|
Post by Emperor AAdmin on Oct 2, 2014 19:39:24 GMT -5
|
|
|
Post by Emperor AAdmin on Oct 2, 2014 19:41:26 GMT -5
SOME REPLIES
|
|
|
Post by Jon Do on Oct 4, 2014 14:54:41 GMT -5
It was communism helping communism nothing else, do not mistake the "Soviet liberation" as a brotherly deed, those guys caused a lot of damage back then even Titoists were talking about it, only recently this s**t is changing. A Russian nationalist is different from a Soviet enthusiast.
|
|
rex362
Senior Moderator
Pellazg
PELASGIANILLYROALBANIAN
Posts: 19,058
|
Post by rex362 on Oct 4, 2014 17:11:36 GMT -5
I just hope Pyrros is the one that greets him as he gets off his plane ....
Pyrros : Welcome oh lord of all Slavdom .....(as Pyrros kneels down to kiss his American Super Bowl ring )
Putin : Go mor'e Malaka keep ,away from me you Albano-vlacho go fix your grandmothers roof (as Putin abruptly pulls his hand away )
|
|
|
Post by aussie75 on Oct 4, 2014 18:19:20 GMT -5
^ remember the love of Shqiptars stealing George Bush's watch in Albania?
|
|
Kralj Vatra
Amicus
Warning: Sometimes uses foul language & insults!!!
20%
Posts: 9,814
|
Post by Kralj Vatra on Oct 6, 2014 5:00:44 GMT -5
Anyway, If the two greatest balkan countries : Serbia and Bulgaria had any guts (and agreed its hard to have guts when the Saxons/Germans/Jews have bombed you to the ground), well they would send their regular armies to help liberate Ukraine, which is currently under Saxon/German/Nazi occupation. Only yesterday the western/NaziWO-backed fascists murdered women and children in cold blood, they bombed schools, kindergardens, hospitals.
But it seems all Serbia and Bulgaria can do is praise orthodox Saints and waive communist flags, as if this will do anything to the suffering Slavic population in occupied Ukraine.
|
|
rex362
Senior Moderator
Pellazg
PELASGIANILLYROALBANIAN
Posts: 19,058
|
Post by rex362 on Oct 6, 2014 11:32:50 GMT -5
you will be despised by europe for having russia openly colonize serbia and we Albanians hate you for selling our Nis for a shoebox full of rubles 25% unemployemt and your wasting dinars for rubles I hope serbia accidentally shoots down his plane thinking its a Malaysian airliner ...wtf that's one way to get russia to recognize Kosova..... and you would also be heroes for once in the last 1400 years of your residency in Illyria
|
|
rex362
Senior Moderator
Pellazg
PELASGIANILLYROALBANIAN
Posts: 19,058
|
Post by rex362 on Oct 7, 2014 9:01:46 GMT -5
wtf "All friends of Serbia invited to military parade" Source: Tanjug BELGRADE -- Bratislav Gašić says "all friends of Serbia, including the U.S. president and the British prime minister" have been invited to an upcoming military parade. www.b92.net/eng/news/politics.php?yyyy=2014&mm=10&dd=07&nav_id=91817this is serbia playing games with world leaders ahhahhahhahhhahahahahahahahhahahhhah
|
|
rex362
Senior Moderator
Pellazg
PELASGIANILLYROALBANIAN
Posts: 19,058
|
Post by rex362 on Oct 7, 2014 9:04:56 GMT -5
Serbia looks to pay Gazprom debt with stake in company Source: TASS MOSCOW -- Serbia may pay its debt to Russian gas giant Gazprom by giving it a stake in petrochemical company HIP-Petrohemija, Foreign Minister Ivica Dačić has said. www.b92.net/eng/news/business.php?yyyy=2014&mm=10&dd=07&nav_id=91823as the great Highduke from this forum of yesteryear use to say ...."Its OVAH !! "
|
|
Kralj Vatra
Amicus
Warning: Sometimes uses foul language & insults!!!
20%
Posts: 9,814
|
Post by Kralj Vatra on Oct 7, 2014 9:54:23 GMT -5
Serbia looks to pay Gazprom debt with stake in company Source: TASS MOSCOW -- Serbia may pay its debt to Russian gas giant Gazprom by giving it a stake in petrochemical company HIP-Petrohemija, Foreign Minister Ivica Dačić has said. www.b92.net/eng/news/business.php?yyyy=2014&mm=10&dd=07&nav_id=91823as the great Highduke from this forum of yesteryear use to say ...."Its OVAH !! " Good news.
|
|
|
Post by Emperor AAdmin on Oct 7, 2014 17:12:37 GMT -5
It was communism helping communism nothing else, do not mistake the "Soviet liberation" as a brotherly deed, those guys caused a lot of damage back then even Titoists were talking about it, only recently this s**t is changing. A Russian nationalist is different from a Soviet enthusiast. Trust me Uz when I tell you that under no circumstances do I confuse Soviets and Russians. 1) Russians are our slavic orthodox brethren that was often there to help out Serbs (both Serbia and especially Montenegro) and it can be argued that both Serb states became independent from Ottoman joke under direct assistance from Russia if not under direct influence and pressure that Russian Empire places on western countries (which in turn wanted either Ottomans to resume control over occupied Balkans or Germans/Austro-Hungarians wanted to replace Ottomans as controlling powers). 2) Soviets, on the other hand, are clearly zionist led creation as it is the very Marx and Engels (who was German Jewish banker himself who was financing Marx writings). Soviets were the main reason Ataturk (again Zionist creation, himself of Jewish origin) was able to "save" Turkey from advancing Greeks in early 1920s. They gave him direct military assistance. Not to mention that main Soviet leaders are all primarily Jewish in origin (including Trotsky) or closely alined with Jewish friends of communist orientation (like Lenin). Soviet system was clearly anti-Russian in nature which explains creation of Ukrainian and WhiteRussian entities out of greater Russian one (just like it did in Yugoslavia with Serbs by making several smaller ethnicities). Etc etc
|
|
Kralj Vatra
Amicus
Warning: Sometimes uses foul language & insults!!!
20%
Posts: 9,814
|
Post by Kralj Vatra on Oct 8, 2014 1:21:48 GMT -5
Soviets were the main reason Ataturk (again Zionist creation, himself of Jewish origin) was able to "save" Turkey from advancing Greeks in early 1920s. This can't be real, maybe we are living in different universes. IT WAS GREEKS, (ok Greeks as complete puppets of England) who SENT ARMY in Ukraine to fight the Soviets (another term for killing Russians). Or just a question, how can one KILL Soviets, without killing Russians, this is beyond me. Greek army was a joke, since the very beginning of this English inspired new country called Greece (Hellas). In fact Russian helped many times Greece and all they got in response was arrogance, lies and hostility. Heck even the name (Hellas) was invented by the English. Greece didn't stand a chance. It is like saying e.g. Mexico "advancing" in USA. Anyway, you just repeat the old common western technique : When Russians are killed that is normal. When Russians fight back, then demonize them to the extreme. Ladies and Gents, Communism, Orthodoxy, Christianity, Democracy, Soviets vs true Russians or any other fancy term you might use are just wrappers around a few basic ANCIENT fundamental deterministic patterns that keep repeating in the course of time. The basic forces remain static. The terminology changes a little bit, but everything else remains the same.
|
|
Kralj Vatra
Amicus
Warning: Sometimes uses foul language & insults!!!
20%
Posts: 9,814
|
Post by Kralj Vatra on Oct 8, 2014 15:00:42 GMT -5
Hey Admin brother... Since you mentioned the Jewish-British campaign against Turkey in 1919-1922 (ooopss maybe you know this as greek, but was far from that) which resulted in complete loss of minor asia and 2,000,000 refugees, the worse genocide against Greeks... THERE WAS NO CHANCE THAT GREECE WOULD WIN, even if Greeks had all jews of known universe on their side + those of the rest of the unknown galaxies. Here is the man that the British Jews installed as a democrat charismatic leader in Greece : alfeiospotamos.pblogs.gr/2012/02/mpenizelos-mpen-selon-h-benizelos-diabaste.htmlBeni Selon ... Not very Cretan name, right?? So we have Zionist Britain, with a Zionist Jew from Crete assigned as a prime minister attacking Jewish zionist Ataturk's Turkey which was aided by supposedly Zionist soviets.... Eastern zionists Vs western zionists again? But for some reason ... ppl are always eager to accuse the bad soviets (platform for demonizing the Russians), rather than zionist greeks or zionist british... Why? because SLAVS are ALWAYS DEMONIZED BY THE WEST. It was done so at the time of Tolstoy, at the time of Oct revolution and after, same with WWII, same with cold war, same with the fall of communism, same after the fall of communism and most probably forever.... This pattern has not changed since antiquity ... The question of de-slavicizing the Slavs (or at least controlling them) has been the main issue of satanic jewish saxon german catholic since at least 500 AD. Christianity , communism, bla bla bla are only terms for public consumption.
|
|
|
Post by Jon Do on Oct 10, 2014 19:47:44 GMT -5
It was communism helping communism nothing else, do not mistake the "Soviet liberation" as a brotherly deed, those guys caused a lot of damage back then even Titoists were talking about it, only recently this s**t is changing. A Russian nationalist is different from a Soviet enthusiast. Trust me Uz when I tell you that under no circumstances do I confuse Soviets and Russians. 1) Russians are our slavic orthodox brethren that was often there to help out Serbs (both Serbia and especially Montenegro) and it can be argued that both Serb states became independent from Ottoman joke under direct assistance from Russia if not under direct influence and pressure that Russian Empire places on western countries (which in turn wanted either Ottomans to resume control over occupied Balkans or Germans/Austro-Hungarians wanted to replace Ottomans as controlling powers). Agreed, and rightfully so. Imperial Russia was the last Russia that was true to the Serbian nation and country, nothing post-Romanov can compare to the true Slavic brotherhood in which was being demonstrated back then in the Empire and before. This history is being erased in both Serbia and Russia, notice how "modern" Russia will NEVER make reference to their truly glorious past (Putin has yet to say a word of it- which is odd since he claims to be a serious devout Orthodox Christian himself), notice how when they bring up "unity" and "strength" they specifically note the Soviet era. To simply lay it out straight. Marx created this philosophy simply so the idea of a central bank could exist and ultimately flourish. Marx was Lionel Rothchilds nephew, enough said, honestly... what else does anyone need to know? Communism by design cannot exist without a central bank, which is pretty much what global economics has become today, just part of one giant web. During Marx's life many people attacked him for precisely this, because the end-goal is that nations will lose their sovereignty, and to have a global economic system as well as legal system that was centralized. So we'll have a situation like today, where some goon sitting in the EU parliament in Brussels will give an order on what should go on in Serbia. Someone who doesn't see it this way is blinded or simply not intellectually aware enough to grasp it. Look deeper than the surface and you'll notice the only thing different is the cover of the book, not the content. Any talk on human rights claims, affirmative action, welfare, social assistance, laws of diversification, equality (race/sex), antisemitism, racism, same sex marriage/rights etc... is only a mirage of it's true intent. Think about really whose the target, the only demographic that doesn't get anything out of this "new world". Think real hard. (everyone).
|
|
|
Post by Emperor AAdmin on Oct 10, 2014 22:28:01 GMT -5
I cant say I disagree with this line of thinking. I do put question on Putin and his devotion to Russia and certainly make a distance from imperial Russia. First and foremost we are talking about the figure that has come out of Yeltsin kitchen which in turn is a continuation or extension of earlier Soviet one. I am afraid that someone is playing the pieces of chess in a manner that might appear one way but their desired end result I am afraid might not favor Russia. I am afraid that things are not as they are attempted to be presented here.
I agree that EU system is starting to resemble more and more rigid Soviet one which might have served dual purposes:
1) To mutate Russia into a culture that would not recognize itself (including creation of smaller ethnicities out of it that would be diametrically opposed to it on top of that and thus could be used by the western bankers in future events as it is the case now with Ukraine) with weakened identity, women's so called liberation (read increased promiscuity) and overall greatly weakened family unit and thus easy pray for western media.
2) Testing ground for future globalist system that seems to be implementing itself in various parts of the world especially in the west.
All these topics you have mentioned are used to only divide the population further against itself. Agreed.
|
|
|
Post by Emperor AAdmin on Oct 10, 2014 22:56:24 GMT -5
Soviets do not under no equation mean ethnically Russians. In fact USSR in many respects seemed to be anti-thesis to strong Russia and to me that was the reason for its creation (weakening Russia and its identity). In fact USSR seems to function using a formula Weak Russia = Strong USSR just like strong Communist Yugoslavia = weak Serbia. Soviet under no circumstances can be perceived as anything traditionally Russian. The communist can be perceived as almost a sect. To a Soviet or Yugoslav Communist a fellow non-communist meant nothing in comparison to a fellow communist from China and Zimbabwe. The level of brain-washing was amazing in this case. Soviet was in essence no longer a Russian any more then a former Russian (centuries ago) from what is called Galicia or western Ukraine is no longer a Russian.
Communist ideology is a invention of western bankers for their own purposes. Lenin comes with a train from Switzerland through war torn Germany in middle of first world war UNINTERRUPTED on his way to Imperial Russia then at the moment when he is given green light by the banking elite.
This communist story in Russia stinks of western interference and Soviet identity is not only not pro-russian but very clearly anti-Ruissian.
|
|
Kralj Vatra
Amicus
Warning: Sometimes uses foul language & insults!!!
20%
Posts: 9,814
|
Post by Kralj Vatra on Oct 11, 2014 7:40:55 GMT -5
yeah yeah , that's why jobless Russians were storming the borders to the west during USSR, while returning en-mass after 1991 when the bad communists were overthrown.
Saying that ex-Yu or USSR were anti-Serb and anti-Russian respectively is so jewishly retarded.
A "nationalistic" Serbia is meant to be small by definition. North to belgrade, south to vranje. Cause nationalistic Bulgaria wants Vranje and Nis as well. A greater Makedonia would include Solun and Vranje according to aold maps. Of course greater albanian would want everything, especially under western custody.
The same exact situation with Russia. Now Ukraine has become a Saxon puppet. Belarus is next. I guess "islamist" Caucasus (~ Bosnia style) and maybe "european" Leningrad (vojvodina style) could be next.
Your vision of small nationalistic slavic nations will only end up in the complete extinction of the Slavic race.
This is so obvious, one should be mentally challenged not to be able to grasp it.
Guys, all this anti-Serb ex-yu narration, bla bla is so commonly propagated that this means it has STRONG NWO backing and roots.
I gave many examples, but no one here cares for the truth. Go present those ideas to some real Serbs/Russians and you will be assured that common sense is against what you believe.
I told many times, that communism is ONLY A VEHICLE FOR DEMONIZATION, and you guys jump on this pretty well....
|
|
|
Post by Emperor AAdmin on Oct 11, 2014 9:40:07 GMT -5
After 1991 Russian expats running back to Russia? I doubt it. During Yeltsin era Russia was step away from economic and political collapse. Yeltsin was there in my opinion to either finish Russia off or to prepare that scenario for his successor. Then came Putin, a man who might have been there to fully destroy Russia or to at least cripple it beyond repair. Case might be that he is a dog that came of the leash (as might be the case with Hitler and Stalin and probably at least somewhat with Tito, in some ways at least). Really. Lets just compare two maps. One from during nazi occupation of Yugoslavia during world war 2 and then current one (result of communist political division within Tito's Yugoslavia). 2 WW Now 1) In communist Yugoslavia Croatia for example gets Baranja and Dubrovnik and even Istra which were never Croatian. Sounds like Croatia is awarded with territory there. No consideration for Serb inhabited Krajina, not even to grant them autonomy as Tito has so warm-heartedly granted this to Kosovo and Vojvodina during early 1970's. Never mind that Krajina had history of having had some autonomy under Austrian Empire as a region. No consideration for an area that was the victim of a major genocide attempt where Nazi Ustase tried exterminating entire Serb population of Krajina during world war 2. Current Croatia succeeded where Ustase failed and that is to make a Serb free Croatia. Current Croatia is clearly a continuation of ww2 policies except it it as a successor of communist republic of Croatia. Oh, and I forgot to mention that communist were major allies of Ustate and that Stalin was MAJOR BENEFACTOR of Ustase movement during the period before WW2. 2) During the recent Balkan wars west tried to have Croatia and Bosnia coordinate everything as much as possible as if it was one state against Serbs (reminiscent of so called Nazi independent state of Croatia during WW2). 3) Montenegro was independent in both cases. During Italian occupation Italian fascists demanded that Montenegrins would not regard themselves as Serb any more, would not write in Cyrillic, would have certain flag etc. Guess what, current Montenegro is exactly what Italian desired back then it would be although during world war 2 people in then Montenegro rose against such fascist policies. Current Montenegro is directly a creation of Communist policies and the party that has been in power in the past 25 years is a direct descendant of Communist Party in Montenegro which does not hide it. 4) Vojvodina in WW2 was apart from Serbia, guess what, during communist era it ws practically apart from Serbia as well while. Its level of autonomy acquired during early 1970s almost rivaled that of the yugoslav communist republics. Now, west is trying hard to foster secession movement there that will start off with autonomy demands (even though it is 70% Serb there). 5) Kosovo was apart from Serbia in WW2. During Italian occupation Italian fascists split it apart from Serbia and had it joined to Italian occupied Albania. Guess what, during communist era it ws practically apart from Serbia as well while. Its level of autonomy acquired during early 1970s almost rivaled that of the yugoslav communist republics. Lets not forget that 100,000's of Serbs were expelled from Kosovo during world war two that communist government of Tito FORBADE TO COME BACK while at the same time ACCEPTING 100,000 of Albania from Albania proper to settle in Kosovo to clearly cement it as a Albanian majority zone. All we need is for Macedonia to "somehow" end up Bulgarian (many of its citizens have accepted Bulgarian passports already) and we are back to the world war 2 scene here too. I do not have such vision, on contrary. I am just trying to see the situation clearly.
|
|
|
Post by Emperor AAdmin on Oct 11, 2014 9:51:37 GMT -5
|
|
|
Post by Jon Do on Oct 11, 2014 17:11:23 GMT -5
Serbia was territoriality crippled during the German occupation because our hierarchical command had no control over the ground this is a fact. If Serbia was more organized and had not succumb to masonic infiltration and fall for the communist propaganda then a Greater Serbia would have been the reality. If the people stood behind the monarch from day-one, had our King not been shot and killed in Marseilles things would have been totally different, interesting to note it was a Macedonian jew who pulled the trigger in cahootz with the Ustase. Things came at a bad time, King Aleksandar was assassinated and his son was too young to carry the brunt that was too come, so his brother Pavle (someone the people knew nothing of and also too weak to carry the brunt) had to take the reign.
|
|