|
Post by branislavnusic on Jun 15, 2018 14:57:55 GMT -5
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Jun 15, 2018 15:01:55 GMT -5
Kingdom SCS too, but so was SFR Yugoslavia. In both countries you had all Serbs living under one banner, with a small exception of some Romanian Serbs and Hungarian Serbs which compose like 10k people in total. The ethnicity of main military staff, top people of secret police etc were Serbian, with exception of Tito. Actually Serbian communists wanted to make other nations more equal to them. Well, I guess the political representatives of other nations didn't agree with the Serbian politicians. Milosevic wanted a more centralised Yugoslavia, The others clearly didn't. Centralization is wicked, it creates resistance and distrust. That's why I propose for people to live in small communities and collaborate between themselves in a form of greater union. The union won't be fragile (be it country or any other sort of union), and the small communities won't intermeddle in each other business this way, so no tribal fights. Check one of the videos I posted here. It is not natural for human beings to live in large cities, let alone large countries where everything is centralized. Because our society is not really following the strict moral norms (in form of religion, I already spoke a lot about it here) it is prone to corruption and decadence. So that is our only salvation.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Jun 15, 2018 15:16:26 GMT -5
|
|
|
Post by Pyrros on Jun 15, 2018 15:18:08 GMT -5
Milosevic wanted a more centralised Yugoslavia, The others clearly didn't. Centralization is wicked, it creates resistance and distrust. That's why I propose for people to live in small communities and collaborate between themselves in a form of greater union. The union won't be fragile (be it country or any other sort of union), and the small communities won't intermeddle in each other business this way, so no tribal fights. Check one of the videos I posted here. It is not natural for human beings to live in large cities, let alone large countries where everything is centralized. Because our society is not really following the strict moral norms (in form of religion, I already spoke a lot about it here) it is prone to corruption and decadence. So that is our only salvation.
WOW
So my theory gets stronger and stronger. Adam was SLAV.
|
|
|
Post by branislavnusic on Jun 15, 2018 15:20:03 GMT -5
Milosevic wanted a more centralised Yugoslavia, The others clearly didn't. Centralization is wicked, it creates resistance and distrust. That's why I propose for people to live in small communities and collaborate between themselves in a form of greater union. The union won't be fragile (be it country or any other sort of union), and the small communities won't intermeddle in each other business this way, so no tribal fights. Check one of the videos I posted here. It is not natural for human beings to live in large cities, let alone large countries where everything is centralized. Because our society is not really following the strict moral norms (in form of religion, I already spoke a lot about it here) it is prone to corruption and decadence. So that is our only salvation. If you can persuade everybody. But in the end it is all about who can get the most POWER. I think no Serb or Albanian nationalist cares behind the history of their country, but rather they would like to form irredentist states so they can have the most power.
|
|
|
Post by Pyrros on Jun 15, 2018 15:21:29 GMT -5
Centralization is wicked, it creates resistance and distrust. That's why I propose for people to live in small communities and collaborate between themselves in a form of greater union. The union won't be fragile (be it country or any other sort of union), and the small communities won't intermeddle in each other business this way, so no tribal fights. Check one of the videos I posted here. It is not natural for human beings to live in large cities, let alone large countries where everything is centralized. Because our society is not really following the strict moral norms (in form of religion, I already spoke a lot about it here) it is prone to corruption and decadence. So that is our only salvation.
By having fragmented organization, you get fragmented bureaucracy, fragmented procedures and ultimate complete failure to scale up. So, Saxons, in this regard are absolutely right when they choose Dictatorship instead of Slavic-Zadruga type democracy. On top of that, they baptize Slavic Democracy as dictatorship and Saxon dictatorship as democracy and call it a day.
|
|
|
Post by branislavnusic on Jun 15, 2018 15:23:29 GMT -5
Centralization is wicked, it creates resistance and distrust. That's why I propose for people to live in small communities and collaborate between themselves in a form of greater union. The union won't be fragile (be it country or any other sort of union), and the small communities won't intermeddle in each other business this way, so no tribal fights. Check one of the videos I posted here. It is not natural for human beings to live in large cities, let alone large countries where everything is centralized. Because our society is not really following the strict moral norms (in form of religion, I already spoke a lot about it here) it is prone to corruption and decadence. So that is our only salvation.
WOW
So my theory gets stronger and stronger. Adam was SLAV.
Adam was black, humanity started in Africa.
|
|
|
Post by branislavnusic on Jun 15, 2018 15:34:41 GMT -5
Why did EU and NATO come to Tudman's aid then? Rather than Milosevic's
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Jun 15, 2018 15:40:15 GMT -5
Centralization is wicked, it creates resistance and distrust. That's why I propose for people to live in small communities and collaborate between themselves in a form of greater union. The union won't be fragile (be it country or any other sort of union), and the small communities won't intermeddle in each other business this way, so no tribal fights. Check one of the videos I posted here. It is not natural for human beings to live in large cities, let alone large countries where everything is centralized. Because our society is not really following the strict moral norms (in form of religion, I already spoke a lot about it here) it is prone to corruption and decadence. So that is our only salvation. If you can persuade everybody. But in the end it is all about who can get the most POWER. I think no Serb or Albanian nationalist cares behind the history of their country, but rather they would like to form irredentist states so they can have the most power. Their sheer manpower would be useless because most of them have nothing to fight for. Since you love Milosevic and his era, I'll give you and example of battle of Kosare where 200 Serbian fighters stopped 3000 NATO invaders. Another example is that many people who live in cities have nothing to fight for, which if you just look at the amount of recruits from Belgrade during 90's war becomes crystal clear (it was just ~10%). When you live in small society and go to war, you can have the trust in other people from your neighbourhood because they would care for you, and most of them are your family. Second important thing is you can organize your defence better, both against internal and external treats. Yes, in Serbia internal treats are real, our government is our biggest enemy, and in larger city you live the bigger treat it is. You are still young, so you don't care about taxes and other things, which make life here unbearable for most people, and as I shown earlier real friendship, real trust can't be built between men who live in very hard conditions. Check the article from Shalamov I copied here. In smaller communities it is the opposite, you can defeat anyone, even if it is your country who would try to send police force against your community for some reason.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Jun 15, 2018 15:45:05 GMT -5
Why did EU and NATO come to Tudman's aid then? Rather than Milosevic's Because Tudjman was willing to compromise, and unwilling to sacrifice his people more than he needed, even if that meant having great financial debt. Milosevic was unwilling to compromise and willing to sacrifice all his nation had, he was also greedy hence why his wife and sons have so much money while resting safely in Russia. That's why second lost, and that's why Serbs were losers of war. That's why you were schooled by generation of losers, while I was schooled by generation of winners (Yugoslav partisans weren't some great WW2 fighters, but hey, still winners).
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Jun 15, 2018 16:17:28 GMT -5
Centralization is wicked, it creates resistance and distrust. That's why I propose for people to live in small communities and collaborate between themselves in a form of greater union. The union won't be fragile (be it country or any other sort of union), and the small communities won't intermeddle in each other business this way, so no tribal fights. Check one of the videos I posted here. It is not natural for human beings to live in large cities, let alone large countries where everything is centralized. Because our society is not really following the strict moral norms (in form of religion, I already spoke a lot about it here) it is prone to corruption and decadence. So that is our only salvation.
By having fragmented organization, you get fragmented bureaucracy, fragmented procedures and ultimate complete failure to scale up. So, Saxons, in this regard are absolutely right when they choose Dictatorship instead of Slavic-Zadruga type democracy. On top of that, they baptize Slavic Democracy as dictatorship and Saxon dictatorship as democracy and call it a day.
You are wrong here. Take a look at Kingdom of Poland. Poland was able to defeat Russia, Ottoman empire, Holy Roman empire. It was only European country that could pull that off. The strength of that Poland was exactly in what I explained above. They had a lot of feudal lords because they were all living in small societies. It was their strength not weakness. Now Poland also had some other problems which was basically that every lord could call veto and stop all parliamentary procedures, but that's what we already have in Serbia and foreign powers already use it against us. That can be eliminated with certain degree of technocracy.
|
|
|
Post by Pyrros on Jun 16, 2018 0:33:36 GMT -5
Why did EU and NATO come to Tudman's aid then? Rather than Milosevic's Because Tudjman was willing to compromise, and unwilling to sacrifice his people more than he needed, even if that meant having great financial debt. Milosevic was unwilling to compromise and willing to sacrifice all his nation had, he was also greedy hence why his wife and sons have so much money while resting safely in Russia. That's why second lost, and that's why Serbs were losers of war. That's why you were schooled by generation of losers, while I was schooled by generation of winners (Yugoslav partisans weren't some great WW2 fighters, but hey, still winners).
You are right about many things and I agreed by giving you thumbs up, but on this one, I think you analyze this in too much Serbo-centric ways. Tudjman was Catholic. Tudjman was theirs. Of course Tudjmans and Tusks and Izetbegovic's and Poroshenko's are just cannon fodder and will experience a similar fate in the end (being Slavs), but still being a little higher in the western food chain (catholic > orthodox, Goth > Latin > Greek > Arab > Slav > African) plays the No1 role in all this.
Look at Greece. We are 100 times worse than you in every single aspect. That's not a problem as long as mama west loves us and cares about us.
So Milosevic was west's man in order to help the chaos in ex-Yugoslavia. He studied in NY if I am not mistaken (like the rest of balkan traitor puppets). But still Tudjam or the mad man Izetbegovic were more corrupt , since their positions were more key and vital in order to bring death on yugoslavia.
About Vucic. I LIKE HIM!!! And Brnabic. they are cool. You cant do better than that when the west doesn't let you sell your products abroad. Same, I like Tsipras.
I am sick of politics really...
|
|
|
Post by branislavnusic on Jun 16, 2018 0:36:56 GMT -5
Why did EU and NATO come to Tudman's aid then? Rather than Milosevic's Because Tudjman was willing to compromise, and unwilling to sacrifice his people more than he needed, even if that meant having great financial debt. Milosevic was unwilling to compromise and willing to sacrifice all his nation had, he was also greedy hence why his wife and sons have so much money while resting safely in Russia. That's why second lost, and that's why Serbs were losers of war. That's why you were schooled by generation of losers, while I was schooled by generation of winners (Yugoslav partisans weren't some great WW2 fighters, but hey, still winners). Ahhhh, But Milosevic stopped helping Karadzic and Mladic and barely fought during the Bosnian war and Croatian war of independence. And anyway. By joining the EU you are basically becoming a puppet of the west.
|
|
|
Post by branislavnusic on Jun 16, 2018 0:40:25 GMT -5
Because Tudjman was willing to compromise, and unwilling to sacrifice his people more than he needed, even if that meant having great financial debt. Milosevic was unwilling to compromise and willing to sacrifice all his nation had, he was also greedy hence why his wife and sons have so much money while resting safely in Russia. That's why second lost, and that's why Serbs were losers of war. That's why you were schooled by generation of losers, while I was schooled by generation of winners (Yugoslav partisans weren't some great WW2 fighters, but hey, still winners).
You are right about many things and I agreed by giving you thumbs up, but on this one, I think you analyze this in too much Serbo-centric ways. Tudjman was Catholic. Tudjman was theirs. Of course Tudjmans and Tusks and Izetbegovic's and Poroshenko's are just cannon fodder and will experience a similar fate in the end (being Slavs), but still being a little higher in the western food chain (catholic > orthodox, Goth > Latin > Greek > Arab > Slav > African) plays the No1 role in all this.
Look at Greece. We are 100 times worse than you in every single aspect. That's not a problem as long as mama west loves us and cares about us.
So Milosevic was west's man in order to help the chaos in ex-Yugoslavia. He studied in NY if I am not mistaken (like the rest of balkan traitor puppets). But still Tudjam or the mad man Izetbegovic were more corrupt , since their positions were more key and vital in order to bring death on yugoslavia.
About Vucic. I LIKE HIM!!! And Brnabic. they are cool. You cant do better than that when the west doesn't let you sell your products abroad. Same, I like Tsipras.
I am sick of politics really...
*Milosevic frequently visited Paris and New York because he became the head of one of Yugoslavia's largest banks.
|
|
|
Post by Pyrros on Jun 16, 2018 0:41:58 GMT -5
By having fragmented organization, you get fragmented bureaucracy, fragmented procedures and ultimate complete failure to scale up. So, Saxons, in this regard are absolutely right when they choose Dictatorship instead of Slavic-Zadruga type democracy. On top of that, they baptize Slavic Democracy as dictatorship and Saxon dictatorship as democracy and call it a day.
You are wrong here. Take a look at Kingdom of Poland. Poland was able to defeat Russia, Ottoman empire, Holy Roman empire. It was only European country that could pull that off. The strength of that Poland was exactly in what I explained above. They had a lot of feudal lords because they were all living in small societies. It was their strength not weakness. Now Poland also had some other problems which was basically that every lord could call veto and stop all parliamentary procedures, but that's what we already have in Serbia and foreign powers already use it against us. That can be eliminated with certain degree of technocracy.
Turkey? I never heard of Turkey going for Poland or vice versa.
Russia? I am 100% sure that any conflict between political powers of Poland and Russia has been magnified to no repair and always for the benefit of the more Catholic. So I question this as well. About Roman empire, also I don't get it, maybe that's why they turned CATHOLIC in the end? Yeah makes sense.
Saxon supremacy and Slavic disasters show that I am very RIGHT about that. You can't use one single exception (if this indeed happened) as the rule.
So in order for your scheme to work, the enemy has to use a similar system. If the enemy has greater integration ability he'll easily defeat the "de-centralized" one.
Maybe the inability for the Slav to believe in something virtual and artificial like a machine or the state is his greatness weakness. You cannot pretend to live in a state but constantly try to steal from it and abuse it.
Don't get me wrong, neo-greeks in this aspect are 100x worse, cause on top of that they cannot respect neither the state nor their adjacent human been.
About Belgrade dont go far. In 2014 while in the floods there were many volunteers from BG.
Serbia IIRC lost about 50 ppl, Bosnia 20 ppl and Croatia 10 ppl (yeah the known Demons handled this as well....)
When smth equivalent happened in Athens, they died 20 ppl, and NO DISCUSSION ABOUT any volunteer....
Yeah.... our lovely jewish priest chose the right orthodoxy ....
|
|
|
Post by branislavnusic on Jun 16, 2018 1:01:00 GMT -5
Because Tudjman was willing to compromise, and unwilling to sacrifice his people more than he needed, even if that meant having great financial debt. Milosevic was unwilling to compromise and willing to sacrifice all his nation had, he was also greedy hence why his wife and sons have so much money while resting safely in Russia. That's why second lost, and that's why Serbs were losers of war. That's why you were schooled by generation of losers, while I was schooled by generation of winners (Yugoslav partisans weren't some great WW2 fighters, but hey, still winners).
You are right about many things and I agreed by giving you thumbs up, but on this one, I think you analyze this in too much Serbo-centric ways. Tudjman was Catholic. Tudjman was theirs. Of course Tudjmans and Tusks and Izetbegovic's and Poroshenko's are just cannon fodder and will experience a similar fate in the end (being Slavs), but still being a little higher in the western food chain (catholic > orthodox, Goth > Latin > Greek > Arab > Slav > African) plays the No1 role in all this.
Look at Greece. We are 100 times worse than you in every single aspect. That's not a problem as long as mama west loves us and cares about us.
So Milosevic was west's man in order to help the chaos in ex-Yugoslavia. He studied in NY if I am not mistaken (like the rest of balkan traitor puppets). But still Tudjam or the mad man Izetbegovic were more corrupt , since their positions were more key and vital in order to bring death on yugoslavia.
About Vucic. I LIKE HIM!!! And Brnabic. they are cool. You cant do better than that when the west doesn't let you sell your products abroad. Same, I like Tsipras.
I am sick of politics really...
You are pro-lgbt?
|
|
|
Post by Pyrros on Jun 16, 2018 1:04:32 GMT -5
You are right about many things and I agreed by giving you thumbs up, but on this one, I think you analyze this in too much Serbo-centric ways. Tudjman was Catholic. Tudjman was theirs. Of course Tudjmans and Tusks and Izetbegovic's and Poroshenko's are just cannon fodder and will experience a similar fate in the end (being Slavs), but still being a little higher in the western food chain (catholic > orthodox, Goth > Latin > Greek > Arab > Slav > African) plays the No1 role in all this.
Look at Greece. We are 100 times worse than you in every single aspect. That's not a problem as long as mama west loves us and cares about us.
So Milosevic was west's man in order to help the chaos in ex-Yugoslavia. He studied in NY if I am not mistaken (like the rest of balkan traitor puppets). But still Tudjam or the mad man Izetbegovic were more corrupt , since their positions were more key and vital in order to bring death on yugoslavia.
About Vucic. I LIKE HIM!!! And Brnabic. they are cool. You cant do better than that when the west doesn't let you sell your products abroad. Same, I like Tsipras.
I am sick of politics really...
You are pro-lgbt?
In no way. But I support the SERBIAN gvmt no matter what. Both Vucic and Brnabic seem serious and determined. What else to do? Shout and scream 24x7 against the gvmt while all the problems are "prepared" elsewhere ?
|
|
|
Post by branislavnusic on Jun 16, 2018 1:23:37 GMT -5
In no way. But I support the SERBIAN gvmt no matter what. Both Vucic and Brnabic seem serious and determined. What else to do? Shout and scream 24x7 against the gvmt while all the problems are "prepared" elsewhere ?
Brnabic has to be kicked out 100%. Anyway support for the EU in Serbia is going down, A LOT because Serbia is getting all the money it needs from China. More Chinese money = less EU money needed.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Jun 16, 2018 3:08:38 GMT -5
You are wrong here. Take a look at Kingdom of Poland. Poland was able to defeat Russia, Ottoman empire, Holy Roman empire. It was only European country that could pull that off. The strength of that Poland was exactly in what I explained above. They had a lot of feudal lords because they were all living in small societies. It was their strength not weakness. Now Poland also had some other problems which was basically that every lord could call veto and stop all parliamentary procedures, but that's what we already have in Serbia and foreign powers already use it against us. That can be eliminated with certain degree of technocracy.
Turkey? I never heard of Turkey going for Poland or vice versa.
Russia? I am 100% sure that any conflict between political powers of Poland and Russia has been magnified to no repair and always for the benefit of the more Catholic. So I question this as well. About Roman empire, also I don't get it, maybe that's why they turned CATHOLIC in the end? Yeah makes sense.
Saxon supremacy and Slavic disasters show that I am very RIGHT about that. You can't use one single exception (if this indeed happened) as the rule.
So in order for your scheme to work, the enemy has to use a similar system. If the enemy has greater integration ability he'll easily defeat the "de-centralized" one.
Maybe the inability for the Slav to believe in something virtual and artificial like a machine or the state is his greatness weakness. You cannot pretend to live in a state but constantly try to steal from it and abuse it.
Don't get me wrong, neo-greeks in this aspect are 100x worse, cause on top of that they cannot respect neither the state nor their adjacent human been.
About Belgrade dont go far. In 2014 while in the floods there were many volunteers from BG.
Serbia IIRC lost about 50 ppl, Bosnia 20 ppl and Croatia 10 ppl (yeah the known Demons handled this as well....)
When smth equivalent happened in Athens, they died 20 ppl, and NO DISCUSSION ABOUT any volunteer....
Yeah.... our lovely jewish priest chose the right orthodoxy ....
Polish-Lithuanian Commonwealth. Defeated Holy Roman Empire (they were neither Holy nor Roman) in 1410. Defeated Ottomans at 1683 in front of Vienna and stop them from entering central Europe. Doesn't matter whether they are Catholic or not, I was there a couple of times their people have much healthier mindset than Serbs. Yes, the Serbs had wars and live in poor conditions today, but I'm also talking the generation that lived during "happy" times of Yugoslavia. Concerning countries I already said, successful country needs strong religion. It doesn't matter whether its classical religion like Christianity or something new, as long as it works for the people, that is - doesn't make them feel pathetic like USSR communism and its close to traditions of a society. That is also the whole point with the jewish priest video.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Jun 16, 2018 3:11:48 GMT -5
In no way. But I support the SERBIAN gvmt no matter what. Both Vucic and Brnabic seem serious and determined. What else to do? Shout and scream 24x7 against the gvmt while all the problems are "prepared" elsewhere ?
Brnabic has to be kicked out 100%. Anyway support for the EU in Serbia is going down, A LOT because Serbia is getting all the money it needs from China. More Chinese money = less EU money needed. Concerning China, I have positive opinions of their society and civilization, but lately they are doing some things that are morally wrong. Just check this, its completely anti-human.
|
|