|
Post by hellboy87 on Oct 29, 2008 5:02:29 GMT -5
ermmm..........why you ask that???
|
|
|
Post by greek1234 on Nov 1, 2008 6:42:47 GMT -5
ermmm..........why you ask that??? Well you seem not to know that the people of Europe, the Near East and North Africa are all Caucasian. The Turks today are mainly Caucasian, some are still Mongoloid. I believe the people who contributed to the Turkish nation can be called Turks.
|
|
|
Post by hellboy87 on Nov 1, 2008 7:50:25 GMT -5
No no no
Europeans,North Africans,West Asians and maybe the Indians of the Indian subcontinent are classified in racial anthropology as CAUCASOIDS.
Caucasians,are used to denote "white" people you know? People of European descent.
But also for people of the Caucasus.
|
|
|
Post by Novi Pazar on Nov 12, 2008 19:56:31 GMT -5
^ thats true hellboy
|
|
|
Post by peccafly on Mar 22, 2009 4:21:03 GMT -5
FFS Turks are anyone who feels they are Turkish. If they speak Turkish, eat Turkish food, listen to Turkish music, know the cultural rules... thats it they are Turks. No one cares about ethnicity. its very true. 100% agree
|
|
|
Post by hellboy87 on Mar 22, 2009 7:24:12 GMT -5
|
|
pax
New Member
Posts: 16
|
Post by pax on Mar 25, 2009 6:53:02 GMT -5
Hellboy, what you are aiming to prove with such infos and claims all regarding the ethnic and racial matters almost in every message you post on this forum?
It's true that there are numerous people having roots from Balkans(me, too) and Caucasian territory in Turkey. 'Turk' term had been used for defining all muslim folks living within the borders of Ottoman empire before the modern Turkey got founded in 1923.
Same approach towards the citizenship conception continued in modern Turkey as well and it was officialized as stabilizing everyone -except the recognized non muslim minorities- living in the country as Turk, without any discrimination based on ethnic issues.
I hope you manage to comprehend this very easy matter shortly and stop spreading such BS in Turkish SF.
|
|
|
Post by hellboy87 on Mar 26, 2009 9:29:29 GMT -5
Well I was just trying get what the wiki page was saying because the facts there are contradictory.They mentioned Turk as a citizen thing,then they talk about DNA and their numbers,which is noting to do with citizenship.
Btw,Turk was used for Muslims in the Balkans,in Anatolia,Turk was used as a derogatory term and ethnic term for those who were culturally Ottoman/Turkish.Turk was used to refer to anything related to the Ottoman goverment and the like
Turk was not used for Muslims in North Africa and areas south of Anatolia.
|
|
Dèsîŗĕ Yèarning
Senior Moderator 
Simarik Turkish Pwincess
Know yourself...
Posts: 3,563
|
Post by Dèsîŗĕ Yèarning on May 1, 2009 20:38:36 GMT -5
There are black Turks actually  u are so misinformed.. Im so lucky to live in Turkey and see everything 1st hand rather than collect selective garbage from the internet like hellbok www.biyotarih.com/?p=507
|
|
Dèsîŗĕ Yèarning
Senior Moderator 
Simarik Turkish Pwincess
Know yourself...
Posts: 3,563
|
Post by Dèsîŗĕ Yèarning on May 1, 2009 21:30:31 GMT -5
|
|
|
Post by hellboy87 on May 4, 2009 12:16:03 GMT -5
There are black Turks actually  u are so misinformed.. Im so lucky to live in Turkey and see everything 1st hand rather than collect selective garbage from the internet like hellbok www.biyotarih.com/?p=507Did I say there isnt any Black Turks? Perhaps you havent seen the thread by janny on AfroTurks supporting Hobama
|
|
Dèsîŗĕ Yèarning
Senior Moderator 
Simarik Turkish Pwincess
Know yourself...
Posts: 3,563
|
Post by Dèsîŗĕ Yèarning on May 5, 2009 4:11:05 GMT -5
You said there are no ethnic black Turks.
Since there aren't many ethnically pure races left, and because Turks mixed with 10's of different races, we can say there are ethnically black Turks. A child with a black african Father and white Turkish mother, who is born in Turkey, who then goes onto marry another child of the same ethnicity, who then marries another of the same ethnicity (which is what has happened in some areas) are ethnically black Turks.
|
|
|
Post by hellboy87 on May 5, 2009 23:51:04 GMT -5
Yes,I said there are ethnic Turks who are Black
Ethnic Turks of Ottoman connection:those in Anatolia are Middle Eastern/West Asian people,and then ethnic Turks of the Balkans who are European(white).Though we still need a confirmation on whether they are indigenous Balkanians who were Turkified because the Gagauz have been proven to have been Turkicized locals by studies.
I got it now,that Turk can be ethnicity and or nationality,those Blacks in Turkey with Turkish blood(ethnic Turkish ancestry) are Turks(as in citizen of Turkey) and also Turks because they have ETHNIC Turkish ancestry.
Those Blacks with only Black ancestry in Turkey,are Turks as in nationality not blood.
|
|
|
Post by thracian08 on May 6, 2009 15:53:32 GMT -5
Desire, I agree with you.
What do you mean by "white"? Turkish people are white - Caucasion. There are "White" Turks that live in Anatolia that are not from the Balkans.
Also, you keep saying Turks look like Greeks, Arabs, and Persians. You are very incorrect. In fact, Turkish people are lighter skinned than Greek people, are not very hairy, have more asian features - rounder faces, higher cheekbones, have straight hair, and do not have long faces - unlike the Greek people.
I also believe the Rum people in central Turkey look different from the Greek people in Greece because they are not ethnically Greek. Anatolian was governed by different city states, and and different groups of people.
Also, it is not if the people from the Balkans are homogenous themselves. The Byzantine Empire was not only Greek you know. There were Greeks, Armenians, Italians, and other people within that Empire.
Back then, no one based anything ethinicity, as nationalism is a new thing which began in the early 1900's in Europe.
There were waives of different people who took over the Balkans and Turkey itself.
|
|
|
Post by tsompanos on May 7, 2009 2:00:30 GMT -5
Desire, I agree with you. What do you mean by "white"? Turkish people are white - Caucasion. There are "White" Turks that live in Anatolia that are not from the Balkans. Also, you keep saying Turks look like Greeks, Arabs, and Persians. You are very incorrect. In fact, Turkish people are lighter skinned than Greek people, are not very hairy, have more asian features - rounder faces, higher cheekbones, have straight hair, and do not have long faces - unlike the Greek people. I also believe the Rum people in central Turkey look different from the Greek people in Greece because they are not ethnically Greek. Anatolian was governed by different city states, and and different groups of people. Also, it is not if the people from the Balkans are homogenous themselves. The Byzantine Empire was not only Greek you know. There were Greeks, Armenians, Italians, and other people within that Empire. Back then, no one based anything ethinicity, as nationalism is a new thing which began in the early 1900's in Europe. There were waives of different people who took over the Balkans and Turkey itself. and then you woke up
|
|
|
Post by thracian08 on May 7, 2009 13:35:08 GMT -5
You do not make any sense.
|
|
|
Post by thracian08 on May 7, 2009 13:37:38 GMT -5
My point is that no one in any country can be 100% any ethnic group.
I am making a generalization about Turks in Turkey, and that they do not look Greek, Arab or Persian. They look different from these groups of people.
|
|
|
Post by Vizier of Oz on May 7, 2009 13:52:18 GMT -5
Desire, I agree with you. What do you mean by "white"? Turkish people are white - Caucasion. There are "White" Turks that live in Anatolia that are not from the Balkans. Also, you keep saying Turks look like Greeks, Arabs, and Persians. You are very incorrect. In fact, Turkish people are lighter skinned than Greek people, are not very hairy, have more asian features - rounder faces, higher cheekbones, have straight hair, and do not have long faces - unlike the Greek people. I also believe the Rum people in central Turkey look different from the Greek people in Greece because they are not ethnically Greek. Anatolian was governed by different city states, and and different groups of people. Also, it is not if the people from the Balkans are homogenous themselves. The Byzantine Empire was not only Greek you know. There were Greeks, Armenians, Italians, and other people within that Empire. Back then, no one based anything ethinicity, as nationalism is a new thing which began in the early 1900's in Europe. There were waives of different people who took over the Balkans and Turkey itself. Quite correct points. 
|
|
|
Post by raven on May 7, 2009 15:33:57 GMT -5
"I am making a generalization about Turks in Turkey, and that they do not look Greek, Arab or Persian. They look different from these groups of people. "
I disagree. There is alot of phenotypical overlaps between Turks and the other ethnic groups around them, as is to be expected.
|
|
|
Post by thracian08 on May 7, 2009 16:56:44 GMT -5
There might be overlaps, but generally speaking, those traits that I wrote adhere to those groups of people. I can detect a Greek, Arab or Persian person immediately and can differentiate between the three. I can also easily detect a Turk as well.
|
|