So why were the saxons of Rhodesia consumables?
I am understanding that word consumable here has pretty much the same meaning as word expendable.
(to minimize confusion)
So the question is why did the WE see whites in Southern Rhodesia (now called Zimbabwe) as expendable
as is also now the case with the way WE (western elite) sees whites in SAR.
in fact some have called this state African Ukraine because it had ability to feed much of Africa (or at least
, interestingly enough just like in SAR, communist and racist anti-whites at the same time if that is possible).
Zimbabwe started to especially deteriorate economically after its nationalist-communist black government started
forcefully confiscating white farms. I believe this is about to start on a bigger scale soon in SAR and afterwards
we can expect same scenario to happen in SAR (Zimbabwe 2.0).
In retrospect, WE seems to want these blacks left to their own devices and wants whites in these regions to be
wiped out (especially if they contribute economically, like farmers). My guess, is that to destroy these regions
economically and keep them that way. For them Africa needs to remain economically a quick sand and a primary
source for migration which they need to occur to all the white countries. Target are whites (who are not part of WE).
Higher IQ therefore perceived as higher threat. Lower IQ populations will probably be dealt with later. All the story
about global warming and overpopulation is part of this.
There have been attempts and suggestions that it is more logical and cheaper by white countries to invest in
media (which is not liberal in reality but leftist and obviously working for interest of WE).