Post by Emperor AAdmin on Feb 21, 2019 20:19:14 GMT -5
Turd Flinging Monkey
Published on Feb 21, 2019
Comments:
Dog Meat
8 hours ago
It's interesting that the "tribe" is in the middle of Individualism and Absolutism, directly across
from Communism. To me, this explains why socialist and diverse countries balkanize and I think
that is what will happen to the US eventually. This chart actually gave me some hope for the future.
.
The more I watch your stuff TFM, the more I realize that the problem with society is that the vast
.
The more I watch your stuff TFM, the more I realize that the problem with society is that the vast
majority of people are too stupid to manage their own affairs. Naturally, tyranny will come in to
fill the vacuum of power as the weak and stupid refuse to take ownership of their own lives.
.
The end goal of MGTOW is self-actualization which flies in the face of what feminists and the left
.
The end goal of MGTOW is self-actualization which flies in the face of what feminists and the left
want for the individual. As the MGTOW movement grows and women realize that more men are
taking their own power back, the culture war is only going to get uglier. Hockey mask time may
be here sooner than we think.
Mark M
8 hours ago
Listening to it TFM. The left is powerful because it has the MSM, Politicians and education system
in their pocket. All 3 focus on emotions, and never facts or stats. I cannot remember the last time
I heard a politician talk about the high Black crime rate, mention false rape claims or feminism
is bad.
.
The Right is united but scared. It also seems the Left can ruin your life through the banks. Looking at
.
The Right is united but scared. It also seems the Left can ruin your life through the banks. Looking at
Martina Makota and Chase abandoning her. Chase is a bank but simply said she cannot bank there
bc reasons.
.
I think the Right is simply worried and RIGHTFULLY so of being demonetized, de-personed and losing
.
I think the Right is simply worried and RIGHTFULLY so of being demonetized, de-personed and losing
ability to survive.
.
You think a politician would call Chase out on it...but nah.
You see a Caste system developing....it could be women above men or Intersectionals above
.
You think a politician would call Chase out on it...but nah.
You see a Caste system developing....it could be women above men or Intersectionals above
everyone....but all of it points to destruction.
TAITZ42
5 hours ago
I agree, I too see Fascism, (the Nazis with our old friend Hitler), and Monarchy and dictatorships,
frankly almost all things top down complete control as creations of leftism and / or statists. To
associate these with the right is just the brainchild of the lefts best press agents, always trying
to wash stains off of the left and soil the rep of the right. Deception is just one of the many
"free" services the left offers, it's what they do. Not to say that the right dindu nuffin wrong,
they have, all humans have. It's just the left owns most of mankind’s worst outcomes.
Communism, Socialism, National Socialism, (aka Nazis), Democratic Socialism, (bwahaha,
couldn't resist), Slavery, Jim crow, mass graves, New York and California, all brought to you
by Democrats and lefties.
Inquisitor Jack
4 hours ago
“Communism has replaced religion.”
.
As a Christian, that was an epiphany. Yeah, pretty much agree with that point
Jamie Sharknado
6 hours ago (edited)
Essentially this is an an extension of a) self interest and b) your own assumptions about
human nature. For eg, you might be an anarcho communist, because you think that it
wouldn't just turn into mad max, and then eventually tyranny. You assume, human nature
is better than it is. That people wouldn't just go back to eating each other. Same with the
communist, they think everyone won't be lazy, that they'll be generous, and kind, rather
than everybody being for themselves and as a result everyone starves. The absolutist
assumes that humans are evil beasts, and vanely hope for a wise dictator, but they rarely
happen. Because people are crap in the first place, and power corrupts. So there's not
really any political poles at all, there's just, what you want, and how you think you'll get it.
Except that everybody is always wrong about the last part, hoping for a pot of gold over
the rainbow.
Akios Eres
4 hours ago (edited)
As a Pre-Cesarean classical fascist I can confirm that all forms of fascism are inherently socialist.
Even those of us who accept and support the free market. Neither side wants to accept this. Not
the other half of the fascist spectrum and assuredly not the democratic socialist types and outright
communists. The libertarians are the only ones that acknowledge it because fascists are also
inherently statist or collectivist which of course libertarians disagree with; so they believe us
when we say we are actually socialists. The Marxists and communists on the other hand know
if they are honest about it then the lies and disinformation they use as a foundation will be
seen as what it is: Hypocricy and vindictiveness.
99legion
6 hours ago
Capitalism does eventually lead to communism, humanity operates in cycles. Capitalism leads to
6 hours ago
Capitalism does eventually lead to communism, humanity operates in cycles. Capitalism leads to
prosperity, prosperity leads to corruption and decay, and decay leads to communist totalitarianism.
Lewis The Black Knight
8 hours ago (edited)
The problem with the modern Right is that they support deregulation of monopolies and big corporations
and hence, we now have like 5 companies monopolizing the economy. Un-regulated monopolies and
corporations act like dictators: case in point is Goggle and Twitter, essentially dictating identity politics
by , inter alia, censoring. these monopolies are playing both sides of the argument by dividing the
population with feminism, identity politics, and religion to distract everyone from their continued
efforts to concentrate economic power to rig the system in their favor and stifle competition
Aram Fingal
8 hours ago (edited)
This triangle seems to be arbitrarily picking particular aspects of the various philosophies to identify
them with each other. Saying communism and individualism are related because they both reject
legally-enforced class hierarchy is like saying coconuts and grizzly bears are related because they
are both brown and fuzzy. "The Right", at least in America, also believes in equality under the law,
so they don't belong so far away from that side of the triangle. Whereas the Nolan chart (the one
with the quadrants) has fairly general meanings for the two dimensions, personal and economic
freedom, so the quadrants actually have significance. If you're wondering where the left libertarians
are, they would be people who value personal freedom to a high degree and economic freedom to
some degree but not as highly. On the Nolan chart moderate Dems like Bill Clinton (at least the
90s version) were in the left side of the libertarian quadrant.
GronkJuice
3 hours ago
The more I look at this I see more faults to the system, however I still understand the triangle
3 hours ago
The more I look at this I see more faults to the system, however I still understand the triangle
schematic. You have the three types of extremities
.
1) hive-mind - This would be both communism and religion (yep they are both hive-minds)
- This works best with perfect information, hence the needs of the hive mind. either it is control of
- This works best with perfect information, hence the needs of the hive mind. either it is control of
information (religion/belief/control(North Korea)) or all possible information that any part would
have would be given to the main entity (the hive-mind/central mind)
.
2) True Equality - This would be the individualists part (as you can not have a true individual non
caste view without true equality)
- Guess these would be the true 'egalitarians' as well as the government form of democracy or
- Guess these would be the true 'egalitarians' as well as the government form of democracy or
oligarchy as the only outlying factors for difference between people would be objective work/birth
.
3) Meritocracy - This would need to have the perfect selection system to work (as it could only work
if you eliminate all forms of bias natures)
- This would be the empires I guess, however the difference between empires and kingdoms was
- This would be the empires I guess, however the difference between empires and kingdoms was
rule succession. Empires let even peasants become rulers if they where selected, where kingdoms
required revolutions/usurpation to usher a new royal family.
Not sure if they interact correctly in the diagram, or even if all of the governments are correct, but a
Not sure if they interact correctly in the diagram, or even if all of the governments are correct, but a
kingdom is not very different from a republic, as many times a republic would gradually form from
kingdoms. Many times revolution did not bring a different form of government from the other side, or
extreme. But brought about what that group would benefit the most from. if it was the masses that
would benefit from collectivism then it would be communist/theocratic. Other times it could be a
different ruling class, and change from empire to kingdom or even republic or oligarchy.
Not sure If i explained this well enough, so I welcome questions.
Not sure If i explained this well enough, so I welcome questions.
Alexander Invictus
8 hours ago (edited)
Serious question. Why do you think national socialism is the same as communism? Because freedom.
8 hours ago (edited)
Serious question. Why do you think national socialism is the same as communism? Because freedom.
Do you want freedom from responsibility, freedom to be a degenerate? In reality your never going to
be totally free. You either have to live by the laws of nature imposed on you or have to live with the
few liberties a state gives you. every political movement has claimed freedom from it's oppressors.
Commies against the capitalist, Fascism against the materialism of communism and capitalism and
democracy from tyranny. Freedom is very abstract.
.
Why haven't you looked at any of the sources on fascism I provided you ,What are you afraid of? In
.
Why haven't you looked at any of the sources on fascism I provided you ,What are you afraid of? In
the fascist state people have the ultimate right of being what a man or woman is supposed to be.
When communist were starving to death in the holodomor and now Venezuela, when capitalist were
starving in the great depression. Hitler within 4 years ended all unemployment, had a thriving economy
based on self sufficient agriculture and industry, and could afford partial subsidized vacations for
workers in the strength through joy program. They also banned women from politics and it was the
duty for every woman to bear children. Capitalism produces greed, socialism produces idleness, both
produce degeneracy.
.
Darwinism is also pretty flawed because the fittest individual doesn't always reproduce. Darwinism is
.
Darwinism is also pretty flawed because the fittest individual doesn't always reproduce. Darwinism is
better applied to collective groups than individuals.
genjurooo
9 hours ago (edited)
There is no quadrant, not triangle, no spectrum. It is only the right way and the wrong way.
Individualism is bullshit. You can't have individualism as the building brick of a system for the very
simple reason that a individual NEEDS other individuals to function. Growing up needs parents/adults
to provide. To breed needs female.
.
Thus because the human is biologically human, the individual can't be the basis of society. So you
build your society on a lie?
.
Also you're wrong about another thing. Czarism or rather monarchies didn't spawn marxism. Ideologically
.
Also you're wrong about another thing. Czarism or rather monarchies didn't spawn marxism. Ideologically
marxists were spawn by liberalism. Radical liberalism was just that. And communism is not at all
anti-individualistic, it in fact individualistic in nature (since it was based on the same classical liberal bullshit).
The communist utopia sees the individual as just that, but somehow all he does is in line with the whole.
The commie end goal is an absolute democracy.
.
Nonetheless, the answer, the RIGHT WAY, is nowhere in this triangle. The right way had a chance to be
.
Nonetheless, the answer, the RIGHT WAY, is nowhere in this triangle. The right way had a chance to be
conceived as a complete response to the liberal revolutions of 1848, but wasn't.
Now this ties in to your UBI conundrum too.