|
|
Post by hellboy87 on Sept 29, 2009 23:58:48 GMT -5
MOD's Opinion: Please avoid sending irrelevant/spam posts.
|
|
|
|
Post by hellboy87 on Oct 2, 2009 16:31:13 GMT -5
I was saving it here because I couldnt do it elsewhere! I was at work,and I couldnt access my email so I put it here and you remove iiiiit!!!
|
|
Dèsîŗĕ Yèarning
Senior Moderator 
Simarik Turkish Pwincess
Know yourself...
Posts: 3,563
|
Post by Dèsîŗĕ Yèarning on Oct 3, 2009 12:54:16 GMT -5
This forum is really boring.
The same subjects over n over n oveeer.
TURKS R A MIXTURE white tanned light redhead... theres a huge variety.... we r not like the bloody chinese man
|
|
|
|
Post by hellboy87 on Oct 3, 2009 16:21:31 GMT -5
Depends on who you are talking about
Anatolian Turks are mostly Middle Eastern looking whose skin colour ranges from pale,to olive to a tanned one.
Original Turkics look like the Chinese,Japanese,Mongolians etc.
Bottom line is,most typical European looking people of Turkey are descended from European muhacirs
Its amazing the lies Turks put out to boost their self esteem
|
|
Dèsîŗĕ Yèarning
Senior Moderator
Simarik Turkish Pwincess
Know yourself...
Posts: 3,563
|
Post by Dèsîŗĕ Yèarning on Oct 4, 2009 1:58:28 GMT -5
hellboy.... u r by far the ugliest and dumbest poster i have ever come across (yes ive seen your picture). until u come to turkey and see it ur comments r worthless...
|
|
|
|
Post by thracian08 on Oct 5, 2009 11:52:48 GMT -5
Agreed Desire. Yes Hellboy, you have no idea who the Turks are. Oguz Turks are white period. Turks are not Chinese or Mongolian. Who are you to constantly write BS about Turks.
We all know that this is the propoganda that Europeans make about Turks, and you are no different from them.
And there is no such thing as Middle Eastern looking. There are a wide variety of features. What does that mean?? Arabs, Iranians have different facial features than Turks.
And why would we lie? You are a complete idiot who constantly tries to belittle my noble race. Go back to India - your backwards country.
|
|
|
|
Post by hellboy87 on Oct 5, 2009 17:51:17 GMT -5
hellboy.... u r by far the ugliest and dumbest poster i have ever come across (yes ive seen your picture). until u come to turkey and see it ur comments r worthless... and tell me where did you see my picture? I have never posted my picture on this forum. I may not be a genius,but when it comes to this topic,I am way smarter than you I know. |
|
|
|
Post by hellboy87 on Oct 5, 2009 17:59:21 GMT -5
Agreed Desire. Yes Hellboy, you have no idea who the Turks are. Oguz Turks are white period. Turks are not Chinese or Mongolian. Who are you to constantly write BS about Turks. We all know that this is the propoganda that Europeans make about Turks, and you are no different from them. And there is no such thing as Middle Eastern looking. There are a wide variety of features. What does that mean?? Arabs, Iranians have different facial features than Turks. And why would we lie? You are a complete idiot who constantly tries to belittle my noble race. Go back to India - your backwards country. Oghuz Turks were said to be Caucasoid. Only idiots like you think Caucasoid is white,ITS NOT! Caucasoid:Europeans(white),North Africans,West Asians and maybe,South Asians No such thing as Middle Eastern looking? You got to be kidding me. People from Morocco to Egypt,from Yemen to Turkey,from Palestine to Iran,they all have that similar look even though there are variation among regions,they have a set of similar features. And MAJORITY of people in Turkey resemble them! thracian,lives in America.Not Turkey. dy looks like a freakin Arab. She said a few times that people told her she looks Egyptian-SAME! |
|
|
|
Post by raven on Oct 5, 2009 19:03:09 GMT -5
Who cares about whiteness really?
its just a silly, era dependant term which changes all the time and has no scientific value at all.
Once upon a time even Scandinavians werent considered "white".
|
|
|
|
Post by hellboy87 on Oct 6, 2009 4:02:05 GMT -5
dont know about that
but the whole white thing here is somewhat valid and understandable in what is being referenced to
|
|
|
|
Post by Red Brigade on Oct 6, 2009 14:09:20 GMT -5
What difference does it make if Turks are white or something else? This is ridiculous.
|
|
|
|
Post by thracian08 on Oct 6, 2009 17:14:25 GMT -5
I actually go to Turkey twice a year for your info, so you cannot even comment on Turkish people, you haven't even been there.
Yes, Turks are White. Their skin color is White. There is nothing incorrect about my statement.
No, they look quite different from each other: Arabs - long small oval faces - a different facial and nose structure - deep set eyes - the Semitic look, Iranians facial features look very Indian, and Turks have lightest skin color - have round faces - have higher cheekbones - have moon shaped eyes. They look completely different from each other, but you cannot accept it.
Middle Eastern looking doesn't have any validity. Italians, Spanish, French, Greeks look Middle Eastern looking just as much.
If DY looks like an ARab is b/c people from Cyprus have different features than in Turkey or Greece. Same goes for Greek Cypriots. During the Ottoman and Selcuk times, there were no Arabs living in Turkey - only in the Southeast place called Hatay. Majority of the population were composed of Turks, Greeks, and Armenians.
|
|
|
|
Post by hellboy87 on Oct 7, 2009 21:10:54 GMT -5
Its not just skin colour,its facial structure
Most people of Turkey are of Anatolian stock.Majority of Anatolians:Turks,Greeks,Armenians,Kurds,Assyrians look Middle Eastern.
Southern Europeans:Portuguese,Spanish,Italians,Greeks and to a certain extent Balkanians,RESEMBLE Middle Easterners but mostly cluster with Europeans in looks.
Iranians,dont look Indian.I am Indian and I know how they look like.
Another thing about Turks,many Anatolian Turks have married with Albanians,Bosniaks,Pomaks,Circassians which is why many could pass as European.
But this just prove again that they are not white.
I may have not been to Turkey,but I have seen over 1000+ pictures of people of from Turkey,seen many footages of them and have seen people from Turkey in front of my own eyes before.Many.
|
|
|
|
Post by thracian08 on Oct 8, 2009 16:34:00 GMT -5
Anatolian stock and facial structure is different from Greeks from Greece, Armenians, Kurds and Assyrians. Some Greeks look like Turks, but not the majority.
Armenians, & Kurds look Iranian, not Turkish. Assyrians look Arabic.
Greeks from Greece (I can spot them easily) look different than Turks - facial features are different.
So you are incorrect in lumping them alltogether. Also, I have met people from all the ethnicities above and they all look different looking from each other.
I don't agree, the Mediterreanean people look just as Middle Eastern looking as Turkish people, even moreso.
And I'm quite sure the different Mediterreanean people all intermarried with each other to so you don't have a point to say that Turkish people only pass as European due to marrying Balkan and Causcasion people. Yoruk Turks have blonde hair and blue eyes and have no marriage with other people.
Anyway,
|
|
|
|
Post by hellboy87 on Oct 8, 2009 17:39:43 GMT -5
In the Middle East or West Asia and North Africa,there are distinct features of the peoples there.
Among them,hooked and curve noses,thick brows,deep eyes and beady eyes,long faces and black hair.
But in parts of these regions like in Iraq,the Levant,north Africa,Anatolia and Iran,many of them have a bit of "European" features.
Thats why you find many Middle Eastern looking people who have green eyes,pale skin,brown hair.Like that.In some parts they are common,some part they are minority.
Now,you do find southern European who have resemble these Middle Easterners and North Africans,but overall they look European.
Now Anatolians,most Anatolian Turks,resemble people in the Arab speaking world.
A minority resemble Greeks and southern Europeans.
Those who look typically European in Turkey are of muhacir descent from Europe.
As for Yoruks,not all of them look European.Also,they are the ones from the Balkans settled in Turkey.Thats why they look European.
I am right about myself saying most Anatolian Turks look Arab/Middle Eastern.In Germany,they are the biggest group that receives racism from the Germans.So the Germans see that too! Same with the Austrians and Swiss.
|
|
|
|
Post by macmako on Oct 9, 2009 6:06:20 GMT -5
|
|
|
|
Post by hellboy87 on Oct 9, 2009 9:31:19 GMT -5
few of those girls look Middle Eastern
anyway,the white looking ones are of European stock anyway.Not Anatolian
As for beauty,yeah group has beautiful ones.
But these girls here in the pics are "made-up'' ladies
|
|
|
|
Post by thracian08 on Oct 9, 2009 10:37:43 GMT -5
you have no idea about Turks look like. I suggest you go to Turkey and see for yourself. They do not resemble Arabs. This is what Arabs look like, not Turks: Among them,hooked and curve noses,thick brows,deep eyes and beady eyes,long faces and black hair.
Yoruks are not from the Balkans, they are from Central Asia - they are Turkmens.
|
|
|
|
Post by Caslav Klonimirovic on Oct 9, 2009 11:15:18 GMT -5
I view the pure Turk as Turkic. I also view them as being highly diverse & I believe they have a lot of Balkan blood in them as well. They are not ugly that's for sure. A Serb girl I know who's about 6 foot 3 & looks fully Baltic recently came back from a holiday in Turkey and she said the guys were really good looking there. Made me feel sick as a Serb hearing that. Afterall Serbs view Turks pretty much as the devil.
|
|
|
|
Post by hellboy87 on Oct 9, 2009 21:57:37 GMT -5
Arsenije,the Turkics are like Indo-Europeans
If you look at Indo-Europeans,you get those who look:
1.European(all Europeans)
2.Middle Eastern(Persians,Kurds,Tadjiks,Armenians,Anatolian Greeks among them)
3.Indian subcontinental(Punjabis,Gujaratis,Sinhalese,Bengalis)
Look at the Altaic peoples,you have
1.Tunguistic(look northeast Asian)
2.Mongolic(look northeast Asian)
3.Turkic:you have those who look European(Balkan Turks,Tatars,Gagauz),Middle Eastern(Anatolian and Cypriot Turks,Iraqi Turkmens and some Turkmens from Turkmenistan) and northeast Asian(Uyghurs,Kazakhs,Uzbeks,Kyrgyz)
I'll have to add that many Turkics in Central Asia and Middle East,look mixed,but still the majority have a distinct look typical of the region their at.
But originally,Turkics look northeast Asian just like their Altaic cousins the Mongolic and Tunguistic peoples.
it just shows that the Turkics were a conquering people who assimilated their conquered subjects wherever they went.Hence,the variety of racial features among Turkics.
And thracian,I do know how Turks of turkey look like.I've met them.
The current Turkish ambassador to Malaysia is of Greek,Tatar and Bosniak descent he told me.Most of the Turks I met look southern European.Some look northern/central European and few look Middle Eastern.
Oh well,most typical Euro-looking Turks are muhacirs anyway.
|
|
