|
Post by srbobran on Dec 25, 2008 0:26:39 GMT -5
|
|
tyson
Amicus
Posts: 1,256
|
Post by tyson on Dec 25, 2008 0:36:43 GMT -5
so why did the sultan execute him?..... it doesnt mention the chapter about his death coz its a preview only.
|
|
highduke
Amicus
Instigator / Scholar
60%
Posts: 3,687
|
Post by highduke on Dec 25, 2008 8:42:13 GMT -5
Gradascevic was as much a Serb as Angelovic, because a balija will always be a failed traitor Serb no matter how much he denies it or how hard he works to oppress and/or kill his own people. Deep down the balija knows he is $hit & hates himself. He is not a person but a mechanism, programed to destroy his own kind & himself. You cant undo 5 centuries of bad breeding & brainwashing. 1/2 of them are Janicari: descendants of kidnapped Serb children, 1/2 from converts for money & power. Nisu nacija
|
|
|
Post by srbobran on Dec 25, 2008 12:02:40 GMT -5
Yeah but Angelovic was Serbian, not Bosniak.
Tyson, he was executed by an Ottoman Imperial Order and historians can only speculate as to why he was executed (or so the book says). Some say its because of his poor preformance at Otluk Beli battle.
|
|
highduke
Amicus
Instigator / Scholar
60%
Posts: 3,687
|
Post by highduke on Dec 25, 2008 15:40:57 GMT -5
There is no such thing as a Bosniak in the sense Srbobran uses it. Bosniak, Bosanac, Bosnjanin are all terms for Serbs from Bosnia, except that bosniak has been misappropriated by descendants of opportunistic converts & brainwashed janisaries to rationalize the shameful manner in which they came about. Srbobran do not give them respect they dont deserve unless your respect is cheap
|
|
|
Post by boscrocop on Dec 26, 2008 21:20:10 GMT -5
Yeah but Angelovic was Serbian, not Bosniak. Tyson, he was executed by an Ottoman Imperial Order and historians can only speculate as to why he was executed (or so the book says). Some say its because of his poor preformance at Otluk Beli battle. how old was he when the Turks took him, I looked through the book a little, but did not find the age...
|
|
|
Post by srbobran on Dec 27, 2008 11:46:10 GMT -5
Historians can only speculate. They think he was born in the 1420 and was captured around 1427 by Ottomans who were besieging Novo Brdo (place of his birth) and the outlying areas.
|
|
|
Post by sweetnugs on Dec 27, 2008 13:26:21 GMT -5
There is no such thing as a Bosniak in the sense Srbobran uses it. Bosniak, Bosanac, Bosnjanin are all terms for Serbs from Bosnia, except that bosniak has been misappropriated by descendants of opportunistic converts & brainwashed janisaries to rationalize the shameful manner in which they came about. Srbobran do not give them respect they dont deserve unless your respect is cheap Glupane, objesi se vise!
|
|
highduke
Amicus
Instigator / Scholar
60%
Posts: 3,687
|
Post by highduke on Dec 27, 2008 13:56:23 GMT -5
Izrode, dokazi da to gore nije istina, a ako ne mozes onda se obesi ti, jebem te u poturcena usta pickasta...ili prihvati da si Srbin i preporodi se
|
|
|
Post by meltdown711 on Dec 27, 2008 17:48:54 GMT -5
Yeah but Angelovic was Serbian, not Bosniak. Tyson, he was executed by an Ottoman Imperial Order and historians can only speculate as to why he was executed (or so the book says). Some say its because of his poor preformance at Otluk Beli battle. how old was he when the Turks took him, I looked through the book a little, but did not find the age... The average age to be taken into the Devshirme was between 13-17... but it could vary. Scanderbeg in Albania was taken about the age 18-19.
|
|
|
Post by kapetan on Dec 27, 2008 18:21:28 GMT -5
I'm gonna start claiming Ancient Egyptians are an offshoot of even ancientier Bosniaks. it's obvious...the whole pyramid thing...I mean cmon you think they just "thought" of that by themselves?
|
|