|
Post by Babylon Enigma on Dec 24, 2013 16:50:54 GMT -5
I know from the Alex Jonestein truther websites it is claimed that Hitler was secretly working for the Rothschilds and the British Royal family. If any of that disinformation propaganda has any merit, how can one explain the fate that these Brits suffered for having sympathy for Hitler's Germany?
Exiled from their family, erased from the family history book and died poor, bitter and isolated.
|
|
|
Post by Balkaneros on Dec 27, 2013 17:07:34 GMT -5
Around when (your thoughts) did the British Monarch turn against her people ? Prior to WWII, even going back to their Empire.
|
|
|
Post by Babylon Enigma on Dec 29, 2013 19:49:13 GMT -5
The British royal family has been just a pony show from the beginning, the jews took over Britain via Cromwell, the king they installed after that was of their choosing, a lame beta king. The royal family has also progressively mixed with jews overtime, the queen is one, just look at her picture when she was young, she looks Sicilian or something. When prince Harry married his jew wife they did a whole bunch of jewish wedding rituals.
But the problem starts with Christianity, which alienated chiefs and tribal leaders from their people and turned them into kings and their people into serfs. The only problems jews had with the old system was that the kings and the military class had the final say, the church too held its share of the pie, so they slowly got rid off of their former allies, WWI put an end to the monarchy, the old rulers. Jews want total monopoly, as they have written on their Old Testament. For me the problem, the root problem starts with the overthrow of the old order, pagan Aryan Europe. Christianity is part of the European decay.
|
|
|
Post by Balkaneros on Dec 30, 2013 17:53:58 GMT -5
The British royal family has been just a pony show from the beginning, the jews took over Britain via Cromwell, the king they installed after that was of their choosing, a lame beta king. The royal family has also progressively mixed with jews overtime, the queen is one, just look at her picture when she was young, she looks Sicilian or something. When prince Harry married his jew wife they did a whole bunch of jewish wedding rituals.
But the problem starts with Christianity, which alienated chiefs and tribal leaders from their people and turned them into kings and their people into serfs. The only problems jews had with the old system was that the kings and the military class had the final say, the church too held its share of the pie, so they slowly got rid off of their former allies, WWI put an end to the monarchy, the old rulers. Jews want total monopoly, as they have written on their Old Testament. For me the problem, the root problem starts with the overthrow of the old order, pagan Aryan Europe. Christianity is part of the European decay. wow, I only did a bit of digging on Cromwell and see how he disgraced his own people. Napolean was at least a little more subtle.
|
|
|
Post by Balkaneros on Dec 30, 2013 19:05:57 GMT -5
I agree that this was the beginning of our demise, always thought so, however Christianity in the West was/is very different than the East (it changed drastically). The monopoly the Vatican has over her people (one world unity-globalization), on a spiritual and communal basis is impossible in Orthodoxy, especially Serbian/Russian Orthodoxy where real Nationalism is engrained within the teachings, and are not as open to "foreigners". Corruption will always be the case, however free-masonry and all other heretic societies are completely banned by our law, it's considered a heavy sin to partake in any of that, in other words we were always taught about "this evil" and not seen as a "conspiracy". The most they can do is mismanage our resources, mis-direct our attention or simply do nothing when we need them.
|
|
|
Post by Babylon Enigma on Jan 11, 2014 22:39:33 GMT -5
UZ, the Greek church in the 1920s declared that it is immoral and against the church to be a mason. That tone has not been repeated again. The Russian church was completely destroyed by judeo-Boshlevist. But even the pre-Soviet church was not that different from the west, the Russians became serfs just like western European farmers, so there nothing inherent in Orthodoxy that would prevent the evolution of society into unfavorable conditions that developed in the west. You think Orthodoxy is different, but where is the church in support of Golden Dawn? Just a typical stab in the back. A most insane move considering that the jew world order is flooding Greece Pakis and other turd worlders. The existence of the Greek Orthodox church depends on the existence of Greeks. It is highly unlikely that the heads of the church don't see this coming, yet here they are denouncing Golden Dawn for its Greek only food drives. The jews plan their destruction, and the church sides with their oppressors, completely illogical. But what proof do you need to see that the church is the creation of the jew, and loyally stands by their policies even when such policies are hostile to the church.
I recall the gay parades in Belgrade. It was the church that urged the angry Serbs to protest peacefully, let's keep it legal, let's lose in honor. What non-sense. If the church threw it's full support in a violent demonstration against the queer parades, let me tell you the state would back down, and the angry crowds would multiply. I doubt the policemen would get violent against the demonstrators as clergymen lead the crowds. All the church does, is throw some token protest and pats believers in the back, telling them they did well, mission accomplished. It is no different than Christian resistance in the west.
I don't care how you go about this, but for the sake of being realistic, name one movement that posed a real danger to the NWO that was Christian based? I can't think of one. The only real movement was that crafted by Germans, and their pro-Christian leanings were just lip service. They didn't plan to blow up churches and hang clergy men like Judeo-Communism did in every country it got a hold, the plan was simply to defeat it by training the youth in racial science, which the ridiculous mumbo jumbo teachings of the jew book cannot not compete. Golden Dawn, just like the Nazi party only gives the church some lip service, it's politics are not based on religious matters, even though being Greek is highly based on Orthodox Christianity. If they did, the stab in back by the church could have proved fatal.
And why is this any important when the church which was created by the jews, is largely dead and irrelevant? I simply don't get the thinking behind this, the church is like a cock inside someone's ass, and the excuse not to take it out is, well it's been there for years, for good or bad it shall stay there. Would you not take an opportunity to cure yourself of disease that you suffered for years but were unaware of its presence? Any religious aspect to nationalist politics should be minimal, just token lip service, not something to rely upon and the let the church warm up to you, not the other way around.
|
|
|
Post by Babylon Enigma on Jan 11, 2014 23:04:28 GMT -5
By the way UZ, the fathers of the Slavonic churches(Cyril and the other guy), recognize something?
|
|
|
Post by Babylon Enigma on Jan 11, 2014 23:09:49 GMT -5
The English monarchy before Cromwell. Edward the Lonkshanks is the "evil" king in the Braveheart movie. The enemies of the jews are forever defamed even after they're long long gone. I honestly can't think of the opposite where Europeans make movies and books about some major jewish personality forever cursing and defaming their name. It's very Asiatic, un-honorable and unmanly. Holding grudges on dead men.
|
|
|
Post by Balkaneros on Jan 12, 2014 14:41:08 GMT -5
By the way UZ, the fathers of the Slavonic churches(Cyril and the other guy), recognize something?
The all-seeing eye and iron cross'? I am all for being independent from the Church, but for sake of argument; according to the doctrine, Christianity was suppose to replace Judaism. The Jews were/are "the children of Satan", from Jesus' mouth, according to John 8:42. It's very likely that Jesus himself was the first documented anti-Semite in history. I am speaking of him, not the religion (what is has become), I know a bit of how Christianity ravaged Europe, slaughtering all those who didn't want to heed to their doctrine, and the clear agenda of "cleansing the old ways", and replacing them with a new-way. Europe clearly needs a monolithic umbrella to unite under, especially with the rise of Islam, it will not help if we all "individualise" our spiritual needs and deal with it as smaller fractions. What do you suggest here, considering that going back to our Pagan religions does not seem to be an option right now, it'll just divide us further. What are the fundamentals in which all Europeans can unite under?
What an observation. I'm in total agreement with you here, which is how I know the Serbian Church in infiltrated, just as much as the Russian Church (if not more). I compare it to the rise of Ljotic's men, and how the Church at the time fully backed him and that was the main motivator for the thousands to join his movement (ZBOR), our clergy marched the streets with our "fascists", joining in massive demonstrations in Belgrade, blessing our soldiers before battle against the communists and sell-out Chetniks, while having open-public mass for those who had fallen. Things have totally changed since then. Don't get me wrong here, I see the Church as a potential tool to unify (in one house - one nation), however your point that it is a broken-one holds more validity.
|
|