Shqiptar history, and current events, proves me right. Not to cause some controversial argument or anything, but didn't a Serb start "The War to end all Wars? I'm not sure if you are getting a kick out of being stupid or what? Do you genuinely believe that a Serb is responsible for WW1? The single act of violence committed by Gavrilo Princip had the aim of gaining independence for his people, not for starting an entire world war. Do you not think you are making a simplistic and offensive conclusion with this statement? Maybe you are trying to advocate chaos theory here or something?
|
|
atdhetar
Amicus
tonight we dine in hell!
Posts: 3,124
|
Post by atdhetar on Mar 13, 2012 5:43:13 GMT -5
Do you disagree? Shqiptar history, and current events, proves me right. lol, i am glad you mentioned history, because if my recent memory serves me right the only way to settle a dispute with the serb is by dropping sky candy over their bridges, you've been reserved that very same treatment in kosovo and bosnia, the only way to negotiate with the serb is pointing a laser-guided missile towards his household.
|
|
|
Post by Moe Lester on Mar 14, 2012 3:45:55 GMT -5
I'm not sure if you are getting a kick out of being stupid or what? Do you genuinely believe that a Serb is responsible for WW1? The single act of violence committed by Gavrilo Princip had the aim of gaining independence for his people, not for starting an entire world war. Do you not think you are making a simplistic and offensive conclusion with this statement? Maybe you are trying to advocate chaos theory here or something? I'm not saying that was his intention, but his act of violence did start the First World War.
|
|
|
Post by Novus Dis on Mar 14, 2012 16:28:58 GMT -5
Do you disagree? Shqiptar history, and current events, proves me right. Not to cause some controversial argument or anything, but didn't a Serb start "The War to end all Wars? I'm not sure if you are getting a kick out of being stupid or what? Do you genuinely believe that a Serb is responsible for WW1? The single act of violence committed by Gavrilo Princip had the aim of gaining independence for his people, not for starting an entire world war. Do you not think you are making a simplistic and offensive conclusion with this statement? Maybe you are trying to advocate chaos theory here or something? I'm not saying that was his intention, but his act of violence did start the First World War. No, that was the leaders of Austria. They're the ones who invaded Serbia which triggered the whole thing. Though, to be fair, it only become a world war when Germany invaded Belgium. Glad to have taught you some history. Do you disagree? Shqiptar history, and current events, proves me right. lol, i am glad you mentioned history, because if my recent memory serves me right the only way to settle a dispute with the serb is by dropping sky candy over their bridges, you've been reserved that very same treatment in kosovo and bosnia, the only way to negotiate with the serb is pointing a laser-guided missile towards his household. I'm going to need five tons of tissues for this Shqiptar, ASAP! Don't worry, Shqiptar. You can dry your tears on the tissues that are coming. In the meantime, you can cry me a river.
|
|
|
Post by Moe Lester on Mar 15, 2012 1:05:44 GMT -5
No, that was the leaders of Austria. They're the ones who invaded Serbia which triggered the whole thing. Though, to be fair, it only become a world war when Germany invaded Belgium. I'm aware that Austria-Hungary was going to war anyway, but that doesn't excuse the actions of Princip and his gang.
|
|
|
Post by Novus Dis on Mar 15, 2012 15:53:30 GMT -5
No, that was the leaders of Austria. They're the ones who invaded Serbia which triggered the whole thing. Though, to be fair, it only become a world war when Germany invaded Belgium. I'm aware that Austria-Hungary was going to war anyway, but that doesn't excuse the actions of Princip and his gang. You're right. I'm pretty sure that Austria's annexation of Bosnia and their mistreatment of Serbs excuses Young Bosnia. And I have no idea why you'd think that something after the fact would excuse said fact.
|
|
atdhetar
Amicus
tonight we dine in hell!
Posts: 3,124
|
Post by atdhetar on Mar 15, 2012 17:34:07 GMT -5
I'm going to need five tons of tissues for this Shqiptar, ASAP! Don't worry, Shqiptar. You can dry your tears on the tissues that are coming. In the meantime, you can cry me a river. oh look, its raining chocolate chip cookies over belgrade
|
|