|
Post by Pyrros on Oct 18, 2018 9:35:07 GMT -5
In this thread I will present my experiences with pseudo-Greek Neo-pseudo-Communists (AKA Anarchists, undisciplined lazy useless mobsters) which are the main reason of the early disgust I felt as young man in the University about Communists.
I will elaborate.
|
|
|
Post by branislavnusic on Oct 18, 2018 9:39:09 GMT -5
In this thread I will present my experiences with pseudo-Greek Neo-pseudo-Communists (AKA Anarchists, undisciplined lazy useless mobsters) which are the main reason of the early disgust I felt as young man in the University about Communists.
I will elaborate.
Communism is basically anarchy
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Oct 18, 2018 10:39:56 GMT -5
I am waiting, because I have a lot to say about some of them too (although in Serbian universities)
|
|
|
Post by Pyrros on Oct 18, 2018 11:35:59 GMT -5
Both commies come from the same school : anti-Soviet anti-east anti-Othodox anti-Serb anti-Russian
pro-west pro-pseudo-palestine pro-pseudo
In this interview some Greek prostitutes from the greek ANTIFA branch push a croat "comrade" to speak against Serbs , only to fall back to the classic recipe : if you cant find none demonizing the Serbs you gotta do it yourself.
In short the greek pseudo-commies in the -ES and -EKS versions are the greatest anti-slav prostitutes .
The interview with Croat "comrade" Marko :
first link in this page.
Opening and reading the text, its only after a whole line that the word srebrenica is mentioned .... ooohhhh some biggie SAXON will be DEEPLY concerned about it... It should be in the first line..... with bold letters ....
You can translate this interview to know first hand how the western anti-SLAV pseudo-communists are alike...
I have come across good communists as well.... Yup, mainly from KKE EKS... but although they were not so openly anti-Serb as their western counterparts, they were something equally stupid ... anti-yugoslav..
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Oct 18, 2018 13:12:02 GMT -5
Both commies come from the same school : anti-Soviet anti-east anti-Othodox anti-Serb anti-Russian
pro-west pro-pseudo-palestine pro-pseudo
In this interview some Greek prostitutes from the greek ANTIFA branch push a croat "comrade" to speak against Serbs , only to fall back to the classic recipe : if you cant find none demonizing the Serbs you gotta do it yourself.
In short the greek pseudo-commies in the -ES and -EKS versions are the greatest anti-slav prostitutes .
The interview with Croat "comrade" Marko :
first link in this page.
Opening and reading the text, its only after a whole line that the word srebrenica is mentioned .... ooohhhh some biggie SAXON will be DEEPLY concerned about it... It should be in the first line..... with bold letters ....
You can translate this interview to know first hand how the western anti-SLAV pseudo-communists are alike...
I have come across good communists as well.... Yup, mainly from KKE EKS... but although they were not so openly anti-Serb as their western counterparts, they were something equally stupid ... anti-yugoslav..
Many of those here. What is pseudo-palestine?
By the way many people around here are anti-Christian in fact, or even worse. I know many cases that swear to be Orthodox or Muslims but they can't even follow all ten commadments, most notably number 7: "Thou shalt not commit adultery ". I guess in case of this pro-westies its number 9 that's critical: "Thou shalt not bear false witness against thy neighbour ", as well as number 10: "Thou shalt not covet".
|
|
|
Post by Emperor AAdmin on Oct 18, 2018 13:56:21 GMT -5
In this thread I will present my experiences with pseudo-Greek Neo-pseudo-Communists (AKA Anarchists, undisciplined lazy useless mobsters) which are the main reason of the early disgust I felt as young man in the University about Communists.
I will elaborate.
Communism is basically anarchy
The way I understand the idea is that the read of communism has several stages:
1) Capitalism is dissolved via so called *proletariat revolution. (**if a given state has a large or dominant village population then commit acts towards destroying villages) (**Such as done in like Mao China in 1960s or by Stalin in Ukrane in early 1930s) (** Village has to be destroyed as it preserves tradition and family on one end and is self-sufficient in terms of food
2) "People" or in reality handful of Communist elitist take over. "Peoples" Republic is proclaimed.
Also called Socialist or even Democratic (East Germany or N Korea). This stage is called socialism. Socialism is perceived as road to Communism.
3) As socialism is advancing private property gradually or abruptly fully disappears. Super state.
Full control assumed by communist elite over populace while top leader is perceived as almost divine.
4) At the point in future super state ABOLISHES ITSELF and small communes are established. In these communes everything is shared according to the needs while. Everyone contributes according to their working ability.
Lets focus on points 3 and 4.
Who else sees a contradiction here as far as logic is concerned.
Are we to believe that super state is WILLINGLY going to abolish itself!
|
|
|
Post by Pyrros on Oct 18, 2018 14:42:57 GMT -5
basically the same as pseudo-Bosniak. Jump like a monkey in front of the SAXAN cameras and play as the script says.
Now guys you gotta read this interview its text PDF, just copy paste to translate.
|
|
rex362
Senior Moderator
Pellazg
PELASGIANILLYROALBANIAN
Posts: 19,058
|
Post by rex362 on Oct 18, 2018 15:22:43 GMT -5
zzzzzzzzzz zzzzzzzzz
|
|
|
Post by branislavnusic on Oct 19, 2018 0:01:31 GMT -5
Communism is basically anarchy
The way I understand the idea is that the read of communism has several stages:
1) Capitalism is dissolved via so called *proletariat revolution. (**if a given state has a large or dominant village population then commit acts towards destroying villages) (**Such as done in like Mao China in 1960s or by Stalin in Ukrane in early 1930s) (** Village has to be destroyed as it preserves tradition and family on one end and is self-sufficient in terms of food
2) "People" or in reality handful of Communist elitist take over. "Peoples" Republic is proclaimed.
Also called Socialist or even Democratic (East Germany or N Korea). This stage is called socialism. Socialism is perceived as road to Communism.
3) As socialism is advancing private property gradually or abruptly fully disappears. Super state.
Full control assumed by communist elite over populace while top leader is perceived as almost divine.
4) At the point in future super state ABOLISHES ITSELF and small communes are established. In these communes everything is shared according to the needs while. Everyone contributes according to their working ability.
Lets focus on points 3 and 4.
Who else sees a contradiction here as far as logic is concerned.
Are we to believe that super state is WILLINGLY going to abolish itself!
There are two kinds of revolutionary socialism: Leninism or Trotskyism, and anarchism. Leninists believe in forming a “vanguard party”, of the most “advanced” sections of the people. The idea is that the vanguard will lead the workers to revolution, and take power in their name, setting up a “workers’ State”, which will “wither away” over time. But anarchists say that no one should take power. Any workers’ State would turn into another tyranny, as in Russia. Instead, we should abolish inequality directly. Anarchists are against any inequality in revolutionary groups — no Branch Committees, National Secretaries etc. Everyone should have an equal say in the group. Anarchists see revolution as being led not by a vanguard party but by the workers themselves. An anarchist’s job is encouraging and helping to defend a revolution — not running it
Anarchism is an improved version of communism
|
|
|
Post by Pyrros on Oct 19, 2018 2:29:27 GMT -5
Communism is basically anarchy
The way I understand the idea is that the read of communism has several stages:
1) Capitalism is dissolved via so called *proletariat revolution. (**if a given state has a large or dominant village population then commit acts towards destroying villages) (**Such as done in like Mao China in 1960s or by Stalin in Ukrane in early 1930s) (** Village has to be destroyed as it preserves tradition and family on one end and is self-sufficient in terms of food
2) "People" or in reality handful of Communist elitist take over. "Peoples" Republic is proclaimed.
Also called Socialist or even Democratic (East Germany or N Korea). This stage is called socialism. Socialism is perceived as road to Communism.
3) As socialism is advancing private property gradually or abruptly fully disappears. Super state.
Full control assumed by communist elite over populace while top leader is perceived as almost divine.
4) At the point in future super state ABOLISHES ITSELF and small communes are established. In these communes everything is shared according to the needs while. Everyone contributes according to their working ability.
Lets focus on points 3 and 4.
Who else sees a contradiction here as far as logic is concerned.
Are we to believe that super state is WILLINGLY going to abolish itself!
This is a long topic. And I believe that 4) is not possible. Not because it cant be done, but because there has to be an authority to organize the defense against SAXAN. Otherwise SAXAN will take over and soon the western brothels will be again full of Slavic flesh.
But this was not the main reason I opened this topic.
The main reason is :
Study pseudo-communism (as practiced in Greece or in the Latin world) as an anti-SLAV instrument.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Oct 19, 2018 2:59:35 GMT -5
basically the same as pseudo-Bosniak. Jump like a monkey in front of the SAXAN cameras and play as the script says.
Now guys you gotta read this interview its text PDF, just copy paste to translate.
I read two pages of the PDF by using Google Translate. The beginning was just about evolution of war in Croatia: How it started, what organizations were involved, how people felt etc.
|
|
|
Post by Pyrros on Oct 19, 2018 10:21:30 GMT -5
The word Srebrenica in the second line, was what made me furious... And the fact that "comrade" is always some Albanian, Muslim or Croat. Never a Serb.
Also those anti-Serbs pseudo-commies hide the western factor by any means. They blame it all on nationalism. Total idiocy.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Oct 19, 2018 11:45:54 GMT -5
The word Srebrenica in the second line, was what made me furious... And the fact that "comrade" is always some Albanian, Muslim or Croat. Never a Serb.
Also those anti-Serbs pseudo-commies hide the western factor by any means. They blame it all on nationalism. Total idiocy.
Well yeah, because being reasonably nationalistic is good way to survive against West and their proxies. Besides, Yugoslav/Serbian version of socialism/communism is nationalistic one, not your typical Marxist internationalism, of course after we split with USSR.
|
|