highduke
Amicus
Instigator / Scholar
60%
Posts: 3,687
|
Post by highduke on Aug 26, 2008 16:14:52 GMT -5
Just wanted to get some opinions, so kindly make a selection an leave comments.
|
|
|
Post by Novus Dis on Aug 26, 2008 16:34:49 GMT -5
No one delete or move this thread.
|
|
|
Post by sweetnugs on Aug 26, 2008 19:06:55 GMT -5
No one delete or move this thread. Pussy
|
|
Anthologic
Amicus
"Lord of all Reality"
Ha!
Posts: 1,237
|
Post by Anthologic on Aug 26, 2008 19:43:53 GMT -5
It's pretty obvious he wasn't for Greater Serbia or croatia or anything.
He was more of a pan-slavist, regarding the south slavs.
|
|
Zvone
Amicus
Never take life seriously. Nobody gets out alive anyway.
Posts: 525
|
Post by Zvone on Aug 26, 2008 19:48:22 GMT -5
He was an egomaniac. As long as it suited him, he didn't give a shit what happened.
|
|
|
Post by Novus Dis on Aug 26, 2008 20:44:40 GMT -5
Tito believed that "a weak Serbia means a strong Yugoslavia" (which is why he made the artificial states of Bosnia and Macedonia and the autonomous regions of Vojvodina and Kosovo) but as we have learnt (since the majority of those who wished to preserve Yugoslavia were Serbs) that was very wrongful thinking. I don't blame him for being so Serbophobic, he fought in the Austrian army after all and their motto was "alle Serben mussen sterben."
|
|