|
Post by Kubrat on Feb 9, 2009 22:55:47 GMT -5
that would have been one hell of a torshia
|
|
|
Post by Kubrat on Jan 30, 2009 18:49:30 GMT -5
kah-na-daaaaaaaaa
|
|
|
Post by Kubrat on Jan 28, 2009 2:25:32 GMT -5
thank you very much, i was actually in BG during the winter break.
|
|
|
Post by Kubrat on Dec 11, 2008 18:36:08 GMT -5
Black hole confirmed in Milky Way By Pallab Ghosh Science correspondent, BBC News There is a giant black hole at the centre of our galaxy, a 16-year study by German astronomers has confirmed. They tracked the movement of 28 stars circling the centre of the Milky Way, using two telescopes in Chile. The black hole, said to be 27,000 light years from Earth, is four million times bigger than the Sun, according to the paper in The Astrophysical Journal. Black holes are objects whose gravity is so great that nothing - including light - can escape them. According to Dr Robert Massey, of the Royal Astronomical Society (RAS), the results suggest that galaxies form around giant black holes in the way that a pearl forms around grit. 'The black pearl' Dr Massey said: "Although we think of black holes as somehow threatening, in the sense that if you get too close to one you are in trouble, they may have had a role in helping galaxies to form - not just our own, but all galaxies. The most spectacular aspect of our 16-year study, is that it has delivered what is now considered to be the best empirical evidence that super-massive black holes do exist Professor Reinhard Genzel Head of the research team "They had a role in bringing matter together and if you had a high enough density of matter then you have the conditions in which stars could form. "Thus the first generation of stars and galaxies could have come into existence". The researchers from the Max Planck Institute for Extraterrestrial Physics in Germany said the black hole was 27,000 light years, or 158 thousand, million, million miles from the Earth. "Undoubtedly the most spectacular aspect of our 16-year study, is that it has delivered what is now considered to be the best empirical evidence that super-massive black holes do really exist," said Professor Reinhard Genzel, head of the research team. "The stellar orbits in the galactic centre show that the central mass concentration of four million solar masses must be a black hole, beyond any reasonable doubt." Observations were made using the 3.5m New Technology Telescope and the 8.2m Very Large Telescope (VLT) in Chile. Both are operated by the European Southern Observatory (Eso). news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/science/nature/7774287.stm
|
|
|
Post by Kubrat on Dec 11, 2008 18:28:18 GMT -5
mine is Aug. 30th
|
|
|
Post by Kubrat on Dec 9, 2008 5:27:46 GMT -5
on the topic of rammstein from their old stuff, love "Tier" but in general, "amour amour" is my favourite, i love the lyrics.
|
|
|
Post by Kubrat on Dec 9, 2008 5:24:29 GMT -5
i'm the tallest nation in the world
|
|
|
Post by Kubrat on Dec 9, 2008 5:18:27 GMT -5
i suggest all 4 or 5 female members that there are here, post their facebook profile pic so that 1) we know they're actually female 2) i don't have to end up pickin Skoric a/s/l that sh*t too while you're at it from here on in, i'll be this forum's matchmaker. you want a girl? i got one for ya, for the right price of course! and that's how the sex trade industry got started. If i've sold your sister, i apologize, it wasn't personal my 'brother'
|
|
|
Post by Kubrat on Dec 6, 2008 18:58:21 GMT -5
not just the Balkans, all of Europe too
|
|
|
Post by Kubrat on Dec 4, 2008 17:28:01 GMT -5
you have shown no such evidence.
|
|
|
Post by Kubrat on Dec 2, 2008 3:07:41 GMT -5
usually rainy, and at times windy the 35 days of the year that it's actually sunny and not windy makes it the best place in Canada during summer. the other 310 rainy days beat the 310 snowy days in the rest of Canada. we have yet to see snow, but the mountains just opened up i think. temperature at times is still hitting double digits.
|
|
|
Post by Kubrat on Dec 2, 2008 2:45:50 GMT -5
holy shit dude, do you not have a life? you're on here every hour of everyday.
"However valiantly the Serbian people fought in Macedonia, the Sultan nevertheless occupied the Serbian towns of Serrai, Strumica, Philippopolis and Veles".
here's why your sources are flawed. there is one city in that list that has never been under serb influence in any form or matter, in the year 1577, or 1000 years before, or 500 years after. i suggest you throw that book out.
slavs does not mean serbs, get that through your head.
|
|
|
Post by Kubrat on Dec 1, 2008 19:09:28 GMT -5
novi stop, you are embarrassing yourself. 681 is not where it started. and get your egotism out of here, serbs where not established then or 150 years before.
|
|
|
Post by Kubrat on Dec 1, 2008 19:08:06 GMT -5
i guess oxymorons are too much for you to handle. look it up yourself, i'm not gonna waste my time on educating you about things you should know when you keep denying them and proposing theories contrary to the truth. you're opinions are meaningless.
|
|
|
Post by Kubrat on Dec 1, 2008 17:58:02 GMT -5
damn it! we're never first! i guess we just have to learn to try harder.
|
|
|
Post by Kubrat on Dec 1, 2008 17:52:43 GMT -5
first 6 years between Bulgaria and Germany 2 weeks in thunderbay almost 16 years in Vancouver now.
|
|
|
Post by Kubrat on Dec 1, 2008 17:49:58 GMT -5
fyrm's first pm came out and admitted that they're Bulgarian.
.......shhhhhhhhhhh don't tell them!
|
|
|
Post by Kubrat on Dec 1, 2008 17:45:24 GMT -5
i'll dumb it down for you. the map is time based on the death of Charlemagne, who died in 814 now historical sources state: "In 804, the Bulgarian Empire took the southeastern Avar lands- Transylvania and south-eastern Pannonia to the Middle Danube river." which is not shown at all in that map. keep inmind that the avars never got that land back and as i said, the "serb" tribes is bs. and the Bulgarian lands are under exagerated when compared to historical sources. if you would like, i could try to explain it to you in binary?
|
|
|
Post by Kubrat on Dec 1, 2008 3:21:35 GMT -5
serbian tribes? no it doesn't! where is the historical reference? hell, the only reference is raska the map shows the slav inhabitants and named them serbs. get over yourselves. secondly, the Bulgarian lands are greatly underexagerated, and the avar kingdom should not be there "In 804, the Bulgarian Empire took the southeastern Avar lands- Transylvania and south-eastern Pannonia to the Middle Danube river. Many Avars joined the Bulgarian Khanate. The Franks turned the Avar lands under their control into a military march. The eastern half of this March was then granted to the Slavic Prince Pribina, who established the Balaton principality in 840 AD" en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Eurasian_Avarsthat alone refutes the markings on the map, get this shit out of here. what do you want? a reference of what? and it's invalid because it's not a proper argument. i told you don't waste my time with this crap. before you state what your country is and has done, find out where your neighbouring countries stand. i suggest you look at some Bulgarian maps for reigns during Krum, Simeon, Omurtag, Trevel before you throw me this crap about serbia and their inhabitants and tribes. also read some stuff about Kubrat and his sons, read about the huns, read about the avars. you'll eventually notice that with all of them there were distinct Bulgars with them. hell there were Bulgars in the present macedonian, italian, and serbian regions before the ostrogoths, before any serb influence. unless you somehow relate anything slavic as being serb which is complete Bullsheet
|
|
|
Post by Kubrat on Nov 30, 2008 22:57:03 GMT -5
quoting a book or subject from a previous book or subject that is know to be invalid does not make the new quoted book or subject valid. don't waste my time.
|
|