highduke
Amicus
Instigator / Scholar
60%
Posts: 3,687
|
Post by highduke on Jan 26, 2009 18:41:57 GMT -5
And you've read his last book? you dont know what your talking about: traits are heritable insofar as the environment regulates them. Ruddy cheeks, lighter pigment, tall heighT result from eating a specific diet grown on a certain region at a certain altitude but change the diet or where it was farmed & you alter those traits in 3 generations, the time passed since MoG was published, hence many albs here disputing Coon's observations
|
|
highduke
Amicus
Instigator / Scholar
60%
Posts: 3,687
|
Post by highduke on Jan 26, 2009 18:44:14 GMT -5
Donnie whats the link to the MoG? pdf? why didnt you post it at the start of the thread? post it now
|
|
donnie
Senior Moderator
Nike Leka i Kelmendit
Posts: 3,389
|
Post by donnie on Jan 26, 2009 18:51:16 GMT -5
The conclusions you claim come from his second book are presented by him in his first book as well. He specualates, he does not conclude, that elevation and nutrition has some sort of impact on pigmentation, and if it does, it is not major; otherwise, White Americans would have differed greatly in pigmentation from continental Europe, as would White Australians, and yet we know that this is not the case.
Pigment is biological, blondism being the result of mutations which occured thousands of years ago. It does not matter if your mother gave birth to you, highdyke, on top of Mt Everest or in the plains of the Netherlands. You'd still inherit the pigment characteristics of your parents. Otherwise Nepalese highlanders would be blue-eyed, blond and/or rufous while White Australians swarthy and brunet.
And height, as I said earlier, is an interaction between genes and environment. You cannot make Dutchmen out of pygmies.
|
|
highduke
Amicus
Instigator / Scholar
60%
Posts: 3,687
|
Post by highduke on Jan 26, 2009 19:01:13 GMT -5
Uh, can you give us the link to the MoG pdf, please? you said you didnt buy the book, so please cut the BS & stop rationalizing away the fact that Coon rejected the intra-racial taxonomic value of height & pigment when you only read Coons first 2 books published in the 30s & provide the link
|
|
|
Post by servus on Jan 26, 2009 19:12:16 GMT -5
|
|
|
Post by Alb_Korcar on Jan 26, 2009 19:21:52 GMT -5
lol Lozonjarke I think u may have a little crush on me every time u post here u always reply to what i write. all the sexual tension between us is too much to bear. anyway, like i said, if Malesors call us Turks because of our religion(which is ridiculous because most of Korca is Orthodox) then they should call Kosovars and all other Albanians Turks too. besides Malesia, the majority of Albanian Christians are in the south so that makes no sense. It's great that you know about Malesors more then me, but i know about my region more then you. There are slavic names all over Albania but the names of places don't prove anything. I have never seen a blonde hair blue eyed Cham I've never even seen a blonde haired blue eyed Albanian lmao. And just because Albania is mountanous it does not mean anything, Montenegro is mountanous too but they're usually really white. Like I said before it is not rocket science, it should not cause unecessary paranoia and has nothing to do with Greece. It applies to all European countries.
|
|
highduke
Amicus
Instigator / Scholar
60%
Posts: 3,687
|
Post by highduke on Jan 26, 2009 19:30:31 GMT -5
Uh. donnie...the link to the Mountain of Giants .pdf? or tell us how much you paid for the book because you wasted your money: i could have given you the book in Stockholm in a month, i'll be switching flights there, whether you decide to show or not
|
|
|
Post by malsor4life on Jan 26, 2009 22:18:43 GMT -5
Can ya post a link ?
|
|
highduke
Amicus
Instigator / Scholar
60%
Posts: 3,687
|
Post by highduke on Jan 26, 2009 22:22:33 GMT -5
donnie? link please...
|
|
|
Post by meltdown711 on Jan 26, 2009 23:43:12 GMT -5
It does for Korca. See Korca is in a low zone, flat terrain as opposed to the rest of Albania which is heavily mountaineous and largely not very well suited for the Slavic and Turkic tribes which entered the Balkans. Even Kolonja wasnt... it is also too mountaineous. With Korca you have a different scenario. In fact, look up Turan, Korca... What is Turan?
|
|
|
Post by sotneser on Jan 27, 2009 6:57:29 GMT -5
I've never even seen a blonde haired blue eyed Albanian lmao. Maybe I'm misunderstanding here something, but that is the most pathetic thing I have read. You really need to get out more, I have no idea where you live, but from that comment it is clear you have hardly seen many Albanians.
|
|
donnie
Senior Moderator
Nike Leka i Kelmendit
Posts: 3,389
|
Post by donnie on Jan 27, 2009 7:11:07 GMT -5
|
|
|
Post by Duke John on Jan 27, 2009 7:21:47 GMT -5
Doni can you send the link to me also?
|
|
highduke
Amicus
Instigator / Scholar
60%
Posts: 3,687
|
Post by highduke on Jan 27, 2009 8:21:11 GMT -5
I NEVER recieved any msg from donnie, duke john. Post the link to the Mountains of Giants .pdf donnie, wtf is your problem?
|
|
|
Post by shejtani on Jan 27, 2009 10:08:02 GMT -5
|
|
|
Post by Alb_Korcar on Jan 27, 2009 10:30:52 GMT -5
some of you...please stop giving me reasons to come back to this retarded forum.
Ballist stop snfifing glue. sotneser why is it pathetic? of course im talking about Albanians i know, some of my Albo homies are so dark they make fun of me for being sucha whittey.
i cant post thier pics but look at t his vidoe to get an idea of what some of the old timers in Korca look like:
|
|
highduke
Amicus
Instigator / Scholar
60%
Posts: 3,687
|
Post by highduke on Jan 27, 2009 11:08:40 GMT -5
Leave them alone, korcabre, they have an inferiority complex, if they read about race & color in ancient times, they'd know that Greeks, Romans, Indians & Egyptians prefered a tanned, olive pigment with blue or green eyes, blond hair (except Egyptians) or brown hair but preferences for the architecture of the face ranged from Dinaric, Nordic (except Egypt) or Upper Paleolithic
|
|
donnie
Senior Moderator
Nike Leka i Kelmendit
Posts: 3,389
|
Post by donnie on Jan 27, 2009 12:32:28 GMT -5
Actually, the one showing the greatest inferiority complex here about pigment is you highdyke, why else would you write this if you were "indifferent";
And then you kept ranting on about minerals being able to change your pigment from dark hair and eyes to blond hair and blue eyes, lol. Let me break something down for you; it is not the swarthy complexion of your peers and yourself that makes you slimey and rotten, but rather the very nature of your psyche and the continuous obsession to destroy anything good and non-Serbian.
|
|
highduke
Amicus
Instigator / Scholar
60%
Posts: 3,687
|
Post by highduke on Jan 27, 2009 13:35:16 GMT -5
An idiot. I never said mineral concentrations specificaly affect pigment exclusively, only that heigh & pigment are regulated by the interaction of mineral concentrations in limestone top-soil + elevation + diet balance basing my POV on Coon's latest & least dated research. You're a pathetic weenie & a liar who obviously lied in this thread, saved by shejtani's intervention: a pathetic loser who lies to his own people
|
|
donnie
Senior Moderator
Nike Leka i Kelmendit
Posts: 3,389
|
Post by donnie on Jan 27, 2009 14:57:28 GMT -5
What a gedzo.
Highdyke just managed to say the same thing, albeit in a more "articulate" fashion, favouring "flatulate" over "fart" or "excrement" instead of "sh!t". Same thing.
Coon merely speculated and, while indeed an expert in physical anthropology and ethnology, had no expertise in modern genetics. If the environment dictates people's pigmentation (we are not speaking height here, which indeed is an interaction between environment and genetics) then White Americans would differ significiantly from their brothers across the Atlantic in pigmentation, as would White Australians. This is not the case, infact, Australians and Americans of predominantly Anglo-Celtic descent are still just as much lighter than native Mediterraneans back in Europe as their peers back in England and Ireland are.
Schmuck.
|
|