|
Post by greenemperor on Dec 15, 2012 19:07:54 GMT -5
Romanians are the autochthonous inhabitants of Transylvania, originating from the fusion of Dacians and Roman colonists. This view was upheld by the following historians:
Guglielmo Ferraro, Victor Chapot, Dr. Julius Jung, J. Thumann, Giovanni Antonio Magini, Johann Troester, Thibault Lefebre, A. de Gerando, Leopold von Ranke, Traugott Tamm, Fr. Miklositch, Paul Hunfalvy, G. Lacour-Gayet, Em. de Martonne, Hippolyte Desprez, and even Pope Pius II.
The ironic thing is that none of this historians is Romanian. ;D
|
|
|
Post by littleboyfatman on Dec 15, 2012 22:43:37 GMT -5
romanians blood can be traced down to the devil himself...
|
|
|
Post by greenemperor on Dec 16, 2012 11:47:37 GMT -5
Oh yeah, and who can Albanians' blood be traced down to?
|
|
|
Post by Ceanglid Desdemon on Dec 16, 2012 11:58:26 GMT -5
|
|
|
Post by littleboyfatman on Dec 16, 2012 21:32:17 GMT -5
Oh yeah, and who can Albanians' blood be traced down to? the father of the devil himself...
|
|
kun
Membrum
Posts: 52
|
Post by kun on May 19, 2013 7:44:21 GMT -5
The main area of the Balkan interior where a Latin-speaking population may have continued, in both towns and country, after the Slav invasion, has already been mentioned: it included the upper Morava valley, northern Macedonia, and the whole of Kosovo. It is, therefore, in the uplands of the Kosovo area (particularly, but not only, on the western side, including parts of Montenegro) that this Albanian-Vlach symbiosis probably developed. [71] All the evidence comes together at this point. What it suggests is that the Kosovo region, together with at least part of northern Albania, was the crucial focus of two distinct but interlinked ethnic histories: the survival of the Albanians, and the emergence of the Romanians and Vlachs. One large group of Vlachs seems to have broken away and moved southwards by the ninth or tenth century; the proto-Romanians stayed in contact with Albanians significantly longer, before drifting north-eastwards, and crossing the Danube in the twelfth century. Kosovo, Origins: Serbs, Albanians and Vlachs - Noel Malcolm www.promacedonia.org/en/nm/kosovo.html
|
|
|
Post by amateurs on May 20, 2013 3:30:16 GMT -5
The main area of the Balkan interior where a Latin-speaking population may have continued, in both towns and country, after the Slav invasion, has already been mentioned: it included the upper Morava valley, northern Macedonia, and the whole of Kosovo. It is, therefore, in the uplands of the Kosovo area (particularly, but not only, on the western side, including parts of Montenegro) that this Albanian-Vlach symbiosis probably developed. [71] All the evidence comes together at this point. What it suggests is that the Kosovo region, together with at least part of northern Albania, was the crucial focus of two distinct but interlinked ethnic histories: the survival of the Albanians, and the emergence of the Romanians and Vlachs. One large group of Vlachs seems to have broken away and moved southwards by the ninth or tenth century; the proto-Romanians stayed in contact with Albanians significantly longer, before drifting north-eastwards, and crossing the Danube in the twelfth century. Kosovo, Origins: Serbs, Albanians and Vlachs - Noel Malcolm www.promacedonia.org/en/nm/kosovo.html Cute, but sources mention the presence of Vlach-speaking population north of Danube earlier than 12th century. All this stuff has been debated in the past, with several sources mentioned. No need to revive that discussion, since no one is here to discuss it.
|
|
kun
Membrum
Posts: 52
|
Post by kun on May 23, 2013 5:40:58 GMT -5
No they don't, not accurate contemporary sources. Still holding the fort, what a deserted place these forums are, anittas.
|
|
|
Post by amateurs on May 24, 2013 4:28:02 GMT -5
Contemporary sources would be sources written in our era.
Vlachs in what is now Moldavia are mentioned on a rune stone from the 11th century.
I don't know why you have to look at Kosovo when you had a Vlach state in Bulgaria.
|
|
kun
Membrum
Posts: 52
|
Post by kun on May 26, 2013 8:28:01 GMT -5
let me rephrase it, contemporary archeological and historical research and investigation...the world is not as flat as your head, anittas.
|
|
|
Post by amateurs on May 26, 2013 9:53:31 GMT -5
The world is not flat at all, which is a good thing because it makes travel easier, and with it, the spread of new ideas. en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Blakumen
|
|
|
Post by Catcher in the Rye on May 26, 2013 16:26:26 GMT -5
More important questions are: Why did Hungarians left Mongolia? and How badly did you miss it? I'm not really interested in the answers, though.
|
|
|
Post by amateurs on May 27, 2013 6:00:40 GMT -5
omg, wtf is that! I had to turn it off! omg!
|
|
kun
Membrum
Posts: 52
|
Post by kun on May 27, 2013 8:17:19 GMT -5
"Why did Hungarians left Mongolia?"
To be honest I don't know why, maybe you should ask your ENGLISH teacher. You should hook that mongolian beauty up with ....your uncle.
|
|
kun
Membrum
Posts: 52
|
Post by kun on May 27, 2013 8:32:49 GMT -5
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Blakumen
Yeah thats pretty far north of the danube, you people really got around. Maybe they'll find vlach artifacts before the vikings in north america.
|
|
|
Post by Catcher in the Rye on May 27, 2013 15:06:06 GMT -5
Titulescu looked like a Chinese. Chinese are fine people unlike Mongolians.
|
|
|
Post by amateurs on May 27, 2013 19:13:37 GMT -5
Titulescu was of Tatar origin, just like our president, Basescu, is. This is not a problem. We are good at assimilating our minorities. For instance, once they were 2 million, now they are much less.
|
|
|
Post by diurpaneus on Jul 25, 2013 2:01:39 GMT -5
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Blakumen Yeah thats pretty far north of the danube, you people really got around. Maybe they'll find vlach artifacts before the vikings in north america. Holgos te kis fasz
|
|
|
Post by williamdbrown on May 22, 2016 13:58:20 GMT -5
It's working double
|
|
|
Post by williamdbrown on May 22, 2016 13:59:24 GMT -5
yes indeed they are
|
|