|
Post by uz on Oct 30, 2011 12:13:48 GMT -5
"This same argument; Milosevic was innocent untill proven guilty, nothing was proven, he died innocent. Mladic is innocent untill proven guilty, he is currently defending himself. " Hitler was innocent as well, I guess. Milosevic died mid-trial. Milosevic knew for some time that he was potentially being poisoned. They'res a huge controversy on what actually happened in case you missed it; In this handwritten letter Slobodan Milosevic speaks of the inadequate treatment administered by doctors of the International Tribunal for the Former Yugoslavia [sic] and again asks for the Russian Federation's support in obtaining permission to undergo a therapeutic course in a medical establishment in Moscow.A Health Ministry official said the medical team would be from the Bakulev Institute [RIA Novosti report], where Milosevic had wanted to be treated, and would also include Russia's chief pathologist. The ICTY Trial Chamber ruled against Milosevic's application for provisional release a Dutch toxicologist has told Reuters that based on blood tests he conducted on Milosevic two weeks ago showed that he had taken rifampicin, a drug used to treat leprosy and tuberculosis that would have countered the effects of Milosevic's heart medication.jurist.law.pitt.edu/paperchase/2006/03/russia-confirms-milosevic-letter-wants.phpThey didn't want him to defend himself. He would have brought down the house of cards. They even tried this at one point; Mr Tomlinson also claimed reports of a "blinding flash" in the tunnel prior to the crash and the reported involvement of another vehicle mirrored plans he had seen in 1992 for the attempted assassination of former Yugoslav President Slobodan Milosevic. news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/uk_news/scotland/3321823.stmMilosevic's blood 'bore traces of drug'www.guardian.co.uk/world/2006/mar/13/warcrimesTo think he took drugs he wasn't suppose to take to commit suicide is ridiculous to say the least. 1) He doesn't fit that profile. 2) He never had access to his medications, he was given when "needed" by the medics.
|
|
|
Post by uz on Oct 30, 2011 12:31:55 GMT -5
The Serbs tried to ethnically cleanse Kosovo and committed terrible crimes. In the aftermath of the war, the Serbs and those who collaborated with them suffered revenge attacks from the population they had terrorized. Most Albanian families came back to destroyed and looted property, they came back to missing family members... they were infuriated and vented on those they associated with the occupation regime. Honestly, that is to be expected in a post-war world. If the UCK, which never organized the mass ethnic cleansing, the Serbs fled of their own volition prior to the return of Albanian refugees largely because of the racist views they held against Albanians and largely because they knew that revenge was going to come. Again, no organ trafficking has even remotely been discovered, no "connections" with Al Qaeda have been verified or even come remotely come to being true (which makes it look like a lame attempt to delegitimize Albanians by simply preying on the fact that they are majority Muslim, which has failed). Instead of trying to actually bridge the gap, all you seem to be doing is rehashing all the old baseless allegations that have never reached any real level of inquiry (unless "inquiry" means a few baseless online articles). " Allegedly some of them formed their own units with Albanian leaders who spoke Arabic fluently." Really makes your case. Sourceless as well. ;D Serbians in kosovo throughout their history have been continuoesly tormented by the Albanians. Coward-like attacks against Serbs by the Albanians are documented, while your allegations are based on war-like times. The Albanian agenda was to cleanse Kosovo of Serbian pressence through driving out families, mass-killing and destruction of Serb cultural centers that have been built centuries before Albanians even arrived. If there was "remotely" no-evidence in the organ-traficking inquiry, then why has it been approved by the COE to have it investigated? Before any evidence can be made public a safety-guarantee for the witness' must be granted. This unfortunately has been a problem considering some have already been murdered. ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------- The witness from Belarus, identified only with initials A.K., had been one of the victims in the so-called Medicus case, named after the Pristina clinic where the alleged crimes took place. The most prominent defendants, who according to the indictment formed "an organised criminal group", are Kosovo's former health secretary Ilir Rrecaj and Lutfi Dervishi, a prominent urologistRrecaj is accused of having issued a licence for the Medicus clinic even though Kosovo law forbids organ transplants. Dervishi is alleged to have set up the whole organ transplant network.
Other suspects in the Medicus case include Turkish doctor Yusuf Sonmez, said to have performed organ removal surgeries, and Moshe Harel, an Israeli accused of having matched donors with recipients. Last month in Istanbul, Turkish public prosecutors indicted Sonmez and Harel over the case and requested a 171-year prison sentence for each. www.emg.rs/en/news/serbia/165595.htmlUnlike Marty, Special Rapporteur of the Council of Europe Jean Charles Gardetto spoke to journalists in Belgrade on Friday to say that witness protection was still problematic in the Western Balkans and that regional countries needed to work on improving the situation in the domain. He added that the Council of Europe intends to tackle the problem of witness protection both in the Balkans and in entire Europe and is currently evaluating witness protection systems in different countries.www.b92.net/eng/news/politics-article.php?yyyy=2011&mm=10&dd=28&nav_id=77073centerforinvestigativereporting.org/tags/dickmartyA key protected witness testifying in the war crimes trial of veteran Kosovo politician and former KLA member Fatmir Limaj has been found dead in Germany, where he apparently committed suicide, officials said on Wednesday"In the past have been reports in which Kosovo and EULEX were blamed for a weak protection system, and this case will strengthen those allegations," he says. "Some can use this as an argument that in Kosovo, investigations on war crimes and other hot issue are difficult, not to say impossible, because witnesses are dead." "In Kosovo, witnesses have been assassinated," Council of Europe (PACE) member Jean-Charles Gardetto told the council. "Apparently, things like house arrest or removal of the witness from the country is not enough. What we need is perhaps to remove the entire family of witnesses, or putting the witnesses in full custody of the police," suggests Bytyci. www.setimes.com/cocoon/setimes/xhtml/en_GB/features/setimes/features/2011/09/29/feature-02Kosovo rebels told UN of organ harvestsEthnic Albanian rebels in Kosovo gave detailed testimony in 2003 on an alleged program to kill Serb captives, sell their organs, and bury hundreds of victims to hide evidence of civilian killings, according to a U.N. document obtained by The Associated Press.The 30-page compilation of statements by at least eight people to U.N. investigators could provide momentum to claims that the world body failed to pay proper attention to war crimes by ethnic Albanian Kosovars in their 1990s war for independence.According to the documents, the sources told U.N. officials in 2003 that senior KLA officers and officials from the Albanian government were involved in the alleged crimes, which purportedly went on as late as the summer of 2000, almost a year after Kosovo came under U.N. and NATO control.www.bostonherald.com/news/international/europe/view/20110219kosovo_rebels_told_un_of_organ_harvests/srvc=home&position=recent
|
|
|
Post by toskaliku8711 on Oct 30, 2011 17:15:21 GMT -5
'If there was "remotely" no-evidence in the organ-traficking inquiry, then why has it been approved by the COE to have it investigated? Before any evidence can be made public a safety-guarantee for the witness' must be granted. This unfortunately has been a problem considering some have already been murdered."
Who are "some"? COE is going to investigate an allegation made by a war crimes prosecutor. However, you guys jumped on it as unequivocal truth from the moment you heard it. With quite some joy mind you, as if to say "YES! They made them suffer so now we can use them!" Unfortunately, since then nothing has occurred. Obviously it is not over, but the entire thing is collapsing... in a year or so it will be forgotten.
More right wing pro-Milosevic nonsense. There was never an ethnic cleansing campaign in Kosovo until the Serbs began atempts to forcefully colonize the region and failed to do so. The cultural destruction in the aftermath of the war was the end result of failed Serbian ethnic cleansing. Sorry if I don't quite feel sorry for a dozen or so old churches, the Serbian church jumped on the war bandwagon. They were at the front of the false victimization of Serbs in the 80s, the false "rapes" that were disproven by Serbs themselves (the only rapes that occurred in Kosovo were from the Serbian paramilitaries, those people you guys are so proud of).
A key protected witness testifying in the war crimes trial of veteran Kosovo politician and former KLA member Fatmir Limaj has been found dead in Germany, where he apparently committed suicide, officials said on Wednesday "
Another amazing non-sequitur. What does this have to do with the allegations of organ transplanting? Also, your first article is deceiving. The people prosecuted had setup a willful trade. Meaning a Turkish man was looking to trade his organs with some Israeli man. Was it right? Im not interested in that. However, doesnt show any evidence that ipso facto organs were forcefully removed. Again, no evidence, just baseless allegations.
Yea as if there is any reason to believe the self-victimization and conspiracies of a man who was probably slowly dying of whatever ailment he had. Good riddance!
|
|
|
Post by uz on Oct 30, 2011 17:24:41 GMT -5
I clearly stated that no evidence will be made public until security-guarantees can be made for the witness', I stated this for you, from the articles.
The article about Fatmir Limaj's (protected witness X) "commiting-suicide" has everything to do with my point. Sure, it hasn't been proven, but this incident raised major concerns regarding witness protection programs across Europe. So obvious Toski, stop missing the point.
No you're wrong; "Other suspects in the Medicus case include Turkish doctor Yusuf Sonmez, said to have performed organ removal surgeries, and Moshe Harel, an Israeli accused of having matched donors with recipients."
Organ transplants are illegal in Kosovo btw; So now you choose the lower road and begin to say that the "procedures" were willingfull? That's a hard laugh. LOL
You by default stand on the Albanian side of things, I get it, I really do, but this self-inflicted victimization the Albanian people continuously instill in their own will be their own downfall. Not to mention the damaging effects on a childs' psychology growing up under these conditions.
Funny how you so conveniently jump sides. The elitists who have had your back for so long are the same people implying these charges, and probably pushing it through, yet you choose to pick what part of their doings is "right" and "wrong". (just a funny observation)
When a UN official speaks out on "Serb" crimes, you call out all of what you got. Probably smiling inside too, while feeling warm and cozy. Given the same token, when a UN official speaks out on behalf Albanian crimes, you cry "FOWL-PLAY". Another funny observation.
*YAWN* try again
|
|
|
Post by Shqipni13 on Oct 30, 2011 20:16:17 GMT -5
Fatmir Limaj was tried himself at the hague. I don't believe he was a witness of any sort.
|
|
|
Post by uz on Oct 30, 2011 20:20:44 GMT -5
Fatmir Limaj was tried himself at the hague. I don't believe he was a witness of any sort. Limaj was not the witness they're talking about. The witness who supposedly killed himself was only known only as; "protected witness X". He was a key witness for the prosecutors, who was going to testify against the KLA in the war crime trials.
|
|
|
Post by toskaliku8711 on Oct 30, 2011 21:57:26 GMT -5
""Other suspects in the Medicus case include Turkish doctor Yusuf Sonmez, said to have performed organ removal surgeries, and Moshe Harel, an Israeli accused of having matched donors with recipients."
Okay... so the story was partially wrong. So apparently the doctor did the surgery in which recepients were matched with donors. Still does not look like a war crime to me. The donors signed up.
Again, the actual act is illegal, however, there is no sign of anything involuntary going on. Is the above ethical? About as ethical as a pimp and prostitute. Not much else there though. No ficticious yellow house, no POWs, no nothing. More non-sequiturs.
|
|
|
Post by Anittas on Oct 31, 2011 2:27:27 GMT -5
We are talking about Albanians abducting people and harvesting their organs. There is enough proof to indicate that such crimes were committed. The lack of strong proof is due to the refusal of Albanian and Kosovar cooperation on the issue.
It sucks that you lack a heart--you and the rest of the cruel SOBs--but don't go stealing the hearts of other people!
|
|
|
Post by toskaliku8711 on Oct 31, 2011 7:58:54 GMT -5
|
|
|
Post by uz on Oct 31, 2011 17:27:31 GMT -5
We are talking about Albanians abducting people and harvesting their organs. There is enough proof to indicate that such crimes were committed. The lack of strong proof is due to the refusal of Albanian and Kosovar cooperation on the issue. It sucks that you lack a heart--you and the rest of the cruel SOBs--but don't go stealing the hearts of other people! actually, untill now, there is none. Florence Harttman doesn't believe it, and no serious doctor would believe that someone could, in 1999, in Northern Albania, do that (for obvious reasons: you need sterilizied surgery rooms, qualified doctors, no time enough to bring the organs in Tirana, not even talking about bringing them abroad ...). The lack of proper equipment is also the point of the illegalities being talked about. Your Florence Hartmann is a journalist directing her stance to the reader. She is irrelevent. All the evidence you need will come in to action when the witness' are guaranteed security. Is this clear enough for you to understand? These claims are not coming from the Serbian government, they're coming from Albanians, non-Albanians, Americans, and former-KLA soldiers themselves. This is a delicate issue if it comes to light. Many others' besides the KLA will be held accountable. When the time is right everything will be dropped on Thaci, to relieve responsiblity from the Eurocrats and Americans. www.guardian.co.uk/world/2010/dec/14/illegal-organ-removals-charges-kosovowww.guardian.co.uk/world/2010/dec/14/kosovo-prime-minister-llike-mafia-bossAgain, everything I post here are sources Non-Serb, and Non-Serb "accusations". Something like this can take down the whole Kosovo-project and many other "top" people, it's no wonder that it's being stalled.
|
|
|
Post by uz on Oct 31, 2011 17:32:26 GMT -5
""Other suspects in the Medicus case include Turkish doctor Yusuf Sonmez, said to have performed organ removal surgeries, and Moshe Harel, an Israeli accused of having matched donors with recipients." Okay... so the story was partially wrong. So apparently the doctor did the surgery in which recepients were matched with donors. Still does not look like a war crime to me. The donors signed up. Again, the actual act is illegal, however, there is no sign of anything involuntary going on. Is the above ethical? About as ethical as a pimp and prostitute. Not much else there though. No ficticious yellow house, no POWs, no nothing. More non-sequiturs. You refuse to aknowledge the possibility b/c it would stain all that you beleive in. Your assumption that Serbians would go to an underground Albanian hospital cordinated by the KLA to willingly have their organs removed, to donate to another is above all the most ridiculous statement you have ever made here (that I have read). Let's leave it at that.
|
|
|
Post by toskaliku8711 on Oct 31, 2011 17:42:53 GMT -5
No, I said that your above is not a good example because it does not have anything to do with being forced... Anyway, there is no point going further, this will just go in circles. I'll say what I said at day one: we will see. I am confident nothing happened, almost 100% confident. We will see. Or, actually, since you can't prove a negative, maybe we wont.
|
|
|
Post by uz on Oct 31, 2011 18:23:52 GMT -5
NATO violations of Internal Law. "The attacks that have started on the Federal Republic of Yugoslavia a few hours ago are in clear violation of Article 53 of the Charter. No country, group of countries or regional arrangement, no matter how powerful, can arrogate to itself the right of taking arbitrary and unilateral military action against others. That would be a return to anarchy where might is right... The attacks now taking place on Yugoslavia have not been authorised by the Council, acting under Chapter VII, and are therefore completely illegal... What NATO has tried to do is to intimidate a government through the threat of attack, and now through direct and unprovoked aggression, to accept foreign military forces on its territory... There are several traditional descriptions for this kind of coercion; peacekeeping is not one of them." (1) NATO actions constitute a violation of Chapter I, Article 2 (4) of the UN Charter which states: "All Members shall refrain in their international relations from the threat or use of force against the territorial integrity or political independence of any state, or in any other manner inconsistent with the purposes of the United Nations." Chapter VII, Article 39 states: "The Security Council shall determine the existence of any threat to the peace, breach of the peace, or act of aggression and shall make recommendations, or decide what measures shall be taken in accordance with Articles 41 and 42, to maintain or restore international peace and security. (2) The bombing of Yugoslavia is a violation of NATO's own charter which claims it is a defensive organization and is only committed to force if one of its members is attacked. No member of NATO was attacked. The relevant sections of NATO's basic purpose reads as follows: "It provides deterrence against any form of aggression against the territory of any NATO member state. It preserves the strategic balance within Europe." When communist rule ended in Europe and the Warsaw Pact was dismantled, presumably these rationales for NATO's existence also ended. An alliance usually posits an enemy in advance, and the enemy lies outside of the alliance system. A commonly perceived external enemy is, after all, the main reason for forging an alliance, not for some vague eventuality that a powerful enemy may arise in some distant future. Without an external enemy there would not be sufficient consensus and motivation to keep the alliance together. There is no strategic balance in Europe to keep. NATO is dominant and international laws have become inconvenient. (3) The so-called Rambouillet "Agreement" (Serbia did not agree to it) is a violation of Articles 51 and 52 of the 1980 Vienna Convention on the Law of Treaties. Article 51 entitled "Coercion of a Representative of a State" declares: "The expression of a State's consent to be bound by a treaty which has been procured by the coercion of it representative through acts or threats directed against him shall be without legal effect. Article 52 entitled "Coercion of a State by the Threat or Use of Force"reads: "A treaty is void if its conclusion has been procured by the threat or use of force in violation of the principles of international law embodied in the Charter of the United Nations." jurist.law.pitt.edu/icty.htmKosovo – NATO’s violation of its UN mandateUNSCR 1244 clearly divides the duties of the international presence in Kosovo in two – responsibility for political developments, negotiations, civil administration and rule of law to the UN mission, and for maintenance of a safe and secure environment to the force that became KFOR. According to UNSCR 1244, NATO has no political mandate; none whatsoever. This means that once order was secured at the northern Kosovo crossing points, responsibility there returned to the civil presence, in this case EULEX under the November 2008 agreement with the UN. Any law enforcement – whether of entry procedures, customs, whatever – would be performed by the local police and/or EULEX. There would be no KFOR – American – troops stopping vehicles and banning commercial shipping. Perhaps, stretching the KFOR mandate, it might have a role in searching vehicles for arms, but nothing more.www.transconflict.com/2011/08/kosovo-natos-violation-of-its-un-mandate-178/icty.org/sid/10052#VrecommendationsHUMAN RIGHTS WATCH LETTER TO NATO SECRETARY GENERAL JAVIER SOLANA www.ess.uwe.ac.uk/kosovo/Kosovo-Current%20News176.htmKosovo: EU Investigation a Step to Justice A BBC investigation has revealed powerful evidence that the separatist ethnic Albanian Kosovo Liberation Army (KLA) maintained a network of detention facilities in Kosovo and Albania, where it held both ethnic Serbs, Roma, Albanian and other captives. The investigation follows credible allegations in the book The Hunt, by Carla del Ponte, former chief prosecutor of the Yugoslav war crimes tribunal, about the abduction and cross-border transfer of around 400 ethnic Serbs and other captives from Kosovo to northern Albania after the withdrawal of Serbian forces on June 1999FEDERAL REPUBLIC OF YUGOSLAVIA; ABUSES AGAINST SERBS AND ROMA IN THE NEW KOSOVO-HARASSMENT AND INTIMIDATION -ABDUCTIONS, DETENTION AND ABUSE -KILLINGS -DISPLACEMENT -ARSON, LOOTING, DESTRUCTION OF PROPERTY, AND TAKEOVER OF HOMES Read all details in this Human Rights Watch Report.www.hrw.org/legacy/reports/1999/kosov2/#_1_12---- Cause and Effects of the depleted Uranim NATO dropped on Serbia.This again, being against International Law, thus a war crime. Read the report prepared by UNMIK; www.who.int/ionizing_radiation/pub_meet/en/Report_WHO_depleted_uranium_Eng.pdfmore information on agreements can be found in the above link.
|
|
|
Post by uz on Oct 31, 2011 18:45:44 GMT -5
To Kill a Nation: The Attack on Yugoslavia - Michael ParentiThe book speaks for itself, I think every Serb out there knows who this guy is. For 78 days in 1999, the United States and NATO forces responded to the violence in Kosovo by conducting aerial attacks against Yugoslavia. Parenti gives an unabashedly critical assessment of this intervention, based on a solid and passionate rejection of Western leaders' "lies" about events in the Balkans and Western interests in that part of the world. Readers not familiar with his leftist analysis may find Parenti's dismissal of NATO's justification for its 1999 bombing campaign shocking or silly; others may find it thought-provoking. He argues that Western intervention in Yugoslavia was driven not by a humanitarian desire to stop ethnic cleansing, but rather by a self-interested determination to subjugate formerly Communist countries to the forces of free-market globalization. The government-controlled media in the U.S., he claims, was unfairly prejudiced against Slobodan Milosevic, once he was no longer of use to the West.- Invoking Humanity: War, Law and Global Order - Danilo Zolo In this first time translation in English, Danilo Zolo considers Carl Schmitt's maxim in the context of the "humanitarian war" waged against the Federal Republic of Yugoslavia in the Spring of 1999 by 19 NATO countries. This erudite and disturbing book is a political, legal and philosophical reflection on an extraordinary display of Western Power and its present and future impact on the global system of international relations.Zolo's account of the war is located within the context of the irresistible drive of globalization which he argues brings economic, financial and military, ecological and ethnic-religious turbulence in its wake. Not only the future of the Balkan region, he suggests, is at stake here, but the fate of international law, the future role of the United Nations and the political destiny of Europe.(One of my personal favorites).
|
|
|
Post by Novi Pazar on Oct 31, 2011 20:22:54 GMT -5
Uz, with all the media spin of Serbian mass murder and genocide of angelic albanians in kosovo who only want peace from the racist serbian oppressive regime in belgrade, it was shown that, NATO, did not have evidence for even ONE albanian civilian murdered in kosovo by the Yugoslav army or security forces.
|
|
|
Post by uz on Oct 31, 2011 20:29:37 GMT -5
Uz, with all the media spin of Serbian mass murder and genocide of angelic albanians in kosovo who only want peace from the racist serbian oppressive regime in belgrade, it was shown that, NATO, did not have evidence for even ONE albanian civilian murdered in kosovo by the Yugoslav army or security forces. NATO acted against the UN-security council's decision. This act alone was illegal and a war-crime. You are correct; No evidence of genocide at all exists. If they're was remotely any evidence at all, the UNSC would have given the go-ahead no problem for NATO to intervene. Albanians in Kosovo know this already, they rely on illegalities to remain "seperate" from Serbia and suport from the United States which will soon disapear.
|
|
|
Post by Novi Pazar on Oct 31, 2011 21:01:42 GMT -5
Uz, the whole kosovo crisis begins before 1999 and even before the riots of 1981.
The propaganda perpetrated by Albanians was, "Serbs and Montenegrins are the privileged class, while we are getting disenfranchised by them."
Could this have been a motto going back to the league of Prizren in 1878? Albanians then fearing their loss (status wise) or privileges enjoyed during the Ottoman period, a paranoia set in realising that the Ottomans are on the way out, hence why they fought with them in the end times. This paranoia continued post Ottoman, but their new Ottoman buddy, the Communists, were unintensionally helping their cause:
"Kosovo became an autonomous province in 1968; Albanians had extensive control of the local political administration, and cultural and educational organizations…"—Nyrop (1982:76)
Does it tell you Uz that the Serbs and Montenegrins from the region had political privileges?
Again, if the Serbs and Montenegrins from the region were a privileged class, then why were they falling:
"Between 1961 and 1981 Serbs dropped from roughly 23 percent to slightly more than 13 percent of the province’s population; at the same time, Albanians rose from two-thirds to over three-quarters of all inhabitants of Kosovo. In part the Albanian high birthrate accounted for the province’s changing ethnic portrait; the exodus of Serbs from the province, however, was more worrisome to Serbian officialdom. There had been a trickle of Serbs, mostly white-collar workers, displaced by the growing Albanian presence in local industry and government administration from the late 1960’s onward."—Nyrop (1982)
Does the above quote point to the fact that the serbs as a privileged class were getting discriminated?
How about this quote:
Pristina University, founded in 1970, was Yugoslavia’s third largest university by 1980. Its enrollment expanded nearly seven times in the decade and was transformed from being a disproportionately Serb student body to one predominantly Albanian."—Nyrop (1982:76)
Uz, what makes me laugh so hard at Albanian propaganda, Albanian propaganda is of similar nature to BuLgarski propaganda, is basically opposite of the reality on the ground.
Take what l mean:
Albanians will say in their propaganda that they expressed resentment against what they viewed as Kosovo’s subordination to Serbian republican officials in Belgrade.
well, what subordination?
The Kosovo parliament, meeting in Pristina, could veto Serbia-wide measures passed by the Serbian parliament in Belgrade, but Belgrade did not have a similar veto power over decisions taken in Pristina pertaining to Kosovo!
Quote:
"…even in policy areas formerly subject to uniform solution throughout Serbia, the provincial leaders—primarily the Albanian dominated leadership of Kosovo (for the leadership of Vojvodina remains heavily Serb)—exercise de facto veto power through their representatives in the [Serbian] republican parliament. The constitutional provisions for the organization and operation of the Serbian parliament have created a de facto federal structure for the republic [of Serbia]."—Nyrop (1982:192)
PS UZ why do you think the kosovo albanians had the highest number (ratio wise) committed to the league of communists?
When l have more time l will add here.
|
|
|
Post by uz on Oct 31, 2011 21:45:17 GMT -5
Novi; The Albanians throughout history have proven to always side with the "bigger" and "stronger" side, pushing aside all elements of morality. We Serbs have a great past with many glories. A true legacy compared to what they claim to hold. Take a look at this and see what their "allies" have done to " their" lands, homes and peoples. Uranium 'killing Italian troops' 10 January 2007 Italian soldiers are still dying following exposure to depleted uranium in the wars in Bosnia and Kosovo, their relatives sayThe US says it fired around 40,000 depleted uranium rounds during the Bosnian and Kosovo conflicts. In 2002 the Italian defence ministry published a report compiled by independent scientists which found a higher than average number of servicemen were suffering from cancer.
It said there was an excessive number of Hodgkin's disease victims among Italian Balkan peacekeepers.
A number of children fathered by the soldiers have been born with disabilities.news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/europe/6247401.stmCheck out this report prepared by the United Nations Environment Programme.postconflict.unep.ch/publications/duserbiamont.pdfNo one can deny this anymore, there is no more room for lies. This is what NATO and USA went completely against;SECURITY COUNCIL REJECTS DEMAND FOR CESSATION OF USE OF FORCE AGAINST FEDERAL REPUBLIC OF YUGOSLAVIA (Press Release) www.un.org/News/Press/docs/1999/19990326.sc6659.html
|
|
|
Post by Novi Pazar on Nov 2, 2011 4:39:43 GMT -5
^ Sickening stuff Uz, if the US really loved their temporary subjects (Albanians) they wouldn't have bombed them with depleted Uranium.
I want to add more points to the arguement prior to 1999 that the angelic albanians were getting racially harrassed by the privilaged Serbs.
The following UZ are factual points that summarises political aspects in kosovo, about the time when radical Albanians begin their major conquest (1981):
- Kosovo Albanians controlled the provincial government;
- Kosovo Albanians controlled the cultural institutions;
- Albanian was the official language in the province (and in fact Serbs in Kosovo were forced to learn Albanian, not the other way around);
- Education was conducted in Albanian;
- Albanians were the overwhelming majority of students at Pristina University
- Albanians were the overwhelming majority in the Kosovo police force
- As The Economist reported in 1981, "Mr Fadil Hoxha [was] a member of Jugoslavia's collective state presidency and a Kosovo Albanian." What does this mean? The collective presidency of the Yugoslav federation was composed of representatives from its constituent republics, and also representatives from Kosovo and Vojvodina. However, Kosovo and Vojvodina were not republics of Yugoslavia but provinces of Serbia. Thus, Kosovo was treated as if it were a republic of Yugoslavia as far as the collective presidency of the federation was concerned.
- Since 1974, the Kosovo parliament in Pristina (Kosovo's capital) could veto decisions taken in Belgrade that corresponded to the entire Republic of Serbia (of which Kosovo is a province), but Belgrade had no say on matters that were decided in Pristina (!).
- Albanians were discriminating against Serbs in industry and in the political administration.
- Kosovo Serbs, apparently starting in the 1970s, were subjected to low-level terrorism and harassment by either the Albanian KLA or its precursors. This caused a trickle, then a flood of Kosovo Serbs to flee the province out of fear for their lives.
Is this the picture of an oppressed Albanian minority in Serbia? Or is this the picture of an oppressed Serbian minority in Kosovo?
|
|
|
Post by terroreign on Nov 3, 2011 4:30:57 GMT -5
^2004 prizren albs went on a terror rampage against the prizren serb community, forcibly kicked them out. explain that.
|
|