Post by Deleted on Aug 3, 2012 11:49:27 GMT -5
That's what I posted in Serbia forum but the assh*les deleted it:
Check out this site:
www.kroraina.com/knigi/en/nm/kosovo.html
"The strongest evidence, however, comes not from the meaning of the proper names (which is always open to doubt) but from their structure. Most Illyrian names are composed of a single unit; many Thracian ones are made of two units joined together. Several Thracian place-names end in -para, for example, which is thought to mean 'ford', or -diza, which is thought to mean 'fortress'. Thus in the territory of the Bessi, a well-known Thracian tribe, we have the town of Bessapara, 'ford of the Bessi'. The structure here is the same as in many European languages: thus the 'town of Peter' can be called Peterborough, Petrograd, Petersburg, Pierreville, and so on. But the crucial fact is that this structure is impossible in Albanian, which can only say 'Qytet i Pjetrit', not 'Pjeterqytet'. If para were the Albanian for 'ford', then the place-name would have to be 'Para e Besseve'; this might be reduced in time to something like 'Parabessa', but it could never become 'Bessapara'. And what is at stake here is not some superficial feature of the language, which might easily change over time, but a profound structural principle. This is one of the strongest available arguments to show that Albanian cannot have developed out of Thracian. [42]"
This means that Albanians are Illyrians of today. For your information (since you Serbs obviously lack the needed knowledge) there are pre-Roman words in Romanian (I am Romanian, not Serb) who have similar correspondents in Albanian: copil=child in Romanian, kopil=bastard in Albanian
This means that you Serbs came in the 6th century and stole Albanians' lands. That's why Kosovo and almost all of Serbia should belong to Albanians. Fortunately Kosovo does so.
You managed to persuade most of the Romanians in northeastern Serbia that they are not Romanians but Serbian Vlachs (when in fact Vlach is the old Slavic word for Romanian) and Romanians in Romania don't do anything about that but hey: you lost Kosovo bigtime to the "inferior" Albanians. As we say in Romanian: every godfather gets to meet his godfather
And by the way Macedonians who think you are hotshots and who eat your c*m are Bulgarians, even Torlaks speak Bulgarian because they used to live a long time under Bulgarian Empires' domination. I wish the worst to you Serbian slaves.
Check out this site:
www.kroraina.com/knigi/en/nm/kosovo.html
"The strongest evidence, however, comes not from the meaning of the proper names (which is always open to doubt) but from their structure. Most Illyrian names are composed of a single unit; many Thracian ones are made of two units joined together. Several Thracian place-names end in -para, for example, which is thought to mean 'ford', or -diza, which is thought to mean 'fortress'. Thus in the territory of the Bessi, a well-known Thracian tribe, we have the town of Bessapara, 'ford of the Bessi'. The structure here is the same as in many European languages: thus the 'town of Peter' can be called Peterborough, Petrograd, Petersburg, Pierreville, and so on. But the crucial fact is that this structure is impossible in Albanian, which can only say 'Qytet i Pjetrit', not 'Pjeterqytet'. If para were the Albanian for 'ford', then the place-name would have to be 'Para e Besseve'; this might be reduced in time to something like 'Parabessa', but it could never become 'Bessapara'. And what is at stake here is not some superficial feature of the language, which might easily change over time, but a profound structural principle. This is one of the strongest available arguments to show that Albanian cannot have developed out of Thracian. [42]"
This means that Albanians are Illyrians of today. For your information (since you Serbs obviously lack the needed knowledge) there are pre-Roman words in Romanian (I am Romanian, not Serb) who have similar correspondents in Albanian: copil=child in Romanian, kopil=bastard in Albanian
This means that you Serbs came in the 6th century and stole Albanians' lands. That's why Kosovo and almost all of Serbia should belong to Albanians. Fortunately Kosovo does so.
You managed to persuade most of the Romanians in northeastern Serbia that they are not Romanians but Serbian Vlachs (when in fact Vlach is the old Slavic word for Romanian) and Romanians in Romania don't do anything about that but hey: you lost Kosovo bigtime to the "inferior" Albanians. As we say in Romanian: every godfather gets to meet his godfather
And by the way Macedonians who think you are hotshots and who eat your c*m are Bulgarians, even Torlaks speak Bulgarian because they used to live a long time under Bulgarian Empires' domination. I wish the worst to you Serbian slaves.