Patrinos
Amicus
Peloponnesos uber alles
Posts: 4,763
|
Post by Patrinos on Apr 16, 2010 6:07:09 GMT -5
Here i show you a video from Bosnia look this Man and you can see this is not Slavic Faces but absolut pure Dinaric. and for the Osmanli Fan say me why turks and greeks look same is that because this was the longest Porn ever 500 Years turks have you know what i mean. Its known that Greek Womens today love most Muslims and greek mans love most greek Mans. Hellas Gyros Our hobby was to kill Osmanlis... not marry them...we let this for the muslim balkanoids, like you and Arnavuds... enjoy your Osmanlilik... Bosnaks role in history is a disgrace for south Slavs and all Balkanians...
|
|
|
Post by PrijesDardanian on Apr 16, 2010 6:42:18 GMT -5
Here i show you a video from Bosnia look this Man and you can see this is not Slavic Faces but absolut pure Dinaric. and for the Osmanli Fan say me why turks and greeks look same is that because this was the longest Porn ever 500 Years turks have you know what i mean. Its known that Greek Womens today love most Muslims and greek mans love most greek Mans. Hellas Gyros Our hobby was to kill Osmanlis... not marry them...we let this for the muslim balkanoids, like you and Arnavuds... enjoy your Osmanlilik... Bosnaks role in history is a disgrace for south Slavs and all Balkanians... LMFAO....you never did any battle againt turks...so you are proud only 1821...in fact were albanians who made the war againt osmanil in modern greece (not greeks or rums)... Albanians even in south Greece in XV-XVII made alot battle againt turks but never did rums, i wonder why?
|
|
Patrinos
Amicus
Peloponnesos uber alles
Posts: 4,763
|
Post by Patrinos on Apr 16, 2010 9:45:36 GMT -5
Our hobby was to kill Osmanlis... not marry them...we let this for the muslim balkanoids, like you and Arnavuds... enjoy your Osmanlilik... Bosnaks role in history is a disgrace for south Slavs and all Balkanians... LMFAO....you never did any battle againt turks...so you are proud only 1821...in fact were albanians who made the war againt osmanil in modern greece (not greeks or rums)... Albanians even in south Greece in XV-XVII made alot battle againt turks but never did rums, i wonder why? i won't comment the 1821 thing...its ridicilous to speak with an albo about this...you cannot understand...it includes the meanings of pride and dignity... you know that words..,? And what the f,,,k was going on...did some albos came and liberated us and left their country to continue to be the icoglans' reservoir of baba Osman...???so much philhellenism...? And you met Turks 4 centuries after they've came in the area... Greeks had to deal with all the Asians, including Turks, for hundreds of years while albos' ancestors were milking their goats and pillaging the cities in the shore... (PS.omg...you are a Kosovar....and you speak about the Turks... ;D ;D ;D ;D what the hell i read over here...paranoia...!!)
|
|
|
Post by PrijesDardanian on Apr 17, 2010 3:06:29 GMT -5
what exactly did greeks againt turks, ore rumuli? Albanians didn't camed from Albania to liberate modern greece but already they lived there and fought like brave while you greeks were mostly peasants and have not made insurrection against invaders and always have have print ready from others, albanians, vllachs ect. (PS.omg...you are a Kosovar....and you speak about the Turks... ;D ;D ;D ;D what the hell i read over here...paranoia...!!) Why not?, anyway we are not from asia minor to hate them like you do ...and i am speaking about greeks (not turks) that have been always Turkish Wise and their employees and now you are make false proud here even funny is that you charges other nations that have no done anything ...haha what disastrous hallucinations you greeks have, funny ;D
|
|
Patrinos
Amicus
Peloponnesos uber alles
Posts: 4,763
|
Post by Patrinos on Apr 17, 2010 3:54:37 GMT -5
Ok Mehmeti Osmani ;D (did i get it correct?)
|
|
|
Post by bosna505 on Apr 17, 2010 4:15:53 GMT -5
Here i show you a video from Bosnia look this Man and you can see this is not Slavic Faces but absolut pure Dinaric. and for the Osmanli Fan say me why turks and greeks look same is that because this was the longest Porn ever 500 Years turks have you know what i mean. Its known that Greek Womens today love most Muslims and greek mans love most greek Mans. Hellas Gyros Our hobby was to kill Osmanlis... not marry them...we let this for the muslim balkanoids, like you and Arnavuds... enjoy your Osmanlilik... Bosnaks role in history is a disgrace for south Slavs and all Balkanians... Absolut stupid your Comments and i dont answered on this Shit only one thing its generaly known that Bosnians was ever the best from the Best of Elitefighters ask all Great Empires. What is Greece your Nation will death in 50 Years this Homonation is a Joke and Greeks are Turks look your Faces. We are Muslims Proud Muslims like many other Countrys in the World and Greek Womens loves so much Muslims say me please why Greek Girls loves so much Hardanal is this Greek Culture???
|
|
|
Post by bosna505 on Apr 17, 2010 4:24:49 GMT -5
Ok Mehmeti Osmani ;D (did i get it correct?) Why so many Greeks converts to Islam??? You know very good your Religion is a big Lie and the people knows that very good Greeks love Islam i know many Converters. Greece will doed in 50 Years or be a Muslim Republic this is the hard greek Reality.
|
|
Patrinos
Amicus
Peloponnesos uber alles
Posts: 4,763
|
Post by Patrinos on Apr 17, 2010 4:34:19 GMT -5
allah allah.... ;D ;D
is that true that in the muslim paradise there is free pilaf and 72 virgins...?
|
|
|
Post by bosna505 on Apr 17, 2010 5:18:09 GMT -5
Yes its truth but its not intressant for you and other Greeks i know because greeks will 72 Homos when not become Homos than a greek dont go fights for the Homonation. Ask your God (Satan) he give 72 Homos for you than your dream will be reality.
|
|
|
Post by bosna505 on Apr 17, 2010 5:29:10 GMT -5
allah allah.... ;D ;D is that true that in the muslim paradise there is free pilaf and 72 virgins...? Here a Original Text from a DNA Forum this Text is a answer from a DNA Expert of this Website. Wie bereits schon mal erwähnt, gibt es noch nicht so viele Studien über die genetische Zusammensetzung im Balkangebiet. Bei den zwei gesendeten Studien hat sich meine Vermutung bestätigt. Leider kann man die Studie "Review of Croatian Genetic Heritage as Revealed by Mitochondrial DNA and Y Chromosomal Lineages" nicht als sehr zuverlässige Quelle ansehen. Erstens wird die Methode nicht ausführlich genug erklärt und der Ort der Publizierung ist nicht typisch für die Resultate einer Studie. Diese Studie hätte neue Ergebnisse und diese publiziert man meistens in einem internationalen Magazin. Die zweite Studie "The Peopling of Modern Bosnia-Herzegovina:Y-Chromosome Haplogroups in the Tree Main Ethnic Groups" dageben ist sehr zuverlässig. Die Annuals of Human Genetic, die Fachzeitschrift, wo diese Studie publiziert wurde, ist sehr seriös und einer der Hauptreferenzen für die Humangenetik. Zusätzlich ist die Methodenbeschreibung, sowie der Aufbau der Studie standardisiert. Allerdings kann man nicht behaupten, dass die erste Studie nicht stimmt und die zweite schon. Für eine richtige Überprüfung, müsste man Gegenquellen haben und weitere Daten. Bei der ersten Studie ist weiterhin noch das Thema problematisch, da hier nur Kroaten angeschaut wurden. Das Ergebnis dieser Studie war, dass Kroaten ein typisch europäisches Genpool haben, in dem sie als häufigste haplogruppe H mütterlicherseits und I väterlicherseits haben. Das gute an dieser Studie ist, dass sie auch die mütterliche Seite angeschaut haben. Wie aber schon in andere Studien passiert ist, sind die Ergebnisse der mütterlichen Linie (mtDNA) nicht so spannend, da Völkerwanderungen meistens duch die Analyse der väterlichen Linie (Y-Chromosom) wiedergespiegelt werden. In der zweiten Studien wurden die drei Hauptvölker von Bosnien-Herzegowina angeschaut. Hier kam heraus, dass die Bosnische Kroaten am homogensten sind, d.h. dass die Kroaten keine grosse Vielfalt in den Ursprüngen haben, sondern sie sich gegenseitig sehr ähnlich sind. Die grösste Vielfalt finden wir bei den Bosnier, welche als erste Menschen in diesen Gebiet einwanderten und nachher mehrere Völker wie die Slawen, Avaren, Kroaten, Serben aufnehmen mussten. Die Bosnier sind ursprünglich Illyrer gewesen, doch nach dem Zerfall des Römischen Reiches kam eine grosse Verschmelzung mit den Slawen, wodurch heutige Bosnier meistens als Slawen bestimmt werden. Lediglich manche Völker in den Bergern, konnten die Illyrische Abstammung durch die territoriale Abgrenzung bis heute noch behalten. Weiterhin hat man aber festgestellt, dass die bosnische Kroaten, bosnische Serben und Bosnier sehr stark miteinander verwandt sind und sich stärker ähneln als mit den Kroaten oder Serben. D.h. dass ein bosnischer Serbe stärker mit einem Bosnier als mit einem Serbe verwandt ist. Die Y-Haplogruppe I1b, welche typisch für das Balkangebiet ist, findet bei den bosnischen Kroaten die grösste Übereinstimmung. 70% der bosnischen Kroaten gehören zu dieser Haplogruppe. die Serben dagegen sind in dieser Haplogruppe nur mit 35% vertreten, obgleich diese immer noch der grösste Stamm ausmacht. Die Y-Haplogruppe J, typisch für eine jüdische Abstammung oder eine arabische Herkunft findet bei den Bosnier die grösste Vertretung mit 12%, während es bei den Kroaten lediglich 1% dazugehören. Diese drei Ethnien in Bosnien sind nah verwandt mit Makedonier, Griechen und Albaner. Kroaten, Ukrainer, Slowenen und Pole dagegen sind eher mit bosnische Kroaten verwandt, aber nciht mit Bosnier oder bosnische Serben. Im allgemeinen wurde aber bestätigt, dass bosnische Kroaten, bosnische Serben und Bosnier das gleiche Genpool teilen.
|
|
Patrinos
Amicus
Peloponnesos uber alles
Posts: 4,763
|
Post by Patrinos on Apr 17, 2010 7:26:58 GMT -5
talk us some illyrian...dobre Ismailovic? ;D
|
|
|
Post by bosna505 on Apr 17, 2010 7:51:13 GMT -5
In Bosnia have many many Illyrian Words our Name of Nation Bosnia is Illyrian than many Citys like Brcko is connected to Illyrian Brcko is from the Tribe Breuci than we have in Bosnia the Surname Bato of the Illyrian King from Bosnia Bato and many other links to Illyrians.
|
|
|
Post by PrijesDardanian on Apr 18, 2010 2:25:40 GMT -5
Ok Mehmeti Osmani ;D (did i get it correct?) You are wrong Xhaferis Karamanlis
|
|
|
Post by 91illyrian on Apr 20, 2010 9:15:40 GMT -5
Ethnic groups in Bosnia and HerzegovinaMore than 95% of population of Bosnia and Herzegovina belongs to one of its three constitutive ethnic groups: Bosniaks, Serbs and Croats . The term constitutive refers to the fact that these three ethnic groups are explicitly mentioned in the constitution, and that none of them can be considered a minority or immigrant. While each have their own standard language variant and a name for it, they speak mutually intelligible languages. On a dialectal level, Serbs, Croats and Bosniaks speak a variety of Štokavian dialects: Serbs, Bosniaks and Croats "southern" neo-Štokavian; Croats and Bosniaks "western" neo-Štokavian and Bosniaks and Croats "eastern-Bosnian" old-Štokavian. These dialects are mutually intelligible, but have fixed phonetic, morphological and lexical differences. The question of standard language of Bosnia and Herzegovina is resolved in such a way that three constituent ethnic groups have their educational and cultural institutions in their respective native or mother tongue languages: Bosnian, Croatian and Serbian. The most easily recognizable feature that distinguishes the three ethnic groups is their religion, with Croats predominantly Catholic Christians, Bosniaks predominantly Muslim, and Serbs Orthodox Christians. This has led some to believe that these ethnic groups emerged from religious groups in a process that occurred in 19th century. On the other hand, numerous historians, culturologists and ethnologists consider that Croats and Serbs have merely completed their ethnic integration in the 19th century (like, for instance, Norwegians or Slovaks), while Bosniaks crystallized into a separate ethnic group only at the end of the 20th century. A Y chromosome haplogroups study published in 2005 found that "three main groups of Bosnia-Herzegovina, in spite of some quantitative differences, share a large fraction of the same ancient gene pool distinctive for the Balkan area".
This supports the view that Bosniaks are autochthonous population of Bosnia (descendants of the same tribes that formed Serbs and Croats), regardless of their religious preferences (i.e. not only Muslims, but also Orthodox, Catholics or any other group in the country). A term for "Serb" or "Croat" as an autochthonous inhabitant was virtually unknown in Bosnia before 19th centurywhen the idea of identifying Bosnian Orthodox population with Serbs started to grow in Serbia with strong political substance, especially after Ilija Garasanin's silent program for a Greater Serbia - Nacertanije.In the same time the opposing political forces in the neighboring Croatia started to claim Bosnian Catholics as Croats, bringing confusion to the mainly apolitical population. BOSNIANS=CROATS/SERBS MUSLIM This Propaganda is like that propaganda of macedonians/bulgarians that believe to be ancient macedonians.
|
|
|
Post by bosna505 on Apr 21, 2010 7:05:51 GMT -5
Ethnic groups in Bosnia and HerzegovinaMore than 95% of population of Bosnia and Herzegovina belongs to one of its three constitutive ethnic groups: Bosniaks, Serbs and Croats . The term constitutive refers to the fact that these three ethnic groups are explicitly mentioned in the constitution, and that none of them can be considered a minority or immigrant. While each have their own standard language variant and a name for it, they speak mutually intelligible languages. On a dialectal level, Serbs, Croats and Bosniaks speak a variety of Štokavian dialects: Serbs, Bosniaks and Croats "southern" neo-Štokavian; Croats and Bosniaks "western" neo-Štokavian and Bosniaks and Croats "eastern-Bosnian" old-Štokavian. These dialects are mutually intelligible, but have fixed phonetic, morphological and lexical differences. The question of standard language of Bosnia and Herzegovina is resolved in such a way that three constituent ethnic groups have their educational and cultural institutions in their respective native or mother tongue languages: Bosnian, Croatian and Serbian. The most easily recognizable feature that distinguishes the three ethnic groups is their religion, with Croats predominantly Catholic Christians, Bosniaks predominantly Muslim, and Serbs Orthodox Christians. This has led some to believe that these ethnic groups emerged from religious groups in a process that occurred in 19th century. On the other hand, numerous historians, culturologists and ethnologists consider that Croats and Serbs have merely completed their ethnic integration in the 19th century (like, for instance, Norwegians or Slovaks), while Bosniaks crystallized into a separate ethnic group only at the end of the 20th century. A Y chromosome haplogroups study published in 2005 found that "three main groups of Bosnia-Herzegovina, in spite of some quantitative differences, share a large fraction of the same ancient gene pool distinctive for the Balkan area".
This supports the view that Bosniaks are autochthonous population of Bosnia (descendants of the same tribes that formed Serbs and Croats), regardless of their religious preferences (i.e. not only Muslims, but also Orthodox, Catholics or any other group in the country). A term for "Serb" or "Croat" as an autochthonous inhabitant was virtually unknown in Bosnia before 19th centurywhen the idea of identifying Bosnian Orthodox population with Serbs started to grow in Serbia with strong political substance, especially after Ilija Garasanin's silent program for a Greater Serbia - Nacertanije.In the same time the opposing political forces in the neighboring Croatia started to claim Bosnian Catholics as Croats, bringing confusion to the mainly apolitical population. BOSNIANS=CROATS/SERBS MUSLIM This Propaganda is like that propaganda of macedonians/bulgarians that believe to be ancient macedonians. Oh Oh Oh what for a stupid SHIT! In my last Post you can read all bosnians are very similar and a bosnian croat or bosnian serb are similar to bosnian muslims but they are different to croats from croatia and serbs in serbia. All Bosnians are Geneticly the SAME but Bosniaks are the ABSOLUT first Nativ People in this Region.
|
|
|
Post by 91illyrian on Apr 21, 2010 10:57:41 GMT -5
;D Encyclopedia Britannica, eleventh edition (year: 1910 (!)), Volume IV, page 281, entry "Bosnia and Herzegovina", subentry (#10) Population and National Characteristics (quote:) In 1895 the population, which tends to increase slowly... numbered 1,568,092. The alien element is small, consisting chiefly of Austro-Hungarians, gipsies, Italians and Jews. Spanish is a common language of the Jews, whose ancestors fled hither, during the 16th century, to escape the Inquisition. The natives are officialy described as Bosniaks, but classify themselves according to religion. Thus the Roman Catholics PREFER the name of CROATS, Hrvats or Latins; the Orthodox, of SERBS; THE MOSLEMS, OF TURKS. All alike belong to the Serbo-Croatian branch of the Slavonic race; and all speak a language almost identical to Serbian, though written by the Roman Catholics in Latin instead of Cyrillic letters. TO AVOID OFFENDING EITHER "SERBS" OR "CROATS," IT IS OFFICIALLY DESIGNATED "BOSNITCH." ... The Bosnians or Bosniaks resemble their Serbian kindfolk in both appearance and character. They have the same love for poetry, music and romance; the same *intense* pride in their race and history; many of the same superstitions and customs. The Christians retain the Serbian costume, modified in detail, as the occasional use of the turban or fez. The "Turkish" women have in some districts abandoned the veil; but in others they even cover the eyes when they leave home. (end quote) This clearly tells about "tolerance" -- in 1910 -- between those who call themseves "Serbs", "Croats" and "Turks". The three ethnic groups of Bosnia would rather be called Bosnians (English), Bosnitch (German) or Bosanci (in Serbo-Croatian) because a Croat would be *offended* to be called a "Turk", "Turk" a Serb etc. (It is surprising to read that Muslims liked to be called "Turks" during the government of Austro-Hungaria. Muslims are Serbs or Croats, but mostly Serbs, who, through centuries converted to Islam). We have to remind you that the above text was written in 1910, i.e. before Muslims (the "Turks") and Croats committed unspeakable atrocities on their Serbian neighbors (in World War I and World War II). World War II). The following sentence was repeated in Encyclopedia Britannica for decades. One can find it in all editions of Britannica from 1971 to 1986. (The entry is: Yugoslavia, World War II). Quote: ...IN BOSNIA... THE CROATIAN FASCISTS BEGAN A MASSACRE OF SERBS WHICH, IN THE WHOLE ANNALS OF WORLD WAR II, WAS SURPASSED FOR SAVAGERY ONLY BY THE MASS EXTERMINATION OF POLISH JEWS!!!!!!!! (end quote) IT IS A CRIME TO FORCE THESE PEOPLE TO LIVE TOGETHER. Especially now after a bloody war. We have seen, once again, how Muslims have showed unbelievable chauvinism and intolerance toward the Serbs. (They did it for the third time in this, twentieth century alone). The Muslims demanded to separate from the Serbs. Even though the only difference is the RELIGION. (The language and everything else is the same). It is a dangerous precedent to declare a group of people a new nation just because they are of different religion. Many countries would over-night become "multi-ethnic".On the other hand, let it be clear, if the Muslims insist to have their own state then no-one should deny them their right for self-determination. And no Serb was denying them that right. Serbs were not denying the Muslims right to form a state in a portion of Bosnia where they, the Muslims, are majority population. But if there is to be any peace or justice then the Serbs should have exactly the same right. Wherever the Muslims were majority before the war - they can govern that teritorry any way they like it. But wherever the Serbs were majority, acording to the U.N. Charter - they have right for self-determination the same way. The Serbs have right to exist. They have right to form their own state. And No Communist design should have precedent over the rights of the living human beings. Today, the Muslims, with backing of the Western powers, want to usurp the right for the entire Bosnia - even though they are MINORITY there. Muslims want to usurp the right for themselves to be the only people called Bosnians. In other words they want to be the only ones to rule the entire Bosnia.Thus, let us remind you, once again, the Serbs are also the indigenous people of Bosnia. Actually they were the *first* Slav tribe to settle there. THE PURE NATION OF "ILLYRIANS" BOSNIAKS ;D
|
|
|
Post by 91illyrian on Apr 21, 2010 11:07:22 GMT -5
The following map was issued by U.S. Department of State, Office of The Geographer. Document id#: 1777 3-92 STATE (INR/GE). The map was entitled: [glow=red,2,300]YUGOSLAV REPUBLICS March 10, 1992 PREDOMINANT ETHNIC GROUPS (*) [/glow] At the time when the map was created (in March 1992) the United States was still recognizing the country of Yugoslavia. Less than a month later (April 6, 1992) the American administration recognized three more countries out of the body of Yugoslavia; the UN recognized multi-ethnic state. This map is a Smoking Gun Proof that the perpetrators of the Yugoslavian vivisection and the civil war in Bosnia were quite aware of the type of crime they were committing. The questions are many: * What about the right of PEOPLE for self-determination? Why were the internal, administrative borders of Yugoslavia (designed by Joseph Broz Tito) sacrosanct? Why does the dead Communist Dictator have more rights than the living people? * If the right for self-determination was given to the "Black people" (Slovenes), "Brown people" (Croats), "Blue people" ("Macedonians") and "Green people" (Muslims) - what about "Purple people"? Why was their right not recognized? * Just look at Bosnia. What was recognized!? * Look at disconnected green islands representing Muslim majority territories in Bosnia. Why was the control given to Muslims - the minority population of the Communist designed "Republic"!? Kindergarten children would be more fair in separating the colors of this map! But the whole project was not about fairness, was it? And it was not about peace. It was about America, the World Hegemon instigating a war and using it as a pretext to conquer yet another part of the globe. ______________________________________________________ (*) - A note from the above document: Selected ethnic groups shown represent a majority for each area. Areas represented in white have no one group over 50%. Note 1 (from the above pie chart): Yugoslavs are those persons who listed themselves as such in the 1981 census. They are dispersed throughout the republics. Author: Dan Kiser, U.S. Department of State, Office of Geographer. Special thanks to Roderick Mackler. ______________________________________________________ OUR NOTE: While the above map shows the region of Krajina (but even that with no precision to it), the map is unfair to the Serbian people at least in these ways: 1. many areas presented here as "no majority area" (in white) are actually areas with Serb majority (examples: Vukovar area, Bilogora-Pakrac area) 2. Montenegrin Serbs are presented in dissimilar color to the other Serbs thus breaking the contiguity of the Serbian lands. 3. " Muslims" as a nation are Communist Tito's invention. Ethnically they are (mostly) Serbs.One more IMPORTANT NOTE: The country of Yugoslavia was formed in 1918. Its first name was the "Kingdom of Serbs, Croats and Slovenes". Those three nations were the constituent nations of Yugoslavia. Thus, they have the right to (using peaceful means) negotiate leaving the union. Albanians of Kosovo are NOT constituent nation of Yugoslavia. They are minority in the true sense of the term. To make a precedent and give Albanians of Kosovo "right" to secede would open a whole new Pandora's box in the international relationships.
|
|
|
Post by bosna505 on Apr 22, 2010 7:28:32 GMT -5
The following map was issued by U.S. Department of State, Office of The Geographer. Document id#: 1777 3-92 STATE (INR/GE). The map was entitled: [glow=red,2,300]YUGOSLAV REPUBLICS March 10, 1992 PREDOMINANT ETHNIC GROUPS (*) [/glow] At the time when the map was created (in March 1992) the United States was still recognizing the country of Yugoslavia. Less than a month later (April 6, 1992) the American administration recognized three more countries out of the body of Yugoslavia; the UN recognized multi-ethnic state. This map is a Smoking Gun Proof that the perpetrators of the Yugoslavian vivisection and the civil war in Bosnia were quite aware of the type of crime they were committing. The questions are many: * What about the right of PEOPLE for self-determination? Why were the internal, administrative borders of Yugoslavia (designed by Joseph Broz Tito) sacrosanct? Why does the dead Communist Dictator have more rights than the living people? * If the right for self-determination was given to the "Black people" (Slovenes), "Brown people" (Croats), "Blue people" ("Macedonians") and "Green people" (Muslims) - what about "Purple people"? Why was their right not recognized? * Just look at Bosnia. What was recognized!? * Look at disconnected green islands representing Muslim majority territories in Bosnia. Why was the control given to Muslims - the minority population of the Communist designed "Republic"!? Kindergarten children would be more fair in separating the colors of this map! But the whole project was not about fairness, was it? And it was not about peace. It was about America, the World Hegemon instigating a war and using it as a pretext to conquer yet another part of the globe. ______________________________________________________ (*) - A note from the above document: Selected ethnic groups shown represent a majority for each area. Areas represented in white have no one group over 50%. Note 1 (from the above pie chart): Yugoslavs are those persons who listed themselves as such in the 1981 census. They are dispersed throughout the republics. Author: Dan Kiser, U.S. Department of State, Office of Geographer. Special thanks to Roderick Mackler. ______________________________________________________ OUR NOTE: While the above map shows the region of Krajina (but even that with no precision to it), the map is unfair to the Serbian people at least in these ways: 1. many areas presented here as "no majority area" (in white) are actually areas with Serb majority (examples: Vukovar area, Bilogora-Pakrac area) 2. Montenegrin Serbs are presented in dissimilar color to the other Serbs thus breaking the contiguity of the Serbian lands. 3. " Muslims" as a nation are Communist Tito's invention. Ethnically they are (mostly) Serbs.One more IMPORTANT NOTE: The country of Yugoslavia was formed in 1918. Its first name was the "Kingdom of Serbs, Croats and Slovenes". Those three nations were the constituent nations of Yugoslavia. Thus, they have the right to (using peaceful means) negotiate leaving the union. Albanians of Kosovo are NOT constituent nation of Yugoslavia. They are minority in the true sense of the term. To make a precedent and give Albanians of Kosovo "right" to secede would open a whole new Pandora's box in the international relationships. Wow you have big intresst on Bosnians its very good when you will be a real Illyrian you must know all about Bosnia. But is very funny the serbs in Bosnia have more Illyrian Blood than Albanians HAHAHAHAHAAHHAHAHAHAHAAHAHAHHAAH Bosnia 50% of I2a2 Albania17% of I2a2 www.eupedia.com/europe/european_y-dna_haplogroups.shtmlAlbanians its Hard we understand you but its Time to accept and stop lie yourself. But Illyrian91 you are a undercover Illyrian
|
|
|
Post by 91illyrian on Apr 23, 2010 8:17:31 GMT -5
But is very funny the serbs in Bosnia have more Illyrian Blood than Albanians HAHAHAHAHAAHHAHAHAHAHAAHAHAHHAAH Bosnia 50% of I2a2 Albania17% of I2a2www.eupedia.com/europe/european_y-dna_haplogroups.shtmlAlbanians its Hard we understand you but its Time to accept and stop lie yourself. But Illyrian91 you are a undercover Illyrian ;D You are so funny.. .l2a2 illyrian??? I2a2 (formerly I1b) is typical of the Dinaric Slavs (Croats, Serbs and Bosniaks). Its highest density is observed around ex-Yugoslavia and Moldova, but it is also common to a lower extent in Albania, Northern Greece, Bulgaria, Romania, Ukraine, Belarus, and southwestern Russia. The high concentratio of I2a2 in north-east Romania, Moldova and central Ukraine reminds of the maximum spread of the Cucuteni-Tripolye culture before it was swallowed by the Indo-European Corded Ware culture. This could mean that the Cucuteni-Tripolye culture was a native European group of hunter-gatherers who adopted farming after coming in contact (with perhaps some intermarriages) with the Levantine farmers who settled in the Balkans (haplogroups E-V13, J2b and T). Etymology: The term Neo-Danubian is derived from Danubian ("of the River Danube"), a cultural designation associated with the proto-Nordics of the Neolithic, who brought Indo-European language (Slavic and Baltic) to the eastern steppes. Other names: - Oriental (Deniker) - Osteuropid (von Eickstedt; includes the East Baltic type) - Pre-Slavic (Czekanowski) - Slavic (popular anthropology) - Subnordic (Deniker; includes the East Baltic type) Origin: Danubian proto-Nordic altered by the semi-mongolid Ladogan racial type of the northeastern forests. This type was brought westward from the Volga country with the migrations of the Baltic Finns during the centuries immediately preceding and after the time of Christ. Today it presents a variable but easily recognizable phenotype of eastern Europe. www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/18664146your propaganda makes me laugh so ;D
|
|
|
Post by PrijesDardanian on Apr 23, 2010 11:48:57 GMT -5
hhahahahahaha
|
|