Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Aug 3, 2018 2:50:09 GMT -5
Some of them wear skirts. Fits.
|
|
|
Post by branislavnusic on Aug 3, 2018 5:18:08 GMT -5
Some of them wear skirts. Fits. This one is called "Serbian warrior" for some reason though..
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Aug 3, 2018 6:11:09 GMT -5
Probably because he wares a trousers. Balkan natives didn't wore trousers but toga, some skirts and so on.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Aug 3, 2018 6:32:51 GMT -5
Early Cetnici in Macedonia wore similar trousers:
|
|
|
Post by branislavnusic on Aug 3, 2018 7:37:34 GMT -5
Probably because he wares a trousers. Balkan natives didn't wore trousers but toga, some skirts and so on. From eastern Serbia, I'm guessing vlach influence....
|
|
|
Post by branislavnusic on Aug 3, 2018 7:39:29 GMT -5
Early Cetnici in Macedonia wore similar trousers:
The guy in the Serbian warrior photo is also wearing Opanci I think
|
|
|
Post by Pyrros on Aug 3, 2018 7:43:10 GMT -5
Balkan natives are the Slavs.
Also those dances from eastern Serbia are 99.99999% similar to the dances of rest of ex-YU.
Vlah element is endorsed by the west, we all know why....
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Aug 3, 2018 7:45:16 GMT -5
I'm fine with the fact I'm (mostly) originating from Eastern and Central Europe.
|
|
|
Post by branislavnusic on Aug 3, 2018 8:46:49 GMT -5
Balkan natives are the Slavs. Also those dances from eastern Serbia are 99.99999% similar to the dances of rest of ex-YU. Vlah element is endorsed by the west, we all know why.... I was talking about the skirt not the dance
|
|
|
Post by Pyrros on Aug 3, 2018 8:53:57 GMT -5
Vojvodina has a skirt, Posavina has a skirt, Slovakia has a skirt, Rusini have a skirt, I think.
|
|
|
Post by branislavnusic on Aug 3, 2018 9:06:12 GMT -5
Vojvodina has a skirt, Posavina has a skirt, Slovakia has a skirt, Rusini have a skirt, I think. Yes, but not the Same skirt, take a look: Vojvodina: Slovak don't: the Rusyns don't either:
|
|
|
Post by Pyrros on Aug 3, 2018 9:09:37 GMT -5
I'm fine with the fact I'm (mostly) originating from Eastern and Central Europe. Saint Nestor of Kiev thinks the opposite. “The ancestors of the Slavs came from the Danube Basin into the land of Novgorod.” The Holy Nestor of Kiev 10th century + the Slavic toponyms of south Greece are SO old that predate any formal formation of any known distinct Slavic language.
|
|
|
Post by branislavnusic on Aug 3, 2018 9:11:45 GMT -5
I'm fine with the fact I'm (mostly) originating from Eastern and Central Europe. Saint Nestor of Kiev thinks the opposite. “The ancestors of the Slavs came from the Danube Basin into the land of Novgorod.” The Holy Nestor of Kiev 10th century + the Slavic toponyms of south Greece are SO old that predate any formal formation of any known distinct Slavic language. There's a Czech document from the 10th century, I forgot which one but it states that all Slavs originate from Serbs and Croats.
|
|
|
Post by Pyrros on Aug 3, 2018 9:37:44 GMT -5
Saint Nestor of Kiev thinks the opposite. “The ancestors of the Slavs came from the Danube Basin into the land of Novgorod.” The Holy Nestor of Kiev 10th century + the Slavic toponyms of south Greece are SO old that predate any formal formation of any known distinct Slavic language. There's a Czech document from the 10th century, I forgot which one but it states that all Slavs originate from Serbs and Croats. The "Thracians" presented in early history books (Herodotos) were described as being *identical* to Slavs.
|
|
|
Post by branislavnusic on Aug 3, 2018 12:12:46 GMT -5
There's a Czech document from the 10th century, I forgot which one but it states that all Slavs originate from Serbs and Croats. The "Thracians" presented in early history books (Herodotos) were described as being *identical* to Slavs. The Thracian and DACIAN relation to balto-slavic is a genuine theory!!!! EVEN western scholars believe this as well lemme give you an example: "Finally, I label Thracian and Dacian as East Baltic...The fitting of special Dacian and Thracian features (which I identified from Duridanov’s listings) into Baltic isogloss patterns so that I identified Dacian and Thracian as southeast Baltic. South Baltic because, like Old Prussian, they keep unchanged the diphthongs ei, ai, en, an (north Baltic Lithuanian and Latvian show varying percentages of ei, ai to ie, and en, an to ę, ą (to ē, ā) in Lithuanian, to ie, uo in Latvian). East Baltic because the Dacian word žuvete (now in Rumanian spelled juvete) has ž, not z as in west Baltic, and the Thracian word pušis (the Latin-Greek transcription shows pousis which, I believe, reflects -š-.) with zero grade puš- as in Lithuanian pušìs rather than with e-grade *peuš- as in Prussian peusē. Zero grade in this word is east Baltic, e-grade here is west Baltic, while the other word for “pine, evergreen”, preidē (Prussian and Dacian), priede (Latvian), is marginal in Lithuanian matched by no *peus- in Latvian."
-Harvey Mayer Balts and Slavs are basically the same people!!!! -Did you also know Bylazora was a town in ancient Paeonia!!!! Bylazora in slavic languages means WHITE DAWN -Did you also know that there was a hittite town in west-anatolia called Wilusa??? Take a look at places named Vilusa in Republika Srpska/Montenegro/Serbia en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Vilju%C5%A1aen.wikipedia.org/wiki/Vilusi,_Banja_Luka en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Vilusi_(Gradi%C5%A1ka)en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Vilusi,_Nik%C5%A1i%C4%87 -Also look at the names across slavic lands with the word TROY in them pl.wikipedia.org/wiki/Trojanowice_(wojew%C3%B3dztwo_ma%C5%82opolskie)en.wikipedia.org/wiki/TrojaneAnd there's more, ETRUSCAN was deciphered using the SLAVIC language:
|
|
|
Post by Pyrros on Aug 3, 2018 15:21:45 GMT -5
I sada razumjemo zasto svi Slaveni istoricari treba da saradnuju.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Aug 3, 2018 15:27:14 GMT -5
I still don't think Etruscans have anything to do with any Slavs. They are genetically different than South Slavs, even different than mainland Greeks. They are only similar to Aegean Islands Greeks. However, Nuragic civilazation is connected to Slavs. That's why high amount of I2a is present on Sardinia.
|
|
|
Post by branislavnusic on Aug 3, 2018 23:04:53 GMT -5
I still don't think Etruscans have anything to do with any Slavs. They are genetically different than South Slavs, even different than mainland Greeks. They are only similar to Aegean Islands Greeks. However, Nuragic civilazation is connected to Slavs. That's why high amount of I2a is present on Sardinia. Yeah, I was wondering why that was as well
|
|
|
Post by branislavnusic on Aug 3, 2018 23:18:55 GMT -5
I sada razumjemo zasto svi Slaveni istoricari treba da saradnuju. did you know that The Balto-Slavic languages border with ALL other families of the Proto-European group, ie , Germanic, Romanesque, Hellenic, Armenian or Persian. AND all slavs used to be called SERBS I have more historians to back up my claim: Czech historian Josef Dobrovský: "If I had to give a common name for all the Slavs, it would be the name Serb". (1813) Polish Historian Lorenz Surowiecki: "The name Serb is older than Slav for all peoples of Wendic ancestry". (1828) Slovak historian Jozef Safarik: "Serbs was the oldest generic name for all Slavs" (1849) Rex is a Serb whether he likes it or not
|
|
|
Post by Pyrros on Aug 4, 2018 7:11:00 GMT -5
Novi pazar has presented a whole book on how Italy slowly turned from Slav land into anti-slav.
The HUGE proximity of Latin to Slavic can only be interpreted by this theory.
|
|