|
Post by uz on Sept 19, 2011 17:59:08 GMT -5
Serbian terrorist organisation claims responsibility for Knin fire person calling in the name of the Serb revolutionary movement (Srpski revolucionarni pokret) has claimed responsibility for the fire that last week engulfed military barracks near Knin, causing stored weaponry to explode. The fire broke out last Tuesday near Padjeni and was contained three days later. An unknown man called the Slobodna Dalmacija newsroom from Germany to claim responsibility for the fire in the name of the so-called Serb revolutionary movement. The call was placed from a hidden number. According to the person who took the call, a middle-aged man delivered his message clearly and calmly, without raising his voice. His accent pointed to the fact that he could be from Knin surroundings. Split police are looking to confirm the veracity of the statement as well as the identity of the caller. A member of the former Yugoslav secret service Udba who followed the work of emigrant and terrorist organisations and currently works as a private detective in Belgrade, Bozidar Spasic, said that there is no organisation by the name of Serb revolutionary movement amongst current Serbian extremists organisations. -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- www.croatiantimes.com/news/General_News/2011-09-19/21929/Serbian_terrorist_organisation_claims_responsibility_for_Knin_fire
|
|
|
Post by Novus Dis on Sept 23, 2011 6:41:38 GMT -5
Nothing more than Croat propaganda, unfortunately.
|
|
Kralj Vatra
Amicus
Warning: Sometimes uses foul language & insults!!!
20%
Posts: 9,814
|
Post by Kralj Vatra on Sept 23, 2011 6:47:49 GMT -5
those nazi bastards could believe anything as long as it is anti-serb. no wander, why, imports from Serbia are strictly "discouraged", and any Croat who imports from Serbia risks a potential harsh psychological war against him.
balkan societies are full of idiocy. croat society is full of hatred and complexes as well...
|
|
|
Post by Moe Lester on Sept 23, 2011 6:50:36 GMT -5
Starting a fire is unusual of a "terrorist organisation". If I were them, I would bomb them or go on a murder spree.
|
|
Kralj Vatra
Amicus
Warning: Sometimes uses foul language & insults!!!
20%
Posts: 9,814
|
Post by Kralj Vatra on Sept 23, 2011 6:58:05 GMT -5
Starting a fire is unusual of a "terrorist organisation". If I were them, I would bomb them or go on a murder spree. slavs/serbs are not that mean. They have good souls.
|
|
|
Post by Moe Lester on Sept 23, 2011 7:00:03 GMT -5
slavs/serbs are not that mean. They have good souls. Of course, as shown by these "terrorists". That's why I would do that stuff if I were them.
|
|
|
Post by Novus Dis on Sept 23, 2011 7:08:23 GMT -5
Do you have any evidence of the existence of these terrorists, Nap? those nazi bastards could believe anything as long as it is anti-serb. no wander, why, imports from Serbia are strictly "discouraged", and any Croat who imports from Serbia risks a potential harsh psychological war against him. balkan societies are full of idiocy. croat society is full of hatred and complexes as well... No, they just need to believe. Because they're a bloodthirsty and stupid people with narcissistic impulses that make them subconsciously project themselves onto others. They remind me of the English, actually.
|
|
|
Post by Moe Lester on Sept 23, 2011 9:06:53 GMT -5
I was making a joke. If they existed, they're not much of a terrorist organisation, since a real terrorist organisation would strike more fear into the general population.
|
|
rex362
Senior Moderator
Pellazg
PELASGIANILLYROALBANIAN
Posts: 19,058
|
Post by rex362 on Sept 23, 2011 11:15:39 GMT -5
Starting a fire is unusual of a "terrorist organisation". If I were them, I would bomb them or go on a murder spree. slavs/serbs are not that mean. They have good souls.
|
|
|
Post by Novus Dis on Sept 23, 2011 11:19:18 GMT -5
I was making a joke. If they existed, they're not much of a terrorist organisation, since a real terrorist organisation would strike more fear into the general population. Cost and damage. How much does it cost a terrorist to light a fire in a forest? How much damage will that fire cause? Terrorism isn't simply to strike fear in people and organizations, it's also an attempt to be resourceful.
|
|
|
Post by uz on Sept 23, 2011 15:15:35 GMT -5
I think it's too early to jump the gun and call this terrorism, considering that no one was hurt and that the event didn't even occur in a public place. If the guy "admits" it for being so, we all have to agree right? Kinda like when Al-Quada claimed immediate responsibility for 9/11 the questions ended right after that.
|
|
|
Post by Moe Lester on Sept 23, 2011 19:43:15 GMT -5
@novus Dis
Terrorists don't care about cost, they just care about scaring the population into doing what they want, and getting what they want. Chechen terrorists don't start fires, they blow up underground railways.
|
|
|
Post by uz on Sept 23, 2011 19:46:33 GMT -5
Terrorism is the systematic use of terror - definition
There was nothing "systematic" about this incident and the attempted use of "fear" was a planned fail (if it was ever even intended).
|
|
|
Post by terroreign on Sept 23, 2011 20:06:12 GMT -5
it's passive-aggressive terrorism. a bunch of half-a$$es full of nationalistic fervor.
the way i'd go about it is the way i've been explaining for a year now: a small team of 8-10 former soldiers, fake passports, car bombs, and sniper assassinations of top political figures.
|
|
|
Post by uz on Sept 23, 2011 20:07:41 GMT -5
Now that's ^ terrorism.
|
|
|
Post by Novus Dis on Sept 23, 2011 20:26:48 GMT -5
None of you guys know a thing about what terrorism is about. It's about the economy of force. It's about resourcefulness. It's about terror through sneak attacks. It's about utilizing what you have and not fantasizing about being able to kill people with complicated devices and plans. The cheapest and simplest act of terrorism that catches the enemy off-guard is what's best.
|
|
|
Post by uz on Sept 23, 2011 20:29:05 GMT -5
Can you provide an example of what you mean by this?
|
|
|
Post by terroreign on Sept 23, 2011 20:40:00 GMT -5
he means like 9/11....which was quite ingenious
|
|
|
Post by uz on Sept 23, 2011 20:40:56 GMT -5
9/11 is not a good example, the situation and arguments based on what happend are not concrete.
|
|
|
Post by uz on Sept 23, 2011 20:44:29 GMT -5
First off, any act of "terrorism" is not going to win any type of revolution. The idea itself is self-destructive. If we're going to "win" anything, the only way it's going to get done is by working together and (it hurts me to say) diplomatically.
|
|