Rhezus
Moderator
DERZA STURIA TRAUS
Posts: 1,674
|
Post by Rhezus on Jul 4, 2008 11:27:03 GMT -5
What kind of appearence she may have?
|
|
|
Post by claudia14 on Jul 6, 2008 18:11:44 GMT -5
Greek?
|
|
|
Post by Duke John on Jul 6, 2008 23:49:08 GMT -5
The face structure especially from eyes she has something eastern, it may be balkan roma or some origins from anatolia, from that dirrection i guess.
|
|
|
Post by jerryspringer on Jul 7, 2008 8:08:24 GMT -5
The face structure especially from eyes she has something eastern, it may be balkan roma or some origins from anatolia, from that dirrection i guess. Dude, stop making a fool of yourself. Everyone who is a bit dark is not Rroma. That girl is not Rroma. I don't know what she is, but she looks good. And being from Anatolia and being Rroma are two different things.
|
|
|
Post by Emperor AAdmin on Jul 7, 2008 9:39:24 GMT -5
That appears eastern Med or Pondic which is dominant in Black Sea Region and Aegean region and it in no way Indian in features (as Gypsies are or 'Romany').
|
|
|
Post by Kastorianos on Jul 7, 2008 11:13:48 GMT -5
I find she has roma features. Could be Italian from Sicily as well, but the people there are anyway very dark and many mixed with gypsies.
|
|
|
Post by jerryspringer on Jul 7, 2008 11:31:06 GMT -5
There is absolutely nothing Rroma about that girl, Kastor. If you just want to take a punch at me, then I'm always ready for a match, but stop spreading such BS. Either that, or you're totally clueless.
|
|
|
Post by Kastorianos on Jul 7, 2008 11:38:08 GMT -5
Is she your cousin?
To me this face shows too many similarities to indian women and too little similarities to typical southern European women (european!), to classify her as clearly non gypsy and 100% caucasoid. She is probably mixed...but thats also what gypsies are in the end. So Rhezus my guess is gypsy, tell us what she really is then.
|
|
|
Post by jerryspringer on Jul 7, 2008 11:50:11 GMT -5
I wish she were my cousin.
Kastor, come on, man! Why are you being like that? There is absolutely nothing Indian about the girl. She could very well be Italian, Greek or Lebanese. She could also be Bulgarian, since the waterstamp on the photo (Elmaz.com) leads to a Bulgarian dating site.
|
|
|
Post by Kastorianos on Jul 7, 2008 12:02:28 GMT -5
Anittas listen, when I say something I dont say it out of arbitrariness. Do you think thats a bazar here where you can persuade me to say "no she is not gypsy" or what... physical anthropology is no good samaritan union...everyone is what he is.
|
|
|
Post by jerryspringer on Jul 7, 2008 12:18:09 GMT -5
Everyone is what they are, but if one has poor judgement, they should not employ it in public. Here's another photo of her: Again, I see nothing Indian. Aadmin should take his time to explain it to you.
|
|
|
Post by Kastorianos on Jul 7, 2008 12:30:31 GMT -5
I dont need explanations by anyone, because I see what I see and this girl looks gypsy to me, in the end only some dna tests will be able to tell us the truth. Just because she doesnt look lke your grandma from your romanian village it doesnt mean she isnt gypsy.
Besides you are the last one to value classifications of others, you have zero clue of anthropology but think you can judge others classifications, how about stopping to go on my nerves with your "oh no Kastor, why are you saying that?"- s.hit?
|
|
|
Post by Duke John on Jul 7, 2008 13:02:51 GMT -5
Everyone is what they are, but if one has poor judgement, they should not employ it in public. Here's another photo of her: Again, I see nothing Indian. Aadmin should take his time to explain it to you. Anittas, i see that you took my post negatively, but look at her, she is or has some roma in her!
|
|
|
Post by Emperor AAdmin on Jul 7, 2008 13:23:46 GMT -5
|
|
|
Post by Kastorianos on Jul 7, 2008 13:33:31 GMT -5
The gypsies of Europe dont usually look like Indians 100% they just look similar to them, their appearance suggests that there has to be a connection to india, in the end they look (usually) like a mix between Europeans and Indians like the ones on that pic of Aadmin. Thats gypsy, gypsy is not urgently=Indians. Just genetically and physically they still show strong and thus visible indian impacts. I dont know why I have to explain that here, since everyone should know it..
Some gypsies look more indian, some less, but both groups are still gypsies, our girl here looks mixed, I find the indian impact is clearly visible, so that leads to the conclusion that she has to be a gypsy ethnically.
|
|
|
Post by Kastorianos on Jul 7, 2008 13:43:25 GMT -5
Isnt that gypsy either? Just because she isnt as dark as her indian forefathers?
|
|
|
Post by Duke John on Jul 7, 2008 14:40:54 GMT -5
Gypsies are Indian (originally Banjara) in origin so lets see how Banjara family looks like and lets compare them to this girl (any other appearance for a Gypsy other then Banjara means being mixed). Its unbelieveble how ignorant you are,have you ever lived in balkans?have yous een gypsys of balkans? damn.... next month im going to balkans and i will take some pictures of gypsys for you andthen you will see what they look like!
|
|
|
Post by Emperor AAdmin on Jul 7, 2008 17:19:09 GMT -5
" Its unbelieveble how ignorant you are,have you ever lived in balkans?have yous een gypsys of balkans? damn.... next month im going to balkans and i will take some pictures of gypsys for you andthen you will see what they look like! " Ignorant? I just informed viewers how these so called gypsies are supposed to look like in their original form and outside of that form means that they are mixed. Now if they are mixed then that can not be used as a comparable instrument of determing of how a Gypsy looks like as it would not be a look deemed unique for them and those related to them (other Dravidians). Glass of lemonade can not be used as an example of how water has yellow color even though it is over 90% water. German Jews have appearance that is far more German (suggesting strongly that they are semitzed Germans versus being actual Jews in origin) then Semitic and thus can not be used as a norm of how Jews look like. In this case (as bellow data show) majority of these Gypsies are at most 30% Indian and many far less then that and this is not sufficient to show as many of these Gypsies were mixed with Northern Med type that are prevalent in many parts of Northern India (and not to mention mixing with Med types in Iran etc). Gypsies in Montenegro could have been grouped easily in two fully distinct groups and those are ones whose appearance doesn't differ from that of locals (meaning that is how heavily mixed they are or that they might be 'dravized' locals) and second are those who have their original Dravidian (Banjara) appearance. Dravidian is a race which is fully distinct from Med (in fact it is far more related to Australoid one) and never to be confused with Med. en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Romani_people#Genetic_evidence
|
|
|
Post by Emperor AAdmin on Jul 7, 2008 17:27:10 GMT -5
I am preety sure that the girl above doesnt fall in the yellow color (Dravidian) in the map but in the blue one (Med)
|
|
|
Post by Kastorianos on Jul 7, 2008 17:46:16 GMT -5
Of course she probably will...Pakistanis Afghan and Indian people fall according to this map under blue as well...
|
|