|
Post by rusebg on Oct 3, 2010 5:20:09 GMT -5
Read, man. Are you illiterate? You are dumb, that's for sure, but you should be able to read at least. Make some effort through the old topics.
|
|
Kralj Vatra
Amicus
Warning: Sometimes uses foul language & insults!!!
20%
Posts: 9,814
|
Post by Kralj Vatra on Oct 3, 2010 5:24:07 GMT -5
I don't get this Bulgarians here. They have over 15 different versions of Bulgarian language there, yet the constantly claim South eastern Serbian people are Bulgarians and their language Bulgarian, if that's not hypocritical I don't know what is. +1
|
|
Kralj Vatra
Amicus
Warning: Sometimes uses foul language & insults!!!
20%
Posts: 9,814
|
Post by Kralj Vatra on Oct 3, 2010 5:27:48 GMT -5
It is good to see that brothers like Ulf, Stanko begin to realise certain things regarding the Bulgars.
Now about the other species of serpent west of Serbia, what can i say...
Andromeda, you are the dirtiest, sneakiest, liar and hypocrite of the forums ever. Not even this Mig ever dared to say BS like yours.
Stanko, this andromeda is the biggest prostitute of the forums.
He can write pages and pages about turbo nationalist serbs, and then add a small sentence in the end : "same holds for croats, more or less"
UNBELIEVABLE!!!
All i know is that my wife always felt like a yugoslav, till she saw her dad tied by a tree. The croats back then back in Zadar, always felt Croats, had their churches, etc... Serbs didn't even have proper churches..
Andromeda is emetically disgusting.
|
|
|
Post by Novi Pazar on Oct 3, 2010 5:42:20 GMT -5
"Read, man. Are you illiterate? You are dumb, that's for sure, but you should be able to read at least. Make some effort through the old topics."
Khan Ruseche, hows the project Khan Kuber doing, has the professors from Sofia found a new theory.....l mean, remember the wikipedia link you used to gleen with joy as thou it was some golden child for it to be destroyed by king Pyrros.
PS No need to explain, we can always throw in a fake inscription that could prove Khan Kubers existence, just like the one found in the late 19th century.
|
|
ioan
Amicus
Posts: 4,162
|
Post by ioan on Oct 3, 2010 5:55:45 GMT -5
i have when i made claims. he did but didnt back it up Dude, give us links? ?? for which CLAIM that I made? Novi the stupid clown made a CLAIM ABOUT THE LANGUAGE OF MY ANSESTORS!!! I want PROOVES!
|
|
|
Post by Novi Pazar on Oct 3, 2010 6:01:03 GMT -5
^ Yes and so l'm waiting for you to tell me what language did your beloved Khan Asparuch speak?
|
|
ioan
Amicus
Posts: 4,162
|
Post by ioan on Oct 3, 2010 6:04:51 GMT -5
its not known for sure. there is hypothesis it was turkic, iranian, mix of both, ugro-finnic etc.
|
|
|
Post by Novi Pazar on Oct 3, 2010 6:09:16 GMT -5
^ there is never a shade of grey, so l want a definate answer:
WAS IT INDO-EUROPEAN OR TURKISH?
PS Indo-europeans never had chinese calendars or drank horse milk.
|
|
ioan
Amicus
Posts: 4,162
|
Post by ioan on Oct 3, 2010 6:13:58 GMT -5
its one thing that is sure monkey, it was never turkiSH. i cant give u definate answer, because most titles seemed turkic, the names seemed iranian etc. even the title of the ruler kanasubigi can be explained via iranian. except that in bulgarian language there are almost no turkic words left preottomans, but there are alot of iranian ones... so thats why there is no deffinate answer still.
|
|
ioan
Amicus
Posts: 4,162
|
Post by ioan on Oct 3, 2010 6:15:25 GMT -5
maybe it was a mix. add to this slavic, even before reaching the bolkans.
|
|
|
Post by Novi Pazar on Oct 3, 2010 6:22:48 GMT -5
^ so it was the Turkish Iranians who taught the Indo-European Bulgari the art of shatra's and shamens who could connect with the Indo-European world. So was the Chinese calendars really, Iranian?
Maybe since l'm a Bulgar turned to a gypsy, my title should be Boylar Khan Ganesh?
|
|
Kralj Vatra
Amicus
Warning: Sometimes uses foul language & insults!!!
20%
Posts: 9,814
|
Post by Kralj Vatra on Oct 3, 2010 9:19:02 GMT -5
^^^^ Novi, we've seen that before, if a person self-declares as Bulgarian he is the best, if the same person turns his back to asian expansionism, automagically he turns into a gypsy.
|
|
Kralj Vatra
Amicus
Warning: Sometimes uses foul language & insults!!!
20%
Posts: 9,814
|
Post by Kralj Vatra on Oct 3, 2010 9:31:10 GMT -5
PS No need to explain, we can always throw in a fake inscription that could prove Khan Kubers existence, just like the one found in the late 19th century. LMAO Novi, like in all products the "latest" models are the best! Same holds for the historical inscriptions manufactured in some factory in eastern Bulgaria ;D
|
|
Kralj Vatra
Amicus
Warning: Sometimes uses foul language & insults!!!
20%
Posts: 9,814
|
Post by Kralj Vatra on Oct 3, 2010 9:34:22 GMT -5
its not known for sure. there is hypothesis it was turkic, iranian, mix of both, ugro-finnic etc. Are you saying that the fathers of old slavic literature were the bastards of those asians? and the famous OCS was their evolved language? No f-u-c-k-i-n-g way.
|
|
|
Post by Marshall_Stanko on Oct 4, 2010 1:34:59 GMT -5
Bulgarians are bullshit artists and keep on asking us to give sources but they continue to rant on and keep on avoiding to provide their own sources to back up their claims.
|
|
ivo
Amicus
Posts: 2,712
|
Post by ivo on Oct 4, 2010 8:49:37 GMT -5
Buddy, there have been plenty of sources provided. The fact that you choose to ignore them and only accept the BS posted by Pazar is your own problem. Though you should know that that same BS that Pazar posts is NOT supported by 90%+ of the free world.. Serbia, clearly doesn't fit in that category.
|
|
Kralj Vatra
Amicus
Warning: Sometimes uses foul language & insults!!!
20%
Posts: 9,814
|
Post by Kralj Vatra on Oct 4, 2010 9:02:31 GMT -5
"Though you should know that that same BS that Pazar posts is NOT supported by 90%+ of the free world.. Serbia, clearly doesn't fit in that category. "
SOURCES?
|
|
|
Post by andromeda on Oct 4, 2010 9:38:48 GMT -5
Some are virulently nationalistic to the point of justifying violence against others.
Serbian nationalism was specifically the topic here but I am not singling out Serbs. Like I said , the exact same thing is true among Croats. The reason the Serbs are probably picked on the most is because in the 1990s , it was they who had the most means necessary to achieve some of these nationalistic goals and they attempted to do so with mixed results. Unsuccessful in Croatia and Kosovo , somewhat successful in Bosnia.
|
|
Kralj Vatra
Amicus
Warning: Sometimes uses foul language & insults!!!
20%
Posts: 9,814
|
Post by Kralj Vatra on Oct 4, 2010 9:46:41 GMT -5
It was not the Serbs you idiot. Initially many Croats/Slovenes/Muslims served in JNA. The fact that they were terrorized by your war mongers to back off, is another story.
|
|
|
Post by andromeda on Oct 4, 2010 10:02:21 GMT -5
It was not the Serbs you idiot. Initially many Croats/Slovenes/Muslims served in JNA. The fact that they were terrorized by your war mongers to back off, is another story. It was the Serbs largely. The JNA high command was mostly ethnic Serb and clearly sided with the Serb-Mont bloc in the presidency. The JNA had a lot of deserters , probably mostly non Serbs but probably also Serbs that correctly thought the aggression was unjust. What was remained of the JNA and most of its arms simply integrated into the Serb forces in Bosnia and Croatia. I would say the JNA 'officially' became a military arm of Serbia ( and not Yugoslavia) is when it let Slovenia go basically. With Slovenia out of the picture Yugoslavia no longer existed but the JNA still did and it doesn't take a genius to predict exactly what they did next.
|
|