highduke
Amicus
Instigator / Scholar
60%
Posts: 3,687
|
Post by highduke on Dec 22, 2007 17:35:55 GMT -5
|
|
|
Post by undoubtable03 on Dec 22, 2007 17:59:05 GMT -5
Great, a new theory, what is this your fifth over a span of three years??? What happened to the one which stated we migrated from the Caucasus and came to the Balkans along with Ottoman soldiers??? I think that was my favorite, but I'm still waiting for an Ethiopian theory. Try working on that. Just imagine, Ethiopians carried the Ark of the Covenant all the way to Albania and migrated with local inhabitants. You could use our large "feet" to justify it as well.
|
|
rex362
Senior Moderator
Pellazg
PELASGIANILLYROALBANIAN
Posts: 19,058
|
Post by rex362 on Dec 22, 2007 18:07:36 GMT -5
AAHAHHAHHAHHAHHAHHAAHAH
|
|
|
Post by albhoney on Dec 22, 2007 18:12:39 GMT -5
Great, a new theory, what is this your fifth over a span of three years??? What happened to the one which stated we migrated from the Caucasus and came to the Balkans along with Ottoman soldiers??? I think that was my favorite, but I'm still waiting for an Ethiopian theory. Try working on that. Just imagine, Ethiopians carried the Ark of the Covenant all the way to Albania and migrated with local inhabitants. You could use our large "feet" to justify it as well. Sweet, I knew Albanians were the ones to create religion for the masses. J. Pandeli is correct is saying that Shqip is the language of God.
|
|
highduke
Amicus
Instigator / Scholar
60%
Posts: 3,687
|
Post by highduke on Dec 22, 2007 20:58:34 GMT -5
undoubtable:
My theory was refined and improved on. That gives it credibility.
The Anatolian theory, unlike the Caucasian theory, accounts for the few similarities between Illyrians and Albanians (Dardanians), as well as for the many great differences. The Caucasian theory did not take account the similarities but focused on the differences.
|
|
|
Post by suart on Dec 22, 2007 21:18:01 GMT -5
Weldone Highduke, it is a great research, keep it up.
|
|
highduke
Amicus
Instigator / Scholar
60%
Posts: 3,687
|
Post by highduke on Dec 22, 2007 21:29:56 GMT -5
thank you.
|
|
|
Post by undoubtable03 on Dec 22, 2007 21:56:53 GMT -5
Highduke:
I don't think you understand, your research will never have credibility. You have a nationalistic bias that affects every aspect of your thinking.
You use research to prove something that you have already determined to be true. No matter what research you use, you will always manipulate it toward your own means. I already know the outcome of every theory you will ever come up with. You will always conclude your findings by saying that Albanians have limited or no Illyrian origin and that they have no right to the land they claim, blah, blah, blah, Serbs are the greatest, blah, blah, blah.
I only wish you could use your motivation toward history and anthropology productively by contributing to each field. However, your bias removes all credibility because your nationalistic agenda far outweighs any goal you have to contribute to your science. In other words, you are no better than any other Serb, Greek, or Albanian that tries to glorify his origins while dismissing those of neighboring nationalities.
|
|
highduke
Amicus
Instigator / Scholar
60%
Posts: 3,687
|
Post by highduke on Dec 23, 2007 16:44:33 GMT -5
I don't have a nationalistic bias. I never determined that Albanians were not Illyrians until I read the same research by western and Albanian scholars that are in that link.
|
|
|
Post by greekslav on Dec 24, 2007 18:12:33 GMT -5
First of all, your single reference is Geocities/Capitol Hill/Lobby. No legitimate references at all. Plus, the pages that the links within the reference show indicate they are old pages from many years ago. When I see this kind of post with a not-so-legitimate reference, red flags go up.
I will pay them no mind since it is nationalistic and nonsense. Some people sway easily. Others do not.
|
|