I didn't claim they were Serbs, (although i bet 99% chances that they were),
Based on what? Your wishful thinking? If its just your wet dream please do not try to present it as a historic fact because it isnt. Oops I forgot you do not regard historic facts highly otherwise we wouldnt have this conversation over fyrom.
If so, we can also MEET those names in Bulgaria too, like Georgi Dragov4ev (http://bg-bg.facebook.com/people/Georgi-Dragovchev/100000208853807), Nikolai Dragov4ev (http://bg-bg.facebook.com/metalfen1), Hristo Dragovchev (http://hirsto-dragovchev.blogspot.com/) and many more, which I have no time and patience to google any more.
Again: here is a "discovery" of your scale so your argument is null and void. But I will never try to proove that those names link Bulgarians with the Dragoviti tribe, because there are enough historic documents that proove that this tribe lived on certain area (west of Solun), was incorporated in Bulgarian kingdome (beginning of 9 century) and later the inhabitants of those places are called by everyone Bulgarians. Those superficial "discoveries" are not needed here because the historical truth is already on the Bulgarian side.
As I prooved you "discovery" is indeed laughable and it proves nothing since we meet the name in Bulgaria too.
I did and I still think it doesnt prove nothing and that it6 is indeed very laughable.
He is indeed Bulgarian (if you are talking about KIRIL PEICHINOVIC) and I guess he felt that someday Pyrro will claim him as Serb so he left more than enough prooves of his REAL ethnicity(undoubtedly Bulgarian):
Ogledalo ("A mirror")
was written in the 'most common and illiterary Bulgarian language of Lower Moesia' (
'ïðåïðîñòåéøèì è íåêíèæíèì ÿçèêîì Áîëãàðñêèì äîëíèÿ Ìèñèè').
In Utesheniå Greshnim ("Solace of the sinner") he referred to the language of the work as the
'common Bulgarian language of Lower Moesia, of Skopje and Tetovo' ('ïðîñòèé ÿçèê áîëãàðñêè äîëíèÿ Ìèñèè Ñêîïññêèé è Òåòîâñêèé').So much for the "Serbian "ethnicity of Kiril.
Is it Lubomir Miletich? He is deffinately Bulgarian:
Lyubomir Miletich (Bulgarian: Ëþáîìèð Ìèëåòè÷) (14 January 1863 – 1 June 1937) was a leading Bulgarian linguist, ethnographer, dialectologist and historian, as well as the chairman of the Bulgarian Academy of Sciences from 1926 to his death.
Lyubomir Miletich was born in Štip, today in the Republic of Macedonia, to a Bulgarian family originally from Edirne (Odrin) in modern Eastern Thrace, Turkey. His great-grandfather voivode Mile had left Edirne and settled in the Austrian Banat in the early 19th century, where his grandfather Simo was born. Simo had two sons, Svetozar and Georgi, Lyubomir's father, who, after briefly living in Bosnia and North Africa, returned to his homeland to become a teacher in Macedonia and northwestern Bulgaria in 1859.[1]
Miletich studied in Sofia and Novi Sad, but finished school in the Zagreb Secondary School for Classical Education in 1882 and graduated in Slavistics from the University of Zagreb and Charles University in Prague, where he was taught by Jan Gebauer. Miletich participated in the foundation of Sofia University in 1888. He became a Ph.D. of philology and Slavic philology of the University of Zagreb in July 1889. Miletich become the dean of the Faculty of History and Philology of University of Sofia during the 1903-04 academic year. During the 1900-01 and 1921-22, he was the rector of the University.
Since 1898, Miletich was a member of the Bulgarian Academy of Sciences, which it presided from 1926 until his death. Similarly, he was the chairman of the Bulgarian Macedonian Scientific Institute from 1927 to his death.
Miletich was a doctor honoris causa of the Kharkiv University, a corresponding member of the Russian Academy of Sciences, as well of the Russian Historical Society, the Polish Academy of Learning, the South Slavic Academy of Sciences, the Czech Academy of Sciences, the Czech Scientific Society and the Czech Ethnographic Society, the Hungarian Ethnographic Society and the Russian Archaeological Institute.
Miletich died in Sofia on 1 June 1937.
Maybe you should pay attention to the fact that the name system (of the surnames) in Bulgaria had a change and -ich is not suffix exclusive for the Serbs:
[edit] Suffixes
Although most popular, "–ov/–ev" and respectively "–ova/–eva" are not the only patronymic and given name suffixes. The second most popular suffix is "–ski/–ska" (sometimes "–ki/–ka") (e.g. Zelenogorski, Stoykovska, Petrinska), which, besides often being merely a version of an "–ov/–ev" or "-–ova/–eva" name, may also often indicate origin (e.g. Sofianski — "from Sofia", Stamboliyski — "from Istanbul").
Another suffix is "–in/–ina" (e.g. Kunin, Ganina, Radin). Unlike all other Bulgarian patronymics and family names, these stem from a female name (e.g. "of Kuna", "of Gana", "of Rada"). They are most common in the region of Razlog and Bansko.
For these three most popular suffixes, there is also a plural form used when referring to the family as a whole or several members of it (as opposed to a single member). For "–ov/–ova" and "–ev/–eva" it is "–ovi/–evi", for "–ski/–ska" it is "–ski" and for "–in/–ina" the form is "–ini".
Historically, the universal suffix "–ich" was quite popular in some regions (bearers of such names include Gavril Krastevich, Hristofor Zhefarovich, Petar Parchevich, Kiril Peychinovich, etc.), particularly among the Roman Catholic Bulgarians, but has today largely fallen out of use and is more typical for the Serbo-Croatian name system.In addition, other suffixes also existed: for instance, names like Tihanek, Kozlek, Lomek (suffixed "–ek") were historically dominant in the town of Koprivshtitsa.[1] (Internet Archive link)
Names lacking a suffix, though often foreign-sounding, have been more popular in the past, but still exist today (e.g. Beron, Tomash), despite being quite uncommon.
The other Pyrros comments do not deserve to be commented on.