|
Post by Balkaneros on Jan 18, 2013 10:37:33 GMT -5
You find this offensive? Regrettable attempts at twisting meaning of song www.tanjug.rs/news/73412/regrettable-attempts-at-twisting-meaning-of-song.htmlyou soar brats... we fought for your independance after we were already liberated... go to Albania the original Ottoman creation you're in SLAVIC LANDS!!!! Bosniaks protest over Serbian WW1-era song www.b92.net/eng/news/society-article.php?yyyy=2013&mm=01&dd=18&nav_id=84220keep protesting you failed creation of a nation it's all you can do in a democracy, so with live it ! What's going on here... Drina March by Vienna philharmonic orchestra... why don't you take your s**t up with the Austrians? Check the crowd you spoiled pups... the world recognizes our accomplishments not yours, you left us remember. Zivela SRBIJA The worlds' Leaders and their people listen to our epics, and Ban Ki-Moon says: "Hvala Srbiju" ...
|
|
|
Post by Balkaneros on Jan 18, 2013 10:41:40 GMT -5
Serbia vs. Austria soccer match....
WE"LL NEVER FORGET!
|
|
|
Post by Balkaneros on Jan 18, 2013 17:24:51 GMT -5
|
|
|
Post by Balkaneros on Jan 19, 2013 20:04:39 GMT -5
|
|
|
Post by littleboyfatman on Jan 19, 2013 21:37:31 GMT -5
you stil hate bosnians?
even after what you did to them?
|
|
|
Post by Balkaneros on Jan 19, 2013 22:08:50 GMT -5
you stil hate bosnians? even after what you did to them? We're not the ones who carry hate, they are. Check the bafoonery they tried to cause at the UN. lmao!
|
|
|
Post by Skroz on Jan 23, 2013 8:21:44 GMT -5
The problem was that Jeremić chose a song of war to be a 'song of peace'. The guy messed up.
|
|
|
Post by littleboyfatman on Jan 23, 2013 9:06:20 GMT -5
You find this offensive? Regrettable attempts at twisting meaning of song www.tanjug.rs/news/73412/regrettable-attempts-at-twisting-meaning-of-song.htmlyou soar brats... we fought for your independance after we were already liberated... go to Albania the original Ottoman creation you're in SLAVIC LANDS!!!! Bosniaks protest over Serbian WW1-era song www.b92.net/eng/news/society-article.php?yyyy=2013&mm=01&dd=18&nav_id=84220keep protesting you failed creation of a nation it's all you can do in a democracy, so with live it ! What's going on here... Drina March by Vienna philharmonic orchestra... why don't you take your s**t up with the Austrians? Check the crowd you spoiled pups... the world recognizes our accomplishments not yours, you left us remember. Zivela SRBIJA The worlds' Leaders and their people listen to our epics, and Ban Ki-Moon says: "Hvala Srbiju" ...
what is drin?
|
|
|
Post by Balkaneros on Mar 10, 2013 15:01:45 GMT -5
NEW YORK -- UN General Assembly President Vuk Jeremić has said that those who do not want the truth to be told are getting nervous ahead of a debate on the Hague Tribunal. He responded on Saturday to the appeal from the Congress of North American Bosniaks and the Advisory Council for Bosnia-Herzegovina sent to U.S. Ambassador to the UN Susan Rice by saying it was obvious there those who did not want truth to be revealed were becoming increasingly nervous ahead of the debate on April 10.
The Bosniak associations from North America asked Rice on Saturday to censor Jeremić urgently and call off the UN debate on the Hague Tribunal scheduled for April 10. Check out the hypocracy being demonstrated by the Bosniaks... "they" want to be recognized, "they" want the acknowledgement but "they" do not beleive anyone else has this right. So instead of battling it out WITH FACTS, they go to mother America and cry like a baby begging FOR THEM to stop the SERBS.
Notice how the Muslim Europeans have the tendency to behave the same and not knowing what the true meaning of justice is. “There is obviously growing nervousness in those who do not like the fact that the truth will be presented on the UN stage,” Jeremić pointed out.
“The preparations for the debate on international criminal judiciary set for April 10 are in the final stages,” he noted, adding that pressure was being ignored.
“The morning part of the debate will allow UN members to present their national views, including Bosnia-Herzegovina,” the UNGA president told Tanjug. The two Bosniak associations told Rice that Jeremić had bad intentions towards the Hague Tribunal and advocated the “Serbian nationalist program”.
The associations expressed concern over the coming debate, which focuses on the work of the Hague Tribunal, Turkish Anadolu news agency has reported.www.b92.net/eng/news/politics-article.php?yyyy=2013&mm=03&dd=10&nav_id=85093I LMAO pretty hard when I read this;"The two Bosniak associations told Rice that Jeremić had bad intentions towards the Hague Tribunal and advocated the “Serbian nationalist program”It's like rex is their spokesman LOL !
|
|
|
Post by Balkaneros on Mar 10, 2013 16:00:06 GMT -5
The problem was that Jeremić chose a song of war to be a 'song of peace'. The guy messed up. During World War I, the river Drina (located on the border between Bosnia and Serbia) was the site of a bloody battle between the Austro-Hungarian army and the allied forces of the Serbian army, the Battle of Cer, from 16 August to 19 August 1914. The triumph of the Serbians over their numerically superior Austro-Hungarian opponents marked the first Allied victory over the Central Powers during the First World War. To honour the bravery of the fallen, the Serbian composer Stanislav Binički composed the "March on the Drina", "Mars na Drinu". This song has become a symbol of the bravery of the Serbs during the First World War.It's a song symbolizing bravery and a moment of victory for freedom.
|
|
|
Post by Skroz on Mar 12, 2013 0:21:52 GMT -5
During World War I, the river Drina (located on the border between Bosnia and Serbia) was the site of a bloody battle between the Austro-Hungarian army and the allied forces of the Serbian army, the Battle of Cer, from 16 August to 19 August 1914. The triumph of the Serbians over their numerically superior Austro-Hungarian opponents marked the first Allied victory over the Central Powers during the First World War. To honour the bravery of the fallen, the Serbian composer Stanislav Binički composed the "March on the Drina", "Mars na Drinu". This song has become a symbol of the bravery of the Serbs during the First World War.It's a song symbolizing bravery and a moment of victory for freedom. Nowhere in there did I see the word "Peace" or "non-violence". It's still a song of war. If Jeremić wanted a song of peace he could have chosen "Hajde Živeli"
|
|
|
Post by Balkaneros on May 26, 2013 15:14:08 GMT -5
Built To Fail: Should The International Community Allow Bosnia To Dissolve? by Zachary Gallant “The authorities in Republika Srpska have taken concrete actions which represent the most serious violation of the Dayton-Paris peace agreement that we have seen since the agreement was signed. The conclusions and the decision on the referendum… are not only a clear breach of the peace agreement but also put into question all laws — I repeat — all laws enacted by the respective high representatives, claiming they are in violation of the peace agreement.” With that statement, Bosnia’s High Representative Valentin Inzko declares the newly-proposed independence referendum by the Serb Republic an act of aggression, of provocation. His proclamation carries with it the full power of a disinterested and over-extended international community, the last flails of a dying institution no longer respected by any party under its authority, praying that the Serbs will not call its bluff. Calling the 1995 Dayton Accords a “Peace Agreement” is a fallacy and a travesty. Dayton was built to fail, a hasty bandage applied to a situation that had nearly bled out. That it has taken 15 years to show these emerging signs of collapse is nothing short of miraculous. That the High Representative is only now seeing how shaky the foundation upon which his institution was built is testament only to his self-delusion. Few Bosnian citizens trust the institution of the Bosnian state. The Serbs feel, often rightly, that the legal system is biased against them. The Croats feel, with powerful evidence to back their claim, that they are second-class, marginalized citizens within the Bosnian Federation. The Bosniaks themselves have little desire to share governance with the same Croat-Serb partnership responsible for the atrocities of the 90s. This was all obvious when I served as an election monitor in Brcko, the dividing line between Republika Srpska and the Bosnian Federation, in October of this past year. Almost 30,000 ethnic-non-Bosniaks were turned away from the polls, and the international observers were not permitted to monitor the vote count in its entirety. But Representative Inzko and his international cohorts applauded the election as free and fair, ignoring and denying the obvious breaches of democracy innate in the Dayton Accords and the laws that have emerged since. We as observers were supposedly strengthening the democratic process, laying the groundwork for a free future for the citizens of Bosnia and Herzegovina. But what good is an election if it only upholds the illusion of democracy? The civil war that could have precipitated from that election would have been at least partially on the “humanitarians” coming in for the festivities of the election. We strengthened the facade of freedom and gave continued legitimacy to the corrupt institutions of the Bosnian state and Dayton, allowing Mr. Inzko to feel entitled to his near-dictatorial position. His feeling of entitlement is obvious through his emphasis that the referendum’s most dangerous feature is that it will “put into question all laws — I repeat — all laws enacted by the respective high representatives, claiming they are in violation of the peace agreement”. But how could a people who claim to be in any way free not reject the authorities of an externally-appointed foreign High Representative? The Dayton Accords—the western-imposed treaty that ended the Bosnian war in an uneasy and unfair draw and left the country an ungovernable mess for fifteen years—are the crowning achievement of international bureaucracy. It’s such a Byzantine maze of backroom deals and bureaucracy that a friend of mine teaching International Law told his class “if you understand Dayton, leave now because you already know too much.” The legacy of Dayton and the High Representative is not peace but rather a long-term tentative stalemate, constantly on the verge of civil war and ethnic conflict. The political lines drawn by Dayton have left the nation (if you can call it that) divided on ethnic and religious lines and entirely reliant on foreign rule and foreign aid. Unlike most ethnically divided regions who make such choices themselves, Dayton has mandated ethnic division, with Bosniaks voting for the Bosnian representative, Serbs for the Serb, and Croats for the Croat, guaranteeing continued division.Before the war, the region was prosperous both agriculturally and industrially. Certainly, conflict has much to do with their fall from grace, but the division of Dayton has left a fragile, stagnating economy only supplemented by a bustling black market and with no hope of restoration or local redevelopment. The only aspect of the Bosnian economy that is thriving is the multi-billion-dollar district of high-priced hotels and restaurants in Sarajevo serving the UN, EU, NATO and OSCE “humanitarians,” with all the public rebuilding that comes with such war tourism. Yes, significant blame falls on the sectarian politicians profiting from the division and strife. But Bosnia’s systemic corruption relies on the Dayton framework, and responsibility can easily be shirked with blame placed on foreign occupiers, such as an all-powerful High Representative, an indefinite position created by Dayton. As the cracks show more and more visibly in the framework upon which the union of Bosnia-Herzegovina was built, the international community must come to terms with the reality that Dayton was built to fail. There are dangers in dissolution and disengagement. Most children in both Republika Srpska and the Bosnian Federation know from a young age how to clean, assemble and fire a rifle, and most families have at least one in the house. Paramilitary civil war is not out of the question, but it never has been, even under Dayton. But the militaries of both entities are declawed, leaving neutered states, incapable of the kind of violence witnessed in the 90s (of which no side is innocent). Dissolution is decried as a guaranteed path to war, but it is more likely that the violent nationalist rhetoric that plagues this failed union can only be mitigated by disengagement. As the dysfunctional, paralyzed non-state created at Dayton, there is only poverty, strife and ethnic tension. There is no future for a united Bosnia. conflictandcollaboration.wordpress.com/2011/05/16/built-to-fail-should-the-international-community-allow-bosnia-to-dissolve-by-zachary-gallant/Bosnia was created to fail, for eventual re-conquering by the EU - under the guise that "the Serbs are responsible". Which is ironic, because it is ONLY the Serbs who are actually going by the LAW/Agreement the West pushed on them in the FIRST PLACE. The hypocracy seen here is deafening. Why can't RS be seperate from Bosnia? Clearely the Muslims and Croats don't like us anyway so what's the issue? ... Since it's RS that is holding the whole "country" on their back economically, RS with Serbia would probably mean "too much" goodness and prosperity for the Serbs - and we all know the West don't like that. So ya, put an imaginary line and continue to lie to yourselves...
|
|