|
Post by Anittas on Sept 18, 2011 18:39:12 GMT -5
"called by Europeans "weak man of Europe" at the time"
Sick man of Europe, actually.
|
|
|
Post by Emperor AAdmin on Sept 18, 2011 18:40:50 GMT -5
Whether the name is Illyria or Yugoslavia is besides the point, unity is the point. The name in itself is almost irrelevant here if the final destination is the same. It is but a mere choice of clothing sort of speak.
|
|
|
Post by Emperor AAdmin on Sept 18, 2011 18:41:39 GMT -5
Correct, 'sick man of Europe', point still stands the same.
|
|
|
Post by Anittas on Sept 18, 2011 18:45:24 GMT -5
The only nation that could form a Balkan union, make it prosperous, and advance its civilization is, Romania.
|
|
|
Post by Emperor AAdmin on Sept 18, 2011 18:47:19 GMT -5
Romania huh Thanks for the nationalist perception of the solution of our needed unification as a region. I guess you don't grasp the point in the least.
|
|
|
Post by Anittas on Sept 18, 2011 18:50:26 GMT -5
You said that the name wouldn't bother you, as long as it would work.
|
|
|
Post by uz on Sept 18, 2011 18:51:09 GMT -5
Correct, 'sick man of Europe', point still stands the same. This is as absolute as it can get. We have even proven this, time after time again we pull the remarkable through unification.
|
|
|
Post by Anittas on Sept 18, 2011 18:52:09 GMT -5
Romania would be the name that would stand for our Byzantine heritage and would compromise all kinds of subjects to ... well, you know ... Romania!
|
|
|
Post by terroreign on Sept 18, 2011 19:00:30 GMT -5
AAdmin you should read Milovan Djilas and see what was fundamentally wrong with this "union".
Bolje svoje jaje no tudja kokoska
|
|
|
Post by Anittas on Sept 18, 2011 19:02:03 GMT -5
I took a look at Yugo-nostalgia (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Yugo-nostalgia) and you guys seem to fit the description.
|
|
|
Post by terroreign on Sept 18, 2011 19:05:04 GMT -5
i said this before and i will say this again, SFR Yugoslavia was the greatest mistake of our history
|
|
|
Post by uz on Sept 18, 2011 19:05:30 GMT -5
What we're talking about is bigger than Yugoslavia, and way beyond any type of nostalgija that goes with Yugo.
|
|
|
Post by terroreign on Sept 18, 2011 19:10:12 GMT -5
yugoslavia sacrificed our identity, history and sacred customs for power, now if that's not an unholy creation i don't know what is.
Aadmin, the Serbdom will unite! Srpska will declare unilateral independence, NATO will dismantle, Seselj will return, and Serbia's troops will march on Pristina.
This i guarantee you
|
|
|
Post by Anittas on Sept 18, 2011 19:16:07 GMT -5
Wow, Krivo can foresee the future. But Krivo, what will happen to the Albanians living in KosovA?
|
|
|
Post by terroreign on Sept 18, 2011 19:25:41 GMT -5
well i did major in international relations and wrote an extensive paper on why NATO should not and cannot exist much longer...so my heart is set on that one i before that wrote a paper on the history of democracy in Iran and successfully predicted the riots a few years back. concerning the albanians, the ones lacking proof of home ownership will be arrested and serbs will be invited back to their homes (there's currently a prevalence of albanian squatters in abandoned serb homes). reparations will be made to the serb families by albanian families, as well as additionally funding from the serb government. all KLA leaders, former members, etc will be rounded up and indicted by the Serbian government (due to being an identified terrorist group), and the other albanians will be guaranteed an equal and just citizenship in Serbia.
|
|
|
Post by uz on Sept 18, 2011 19:30:19 GMT -5
Something like NATO will always have to exist. Your bordering the line in saying the UN shouldn't exist either.
|
|
|
Post by Anittas on Sept 18, 2011 19:31:17 GMT -5
Really? Cool. I don't see why NATO would seize to exist, though. There are no benefits from that, even if Ron Paul would become president (he wants to end the American empire overseas -- lolz).
|
|
|
Post by terroreign on Sept 18, 2011 19:33:42 GMT -5
Something like NATO will always have to exist. Your bordering the line in saying the UN shouldn't exist either. NATO was created to counter the warsaw pact, the latter was dismantled, why is NATO still here? it contradicts the UN in a plethora of aspects. (as in the 1999 bombing of serbia).
|
|
|
Post by uz on Sept 18, 2011 19:38:21 GMT -5
Something like NATO will always have to exist. Your bordering the line in saying the UN shouldn't exist either. NATO was created to counter the warsaw pact, the latter was dismantled, why is NATO still here? it contradicts the UN in a plethora of aspects. (as in the 1999 bombing of serbia). You know exactly why NATO is here, and why it "needs" to stay.
|
|
|
Post by terroreign on Sept 18, 2011 19:42:53 GMT -5
nato's selling of weapons & soldiers helps the american economic crisis, however the growing lack of european participation will make nato a burden upon american foreign relations and economy.
|
|