Rhezus
Moderator
DERZA STURIA TRAUS
Posts: 1,674
|
Post by Rhezus on Apr 26, 2008 21:08:26 GMT -5
Not many ppl had need of state formation.. at that time they were just dwelling in their territories. Sooner or later a stete formation should accure - without any huns, avars or pechenegs. Btw, the last mentionned names automatically associate asiatic origin. Modern Hungarians do not look asiatic and that says more than thousand words.
|
|
|
Post by oszkarthehun on Apr 26, 2008 22:26:22 GMT -5
It did occur under Magyars in 1000AD and from then continued 300 years of Magyar Kings and this same State exists today as MagyarOrszag.
Whomever it ocured under it would more than likely have been by force as most State formations were and its not necessary it would have been under the local population eg it may have become a Germanic state.
As has been said the term Asiatic is somewhat a broad term in this context but it can be said they were most likely not Indo-European names.Certain Hungarian names of today are not Indo-European origin either.
As has been said modern Hungarians are a mixture of all the layers that went before them. And as I have pointed out there has been a lot of immigration into Hungary from early times majority of those people assimilated into Hungarians so Magyar blood was not just diluted by whomever was there when they arrived but also from the many people whom went into Hungary from East and West.
I would say the Hun tribes stock was probably stronger in the first 300 years and after that due to much intermixing and much immigration into Hungary it became more and more diluted even still as has been stated Turanian blood is still considered to be as high as 25% in Hungary.
|
|
pixot
New Member
Posts: 48
|
Post by pixot on Jun 12, 2008 18:06:01 GMT -5
Hungarians are a fascinanting people!!!
|
|