Post by Bozur on Mar 2, 2005 16:57:05 GMT -5
World - AP
Court Sides With Girl on Religious Dress
By JILL LAWLESS, Associated Press Writer
LONDON - A school violated a student's human rights by banning her from wearing a traditional Muslim gown to class, a British court ruled Wednesday, ending a more than two year legal battle.
AP Photo / Wed Mar 2, 6:55 AM ET / British Muslim schoolgirl Shabina Begum, 16, leaves The Royal Court of Justice in London, Wednesday March 2, 2005, after a panel of three judges in the Court of Appeal ruled that her human rights were violated by her school's ban on her wearing the jilbab, a long, flowing gown covering all of her body except her hands and face.(AP Photo/Adam Butler)
AP Photo / A man holds a portrait of Shabina Begum. The Muslim girl won a long legal battle to force her school to let her wear traditional full-length Islamic dress in class -- a case reflecting similar debates elsewhere in Europe.(AFP/File/Choo Youn-Kong)
Assimilating Muslim students is a sensitive political issue in Europe, especially in France, which last year banned "conspicuous religious symbols" such as head scarves from state schools. Britain allows individual schools to decide what form of dress is appropriate.
Shabina Begum, now 16, was sent home from school in Luton, north of London, in September 2002 for wearing the jilbab, a long, flowing gown covering all her body except her hands and face.
She first went to the High Court, arguing that the ban breached her right to religious freedom under the European Convention on Human Rights.
The court rejected that argument in June. But on Wednesday a panel of three Court of Appeal judges ruled that Begum had been illegally excluded from the school, which "unlawfully denied her the right to manifest her religion."
The teenager was represented in her high-profile appeal by Cherie Booth, wife of Prime Minister Tony Blair.
Muslim leaders welcomed the ruling that Denbigh High School had breached Begum's right to freedom of religion. The school said it was trying to respect the views of all its students — and balance competing views of what is "appropriate" Muslim attire.
Begum, who now attends a school that allows her to wear the jilbab, said the ruling was "a victory for all Muslims who wish to preserve their identity and values despite prejudice and bigotry."
"It is amazing that in the so-called free world I have to fight to wear this attire," she said.
Four-fifths of Denbigh High's students are Muslims, and the school said its ban on the jilbab had the support of many students and parents, who looked to the school to protect children from the influence of religious extremists.
The school argued that the jilbab posed a health and safety risk, and might cause divisions among pupils, with those who wore traditional dress being seen as "better Muslims" than others. Pupils are allowed to wear trousers, skirts or a traditional shalwar kameez, consisting of trousers and a tunic, and female pupils may wear head scarves.
Yasin Rehman of the Luton Council of Mosques said the school's existing dress code was "very satisfactory" and worried the appeal court's ruling could complicate matters.
"There is no prescribed Islamic dress code," he said. "People of Islam, like other religions, say that you should dress modestly. The question is: how do you define that? This will create a lot of complications. Where is the end to this?"
But Iqbal Sacranie, secretary-general of the Muslim Council of Britain, said the ruling struck a blow for religious freedom.
"Those believe and choose to wear the jilbab and consider it to be part of the faith requirement for modest attire should be respected," he said.
Court Sides With Girl on Religious Dress
By JILL LAWLESS, Associated Press Writer
LONDON - A school violated a student's human rights by banning her from wearing a traditional Muslim gown to class, a British court ruled Wednesday, ending a more than two year legal battle.
AP Photo / Wed Mar 2, 6:55 AM ET / British Muslim schoolgirl Shabina Begum, 16, leaves The Royal Court of Justice in London, Wednesday March 2, 2005, after a panel of three judges in the Court of Appeal ruled that her human rights were violated by her school's ban on her wearing the jilbab, a long, flowing gown covering all of her body except her hands and face.(AP Photo/Adam Butler)
AP Photo / A man holds a portrait of Shabina Begum. The Muslim girl won a long legal battle to force her school to let her wear traditional full-length Islamic dress in class -- a case reflecting similar debates elsewhere in Europe.(AFP/File/Choo Youn-Kong)
Assimilating Muslim students is a sensitive political issue in Europe, especially in France, which last year banned "conspicuous religious symbols" such as head scarves from state schools. Britain allows individual schools to decide what form of dress is appropriate.
Shabina Begum, now 16, was sent home from school in Luton, north of London, in September 2002 for wearing the jilbab, a long, flowing gown covering all her body except her hands and face.
She first went to the High Court, arguing that the ban breached her right to religious freedom under the European Convention on Human Rights.
The court rejected that argument in June. But on Wednesday a panel of three Court of Appeal judges ruled that Begum had been illegally excluded from the school, which "unlawfully denied her the right to manifest her religion."
The teenager was represented in her high-profile appeal by Cherie Booth, wife of Prime Minister Tony Blair.
Muslim leaders welcomed the ruling that Denbigh High School had breached Begum's right to freedom of religion. The school said it was trying to respect the views of all its students — and balance competing views of what is "appropriate" Muslim attire.
Begum, who now attends a school that allows her to wear the jilbab, said the ruling was "a victory for all Muslims who wish to preserve their identity and values despite prejudice and bigotry."
"It is amazing that in the so-called free world I have to fight to wear this attire," she said.
Four-fifths of Denbigh High's students are Muslims, and the school said its ban on the jilbab had the support of many students and parents, who looked to the school to protect children from the influence of religious extremists.
The school argued that the jilbab posed a health and safety risk, and might cause divisions among pupils, with those who wore traditional dress being seen as "better Muslims" than others. Pupils are allowed to wear trousers, skirts or a traditional shalwar kameez, consisting of trousers and a tunic, and female pupils may wear head scarves.
Yasin Rehman of the Luton Council of Mosques said the school's existing dress code was "very satisfactory" and worried the appeal court's ruling could complicate matters.
"There is no prescribed Islamic dress code," he said. "People of Islam, like other religions, say that you should dress modestly. The question is: how do you define that? This will create a lot of complications. Where is the end to this?"
But Iqbal Sacranie, secretary-general of the Muslim Council of Britain, said the ruling struck a blow for religious freedom.
"Those believe and choose to wear the jilbab and consider it to be part of the faith requirement for modest attire should be respected," he said.