kun
Membrum
Posts: 52
|
Post by kun on Dec 1, 2012 9:14:29 GMT -5
So you say you're "cool mongols", now I know what I'm dealing with here...mongoloids as in retards.
You do have a long history in Silistria, south of the danube where you belong.
|
|
|
Post by amateurs on Dec 1, 2012 11:21:30 GMT -5
So you say you're "cool mongols", now I know what I'm dealing with here...mongoloids as in retards. You do have a long history in Silistria, south of the danube where you belong. We were saying they are cool Mongols, and not mongoloids. The latter category belongs to you. Hey, we're not racist, just selective. Intelligence belongs north of Danube, stupidity goes south of Danube.
|
|
|
Post by Catcher in the Rye on Dec 1, 2012 12:09:46 GMT -5
@hun
You have a long history in Mongolia, but you don't belong there. You belong nowhere, you are Mongolian vagabonds.
|
|
kun
Membrum
Posts: 52
|
Post by kun on Dec 1, 2012 14:09:10 GMT -5
which is it? dacians or cool mongols or do you even know? Your balkan genetics are still so apparent. Even the Bulgarians are more evolved
|
|
|
Post by amateurs on Dec 1, 2012 15:42:45 GMT -5
which is it? dacians or cool mongols or do you even know? Your balkan genetics are still so apparent. Even the Bulgarians are more evolved Bulgarians are among the least evolved. Romanians are not racist, we are patriotic, not nationalist; and we don't hate. Romania is the only Balkan country that adopted Liberalism in the 19th century. The rest of the Balkan countries still live in a Mediaval mindset.
|
|
kun
Membrum
Posts: 52
|
Post by kun on Dec 2, 2012 9:12:59 GMT -5
No I disagree, among Balkanoids, Bulgarians are the most sophisticated, intelligent and civilized, they were crippled by unjust treaties just like Hungary and they've surpassed Romania (with all its gifts of territory, natural resources and infrastructure). But you're right, how could a Romanian be a racist, you people are a mixture of every godforsaken nationality in the region. but you are chauvinists and xenophobes though, and as far as "hate", why should you hate anyone? you have everyone's land. You're "the hated".
|
|
|
Post by amateurs on Dec 2, 2012 9:34:07 GMT -5
No I disagree, among Balkanoids, Bulgarians are the most sophisticated, intelligent and civilized, they were crippled by unjust treaties just like Hungary and they've surpassed Romania (with all its gifts of territory, natural resources and infrastructure). But you're right, how could a Romanian be a racist, you people are a mixture of every godforsaken nationality in the region. but you are chauvinists and xenophobes though, and as far as "hate", why should you hate anyone? you have everyone's land. You're "the hated". Bulgarians are among the least evolved specimen of the Balkans. Romanians visit Bulgaria for cheap vocations and cheaper products. If we were to close our borders, you would starve, so watch your mouth!
|
|
kun
Membrum
Posts: 52
|
Post by kun on Dec 2, 2012 13:22:31 GMT -5
Romanians are the self-denying, backward little brat, that bites the hand that feeds it. Bulgarians gave you their writing and religion, Hungarians their cities and history in central Europe. But as hard as you might try your backward Balkaness always shows through.
|
|
|
Post by amateurs on Dec 2, 2012 13:56:50 GMT -5
Romanians are the self-denying, backward little brat, that bites the hand that feeds it. Bulgarians gave you their writing and religion, Hungarians their cities and history in central Europe. But as hard as you might try your backward Balkaness always shows through. Bulgarians gave us the writing, but that's nothing to cheer for, since it was some ugly ass piece of shyt that made us puke! As for the religion, of course you didn't give us the religion, since this region was christianized before your sorry ass settled here! Hungarians gave us some cities, true, but we gave them a country to settle on. Or they took it, but what's the difference, right? Now, as for you ugly heads, if you don't have the looks, at least have the brains. Have neither and ... ugh!
|
|
|
Post by Ceanglid Desdemon on Dec 2, 2012 20:58:52 GMT -5
Vlachos are so lame. Theye occupie Silistra uen Bulgarien uere fichtinc Graeci and Tourki. Uen Bulgarien and Vlachos fichtinc in 1916 at Tutrakan, Bulgarien kieked mongrel arse ;D
|
|
|
Post by greenemperor on Dec 2, 2012 23:58:36 GMT -5
Other countries have always tried to bully us Romanians but we're still here and Romania is the biggest country in southeastern Europe.
The earliest written language in the Balkans, other than Greek is Romanian. "Torna Torna Fratre, in 587 AD." ;D
|
|
|
Post by littleboyfatman on Dec 3, 2012 11:36:15 GMT -5
i realy find fascinating
that romania stayed romania in middle of asiatic invasion of slaves...
surounded by slaves...
but they are still romanians
|
|
wbb
Moderator
Posts: 733
|
Post by wbb on Dec 4, 2012 3:17:51 GMT -5
Thats right greenemperor, wikipedia is not the most reliable site to prove a source. Anyone including me can write bs on wikipedia to fool the people with our own fantasies. The articles keep getting edited or even vandalised, so i dont know why you depend to much on it.
I dont give a shyt what the majority of scholars thinks about scythians being iranians, scythians are in facts proto-turkic or Turanian people that lived in Scythia, and iranians were people that lived in Parthia (Iran), so there's no need to twist things here of scythians being iranians because they are not iranians.
Amateurs and Catcha, can you guys do me one good favour, will u guys shut up about the fukin mongols, cause really im getting quite bored listening to it. Its funny, maybe 2,3 or 4 times, but not all the time, since its boring.
And if we were to completely ban and wipe out latin from being spoken in the balkans, since we did have enough power to be able to do this when our country was dominating the balkans, you guys wouldnt be speaking a word of latin till now. You guys will speak any other languages but latin. So no need to waste your insult on Kun.
|
|
|
Post by amateurs on Dec 4, 2012 8:22:08 GMT -5
Thats right greenemperor, wikipedia is not the most reliable site to prove a source. Anyone including me can write bs on wikipedia to fool the people with our own fantasies. The articles keep getting edited or even vandalised, so i dont know why you depend to much on it. I dont give a shyt what the majority of scholars thinks about scythians being iranians, scythians are in facts proto-turkic or Turanian people that lived in Scythia, and iranians were people that lived in Parthia (Iran), so there's no need to twist things here of scythians being iranians because they are not iranians. Amateurs and Catcha, can you guys do me one good favour, will u guys shut up about the fukin mongols, cause really im getting quite bored listening to it. Its funny, maybe 2,3 or 4 times, but not all the time, since its boring. And if we were to completely ban and wipe out latin from being spoken in the balkans, since we did have enough power to be able to do this when our country was dominating the balkans, you guys wouldnt be speaking a word of latin till now. You guys will speak any other languages but latin. So no need to waste your insult on Kun. Wbb is pissed that his alter ego is dead and is now writing in good English: good flow, laconic, and right to the point. Anyhow, the Hungarians did try to wipe us out on several occasions, but were defeated each time, so have nothing to thank them for. Battle of Posada and Battle of Baia are two good examples where Hungarians tried to occupy Wallachia and Moldavia, but failed. Of course we speak a Romance language that derives from Eastern Romance. Just because the Australian culture is vulgar and racist doesn't mean you can come here insulting us with made-up lies.
|
|
kun
Membrum
Posts: 52
|
Post by kun on Dec 4, 2012 10:10:51 GMT -5
amateurs, your replies are amature, so your nick is fitting. Those battles you speak of were ambushes, nothing more. Organized and led by Cumans (my ancestors). Instead of antagonizing and insulting your neighbors all the time you should thank them for giving your vlach ancestors everything they have.
|
|
|
Post by Catcher in the Rye on Dec 4, 2012 10:46:17 GMT -5
I'm not sure if you can find Chronicon Pictum translated in Mongolian, but it narrates how Romanians were butchering the Mongolians. Some of the Mongolians were Cuman auxiliaries. who were especially easy to kill since they had no heavy armor and their mobility was of no use.
We can joke about history since is no use being serious with morons like you, but don't imagine we don't know the real history.
|
|
kun
Membrum
Posts: 52
|
Post by kun on Dec 4, 2012 11:10:02 GMT -5
You don't have to research your picture books, just look at your present day leaders and intellectuals, they're all tatars/mongols. Why you continually insult Romanian intelligentsia is beyond me, it only shows your complete and utter lack of knowledge, your mental capacity is obviously very limited, oh yes but those are "cool mongols" as you were saying. A Romanian ethnicity during the middle ages?? Yes you are one big JOKE concerning history.
|
|
|
Post by amateurs on Dec 4, 2012 15:23:21 GMT -5
amateurs, your replies are amature, so your nick is fitting. Those battles you speak of were ambushes, nothing more. Organized and led by Cumans (my ancestors). Instead of antagonizing and insulting your neighbors all the time you should thank them for giving your vlach ancestors everything they have. Kun, you don't know what you're talking about. Posada was an ambush, but Baia was not. Also, the battle of Baia was fought between Moldavians and Hungarians. Cumans were long gone by then. At Posada, you could at best argue that the Basarab dynasty was of Cuman origin, but the Wallachians were not. But I do agree with you when you say that the Cumans, a Turkic people, are the ancestors of the Bulgarians.
|
|
|
Post by amateurs on Dec 4, 2012 15:24:40 GMT -5
You don't have to research your picture books, just look at your present day leaders and intellectuals, they're all tatars/mongols. Why you continually insult Romanian intelligentsia is beyond me, it only shows your complete and utter lack of knowledge, your mental capacity is obviously very limited, oh yes but those are "cool mongols" as you were saying. A Romanian ethnicity during the middle ages?? Yes you are one big JOKE concerning history. Yes, a Romanian ethnicity during the Middle Ages, and a principality called Tara Rumaneasca that conquered Dobrogea from the Ottoman Turks.
|
|
|
Post by Catcher in the Rye on Dec 5, 2012 4:36:16 GMT -5
At Posada, you could at best argue that the Basarab dynasty was of Cuman origin, but the Wallachians were not. At Posada there were Cumans, but on Hungarian side. The Cumans migrated in Hungary in front of the Tatar invasion. As for Basarab, there is absolutely no information that they had anything to do with the Cumans. Anybody can notice the fact that in Hungarian documents there was the habit of mentioning the ethnicity. Those that were Cumans were mentioned as such. Basarab on the other hand is explicitly mentioned as Basarab the Wallachian. And it should be known that at that time Wallachia wasn't called like that in the Hungarian documents, but was called Transalpina so nobody can say he was called Wallachian because he was from Wallachia. In that period, the name Basarab was quite fashionable and there were a number of chieftains in SW Transylvania called Basarab and those Basarabs mentioned in documents were all Romanians.
|
|