|
Post by Emperor AAdmin on Dec 28, 2007 20:13:32 GMT -5
reposting ----- superalbanian Amicus (10/30/05 4:24 am)
New Post: Love Vs Money
Which one of these do you think you have more passion for? Love or Money?
My passion is Love! Love Vs Money
|
|
|
Post by Emperor AAdmin on Dec 28, 2007 20:19:53 GMT -5
AAdmin Forum Emperor! (10/31/05 12:59 am) Re: Love Vs Moneykasandri " money can buy you happiness and love, (with love I mean in many different ways" so young, so much to learn. Most balkanians will choose love as most other meds would. Money loves only itself (as do others who love money and only money) and not the bearer of it. Anyone who has multitude of money will be treated in a (fake) pleasant manner only for as long that he has this multitude of money (since it is money in effect that is treated in such manner and not him). As a result money will never be able to buy true happiness or true love (since neither one is never to be measured when one is in fortune but when one is in misfortune) . Also happiness and money, like a form of currency or rather exchange, is expected to be given for it to be received back (although not to be given easily but only when deserved). Also as in any relationship honesty and respect are paramount. PESHKY " Whoever voted for the M word is too young to know what LOVE is. Most of the people that would chose money have never experienced love in their life, and I am sure Kassandri didn't. So that's why he would choose money. If he had really been in love at least ONCE he would have a different opinion toward this situation."
Marko Serb1 " even a blind fool can fall in love. It's a natural process that no humain escapes. Money provides us whit means and materialisme. Money is hard to get. "
NemamIme " If I had to choose between having money and not having love, or having love but not having money... obviously love. Money is not everything. In fact forget love. The number one item is health. If you have your health that is primary. Everything else comes after. Including love, and then money."
choosing not to love (for money) in this case (to me) means choosing not to care whatsoever. In this case not loving involves also means not loving ones parents/siblings/friends/children/country/hobby/etc Therefore life void of love, passion and affection. (its a given that good health is a must) (one would not even want to be social in such case since not loving means not needing being around people period, at least not in any meaningful true heartfelt manner) Now who again would choose money over this? Who would choose to live a robot-like life instead of a human (humane) one and all in the name of money? I am just curious. BTW: The question in itself is an oxymoron since by even choosing money over love one is choosing love for money rather then love for itself (albeit still love even though for money). Therefore choosing money for itself only still constitutes choosing love (although probably one of the unhealthiest forms of it - since such love will never be returned back).
|
|
|
Post by Emperor AAdmin on Dec 28, 2007 20:23:53 GMT -5
Marko Serb1 (11/3/05 7:12 am) Re: Love Vs Money?I chose money aadmin. Lets not forget what was the question. It wasn't one of making the choice (eitherr love or money). Some of you don't seem to get that. "passion" is the key word. Moreover, passion is a bit of a hard, strong word. Quote:Who would choose to live a robot-like life instead of a human (humane) one and all in the name of money? You got it wrong. It was not choosing between those that was a question here. I'm more "passionate" for money... I think MONEY first, love will come. It always dos, inevitable... Again, you imply that one will love you falsely if you got lots of money... That's ridiculous.... There are social stepping stones. A rich man will not ultimately fall in love whit a poor lady. I hope you understand that rich is more likely to fall in love whit rich, it's a logical outcome when one is participating in events of their social-class caliber. In other words if you hang out whit your "above average" class of people.... you're most likely to experience other sorts of loving among those people. Quote: The question in itself is an oxymoron since by even choosing money over love one is choosing love for money My point of view: Money we must achieve. Love will come by itself. No1 can wake up and work on it, getting madly loved/in love.... However money we MUST have, and the sooner you get rich, sooner you will have time and means to do other things and prosper (morally, emotionally, academically...) Love will come anyways (poor or rich...) love isn't a choice. It's the most obvious element of human life. So why would it be my passion since I know I will have it one way or the other? SO my "passion" of lots of money prevails since it is not a certain part of everyones life.
|
|
|
Post by Emperor AAdmin on Dec 28, 2007 20:33:35 GMT -5
RuseBG (2/14/06 8:57 am) " Love...provided that you have enough money to not worry about financial problems. Such problems can easily kill love." ----- Anittas (2/14/06 9:55 am) " Love, of course. Then again, there are those who love money, and their answer will be one and the same." ----- Dea (2/14/06 3:45 pm)
I think that the chances that nowadays you will find the Romeo and Juliet kind of love are slim to none. Although, in a matter of a fraction of a second, at any given moment in time I would choose love over money, I can not help but wonder whether love is indeed the purest sentiment a human being can ever feel. We choose to be with people we love and not with people that love us. So in essence love is selfish and a means to please one self `s senses.
As far as money is concerned, for me personally, it is as important as long as it buys the most indispensable means of life, independence, schooling and education as well as a higher level of consciousness instead of furry coats, expensive jewelery or fast sport cars.
|
|
|
Post by Emperor AAdmin on Dec 28, 2007 20:35:11 GMT -5
Blood and Iron (2/15/06 4:45 am)
Re: Love Vs Money
"what is love? baby dont hurt me, dont hurt me, no more"-Haddaway
btw "true" love evolved from empathy, and the feeling humans call love only lasts long enough for the child to be raised among the social group (approximately 4 years in chimps, 8 years in humans). The "Love" preached to people by the church and society is not "true" love, but a guilt-love, forcing the couple to stay together even after the initial feelings of "true"(evolutionary) love have gone away.
The reason why couples in the United States have over 50% divorce rate is because of the decline of the church, and the values of society have shifted to not seeing divorce as a bad thing. Thus, because society says its "ok" to get divorced, many people (following their natural instincts, and having fallen out of evolutionary love) do get divorced.
Therefore, love is an evolutionary emotion that helps us raise children and when the children are old enough to fend for themselves, the emotion goes away.
Read The Selfish Gene by Richard Dawkins and you will know what i mean. Naturally, i voted for money.
|
|
|
Post by Emperor AAdmin on Dec 28, 2007 20:36:36 GMT -5
Gyilkos Ungara ("MINCH")(2/15/06 8:55 am) Re: Love Vs MoneyQuote:The reason why couples in the United States have over 50% divorce rate is because of the decline of the church, and the values of society have shifted to not seeing divorce as a bad thing. I agree that people here in the states don't see divorce as a bad thing anymore, thats very true. However I think the reason people get divorced so much is not because of the church but because people tend to get to know one another based on artificial feelings and just not really getting to know the other person well at all and they end up just rushing into a heavy relationship then they realize one day that they don't really know the other person at all and by that time they have already rushed into a marriage. You see it here with celebrities so much that its disgusting. They marry another celebrity after one week of dating then a month later they are married to another. That is a bad message to send subconsciously in the eyes of so many people being famous and setting this example that its "normal" or not a big deal to do it.
|
|
|
Post by Emperor AAdmin on Dec 28, 2007 20:48:31 GMT -5
Red Brigade10 (2/16/06 2:52 am)
Re: Love Vs Money
Sometimes i feel emotions such as love are our prison.
Love is like an opium. It is clouding your judgment and therefore you become unable to make rational decisions. It is essentially nature's trick to make us reproduce. -------- desire yearning (2/19/06 2:24 pm)
Re: Love Vs Money
I vote money... without Money whats ur quality of life like, even if you find Love you wont be able to enjoy it to the maximum due to money stress, so therefore money and stability first Love second. --------- Rudeinside (2/19/06 5:20 pm)
Re: Love Vs Money
True life has become very expensive no doubt and it's only logical that money does improve your quality of life but at what price ? I think too many people have lost their passion for life and have concentrated too much on money,you only live once so try to enjoy it as much as you can and have fun whether you have or not. (money is secondary). -------- desire yearning (2/19/06 9:37 pm)
Re: Love Vs Money
i duno about u.. but i prefer a good quality life, instead of a crappy life with love... whats love anyway just a message from the brain saying """ooohhh this is something good"""" i can feel the same way if i buy a lambo... lol... ur heart just pumps blood... it has no feelings,, no such thing as love from the heart --------- Albanesehoney (2/20/06 1:19 am)
Re: Love Vs Money
Quote:Love is like an opium.
You have your points, except, love just makes the pursuit of material 'happiness' so worth it and so much more enjoyable. Love just makes this whole journey SO MUCH MORE MEANINGFUL AND FUN. Especially, that part of 'reproducing' for our continuance. --------- TheKhun (2/23/06 4:10 pm)
Re: Love Vs Money
love hurts, love brings letdown, love fools, love is short but love is worths everything. it is a feeling makes you strongest and weakest man at the same time.
----------- GorskiVijenac (2/25/06 1:06 pm)Re: Love Vs Money
Voted for love, of course. Just don't forget that both are important. Money cannot buy you love (no, it cannot. It can buy you company, admiration and sex, but not love). Unfortunately a loss of money can also mean a loss of love, as is evident by the divorce rates after bankruptcies.
|
|
|
Post by SKORIC on Jun 9, 2008 22:49:55 GMT -5
Love.
Money comes and goes but if i lost any loved one it would fuck me up.
|
|
Aris
Amicus
Greek Troll
Posts: 832
|
Post by Aris on Jul 24, 2009 17:24:45 GMT -5
|
|