|
Post by insomniac on Mar 15, 2010 3:15:35 GMT -5
Montenegro:Serbia's behavior is the problem of the Balkans Montenegrin Prime Minister Milo Djukanovic has strongly criticized Serbia, claiming that it intends to present Montenegro as a "criminal state". In an interview for the Montenegrin TV Djukanovic has said that Serbia intends to blacmail the Montenegrin state and show that Montenegro has no legal capacity to be an independent state. All this shows, Djukanovic said that the fundamental problem is not Montenegro's Kosovo stance, but the essential problem is the independence of Montenegro and they are not complied with the law of Montenegro to take their own decisions. "Another problem is that Serbia claims for the position of leader in the region, but for someone to be a leader must first solve the problem of war criminals, to settle if those who have committed crimes in Srebrenica are heroes or criminals, and to show more ability to develop relations with its neighbors, Djukanovic said. Montenegrin Prime Minister stressed that Serbia has problems with all countries of the region, with Croatia, Bosnia, Kosovo, and Montenegro and Macedonia. "Despite the logical goal of Serbia to be a leader in the region, sometimes with pride that has become controversial to itself, fortunately not with those consequences as in years nineties of the last century, recalling the military aggression of Serbia against all its neighbors, stressed Djukanovic. www.newkosovareport.com/201003102178/Region/MontenegroSerbia-s-behavior-is-the-problem-of-the-Balkans.html
|
|
|
Post by Sh1 Shonić on Mar 15, 2010 10:48:29 GMT -5
Montenegro:Serbia's behavior is the problem of the Balkans Montenegrin Prime Minister Milo Djukanovic has strongly criticized Serbia, Crna Gora nije Milo!
|
|
|
Post by Emperor AAdmin on Mar 15, 2010 11:03:02 GMT -5
Milo sounds a bit desperate there.
All that bla bla bla because of Saric issue? (or whats his name)
Krca guza ljesnika ;D
|
|
|
Post by Novi Pazar on Mar 16, 2010 4:33:21 GMT -5
Milo needs to look at his own problems like cigarette smuggling.
|
|
|
Post by dusko1 on Mar 16, 2010 15:15:08 GMT -5
Milo needs to look at his own problems like cigarette smuggling. Why does everyone keep talking about cigarette smuggling when Milo's name comes up? Big deal? Who gives a shit?
|
|
|
Post by Caslav Klonimirovic on Mar 16, 2010 19:47:59 GMT -5
What the fuck is he talking about??? Honestly. When he says "Serbia" is he talking about the politicians, the people, the media? On what basis is he making these claims? Anyway, any attempt by Serbian elements to paint Montenegro as a criminal state would pale in comparison to Montenegrin whining about big bad Serbia and their play along with this thing in international relations as if they're always in a struggle to get away from big bad Serbia. It's like a play along they try and do & this is a clear example. He's like lets pull a Bosnia and Kosovo and constantly whine about Serbian suppression when particularly in their case it's epic bullshit. If anything Montengin policies such as the eco tourism tax have been discriminatory towards Serbs. They're doing all they can to destroy Serbian identity in Montengro, meanwhile Montenegrins are in all the upper levels of Management in Serbia and it's citizens have even had special rights there such as in education.
|
|
|
Post by ljubotan on Mar 17, 2010 14:38:45 GMT -5
Out of curiosity, why have they been privileged with such 'high positions' such as Directors in Serbia? I've heard this before but never inquired on how they have such pull (I assume bribery).
|
|
|
Post by radovic on Mar 19, 2010 10:49:37 GMT -5
First problem. This isn't a legitimate news site. But let's ignore that fact and look at what Djukanovic said.
No, Serbia intends to do what a normal state and go after criminals. Only Montenegro is presenting its self as a criminal state in it's behaviour to indictments against criminals Serbia has made.
After all what kind of state that isn't criminal gives citizenship to a character like Saric mere days after he is indicted in Serbia.
Also, Djukanovic these allegations have been made by Italy and Thailand (it was you Mr. Djukanovic who personally gave fugitive Thai PM Thaksin Shinawatra Montenegrin citizenship).
LOL. No such notion exists in international law or in any way regarding soveireignity. It's the usual Djuaknovic lie to deflate away form the situation. He thinks people will forget about Saric, KAP and othber problems Montenegro has if he accuses Serbia of seeking to takeover Montenegro.
Given the relations other states have and have had with crime, this principle wouldn't be applied to Montenegro if it existed.
Whether those at Srebrenica were heroes or criminals is a question for Bosnian Serbs to decide, not Serbia.
If he's going to talk about war cirminals, when will see an investigation into his role in the war, Muslims were deported to BiH to be slaughtered in one instance, and massacred in a CG border town in another -- all on orders of the Montenegrin DB.
Funny all our neighbours. When was Serbia at war with Montenegro, with Romania, with Hungary, with FYROM, with Bulgaria, with Albania.
Didn't the international courts rule Serbia was not an aggressor in Bosnia.
Seems he's trying to deflect the fact that: a) for the role of regional leader other states are interested -- most notably Zagreb, b) Montenegro was an aggressor in Croatia and in Bosnia (and that unlike Slobo there is direct evidence of Djukanovic telling troops to thrash places in Croatia -- i,.e. Dubrovnik)
|
|
|
Post by radovic on Mar 19, 2010 12:05:23 GMT -5
Out of curiosity, why have they been privileged with such 'high positions' such as Directors in Serbia? I've heard this before but never inquired on how they have such pull (I assume bribery). During the Kostunica years such promotions to directors occured, as a way to cause less support for independence. But that's only marginal (most of the Montenegrins whose appointments were tied to Kostunica are gone). Its not just Montenegrins, Bosnian Serbs and Serbs from outside of Serbia are generally overrepresented in Serbia. This over representation becomes entrenched to the point that Serbs form Serbia who have no origin from outside lose (this is especially the case in Vojvodina).
|
|