|
Post by diurpaneus on Jun 17, 2008 9:55:37 GMT -5
PS: Ruse, that is not a celtic Cross. That is how the Crosses from Maramures (a region from Transsylvania) look like. Here is one example:
|
|
|
Post by jerryspringer on Jun 17, 2008 10:38:12 GMT -5
I don't quite understand what a "clear Romanian identification" means or even what a non-clear Romanian identification would mean.
The territory that the Albanians inhabit today was overwhelmed by Slavs, like the rest of the Balkans.
The first documents that affirms northern Vlachs being of Dacian origin derives from the 12th century. Anna Comnena was the first historian to make that affirmation. The first Romanian document to claim a Dacian origin for the Romanians is the 16th century Letopisetul Tarii Moldovei, followed by Cantemir's Descriptio Moldaviæ. That was centuries before the two principalities united.
Can you name one example?
|
|
|
Post by rusebg on Jun 17, 2008 10:58:33 GMT -5
This is utterly irrelevant reply. Cognate, you are stoned. And this is the better option. The other one is that when you last had a poo, you managed to throw away your sense of humour as well.
Rhezus, I have an advice for you. When two guys are measuring their dic.ks, don't place your arse in between.
Diur, thanks for the picture. Now it makes sense.
|
|
Rhezus
Moderator
DERZA STURIA TRAUS
Posts: 1,674
|
Post by Rhezus on Jun 17, 2008 12:45:15 GMT -5
Haha.. Ruse, do you really do that? ;D You mean you measure your tongues?!..
|
|
|
Post by rusebg on Jun 17, 2008 17:06:15 GMT -5
Tongues are also used in sex but this is irrelevant to the measures you should take for your own safety.
|
|
Rhezus
Moderator
DERZA STURIA TRAUS
Posts: 1,674
|
Post by Rhezus on Jun 17, 2008 23:45:33 GMT -5
No one is talking about sex here.
|
|
|
Post by chalkedon on Jun 18, 2008 8:27:40 GMT -5
I support finding archeoligical sites of Bulgaria. I think its fascinating if we can find more info on thracians One thing I cant figure out...is why their language died out like the illyrians From what herodotus says...they were the most populated groups in europe. And not to shabby in the fine arts... correct me if im wrong...but werent the thracians also head hunters ? en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Image:Bulgar_warior.jpg
|
|
|
Post by chalkedon on Jun 18, 2008 8:39:32 GMT -5
Also, Ever wonder why nobody is claiming scythian lineage yet... You would think that would of happened by now...
I think well have a splinter group in the near future that will make the connection ;D kindof like our fyromian friends...
|
|
|
Post by c0gnate on Jun 18, 2008 9:10:14 GMT -5
This is utterly irrelevant reply. Cognate, you are stoned. And this is the better option. The other one is that when you last had a poo, you managed to throw away your sense of humour as well. Did I touch a nerve, Rusecho?
|
|
|
Post by jerryspringer on Jun 18, 2008 9:40:07 GMT -5
What do you base that on?
|
|
|
Post by rusebg on Jun 18, 2008 11:32:31 GMT -5
No, your reply was just plain stupid.
|
|
|
Post by chalkedon on Jun 18, 2008 11:56:09 GMT -5
What do you base that on? Just that pic on wikipedia reminded me of something i read a long time ago about thracians. I might of been wrong...anyway i thought about the connection between the two. that is all..
|
|
|
Post by rusebg on Jun 18, 2008 15:54:50 GMT -5
I claim it ;D
|
|
|
Post by c0gnate on Jun 18, 2008 17:07:17 GMT -5
No, your reply was just plain stupid. Ruse, the correct dose is written in small letters on the side of the pillbox.
|
|
Rhezus
Moderator
DERZA STURIA TRAUS
Posts: 1,674
|
Post by Rhezus on Jun 18, 2008 18:16:43 GMT -5
Hey, hey Expatriot... The link you attached - it's a bulgar warrior, not a thracian! This is Thracian..
|
|
|
Post by chalkedon on Jun 18, 2008 18:29:53 GMT -5
yes...put together both and you have a bulgarian. Thats what i was referring to...
|
|
|
Post by diurpaneus on Jun 19, 2008 15:37:54 GMT -5
Too late... the hungarians claimed it before you.
|
|
|
Post by benkovski on Jun 20, 2008 21:38:40 GMT -5
I am saying exactly what I wrote earlier.
You make of this what you will.
No my friend, I am not envious of Romania or its history. I am Bulgarian and have my own history to be proud of. In fact you have reason to be proud of your southern neighbor as well. After all, your entire country was a province in the Bulgarian states and empires for quite a while. In fact your official administrative language was Old Bulgarian until the 17th-18th century, and the alphabet you used until then was the Bulgarian alphabet, Cyrillic. Hah, you are also a Christian because you were a part of the First Bulgarian Empire when we accepted the Christian religion. Our Tsar extended this faith to all of his subjects.
Pick up a book on Roman history, particularly something pertaining to the life within the empire. Like I said, Romanians are as much Dacian as Macedonians are ancient Macedonians.
Until the 13th century there was no clear identification of being Romanian, or rather a Vlach north of the Danube. Vlach seems to have been a generic term that has been used to designate partly designate today’s Romanians, but also other peoples who currently don’t identify with Romania. Prior to the late 1200’s it is just known that there were some Latin speaking inhabitants in various pockets in the Balkans. But who were they, who did they become, where did they come from.. historians can only speculate, but they don’t know for sure. Something you probably didn’t know is.. one of the Bulgarian rulers actually settled about 50,000 East Roman prisoners from Anatolia in the regions of present day Romania.
Some Ukrainians and Russians appear to claim Scythian lineage, but it’s as thin as the ancient Macedonian claims.
Although, Scythia is where Old Great Bulgaria was founded. There are also many references that equate Bulgarian rulers and culture with Scythians.
|
|
|
Post by diurpaneus on Jun 21, 2008 3:10:31 GMT -5
Here goes the bulgarian inferiority complex again. Way to go, dickhead
|
|
|
Post by jerryspringer on Jun 21, 2008 9:45:47 GMT -5
If you make the claim, you're supposed to provide the source. The Vlach identity north of Danube is attested at least as early as the 11th century. If I remember it right, the number was less and they were lated released. Not our entire country. Northern Moldavia, for instance, was not. Check your maps again. Also, those were vassal states. There was no such thing as official language, just like there's no official language in USA. There was, however, an administrative language, out of which Church Slavonic was used the most. Other languages that were used was Latin, Greek, and on a few ocassions, Romanian. This has been discussed by the members of this forum before, with sources. You bring no sources and nothing new to the table. Here, let me repeat myself again: if the Bulgarians had introduced Christianity to the Romanians, then we wouldn't have had the Latin terms of religion. The best bet is that Bulgarians introduced the Orthodoxy as they knew it, but that has not served us well. Check this thread: illyria.proboards19.com/index.cgi?board=balgarijabulgaria&action=display&thread=4669
|
|