|
Post by armani on Sept 16, 2012 7:41:39 GMT -5
;D Back to Kirigizstan for you, OR, to the Bu Lgarska mountain range in Kirgizistan LMAO Say this to Milan Stankovic or Jelena Jankovic. ;D ;D Ofcourse you are Turko-Slav, the name BULGARia IS NOT INDO-EUROPEAN to begin with. To take this name MEANS your a decendant from them, YOU ACKNOWLEDGE they are your forefathers! PS Gypsies are technically closer to EUROPEANS than you Slavo-Turks! The problem is that we lack East Asian haplogroups, while you have the South Asian (Gypsy) ones.
|
|
|
Post by Novi Pazar on Sept 16, 2012 7:42:38 GMT -5
^ OK Armani LMAO
PS To be a Slavo-Turk is not something to be proud of LMAO
|
|
|
Post by Novi Pazar on Sept 17, 2012 1:38:57 GMT -5
Bulgars lack East Asian halogroups? Then all the while its been noted by athropologists that 5% or 1 in 20 Bulgar looks like a central asian hybrid. You haven't answered why North Indians, i.e, Brahmans and Punjabis have a higher rate of Aryan (R1a) than Europeans themselves? Something interesting to note my young hypernationalist Slavo-Turk: " R1a and R1a1a are believed to have originated somewhere within Eurasia, most likely in the area from Eastern Europe to South Asia. Several recent studies have proposed that South Asia is the most likely region of origin. But on the other hand, as will be discussed below, some researchers continue to treat modern Indian R1a as being largely due to immigration from the Central Eurasian steppes or Southwestern Asia." South AsiaIn India, high percentage of this haplogroup is observed in West Bengal Brahmins ( 72%) [10] to the east, Konkanastha Brahmins ( 48%) [10] to the west, Khatris ( 67%)[2] in north and Iyenger Brahmins (31%) [10] of south. It has also been found in several South Indian Dravidian-speaking Adivasis including the Chenchu (26%) and the Valmikis of Andhra Pradesh and the Kallar of Tamil Nadu suggesting that M17 is widespread in Tribal Southern Indians.[11] Besides these, studies show high percentages in regionally diverse groups such as Manipuris ( 50%)[2] to the extreme North East and in Punjab (47%)[11] to the extreme North West. In Pakistan it is found at 71% among the Mohanna tribe in Sindh province to the south and 46% among the Baltis of Gilgit-Baltistan to the north.[2] While 13% of Sinhalese of Sri Lanka were found to be R1a1a (R-M17) positive.[11] Hindus of Terai region of Nepal show it at 69%.[12] In Afghanistan, R1a1a (R-M17) is found at 51.02% among the Pashtuns (the largest ethnic group in Afghanistan) and 30.36% among the Tajiks, but it is less frequent among the Hazaras (6.67%) and the Turkic-speaking Uzbeks (17.65%) Europe In Europe, R1a, again almost entirely in the R1a1a sub-clade, is found at highest levels among peoples of Eastern European descent (Sorbs, Poles, Russians and Ukrainians; 50 to 65%)en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Haplogroup_R1a_%28Y-DNA%29PS Serbs DIRECTLY decend from Sorbs/wends/serb!
|
|
Kralj Vatra
Amicus
Warning: Sometimes uses foul language & insults!!!
20%
Posts: 9,814
|
Post by Kralj Vatra on Sept 17, 2012 2:00:44 GMT -5
Novi bro, we should eliminate this albanian armani, but we should not spoil relations with the most pro-Serb nation in the balkans. That is a clear suicide.
|
|
Kralj Vatra
Amicus
Warning: Sometimes uses foul language & insults!!!
20%
Posts: 9,814
|
Post by Kralj Vatra on Sept 17, 2012 2:07:31 GMT -5
also let us rape this arbani once more : the dark parts in western bulgaria (20-30%) is where Serbs used to rule... Also standard south serbian Ekavica/Stokavica is spoken in those ex-serbian lands.
|
|
|
Post by Novi Pazar on Sept 17, 2012 2:23:12 GMT -5
^ Brate, this contradicting teenage hypernationalist, tells me Serbs are highly mixed with Gypsies, while studies have concluded Slavs and North Indians, plus to a lesser degree South Indians, have a high incidence of R1a, but Bulgari are pure Indo-European Aryans? Then this hypernationalst Armani tells me Serbs have more Gypsies than BuLgarska? However, BuLgarska has more Gypsies than Serbia, much more! Then this self diluded teenager tells me Serbs have more Turkic looking individuals then BuLgarska, while intellects/athropologists also concluded that 5% (1 in 20) of the Bulgarian racial pool looks like a Turanid or central asian Mongol/Caucasian mix.....what next, Bulgars are pure blonds with blue eyed slavs, and all slavs originated from these Slavo-Turks?
|
|
|
Post by armani on Sept 17, 2012 5:11:41 GMT -5
^ Brate, this contradicting teenage hypernationalist, tells me Serbs are highly mixed with Gypsies, while studies have concluded Slavs and North Indians, plus to a lesser degree South Indians, have a high incidence of R1a, but Bulgari are pure Indo-European Aryans? Like i said, i prefer to be Q Mongoloid than R1a South Asian. Look the brown part of the Serbian diagram. That's the gypsy in you. Then this hypernationalst Armani tells me Serbs have more Gypsies than BuLgarska? However, BuLgarska has more Gypsies than Serbia, much more! DNA tests say otherwise. I have facts, you have butthurt whining. Then this self diluded teenager tells me Serbs have more Turkic looking individuals then BuLgarska, while intellects/athropologists also concluded that 5% (1 in 20) of the Bulgarian racial pool looks like a Turanid or central asian Mongol/Caucasian mix I don't know Bulgarian celebirty which looks Mongoloid like Jelena Jankovic and Milan Stankovic. And again, we lack East Asian haplogroups, the map i posted 100 times prove my point. .....what next, Bulgars are pure blonds with blue eyed slavs, and all slavs originated from these Slavo-Turks? No, but we are blonder than Serbs, that's for sure.
|
|
|
Post by armani on Sept 17, 2012 5:13:59 GMT -5
but we should not spoil relations with the most pro-Serb nation in the balkans. lol
|
|
Kralj Vatra
Amicus
Warning: Sometimes uses foul language & insults!!!
20%
Posts: 9,814
|
Post by Kralj Vatra on Sept 17, 2012 6:23:21 GMT -5
No, but we are blonder than Serbs, that's for sure.
|
|
Kralj Vatra
Amicus
Warning: Sometimes uses foul language & insults!!!
20%
Posts: 9,814
|
Post by Kralj Vatra on Sept 17, 2012 6:26:45 GMT -5
|
|
|
Post by armani on Sept 17, 2012 6:44:19 GMT -5
^They are more European than Milan Stankovic and Jelena Jankovic.
|
|
|
Post by armani on Sept 17, 2012 6:47:53 GMT -5
BTW, posting pics of woggy celebrities is useless.
Haplogroups prove that Serbs have much more non-Euro (gypsy) blood than Bulgarians.
|
|
Kralj Vatra
Amicus
Warning: Sometimes uses foul language & insults!!!
20%
Posts: 9,814
|
Post by Kralj Vatra on Sept 17, 2012 7:48:53 GMT -5
BTW, posting pics of woggy celebrities is useless. Haplogroups prove that Serbs have much more non-Euro (gypsy) blood than Bulgarians. LMAO, like haplogroup I2? in the mean time, more bulgo celebrities : lol
|
|
Kralj Vatra
Amicus
Warning: Sometimes uses foul language & insults!!!
20%
Posts: 9,814
|
Post by Kralj Vatra on Sept 17, 2012 7:50:39 GMT -5
More bulgarian beauties : Balgariya do Indiya!
|
|
Kralj Vatra
Amicus
Warning: Sometimes uses foul language & insults!!!
20%
Posts: 9,814
|
Post by Kralj Vatra on Sept 17, 2012 7:51:52 GMT -5
btw, the two serbs you posted are 1000 times whiter than the blonder bulgarian.. lol
|
|
|
Post by armani on Sept 17, 2012 11:17:15 GMT -5
BTW, posting pics of woggy celebrities is useless. Haplogroups prove that Serbs have much more non-Euro (gypsy) blood than Bulgarians. LMAO, like haplogroup I2? No, like haplogroup T (the gypsy haplogroup).
|
|
|
Post by ulf on Sept 17, 2012 15:01:09 GMT -5
Its useless to argue, Bulgarians being mostly of South Mediterranean stock are darker than Serbs who can sometimes be of Northern Mediterranean stock. On other side Serbia has more blonder Alpines, Nordoids, Baltids and Cro-Magnon types, than Bulgaria. Actually, talking about UP types Bulgaria just has here and there some Alpines(mostly) and few Baltids(quite rare)
|
|
Kralj Vatra
Amicus
Warning: Sometimes uses foul language & insults!!!
20%
Posts: 9,814
|
Post by Kralj Vatra on Sept 17, 2012 15:20:14 GMT -5
After two months in Bulg, i can say with certainty that, in comparison with the greeks, the urban population in Bulgaria *might* be a little blonder than the greeks, at certain place/time spots, but on average the mean greek is WHITER than the mean bulgarian. Now regarding, the rural population, things are getting more extreme... Bulgarian in the country are MUCH MUCH MUCH darker than the provincial Greeks.
South Serbia is just an normalized version of Bulgarians, more blonds, still lots of meds (darker than greeks).
Sumadija+north ppl start to get bigger and with different facial structure. But still loads of standard (tallish) serbian types in south Serbia as well.
Bulgaria??? hmmm the tallest ppl i saw were the guys from the national voley team.... nothing spectacular regarding heights... smth very close to greeks, or even shorter (judging by policemen, ppl on the street etc....)
In the company the biggest guy was .... spanish and he was smth less than 195....
When in Serbs, almost 1 out of 20/50 young men is taller than 200cm....
(not to talk about BiH/Herc/CG)
|
|
|
Post by ulf on Sept 17, 2012 15:31:20 GMT -5
After two months in Bulg, i can say with certainty that, in comparison with the greeks, the urban population in Bulgaria *might* be a little blonder than the greeks, at certain place/time spots, but on average the mean greek is WHITER than the mean bulgarian. Now regarding, the rural population, things are getting more extreme... Bulgarian in the country are MUCH MUCH MUCH darker than the provincial Greeks. South Serbia is just an normalized version of Bulgarians, more blonds, still lots of meds (darker than greeks). Sumadija+north ppl start to get bigger and with different facial structure. But still loads of standard (tallish) serbian types in south Serbia as well. Bulgaria??? hmmm the tallest ppl i saw were the guys from the national voley team.... nothing spectacular regarding heights... smth very close to greeks, or even shorter (judging by policemen, ppl on the street etc....) In the company the biggest guy was .... spanish and he was smth less than 195.... When in Serbs, almost 1 out of 20/50 young men is taller than 200cm.... (not to talk about BiH/Herc/CG) Actually South Serbia has Alpines in huge amounts, not so much Mediterraneans. They can have black hairs sometimes so it might give you Mediterranean vibe, but they have more circular, round heads with pronounced jaw Also, in Belgrade, its about 1 in 15 who is taller than 2 m, judging by my high school friends
|
|
|
Post by valmir on Sept 17, 2012 15:42:00 GMT -5
When i was much younger i always thought Bulgarians are white and blonde just like the Russians
|
|