|
Post by radovic on Mar 21, 2008 15:47:35 GMT -5
Albania wasn't the worst place on earth!!! As a matter of fact, 'till the 70's it was better than Greece and Italy. Then Hoxha made the first mistake and it followed...the worst years were: '80-'90! Super-worst: '90-2000 worst so-so-...now... Oh man. Your funny. Albania was better then Greece during cold war. ;D ;D ;D
|
|
rex362
Senior Moderator
Pellazg
PELASGIANILLYROALBANIAN
Posts: 19,058
|
Post by rex362 on Mar 21, 2008 20:40:56 GMT -5
Further apart from name Illyria (which can also be referred to as Yugoslavia) also new Illyrian ethnic identity should be forged and fully adapted over time by all Slovenes, Serbs, Croats, Bosniaks, Montenegrins and SlavMacedonians. Bulgarians can over time adapt name of Thracians and Thrace as this is the actual origin of that population only slavized. New fused culture would be referred to as Yugoslavia (or and Illyria & Thrace).
ALL SOUNDS FYROMANIAC LIKE .....AHAHAHHAHAHA
like I said in the beginning ...Yugo is not there anymore ....simple as that
lets just call it a good and bad dream ....and throw it in "History Etc" section ....
|
|
|
Post by Ja Ona i Pivo on Mar 24, 2008 12:03:39 GMT -5
Hahha so funny to se dijaspora guys who never lived in juga talk about how "bad" it was At least then we were respected throughout the world, look at us now, we are just a black hole in Europe, and cikola dont think Croatia as all wonderfull and everything... Some sweeds even asked me if its safe to travel to croatia? Come on.... Balkan is just a black hole like balticum... I dont even want to mention how Albania is,,, WOW albos probably will show some random pictures how "beautiful" albania is... I can find u beautiful photos from afghanistan if u want..
|
|
MiG
Amicus
Republika
Posts: 4,793
|
Post by MiG on Mar 24, 2008 20:37:57 GMT -5
^ LOL! Yes we were respected once, a long, very long time ago.
|
|
|
Post by Novus Dis on Mar 26, 2008 4:35:37 GMT -5
Hahha so funny to se dijaspora guys who never lived in juga talk about how "bad" it was At least then we were respected throughout the world, look at us now, we are just a black hole in Europe, and cikola dont think Croatia as all wonderfull and everything... Some sweeds even asked me if its safe to travel to croatia? Come on.... Balkan is just a black hole like balticum... I dont even want to mention how Albania is,,, WOW albos probably will show some random pictures how "beautiful" albania is... I can find u beautiful photos from afghanistan if u want.. What does “respected throughout the world” mean? Know what WOG means? That’s what Yugoslavs were to the world.
|
|
|
Post by toskali4springbrk on Mar 26, 2008 12:57:59 GMT -5
Yugoslavia is dead!!!! Good riddance. ;D
|
|
|
Post by Novus Dis on Mar 26, 2008 13:59:31 GMT -5
One nation, one king, one country.
|
|
|
Post by c0gnate on Mar 27, 2008 17:06:35 GMT -5
One nation, one king, one country. Tasmania?
|
|
MiG
Amicus
Republika
Posts: 4,793
|
Post by MiG on Mar 27, 2008 21:51:12 GMT -5
Then Illyria SF should go too.
|
|
Anthologic
Amicus
"Lord of all Reality"
Ha!
Posts: 1,237
|
Post by Anthologic on Mar 29, 2008 21:28:47 GMT -5
We can take a vote.
|
|
CiKoLa
Amicus
Gotovina Heroj!
Posts: 3,728
|
Post by CiKoLa on Mar 30, 2008 22:54:36 GMT -5
That wasn't provocative. No, not at all.
|
|
|
Post by Ja Ona i Pivo on Mar 31, 2008 8:59:56 GMT -5
One nation, one king, one country. Come on, u cant be as dumb as Cikola? Where is Serbia respected`? Where? Russia? Tadjikistan? Kazhakstan? U can talk about king this king that where was the king when ww2 broke out? aah?
|
|
|
Post by Emperor AAdmin on Mar 31, 2008 22:22:02 GMT -5
CiKoLa
No need to post such provocative pictures and instigate against those who feel something towards former Yugoslavia. If you have an opinion express it in a civil and non-instigating manner otherwise there is no need to post in this particular subforum as you would not be contributing in any meaningful manner.
|
|
|
Post by Teuta1975 on Mar 31, 2008 22:43:27 GMT -5
Yougoslavia as an idea is similar to what USA is! But there are not ethnic conflicts in USA because (according to Schlender) USA didn't try to preserve only one identity, but to create a new one, American. Yougoslavs (Tito) tried to do that but he didn't have enough experience and the conglomerate of people in Yougoslavia wasn't the of the same diversity as in USA. Thus, even though -he continues- the ethnic conflicts are breaking up nations (URSS, Yougoslavia, Ethiopia etc), USA solved the problem by creating a new identity where every one would feel American and that's the secret of this existing melting pot, plenty on its diversity but compact on its composition. Now, the question is: what went wrong in Yougoslavia? Why?
|
|
|
Post by julius on Mar 31, 2008 23:10:59 GMT -5
^ LOL! Yes we were respected once, a long, very long time ago. I think everyone should respect a dead man/thing/whatever. IMO Leave the section alive as memories should be. (I mean it)
|
|
stickinthemud
Membrum
Economist, Historian, Philosopher
Posts: 131
|
Post by stickinthemud on Apr 1, 2008 8:12:08 GMT -5
Yougoslavia as an idea is similar to what USA is! But there are not ethnic conflicts in USA because (according to Schlender) USA didn't try to preserve only one identity, but to create a new one, American. Yougoslavs (Tito) tried to do that but he didn't have enough experience and the conglomerate of people in Yougoslavia wasn't the of the same diversity as in USA. Thus, even though -he continues- the ethnic conflicts are breaking up nations (URSS, Yougoslavia, Ethiopia etc), USA solved the problem by creating a new identity where every one would feel American and that's the secret of this existing melting pot, plenty on its diversity but compact on its composition. Now, the question is: what went wrong in Yougoslavia? Why? Yet, if one were to objectively investigate the history of the U.S. one would find that the old colonies rarely looked to each other as the 'same nation.' The concept of a strong united 'American' identity emerged in the 19th century and achieved its goal when the Federal government unconstitutionally prevented the South from seceding. Early America was more of a confederation of independent and sovereign States each with their own customs, culture, and indeed, identities.
|
|
Anthologic
Amicus
"Lord of all Reality"
Ha!
Posts: 1,237
|
Post by Anthologic on Apr 1, 2008 15:35:52 GMT -5
Yougoslavia as an idea is similar to what USA is! But there are not ethnic conflicts in USA because (according to Schlender) USA didn't try to preserve only one identity, but to create a new one, American. Yougoslavs (Tito) tried to do that but he didn't have enough experience and the conglomerate of people in Yougoslavia wasn't the of the same diversity as in USA. Thus, even though -he continues- the ethnic conflicts are breaking up nations (URSS, Yougoslavia, Ethiopia etc), USA solved the problem by creating a new identity where every one would feel American and that's the secret of this existing melting pot, plenty on its diversity but compact on its composition. Now, the question is: what went wrong in Yougoslavia? Why? Actually, what Tito did to Yugoslavia is like uniting the confederate states and the union states without changing their identity to be a unified USA. Tito intentionally left the republics as mini-nations within Yugoslavia.
|
|
MiG
Amicus
Republika
Posts: 4,793
|
Post by MiG on Apr 2, 2008 23:04:37 GMT -5
He should have hand picked a successor. That was his only mistake.
|
|
|
Post by julius on Apr 3, 2008 11:44:09 GMT -5
Lets concentrate on memories only... Here is a good funny one:
|
|
|
Post by terroreign on Apr 5, 2008 4:42:43 GMT -5
Montenegro was forced into Yugoslavia, we wanted to stay independent forever.
If we weren't annexed in 1918, we would be like Monaco today.
Thanks Tito and Draza...
|
|