CiKoLa
Amicus
Gotovina Heroj!
Posts: 3,728
|
Post by CiKoLa on Nov 26, 2008 3:38:15 GMT -5
Panika u Srbiji: Hrvatska će tražiti 50 milijardi eura odštete
Ukoliko Hrvatska dobije spor protiv Srbije po tužbi za genocid koju je podnjela Međunarodnom sudu pravde, vjerovatno će zatražiti odštetu u visini od 35 do 50 milijardi eura
BEOGRAD - Ukoliko Hrvatska dobije spor protiv Srbije po tužbi za genocid koju je podnjela Međunarodnom sudu pravde, vjerovatno će zatražiti odštetu u visini od 35 do 50 milijardi eura, tvrdi u izjavi za Kurir Milorad Buha, predsjednik Vlade Republike Srpske Krajine u egzilu.
On dodaje kako se ovaj iznos spominje u hrvatskoj javnosti, bez obzira na to što se, kako kaže, u samoj tužbi ne precizira iznos, ali se ostavlja dovoljno prostora da se račun naknadno priloži.
- Hrvati traže da se Srbija proglasi odgovornom za genocid i plati materijalnu i nematerijalnu štetu za uništena materijalna i kulturna dobra - kaže Buha. On je uvjeren kako će EU natjerati Vladu da promjeni odluku i odustane od kontratužbe.
Savo Štrbac, direktor Dokumentacijskog centra „Veritas“, napominje kako Hrvatska ne precizira visinu odštete.
- U tužbi je za odštetu rečeno - po određenju suda. Tužba je tehnički vrlo dobro odrađena i kronološki su navedeni svi događaji. Hrvati traže odštetu za sve što su pobrojali, međutim, mora se dokazati genocid. Ako bi do toga došlo, visina odštete bi se mogla odrediti u istoj parnici ili u drugom postupku - kaže Štrbac za Kurir.
I profesor Milan Bulajić, direktor Fonda za istraživanje genocida, tvrdi kako se o visini odštete koju će tražiti Hrvatska može samo nagađati.
- Svako nagađanje bilo bi neozbiljno, jer se to ne može unaprijed reći - naglašava Bulajić.
26.11.2008. Pincom.info
|
|
|
Post by zgembo on Nov 26, 2008 3:50:19 GMT -5
LOL
|
|
|
Post by markosijekira on Nov 26, 2008 4:01:04 GMT -5
Yeah, this is not going to happen. 50 billion, nice summ, would boost the federal budget for sure
|
|
|
Post by SKORIC on Nov 26, 2008 7:59:49 GMT -5
Why not 50 trillion?
|
|
Zvone
Amicus
Never take life seriously. Nobody gets out alive anyway.
Posts: 525
|
Post by Zvone on Nov 26, 2008 8:03:03 GMT -5
That's more than their economy is worth....
|
|
|
Post by SKORIC on Nov 26, 2008 8:21:49 GMT -5
ok ok...100 trillion, but thats my final offer.
|
|
|
Post by sweetnugs on Nov 26, 2008 10:43:01 GMT -5
Yeah okay... good luck.
|
|
|
Post by radovic on Nov 26, 2008 11:40:00 GMT -5
And bosnia was talking of obtaining $130 billion. In the end they were told "There was only 1 act of genocide in Bosnia, Serbia bares no responsibility for what happenned in Bosnia and was not directly involved in anything that you alledge. You get $0."
Add to that Bosnia had more of a case against Serbia then Croatia ever would.
|
|
|
Post by bog on Nov 26, 2008 12:33:15 GMT -5
Ja trazim 1,000,000 Evra od Srbije... Onda imam za kucu, dobra kola... ljetovanje...
sutra cu ih nazvat....
ima da se malo uplase kada dodjem u ambasadu da trazim pare... obucu crnu t-majcu
mohahaha
|
|
|
Post by ilirdardani on Nov 26, 2008 12:45:51 GMT -5
Bosnia, Croatia and Kosovo, should sue Serbia at the same time for 100+ billion Euros, for war damages.
Too bad that our leaders won't do it because they try and be nice to the international community.
Serbia has gotten off way to easily from all their crimes they did during 80s and 90s.
|
|
|
Post by radovic on Nov 26, 2008 13:45:36 GMT -5
Bosnia, Croatia and Kosovo, should sue Serbia at the same time for 100+ billion Euros, for war damages. Too bad that our leaders won't do it because they try and be nice to the international community. Serbia has gotten off way to easily from all their crimes they did during 80s and 90s. Lol. Bosnioa tried it failed. Croatia is trying. It will fail. If anything, it has been proven that all the bullshit claimed about Serbia in the 80s and 90s was exagerrations, lies and propaganda.Kosovo's own supreme court ruled there was no genocide. ;DFriday, 7 September, 2001, 14:04 GMT 15:04 UK Kosovo assault 'was not genocide'The court ruled there was no attempt to destroy the Albanian ethnic groupA United Nations court has ruled that Serbian troops did not carry out genocide against ethnic Albanians during Slobodan Milosevic's campaign of aggression in Kosovo from 1998 to 1999. The controversial ruling by the UN-supervised Supreme Court in the Kosovan capital, Pristina, has angered Albanians, and some UN officials are reported to be preparing to challenge it. The decision comes as authorities in Serbia begin the excavation of another mass grave believed to contain the bodies of around 50 Kosovar Albanians. Four graves have already been investigated, revealing the remains of 340 victims. UN 'unhappy' The court, Kosovo's highest legal body, said there had been a "systematic campaign of terror, including murders, rapes, arsons and severe maltreatments". Slobodan Milosevic has not yet been charged with genocide in Kosovo Crimes against humanity and war crimes did take place, it said, but "the exactions committed by Milosevic's regime cannot be qualified as criminal acts of genocide, since their purpose was not the destruction of the Albanian ethnic group... but its forceful departure from Kosovo". However the BBC's Paul Wood in Belgrade says that some UN legal officials are deeply unhappy and have begun a campaign to have the ruling overturned. The decision was based on the 1948 Geneva convention which defines genocide as the intent "to destroy, in whole or in part, a national, ethnic, racial or religious group as such". Milosevic debate The court, which is comprised of two international judges and one Albanian, was ruling on the case of a Serb, Miroslav Vuckovic, convicted of genocide by a district court in Mitrovica. Excavations of mass graves have changed public opinion International officials have raised concerns about the treatment of Serbs by Kosovo's Albanian dominated judiciary. Mr Vuckovic's conviction has now been overturned and he will face a retrial in Mitrovica. The decision is likely to reopen the debate on whether Slobodan Milosevic should face genocide charges at The Hague, where he already stands accused of war crimes and crimes against humanity. The tribunal is currently preparing indictments of genocide against Mr Milosevic in connection with atrocities carried out in Bosnia and Croatia. Mass grave Serbian authorities in the western Serbian town of Bajina Basta began on Thursday to excavate a mass grave thought to contain the bodies of Kosovo Albanians. They are believed to have been transported out of the province in an attempt by Mr Milosevic to cover up atrocities and possible war crimes carried out during his campaign of terror. Serbian police believe around 800 victims of the conflict in Kosovo have been buried around Serbian territory. The gruesome revelations of the bodies are credited with changing public opinion in Serbia and increasing acceptance that war crimes were carried out under the Milosevic regime.
|
|
CiKoLa
Amicus
Gotovina Heroj!
Posts: 3,728
|
Post by CiKoLa on Nov 26, 2008 19:43:01 GMT -5
serbia was found guilty of not preventing Genocide.
|
|
|
Post by Caslav Klonimirovic on Nov 26, 2008 19:49:55 GMT -5
serbia was found guilty of not preventing Genocide. Croatia was not found guilty for Jasenovac.
|
|
|
Post by vinjak on Nov 26, 2008 19:55:35 GMT -5
serbia was found guilty of not preventing Genocide. There you go again didnt we have this debate a month or so ago ? There was no charges of not preventing Genocide thus how could Serbia be found guilty, it was a mention from the judges not a guilty verdict
|
|
CiKoLa
Amicus
Gotovina Heroj!
Posts: 3,728
|
Post by CiKoLa on Nov 26, 2008 19:56:48 GMT -5
^^ Are u a lawyer?
|
|
CiKoLa
Amicus
Gotovina Heroj!
Posts: 3,728
|
Post by CiKoLa on Nov 26, 2008 20:02:31 GMT -5
The International Court of Justice found that Serbia had violated its obligation under the Genocide Convention to prevent genocide in Srebrenica.
|
|
|
Post by Ja Ona i Pivo on Nov 26, 2008 21:11:30 GMT -5
cikola u dont need to copy paste all the time! We know what serbia was and was not found guilty of...
|
|
|
Post by radovic on Nov 26, 2008 23:18:01 GMT -5
serbia was found guilty of not preventing Genocide. Except that means literally nothing. The same logic could be said of Croatia, NATO, the Dutch and all countries who contributed troops to UNPROFOR.
|
|
|
Post by radovic on Nov 26, 2008 23:21:50 GMT -5
Has anyone looked at the posibily that this might be an attempt by the Croatian authorities to not by certain short-term and long-term liabiltiies to Serb citizens and residents. www.kurir-info.rs/clanak/vesti/kurir-26-11-2008/traze-50-milijardi- Na kraju æe se sve rešiti nagodbom koja æe se kompenzovati imovinom Srba iz Hrvatske. Srbija æe pristati da se ne isplate penzije Srbima koje Hrvatska duguje za period od 1991. do 1998, a taj dug se popeo na sedam milijardi evra. Zatim, iæi æe se na to da se ne vrate stanarska prava Srbima za 50.000 stanova, vrednosti tri i po do èetiri milijarde evra, i da se ne isplate naknade Srbima za akcije koje su deljene u procesu privatizacije, što iznosi 15 milijardi evra - navodi Buha.
|
|
|
Post by karabin on Nov 26, 2008 23:25:57 GMT -5
LOL!!! This case is dead on arrival. I pray the same for pickola.
|
|