|
Post by Anittas on Sept 6, 2011 9:28:16 GMT -5
|
|
Kralj Vatra
Amicus
Warning: Sometimes uses foul language & insults!!!
20%
Posts: 9,814
|
Post by Kralj Vatra on Sept 6, 2011 9:41:27 GMT -5
the similarities with chinese/japanese sumo fighters are apparent.
|
|
|
Post by Anittas on Sept 6, 2011 9:55:53 GMT -5
Look how lovely those European in the background look like! So sweet! And then the Bulgarian comes to create contrast. What an artist!
|
|
ivo
Amicus
Posts: 2,712
|
Post by ivo on Sept 6, 2011 10:24:42 GMT -5
Ahh and at the same time people with similar features can be found in all Balkan countries.
|
|
Kralj Vatra
Amicus
Warning: Sometimes uses foul language & insults!!!
20%
Posts: 9,814
|
Post by Kralj Vatra on Sept 6, 2011 11:07:34 GMT -5
Ahh and at the same time people with similar features can be found in all Balkan countries. sure, the mighty bolgars ruled over the whole bolkans, right?
|
|
ivo
Amicus
Posts: 2,712
|
Post by ivo on Sept 6, 2011 12:33:57 GMT -5
Yes, you guys were our bitches for centuries.
|
|
elemag
Senior Moderator
Posts: 369
|
Post by elemag on Sept 6, 2011 16:22:17 GMT -5
Who are you afraid to be hurt of and who are those 'us'?
|
|
|
Post by Catcher in the Rye on Sept 6, 2011 16:46:03 GMT -5
It must be a pain to be a Bulgarian. www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2033293/Black-England-footballers-suffer-Nazi-salutes-vile-monkey-noises-racist-Bulgarian-fans.htmlNow look at the Bulgarian fans insulting the English players... Look at these superior creatures: (Picture above it's of the Bulgarian fans at the Bulgaria- England game last Friday. From a Romanian newspaper.) The used the Nazi salute? Hitler would have filled the ovens with those specimens. The Nazis considered Slavs to be subhumans anyway, even more so a Mongolian-Slavic-Indian mongrel Nation. It's funny that they constantly insult us, Romanians, by calling us gypsies. They think we will be irritated maybe, well, we just laugh and laugh, they are the swarthiest nation in Europe and the least European looking. They are so pathetic, they even don't deserve me wasting my time to write this but i happen to be in a good mood...
|
|
elemag
Senior Moderator
Posts: 369
|
Post by elemag on Sept 6, 2011 16:51:49 GMT -5
You are not gypsies. Not all. Some of you have Bulgarian blood, some Hungarian, some Ukrainian. These are the white ones. You even have a certain percentage of your population that is blacker than gypsies but they are not. May be these are your Daco-Roman ancestors. As a whole - what is white in your country, it is not Romanian.
|
|
|
Post by Catcher in the Rye on Sept 6, 2011 16:58:52 GMT -5
Talk to the hand... I don't need the opinion of a nobody to change what I observed over a long time with my own eyes.
|
|
|
Post by Anittas on Sept 6, 2011 17:02:35 GMT -5
Hitler didn't do shit to the Bulgarians. The Bulgarians played their game in WW2 in good fashion. First they told Hitler that they want souther Dobrogea if he wants them to be his ally. They got that and more from Yugoslavia (Macedonia, northern Greece).
They sent not a single Jew to be killed. They played delaying tactics. For this, specifically, they deserve credit. We did this much later in the process, when 300,000 Jews were already sent to die. Our mayor in Cernauti deserves some credit for saving up to 20,000 Jews.
Anyway, back to the Bulgarians. After they got land by not raising a finger and not sacrificing a single Jew, when Hitler asked them to aid him in the Eastern front, they replied that someone had to remain in the south and protect the border from the Greeks, the Yugoslavs... and from Turkey, in case they would join the Allies. Hitler bought their argument.
So, while we lost northern Transylvania, froze our ass off in Stalingrad and supplied Germany with 2-thirds of its oil, we got Bessarabia, Transnistria and more territory inhabited by Ukrainians and Russians (as compensation for N. Transylvania) which we did not want in the first place.
I have to give the Bulgarians some credit here. They played their game right. When they turned against Germany, they were allowed to keep S. Dobrogea, even though we helped the Soviets in Czech Republic. The Bulgarians didn't lift a finger, although they did lose Macedonia and N. Greece (that was expected). We on the other hand had to play nice till the end in order to receive N. Transylvania back. Stalin even gave Nicolae Radescu, our last pre-Communism Prime Minister, an ultimatum to resign or we wouldn't regain N. Transylvania.
As for the photo, the guy to our left could've been English as well. As for the rest... no comment.
|
|
elemag
Senior Moderator
Posts: 369
|
Post by elemag on Sept 6, 2011 17:04:30 GMT -5
Yup mate...this one coming from someone from a country where you can see huge gypsy houses built in the middle of nowhere with no sewage, no shops, no electricity and no whatever kind of civilization but the landscape of small gypsies running dirty around.
|
|
|
Post by Anittas on Sept 6, 2011 17:06:10 GMT -5
You are not gypsies. Not all. Some of you have Bulgarian blood, some Hungarian, some Ukrainian. These are the white ones. You even have a certain percentage of your population that is blacker than gypsies but they are not. May be these are your Daco-Roman ancestors. As a whole - what is white in your country, it is not Romanian. So before the Gypsies arrived in the Balkans, and before our ancestors would intermarry with a small part of the people mentioned by you, what were they, if not "white"? Don't be silly. For starters, the Hungarians were Asians, as were the Bulgars. It is they that mixed with the locals--including the Slavs--and it is from them that they got the European resemblance.
|
|
elemag
Senior Moderator
Posts: 369
|
Post by elemag on Sept 6, 2011 17:09:11 GMT -5
If it is about history, you didn't do a great favour to Germans in Stalingard. I don't know if history is your strong point but the first lines that the Soviets started to bombard were those of the Romanian soldiers. As expected, they gave up very quickly. As for Southern Dobrudja, it was never yours with the exception of the short period after WWI, when you took it due to your coward, whore-like politics. The opposite is right - Northern Dobrudja should belong to Bulgaria because it has always been an integral part of the two Bulgarian empires.
|
|
elemag
Senior Moderator
Posts: 369
|
Post by elemag on Sept 6, 2011 17:13:02 GMT -5
Your ancestors, my friend, were deeply unknown to Balkan history before the 13th century. What they mostly did was shagging goats, which is in no way any contribution to Balkan development. Sorry, you were nothing and you should be thankful to Bulgarian and Hungarians for providing you with some sensible rulers that let first established your small kingdoms and let them remain and later form your pathetic nationality, full of myths and fairy tales.
|
|
|
Post by Catcher in the Rye on Sept 6, 2011 17:17:12 GMT -5
Yup mate...this one coming from someone from a country where you can see huge gypsy houses built in the middle of nowhere with no sewage, no shops, no electricity and no whatever kind of civilization but the landscape of small gypsies running dirty around. I've never been to Bulgaria but i doubt it's that bad.
|
|
elemag
Senior Moderator
Posts: 369
|
Post by elemag on Sept 6, 2011 17:20:29 GMT -5
I was talking about Romania and I have videos on my phone for that. Don't play dumb. Your reply sounds like you are 5-6 year old.
|
|
|
Post by Anittas on Sept 6, 2011 17:23:21 GMT -5
If it is about history, you didn't do a great favour to Germans in Stalingard. I don't know if history is your strong point but the first lines that the Soviets started to bombard were those of the Romanian soldiers. As expected, they gave up very quickly. As for Southern Dobrudja, it was never yours with the exception of the short period after WWI, when you took it due to your coward, w**re-like politics. The opposite is right - Northern Dobrudja should belong to Bulgaria because it has always been an integral part of the two Bulgarian empires. WW2 history is not my strongest point; and yes, I'm aware that we gave up pretty quickly, but the Germans should've equipped us better if they wanted us to perform better. It shouldn't have come as a surprise to them. We suffered from the same problem in WW1, although we did defeat the Germans at Marasesti. Dobrogea was ours on two ocassions: first, under Mircea; secondly, under Michael the Brave. We lost Dobrogea to the Ottomans. Bulgaria gained southern Dobrogea because Hitler forced us to concede it.
|
|
|
Post by Croatian Vanguard on Sept 6, 2011 17:23:37 GMT -5
For someone from Romania to call Bulgaria underdeveloped is a bit of the 'pot and kettle' complex. I wonder what the Hungarians have to say about Transylvania? Were they settlers that forced themselves upon the local ( Romanian) population or was that always part of ethnic Hungary?
Didn't know so much tension existed between Bulgarians and Romanians. But you are not hard to distinguish from eachother , right? Different language so its pretty easy to tell what is Bulgarian/Romanian and what is not.
|
|
|
Post by Anittas on Sept 6, 2011 17:27:02 GMT -5
Your ancestors, my friend, were deeply unknown to Balkan history before the 13th century. What they mostly did was shagging goats, which is in no way any contribution to Balkan development. Sorry, you were nothing and you should be thankful to Bulgarian and Hungarians for providing you with some sensible rulers that let first established your small kingdoms and let them remain and later form your pathetic nationality, full of myths and fairy tales. Kotrag (Ivo), as many have pointed out to you, including Ioan, the Vlachs were first mentioned in the 11th century. That you are not familiar with our history is a different issue. Hungarians didn't provide us with a single ruler. We provided Hungary with Hunyady and his son, Corvinus. The Bulgarians didn't provide us with any ruler, although a Wallachian prince did marry some Bulgarian princess. On the other hand, Romanians founded the Romanian-Bulgarian Empire and the last two emperors were Romanian.
|
|