|
Post by ulf on Mar 12, 2012 14:18:03 GMT -5
|
|
|
Post by ulf on Mar 12, 2012 17:05:29 GMT -5
Its interesting because it shows Romania has 86.2% European, 10.9% Middle Eastern, 2.9% South Asian admixture, unlike Bulgaria which is fully Caucasoid ‐ 92.4% European, 7.6% Middle Eastern ;D
|
|
|
Post by groet on Mar 13, 2012 12:19:53 GMT -5
It seems rather faulty to me. Spain scores 98% Iberian (which I guess is Meditteranean, terrible term) but 88.6% European, meaning that part of the identical Iberian genetic component is European while another part isn't. A lot of these results are very dubious, like some (genetically very diverse) countries scoring so pure. Some of the admixture is also highly unlikely, a Baltic-Ural component in Spaniards but not a Northwest European one? There are other examples as well, though I only used Spain.
These admixture analyses done on the Internet are usually rather weak.
|
|
|
Post by ulf on Mar 13, 2012 13:01:17 GMT -5
It seems rather faulty to me. Spain scores 98% Iberian (which I guess is Meditteranean, terrible term) but 88.6% European, meaning that part of the identical Iberian genetic component is European while another part isn't. A lot of these results are very dubious, like some (genetically very diverse) countries scoring so pure. Some of the admixture is also highly unlikely, a Baltic-Ural component in Spaniards but not a Northwest European one? There are other examples as well, though I only used Spain. These admixture analyses done on the Internet are usually rather weak. I suggest you to take a better look. There is a map above every set of results
|
|
|
Post by groet on Mar 13, 2012 13:28:00 GMT -5
It seems rather faulty to me. Spain scores 98% Iberian (which I guess is Meditteranean, terrible term) but 88.6% European, meaning that part of the identical Iberian genetic component is European while another part isn't. A lot of these results are very dubious, like some (genetically very diverse) countries scoring so pure. Some of the admixture is also highly unlikely, a Baltic-Ural component in Spaniards but not a Northwest European one? There are other examples as well, though I only used Spain. These admixture analyses done on the Internet are usually rather weak. I suggest you to take a better look. There is a map above every set of results Yes. Still, the Iberian genetic component should be separated from the Middle-Eastern one. Clearly, Middle Eastern genetic component and Iberian aren't the same. And this still doesn't explain highly unlikely results which don't fit with actual admixtures and that this doesn't fit with previous results.
|
|
Kralj Vatra
Amicus
Warning: Sometimes uses foul language & insults!!!
20%
Posts: 9,814
|
Post by Kralj Vatra on Mar 15, 2012 6:50:36 GMT -5
I didn't know that regions with timezone west of GMT could be considered "eastern". The whole pdf is a joke.
|
|
|
Post by ulf on Mar 16, 2012 19:02:31 GMT -5
I suggest you to take a better look. There is a map above every set of results Yes. Still, the Iberian genetic component should be separated from the Middle-Eastern one. Clearly, Middle Eastern genetic component and Iberian aren't the same. And this still doesn't explain highly unlikely results which don't fit with actual admixtures and that this doesn't fit with previous results. I think by Iberian they meant European Mediterranean. They certainly separated it from Middle Eastern one.
|
|
|
Post by bowandarrow on Mar 16, 2012 19:20:58 GMT -5
Other one is from the Caucasus.
|
|
|
Post by hellboy87 on Mar 17, 2012 7:13:50 GMT -5
Its interesting because it shows Romania has 86.2% European, 10.9% Middle Eastern, 2.9% South Asian admixture The South Asian admixture probably comes from the Gypsies.
|
|
|
Post by ulf on Mar 17, 2012 16:07:12 GMT -5
Its interesting because it shows Romania has 86.2% European, 10.9% Middle Eastern, 2.9% South Asian admixture The South Asian admixture probably comes from the Gypsies. Everything is a possibility. It shows us the total population admixture, regardless of ethnicity
|
|