|
Post by bob1389 on Nov 24, 2008 10:16:37 GMT -5
Silajdzic Compares RS Premier Dodik To Hitler
Silajdzic pointed out that a compromise would already been achieved if genocide was a good thing.
The Bosnia-Herzegovina Constitutional Court has rejected a request for issuing out temporary measures which Bosnia-Herzegovina Presidency presiding Haris Silajdzic wrote, asking for a court body to end the Bosnian Serb entity of Republika Srpska violating the BH Constitution, Pincom writes.
The court concluded that Silajdzic did not offer arguments based on which it could decide that granting temporary measures was necessary in the interest of parties or the right procedure. Tensions between Bosnian Serb entity of Republika Srpska Prime Minister Milorad Dodik and Haris Silajdzic are a well-known fact, while recently Silajdzic compared the premier to Adolf Hitler.
- Has there been a compromise between Hitler and the Allies? – Silajdzic wondered after a La Vanguardia asked him if a deal was possible with Dodik. Furthermore, he pointed out that a compromise would already been achieved if genocide was a good thing.
|
|
|
Post by bob1389 on Nov 24, 2008 10:27:03 GMT -5
Not a surprise though, comming from the man that spent most of the 90s going around the world telling everyone what big 'baby eating fascists' Serbs are. The truly tragic part is those gullable 'Bosniak patriots' such as Cheero & co. who voted for this pr!ck with the intention of unifying BiH (OMG party's name is called 'For Bosnia', it mustz be really gudz!) Even more tragic is that after comming to terms with Silajdzic, a man with all bark and no bite, there is the vain attempt of equating his failures with that of Dodiks - with the assumption that he has been 'just as bad for Serbs' whilst Dodik has been the best thing for Serbs and RS since our great Doctor and founding father proclaimed our Republic on that fateful day in January 1992
|
|
|
Post by manijak on Nov 24, 2008 11:17:05 GMT -5
You might hate the guy, and he can state some stupid and extreme things, but you can't say Silajdzic is not a man of principle or that he isn't intelligent. He is trying to follow the rule of law. He is doing everything by the book. The international community though is not really following their own rules and they didn't from the very beginning.
One of the first things Bosniaks wanted was the RIGHT to defend themselves, which is stated in the UN charter, but this was not accepted by the international community/UN. So weapons had to be acquired on the black market. This was of course a MAJOR deal, this was during a time of war, and our people could have been totally wiped out by such a decision. A decision that totally went against their own charter. Silajdzic has basically seen that type of stuff happen over and over.
Their charter also states that any situation that is created by such things as genocide, or any situation where one side was really the aggressor, where they did things which international law does not stand for,(ie crimes against humanity) which their own courts agreed was the case in Bosnia, should not be legitimized. So if they followed that portion of their laws, RS should really not be allowed to stand today.
There have been other things as well.
The issue with all of this is that the UN is weak, international law is not respected, and nobody cares about our area. This was proven as well with the war in Iraq which the US went into despite what the UN said and what international laws state. So as right as you may be, as principled as you may be, it doesn't really matter if nobody cares.
When you actually think about it, what Silajdzic wants OVERALL is in fact somewhat of a compromise position. The issue though is, and its a big one, is that its a compromise position that has no chance of changing any of its major points because of principle.
|
|
|
Post by zgembo on Nov 24, 2008 13:56:13 GMT -5
Thing is, Republika Srpska could not have been the aggressor in Bosnia since its not a seperate country, since Bosnian Serbs are also a part of Bosnia. Following this by the book makes the war in Bosnia a civil war, but Silajdzic always insists on aggression by Serbia/Milosevic. And the only proven genocide that happened in Bosnia was in Srebrenica. So, you can't say Republika Srpska was formed by genocide. Perhaps Srebrenica being part of Republika Srpska is a form of recognizing genocide but, even that, assumes that what happened in Srebrenica is the fault of the entire entity (and not military individuals in charge such as Ratko Mladic and Radoslav Krstic).
Silajdzic has his own interpretation of events, he sticks to them and refuses to consider the other side of the coin. You can call that a principled stand. I think he just convinces himself of whatever version of events suits his own agenda. Most people see through such subjective interpretations and don't pay attention to them. That is why Europeans and even Americans have ignored his rhetoric over the past couple of years.
P.S. The right to defend yourself, in the UN Charter, is qualified by the UN Security Council's ability to take measures to maintain international peace and security. The embargo imposed was in line with that. You may not like it, but again, it is by the book actually.
|
|
|
Post by kapetan on Nov 24, 2008 14:13:23 GMT -5
lol @ serbs ALWAYS having some technicality or loophole
|
|
|
Post by bog on Nov 24, 2008 18:07:54 GMT -5
Thing is, Republika Srpska could not have been the aggressor in Bosnia since its not a seperate country, since Bosnian Serbs are also a part of Bosnia. Following this by the book makes the war in Bosnia a civil war, but Silajdzic always insists on aggression by Serbia/Milosevic. And the only proven genocide that happened in Bosnia was in Srebrenica. So, you can't say Republika Srpska was formed by genocide. Perhaps Srebrenica being part of Republika Srpska is a form of recognizing genocide but, even that, assumes that what happened in Srebrenica is the fault of the entire entity (and not military individuals in charge such as Ratko Mladic and Radoslav Krstic). Silajdzic has his own interpretation of events, he sticks to them and refuses to consider the other side of the coin. You can call that a principled stand. I think he just convinces himself of whatever version of events suits his own agenda. Most people see through such subjective interpretations and don't pay attention to them. That is why Europeans and even Americans have ignored his rhetoric over the past couple of years. P.S. The right to defend yourself, in the UN Charter, is qualified by the UN Security Council's ability to take measures to maintain international peace and security. The embargo imposed was in line with that. You may not like it, but again, it is by the book actually. Would be funny if the siptars, made the republic of siptarska or what not in 49% of the Republic of Serbia Anyways, Dilajdzic is smart, he knows how to get votes, and how to get cash$$$. Nnd the only thing that will change now that he has shown that he is an utter failure, is that ppl who voted for SBiH wil vote for SDA, and they are basicly the same party... happy days ;D It's funny that most Serbs think that the RS can join Serbia, even if the main part of the RS does not have a land link, and Serbia has no army to speak of. It is also funny that the Bosniacs think the RS can just go away over night, like Serbs would have a reason to join Bosnia as it is now. Thinking RS Serbs would support Bosnia as it is now, is as thinking that Bosniacs would have had a reason to support leftover-Yugoslavia as it was in 1992....
|
|
|
Post by bob1389 on Nov 24, 2008 19:51:52 GMT -5
Tihic said it best;
"Silajdžić destroying Bosnia"
BANJA LUKA -- SDA leader Sulejman Tihić says that Bosnian Presidency member Haris Silajdžić is toppling the state with his public statements and political activities.
"Silajdžić is not offering anything new, he is not offering any tangible solutions, but merely criticizing politicians who are advocating Bosnia’s economic and political stability and its association with the EU," Tihić said in an interview with Banja Luka daily Glas Srpske.
|
|
|
Post by zgembo on Nov 25, 2008 2:33:52 GMT -5
OHR otvoreno napao Harisa SilajdžićaDijalog i kompromisni sporazumi su sastavni dio moderne europske političke prakse i nema mjesta stavovima "sve ili ništa" ukoliko se želi da BiH krene naprijed prema Europi, navodi se u reagiranju OHR-a na otvoreno pismo Harisa Silajdžića. www.pincom.info/bih/opsirnije.asp?ID=60977
|
|
|
Post by Marshall_Stanko on Nov 28, 2008 4:04:24 GMT -5
Silajdzjic mora da poljubi shmajseru u usta.
|
|