|
Post by branislavnusic on Jun 16, 2018 3:33:54 GMT -5
Brnabic has to be kicked out 100%. Anyway support for the EU in Serbia is going down, A LOT because Serbia is getting all the money it needs from China. More Chinese money = less EU money needed. Concerning China, I have positive opinions of their society and civilization, but lately they are doing some things that are morally wrong. Just check this, its completely anti-human. That is morally wrong. China helps Serbia out A LOT, In 99 there were huge protests in China because of the bombing of SERBIA. Quite a nice feeling to know that you have great allies thousands of miles away.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Jun 16, 2018 3:52:01 GMT -5
That feeling when you read Tao Te Ching written by a guy who lived 700 BC (his name was Laozi) and realize that a small "bible" of Taoism has more sage and wisdom than whole West European philosophy.
|
|
|
Post by Pyrros on Jun 16, 2018 4:14:49 GMT -5
I was there a couple of times their people have much healthier mindset than Serbs.
I was there as well. And surely I liked the place. People got cheered up when I pronounced their words, I said I was trained in Bosnia how could I miss the Pollish accent ? Anyways, I think the opposite. I got sick hearing them (or at least those who had to talk) accusing Russia and USSR 24x7. The tourist guide in front of Stalin's building started some unbelievable nonsense in order to justify the current "western" position of Poland. Why should she try to make a fool of herself in front of such a great monument is beyond me, or maybe it was written in the script they gave her. I cannot think so much stupidity exists in Serbia. Not even Bosnia or Croatia. Another point : women. Lets say that women there are ... far too ... liberal ... Same like in Bulgaria... Must be smthing in the genes going along with Jakavica speakers I dunno. Like Bulgarians, you feel you can buy them with money. They lack this sincerely generous strength and freedom of the SERB.
Dont get me wrong. I have Bulgaria and Poland VERY high. Just giving Serbs the points they deserve.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Jun 16, 2018 4:46:59 GMT -5
I was there a couple of times their people have much healthier mindset than Serbs.
I was there as well. And surely I liked the place. People got cheered up when I pronounced their words, I said I was trained in Bosnia how could I miss the Pollish accent ? Anyways, I think the opposite. I got sick hearing them (or at least those who had to talk) accusing Russia and USSR 24x7. The tourist guide in front of Stalin's building started some unbelievable nonsense in order to justify the current "western" position of Poland. Why should she try to make a fool of herself in front of such a great monument is beyond me, or maybe it was written in the script they gave her. I cannot think so much stupidity exists in Serbia. Not even Bosnia or Croatia. Another point : women. Lets say that women there are ... far too ... liberal ... Same like in Bulgaria... Must be smthing in the genes going along with Jakavica speakers I dunno. Like Bulgarians, you feel you can buy them with money. They lack this sincerely generous strength and freedom of the SERB.
Dont get me wrong. I have Bulgaria and Poland VERY high. Just giving Serbs the points they deserve.
Now you see why I don't like big cities. All of those plastic people move to live in large cities. Your Warsaw tour guide is clearly damaged good. However, concerning women - average Polish woman is better than average Serbian woman. You said you were in Warsaw, and so did I, but I also went to smaller cities like Bialystok, Lublin etc. If I start to explain you the stupidities of Belgrade women I witnessed you'll laugh hard.
|
|
|
Post by Pyrros on Jun 16, 2018 5:53:42 GMT -5
But there is a difference. Most probably you are single and the public around you knows that. Whereas I am married, middle aged and also ppl around me know that.
please tell me differences between Bialistok/Lubilin VS BG.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Jun 16, 2018 6:19:21 GMT -5
But there is a difference. Most probably you are single and the public around you knows that. Whereas I am married, middle aged and also ppl around me know that.
please tell me differences between Bialistok/Lubilin VS BG.
I'm not single. Women are more faithful to their partners than in Belgrade.
|
|
|
Post by Emperor AAdmin on Jun 16, 2018 9:04:24 GMT -5
Some starting points from the video: "IQ not that much higher then that of a dog" (6min)
"German female judge ruling basically states all western women are prostitutes" (7min)
"They are even thinking about putting Sharia judges into German legal system" (8min)
=====
Must see video about the technocratic takeover of the human kind. How state of Estonia and PR China are testing grounds for the all controlling grid.
|
|
|
Post by Pyrros on Jun 16, 2018 9:29:30 GMT -5
Some starting points from the video: "IQ not that much higher then that of a dog" (6min)
"German female judge ruling basically states all western women are prostitutes" (7min)
"They are even thinking about putting Sharia judges into German legal system" (8min)
=====
Must see video about the technocratic takeover of the human kind. How state of Estonia and PR China are testing grounds for the all controlling grid.
When Mercedes Benz, Siemens, VW, BMW, etc get access to the whole world market with great positive advertising, there is a price to pay. Yeah even for Goths....
If all those Goths/Saxons admit their own crimes, and pay compensations for all SLAVIC/ARAB/African life they have killed , then I'll think about it...
|
|
|
Post by branislavnusic on Jun 16, 2018 11:04:22 GMT -5
Some starting points from the video: "IQ not that much higher then that of a dog" (6min)
"German female judge ruling basically states all western women are prostitutes" (7min)
"They are even thinking about putting Sharia judges into German legal system" (8min)
=====
Must see video about the technocratic takeover of the human kind. How state of Estonia and PR China are testing grounds for the all controlling grid.
When Mercedes Benz, Siemens, VW, BMW, etc get access to the whole world market with great positive advertising, there is a price to pay. Yeah even for Goths....
If all those Goths/Saxons admit their own crimes, and pay compensations for all SLAVIC/ARAB/African life they have killed , then I'll think about it...
Saxons and Goths, basically the same.
|
|
|
Post by Pyrros on Jun 16, 2018 11:40:22 GMT -5
Saxons and Goths, basically the same.
yeah Saxons : great masters Goths : students
|
|
|
Post by branislavnusic on Jun 17, 2018 0:19:43 GMT -5
Saxons and Goths, basically the same.
yeah Saxons : great masters Goths : students
I'd say the opposite
|
|
|
Post by Pyrros on Jun 17, 2018 1:33:56 GMT -5
are we using :
- JEWISH - GERMAN - SWEDISH - KHAZAR - TURKISH - CHINESE or ... just
- ENGLISH language right now?
THOSE ARE THE MASTERS.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Jun 18, 2018 13:08:29 GMT -5
Centralization is wicked, it creates resistance and distrust. That's why I propose for people to live in small communities and collaborate between themselves in a form of greater union. The union won't be fragile (be it country or any other sort of union), and the small communities won't intermeddle in each other business this way, so no tribal fights. Check one of the videos I posted here. It is not natural for human beings to live in large cities, let alone large countries where everything is centralized. Because our society is not really following the strict moral norms (in form of religion, I already spoke a lot about it here) it is prone to corruption and decadence. So that is our only salvation.
WOW
So my theory gets stronger and stronger. Adam was SLAV.
No, I doubt he was. I wanted to reply sooner on this comment, but I couldn't spare enough time to compose the satisfactory response. So here goes the long explanation.
The fact is there is at least one characteristic trait for mankind: we’re always hungry. When homo sapiens left Africa to “conquer” the rest of the world, about 60 000 years ago, they sought their shelters near food sources. The more food abundant the areas were the more dense they were inhabited. Some groups inhabited forest and became hunters, the others chose meadows and became cattle farmers. Stone Age inhabitants from coastline areas of Mexico ate sea shells, leaving huge pile of their remains which composed area of 75 x 30 x 7 cubic meters. However, there is another characteristic trait: we don’t like to share anything. Various tribes have fought battles for territories since prehistoric times, whereby some were suppressed to inhospitable terrains. Nomads, on the other hand, were using scarce resources quite successfully. For example, Arabs were able to conquer whole Arab peninsula by the domestication of camel, which we all know is very durable animal able to cross great distances between two oases. Central Asian people managed to successfully domesticate horses which allowed them to spread across the steppe. Inuits used the icy environment to craft igloo, house made of ice. The sheer ratio of invested work/calories outcome, that you can get from one hectare of wheat, significantly surpasses any form of hunting, cattle farming or fishing. Man started to cultivate wheat 9 000 BC, and soon this activity spread all across the globe, allowing the human population to grow in number (ah, so the human kind love sex too) in grain areas. Soon, mankind made sufficient amount of grains so one part of population became craftsmen. After potters, weavers, and stone mason, other professions appeared. Of course, the oldest profession in the world belongs here. Around 8000 BC, first organized forms of human civilization appears – by which I assume people who lived in a settlements. Craftsmen started to join the temporary camps, for the protections from various rival groups and for easier trade. Simultaneously, settlements gave rise to the first types of governments – which in the most cases were inherent monarchies formed by the old tribal communities. It is thought that first monarchies was formed by a members of a single clan or family and passed on to new generations, with a dominant man on its helm. In prehistoric period it is thought that there were matriarchal organizations, as well as early forms of tribal democracies, but by the time history started to be recorded they vanished. Without an exception the first organizations were ruled by a ruler - king. From that period on, men had monopoly on the government. All ancient rulers had simple tasks: protect their subjects. People believed that authority of rulers is coming from the immortal gods, so the rulers were tightly connected to religion from the start. This is where things start to differ, in one part of the world, like ancient Egypt, rulers were high priests themselves. In other parts, rulers tightly cooperated with priesthood, or they'd hire a prophet to foretell them the future. Even if there was a danger coming from other kingdoms, the greatest problem the first civilizations had is nature, which was controlled by gods. Floods, drought and other natural catastrophes were often destroying crops, bringing grief and misery. In translation: it was widely believed gods were pleased by the ruler if his subjects had enough food. For this reasons it doesn’t come surprising that most important thing each ruler had on his mind is to create food supplies. For such system to work, rulers demanded from their subjects to store a part of their grain after each good harvest, which they would use in case of shortage. The grain would be stored in a large buildings made out of stone or a mud bricks, called granary. The priests had a duty to record the amount of grain each landowner gave. To be able to efficiently keep their records, the priests invented writing system. The fact they started to write the amount of grain, dates and names, led to invention of accounting and banking. Soon, common mortals started to keep the record of their cattle, tools, luxury goods… With the spread of writing and literacy among the masses, new professions soon appeared – traders, bankers and notaries. Shortly after, the first commercial deals appeared, a simple written deals in form: “For utility A, I give utility B”. As previously said, there were other forms of societies, those that didn’t want to live a stationary life – nomads. The differences between nomads and stationary civilizations caused various clashes. Accumulated wealth in the cities, in form of grains and other goods, was catching attention of the people who lived outside the cities, those who had significantly harder lives. Nomads, had great tactical superiority, so these people skilled with horseback warfare had long terrorized the regular farmers on the peripherals of the cities. Nomadic threats exist even today regardless of the fact that power of stationary societies grew many times since 1500 BC, as it can be seen with recent migrant crisis. In short, the history of civilization is story of nomads.
|
|
|
Post by Pyrros on Jun 18, 2018 15:02:10 GMT -5
Modern civilization is based on accumulative knowledge, expressed with vertical and horizontal scaling. That's how the mighty empires (Serbian, Bulgarian, Russian) were built. This can only be practiced and perfected by farmers. Nomads are always Albanians (thieves). They are too gay to stay and protect their property. They cannot even fight a straight organized fight.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Jun 18, 2018 15:24:30 GMT -5
Modern civilization is based on accumulative knowledge, expressed with vertical and horizontal scaling. That's how the mighty empires (Serbian, Bulgarian, Russian) were built. This can only be practiced and perfected by farmers. Nomads are always Albanians (thieves). They are too gay to stay and protect their property. They cannot even fight a straight organized fight.
The examples I was talking about were early cities such as Jericho and Catal Huyuk, from which early countries of Fertile Crescent emerged. Serbia or Bulgaria are nowhere near Russia, who is independent dominant player. Serbia and Bulgaria if they want to continue their existance must understand they can't exist on their own. Bulgaria understands it, but Serbian government wants to convince its people that it can since 1987. They are dead wrong and Serbia will thus continue to shrink in size and population. Also take a look what was the role of a ruler. You can't find any ruler of Serbian origin that will fit these primitive need of civilization from this moment all the way back to 1903 when last Obrenovic was assassinated. The Obrenovic dynasty were last true rulers of Serbia. That being said, I simply don't care whether or not Albania is nomadic, in fact I don't know what is Albania and I don't care what is Albania. It is their own Albanian concern. I only care for the society I am part of.
PS. Another thing that pisses me off lately is the belief among public in Serbia that we can handle our country in the way Israel does. Public takes Israel as prime example how one small country can have strong army. Those same liars don't tell to the common people that Israel gets between 3 and 4 billion dollars of USA donations annual for military investment only. That's why their biggest strenght is not in manpower but technology. Serbia can't manufacture its own simple hunter drone. Other countries they take in comparison with Serbia are Switzlerland, Sweden, and Finland all eons ahead of Serbia in terms of technology and industry.
|
|
|
Post by branislavnusic on Jun 19, 2018 0:24:02 GMT -5
Modern civilization is based on accumulative knowledge, expressed with vertical and horizontal scaling. That's how the mighty empires (Serbian, Bulgarian, Russian) were built. This can only be practiced and perfected by farmers. Nomads are always Albanians (thieves). They are too gay to stay and protect their property. They cannot even fight a straight organized fight.
Gypsies are nomads as well.
|
|
|
Post by Pyrros on Jun 19, 2018 3:37:51 GMT -5
Bulgaria understands it, but Serbian government wants to convince its people that it can since 1987. They are dead wrong and Serbia will thus continue to shrink in size and population. Bulgaria gave everything to the west : soul, brain, body, soil, everything and what they got in return is a country MORE poor than Serbia, with likewise shrinking population and decay in every aspect (except IT which thrives in Sofia as well as in Beograd). The moment things will change is the moment that Serbs , Bulgarians , Makedonians , Bosnians , Croats , Poles , etc will start PROMOTING themselves and PRAYING for themselves. Slavs (Serbs) do a fantastic job being kind and respectful to other cultures, but they are lousy as hell protecting themselves. I think the decay of Serbs was a plan conceived 100s of years ago, organized and executed with great discipline. There is nothing any Serb politician would do to change this. Best case Serbia would be like Bulgaria (ehmmm which is ... worse than Serbia, or about the same). If you care about Serbs you should DEFINITELY care about Albanians. Why? Not because those savage jews are of any value, but because their presence in the balkans was a plan executed by the west about 900-1100 AD. The purpose of Albanians was to ..... not be Slavs. Reduce Slavic life. I am so sure of the above I would bet all my money on the truth of those statements. I am definite that Slavs are great people and especially Serbs are the best in the world.
|
|
|
Post by Pyrros on Jun 19, 2018 3:39:33 GMT -5
Gypsies are nomads as well. Yeah, when I am south to Leskovac, I see gypsy houses next to serb houses, and I can clearly see the difference in mentality. Both Serbs and Gypsies are poor, but Serbian houses are much times better than the Gypsy houses.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Jun 19, 2018 4:20:39 GMT -5
Bulgaria understands it, but Serbian government wants to convince its people that it can since 1987. They are dead wrong and Serbia will thus continue to shrink in size and population. Bulgaria gave everything to the west : soul, brain, body, soil, everything and what they got in return is a country MORE poor than Serbia, with likewise shrinking population and decay in every aspect (except IT which thrives in Sofia as well as in Beograd). The moment things will change is the moment that Serbs , Bulgarians , Makedonians , Bosnians , Croats , Poles , etc will start PROMOTING themselves and PRAYING for themselves. Slavs (Serbs) do a fantastic job being kind and respectful to other cultures, but they are lousy as hell protecting themselves. I think the decay of Serbs was a plan conceived 100s of years ago, organized and executed with great discipline. There is nothing any Serb politician would do to change this. Best case Serbia would be like Bulgaria (ehmmm which is ... worse than Serbia, or about the same). If you care about Serbs you should DEFINITELY care about Albanians. Why? Not because those savage jews are of any value, but because their presence in the balkans was a plan executed by the west about 900-1100 AD. The purpose of Albanians was to ..... not be Slavs. Reduce Slavic life. I am so sure of the above I would bet all my money on the truth of those statements. I am definite that Slavs are great people and especially Serbs are the best in the world. I'm just realistic. If I was kind and respectful to other cultures, and disrespectful for my own I would move out of here long ago, as it wouldn't be the place where I want to live. The fact is I consider most of EU & USA degenerates. One country can only prosper if it invests in the technology and science, in other words in its future. Then you have strong industry you have strong military and problems with neighbors go away. So modern military is not about manpower. Modern military is about multitude of technologies and determined people. Problem Serbia has is it has too many dumb people in too highly responsible positions, while the smartest work some lame jobs for foreigners. Serbia has too many people employed by the government. Smart people don't appreciate how everything about Serbia is bound to ruling political party and not about the progress itself. I know too many smart, highly educated, apolitical people who all lost their jobs due to greed of ruling class in last 20 years. Some of them have hard time to find new jobs because their professions were tightly connected to institutes which are being closed by the government. So I'm not saying we don't have smart people but rather we got negative selection when we choose the leaders. Average Serb is, I'm afraid, too stupid to realize it, and too coward to change something about it. I mean just take a look this SNS people, they were all funded by real mafia money.
|
|
|
Post by Pyrros on Jun 19, 2018 5:02:36 GMT -5
^^ That's exactly the "vision" that west had in mind when they started executing their anti-Serbian plan. Everything is controlled by the west. Even turbo-folk. Let just one Serb politician start anything BIG (like a real great technology project) or fights corruption and it won't be long till NATO planes hide the sun again in Serbia.
The west wanted back-water and retarded and pseudo-nationalistic balkans , and they succeeded.
I wont even bother putting the finger on Serbs. Why? Cause in normal circumstances Serbs would make something nice and great.
But under this extremely hostile environment it is very hard to fight back.
I mean NOT EVEN SERBS can't do it....
|
|