niquetamere
Amicus
Ancient Bosnian Serbatron
Posts: 529
|
Post by niquetamere on May 26, 2008 15:56:02 GMT -5
|
|
|
Post by Ja Ona i Pivo on May 27, 2008 2:53:35 GMT -5
Cudi me kako ti okvira nema u Kninu gdje su srbi otjerani? Valjda ovako atraktivnije za turiste.. Ipak zalosno ko god da je protjeran/pobijen!
|
|
Anthologic
Amicus
"Lord of all Reality"
Ha!
Posts: 1,237
|
Post by Anthologic on May 27, 2008 3:04:40 GMT -5
How long until they remove the "Montenegrins" from the description?
|
|
tyson
Amicus
Posts: 1,256
|
Post by tyson on May 27, 2008 8:54:37 GMT -5
^ why do you ask?
|
|
niquetamere
Amicus
Ancient Bosnian Serbatron
Posts: 529
|
Post by niquetamere on May 27, 2008 10:46:29 GMT -5
I don't see it being removed. The siege and destruction of Dubrovnik is embedded within Rep. Ragusa's people. =x
|
|
|
Post by terroreign on May 27, 2008 19:47:04 GMT -5
I find that sign offensive, and a direct attack on the ethnic Montenegrin nation.
|
|
|
Post by radovic on May 27, 2008 20:20:20 GMT -5
I find that sign offensive, and a direct attack on the ethnic Montenegrin nation. And Montenegrins find it oofensive that you a shiqptar masquerade as a Montenegrin.
|
|
CiKoLa
Amicus
Gotovina Heroj!
Posts: 3,728
|
Post by CiKoLa on May 27, 2008 20:42:30 GMT -5
I find that sign offensive, and a direct attack on the ethnic Montenegrin nation. offensive.? Im disgusted by your view point. Did we Croats bomb any of your towns and cities? Killing innocent people in the process? Was any town in Montenegro (UNESCO listed) destroyed at the hands of the Croats? The answer is no. Direct attack on Montenegro? How so? U mean as opposed to the attack on Dubrovnik (UNSECO protected) and its people?
|
|
niquetamere
Amicus
Ancient Bosnian Serbatron
Posts: 529
|
Post by niquetamere on May 27, 2008 21:34:54 GMT -5
Ya know, this is the first time ever that I agree with this clown Cikola.
|
|
|
Post by terroreign on May 27, 2008 21:40:00 GMT -5
Cikola - I never said it was an attack on Montenegro, but on the Montenegrin people
That sign just ignores all the trouble and suffering so many Montenegrins went through protesting against the attack and against JNA, yet after all of that you still publicly denounce us, that isnt respect nor is it honorable.
|
|
|
Post by vinjak on May 27, 2008 21:47:47 GMT -5
^^^^^ Dude please stop kissing butt its just so disgusting
|
|
CiKoLa
Amicus
Gotovina Heroj!
Posts: 3,728
|
Post by CiKoLa on May 27, 2008 21:58:00 GMT -5
Cikola - I never said it was an attack on Montenegro, but on the Montenegrin people That sign just ignores all the trouble and suffering so many Montenegrins went through protesting against the attack and against JNA, yet after all of that you still publicly denounce us, that isnt respect nor is it honorable. This sign isnt meant to be an attack on anyone. It just explains historical facts. Montenegrins attacked Dubrovnik did they not? Is the sign by any means inaccurate? NO.! Let me ask u a question ... you talk about honor but Is it honorable to bury the past ... to forget it ... to cover it up like it never happened? It did happen. I realise that u are ashamed of what happened in Dubrovnik but that doesnt mean that we now should forget and bury historical facts in order to please the aggressor.
|
|
|
Post by Banatski on May 28, 2008 2:36:02 GMT -5
Croats so much like their victim position that they turn it to profit and tourism. I find this quite funny actually. Can we see the real harm done to these objects please? Not the smoke fire taped from the chopper that could easily have been burnt tires, but the real harm (destroyed buildings and such, not broken windows).
|
|
MiG
Amicus
Republika
Posts: 4,793
|
Post by MiG on May 28, 2008 9:31:38 GMT -5
|
|
|
Post by radovic on May 28, 2008 10:26:50 GMT -5
I find that sign offensive, and a direct attack on the ethnic Montenegrin nation. offensive.? Im disgusted by your view point. Did we Croats bomb any of your towns and cities? Killing innocent people in the process? Was any town in Montenegro (UNESCO listed) destroyed at the hands of the Croats? The answer is no. Direct attack on Montenegro? How so? U mean as opposed to the attack on Dubrovnik (UNSECO protected) and its people? ^ How exactly was Dubrovnik destroyed? Vukovar certainly was destroyed, but Dubrovnik can't be compared to Vukovar. Dubrovniks received very little damage. It was attacked in fall of 91 and by spring was taking in tourists already.
|
|
|
Post by radovic on May 28, 2008 10:30:00 GMT -5
Cikola - I never said it was an attack on Montenegro, but on the Montenegrin people That sign just ignores all the trouble and suffering so many Montenegrins went through protesting against the attack and against JNA, yet after all of that you still publicly denounce us, that isnt respect nor is it honorable. Did you even watch the video. In the first few seconds the reader says a small number of Montenegrins. The attack on Dubrovnik had support of the majority of Montenegrins, it is the only case of Serb or Montenegrin TDF's actually engaging outside Serb or Montenegrin borders. Not only that but your hero Djukanovic himself said the following to get support for the attack: - "25,000 Ustashas will attack Montenegro if we do not. The Ustashas have enlisted Kurdish mercenaries for this attack." - "The Croats plan to attack Njegos's mausoleum." - "I hate chess because fo the sahovica."
|
|
|
Post by terroreign on May 28, 2008 14:31:51 GMT -5
Yes, did you?
He said 8 to 10,000
It did at the time, and the majority of Montenegro were manipulated by the Belgrade-propaganda.
Djukanovic took his orders from the Milosevic-regime in Belgrade, who told him that the Croats were going to attack Montenegro. Watch the rest of the documentary.
And I'm not saying at all that I supported him then, or any of those people (Miomir Bulatovic, ect)
They were all basically traitors and scum, except for Slavko Perovic
But since then Djukanovic and Marovic have switched to the good side and I applaud them for that.
|
|
|
Post by radovic on May 28, 2008 14:38:37 GMT -5
6,000-8,000 people was the most the peace side could get to protest, while at the time the pro-war side could gsather much more people at regularly held rallies.
Learn proper grammar. This is absurd, Montenegro's media has always been seperate from that of Serbia. The major titles then as now were all Montenegrin published. RTS (spoecifically RTB at the time your talking about) also never aired in the territory of Montenegro.
An absurd claim. Djukanovic didn't take orders form Belgrade he did what was in his interests and war with Croatia was in his interests. If Djukanovic was such a loyalist stooge then how come in September and Octoboer of 1991 the Montenegrins supported the EC's "Hague Agreement/Compromise" while Serbia did not. If what you claim is true then that sohuld have been impossible.
You mean sinc ethey decided to blame others for Montenegro's problems.
|
|
|
Post by terroreign on May 28, 2008 14:50:24 GMT -5
Watch the documentary again, its 8-10,000
You should be the last one to talk...
No, indirectly or directly he did take his orders from Belgrade.
He wouldnt have anything to do with that, you do know Momir Bulatovic was the president in 1991 right?
No, since they stopped being the serbs' stooges.
|
|